24 books
—
1 voter
Lean Startup Books
Showing 1-50 of 133

by (shelved 29 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.11 — 359,246 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 17 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.09 — 20,471 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 11 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.10 — 2,093 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 10 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.95 — 16,682 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 10 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.10 — 8,174 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 8 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.21 — 58,545 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 7 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.11 — 12,761 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 7 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.99 — 6,667 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 7 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.02 — 5,397 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 6 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.06 — 13,744 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 6 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.98 — 4,034 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 6 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.30 — 522 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 6 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.21 — 7,108 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 6 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.18 — 1,258 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 6 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.11 — 1,936 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 5 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.19 — 23,182 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 5 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.24 — 1,549 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 5 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.37 — 13,097 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 5 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.27 — 3,532 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 4 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.92 — 5,946 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 4 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.04 — 59,520 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 4 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.02 — 30,929 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 3 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.15 — 387,993 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.25 — 2,063 ratings — published 1954

by (shelved 3 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.14 — 23,395 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.78 — 186 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.18 — 2,514 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.11 — 2,010 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 3 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.07 — 1,912 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.98 — 174,046 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.26 — 990 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.03 — 97 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.11 — 179 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.13 — 663 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.01 — 4,559 ratings — published 1982

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.92 — 969 ratings — published 1964

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.12 — 4,064 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.75 — 381 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.07 — 667 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.03 — 877 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.08 — 11,261 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.66 — 969 ratings — published 1911

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.01 — 362 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.11 — 289 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.14 — 1,417 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.14 — 208 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 3.62 — 224 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.00 — 227 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.07 — 1,135 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as lean-startup)
avg rating 4.02 — 100 ratings — published 2008
“A good metric is a ratio or a rate. Accountants and financial analysts have several ratios they look at to understand, at a glance, the fundamental health of a company. You need some, too.
There are several reasons ratios tend to be the best metrics:
• Ratios are easier to act on. Think about driving a car. Distance traveled is informational. But speed—distance per hour—is something you can act on, because it tells you about your current state, and whether you need to go faster or slower to get to your destination on time.
• Ratios are inherently comparative. If you compare a daily metric to the same metric over a month, you’ll see whether you’re looking at a sudden spike or a long-term trend. In a car, speed is one metric, but speed right now over average speed this hour shows you a lot about whether you’re accelerating or slowing down.
• Ratios are also good for comparing factors that are somehow opposed, or for which there’s an inherent tension. In a car, this might be distance covered divided by traffic tickets. The faster you drive, the more distance you cover—but the more tickets you get. This ratio might suggest whether or not you should be breaking the speed limit.”
― Lean Analytics: Use Data to Build a Better Startup Faster
There are several reasons ratios tend to be the best metrics:
• Ratios are easier to act on. Think about driving a car. Distance traveled is informational. But speed—distance per hour—is something you can act on, because it tells you about your current state, and whether you need to go faster or slower to get to your destination on time.
• Ratios are inherently comparative. If you compare a daily metric to the same metric over a month, you’ll see whether you’re looking at a sudden spike or a long-term trend. In a car, speed is one metric, but speed right now over average speed this hour shows you a lot about whether you’re accelerating or slowing down.
• Ratios are also good for comparing factors that are somehow opposed, or for which there’s an inherent tension. In a car, this might be distance covered divided by traffic tickets. The faster you drive, the more distance you cover—but the more tickets you get. This ratio might suggest whether or not you should be breaking the speed limit.”
― Lean Analytics: Use Data to Build a Better Startup Faster