Okay, let's leave the average genre fiction off (no standard romance, standard scifi/fantasy, standard horror). What are the books you like most, but have to admit you couldn't tell anyone else that they'd actually enjoy. Not bad to laugh at (entirely), but embarrassingly fun-bad.
When your friends see you reading it, or see it on your shelf, what do you have to explain, defend, or deny?
What books do you avoid buying because, no matter how much you want them, you dread explaining them to your friends and visitors even more?
When your friends see you reading it, or see it on your shelf, what do you have to explain, defend, or deny?
What books do you avoid buying because, no matter how much you want them, you dread explaining them to your friends and visitors even more?
Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jun 04, 2010 01:04PM
I am not embarrassed and very tired of intellectual snobs. If goodreads is only about that please delete me. I had enough of that in college to last me a lifetime.
reply
|
flag

Check them out. They're inherently anti-snobbery: lists of things that people love no matter what the prima facia critical response would be.
There is often a bit of a thrill for people when they "admit" to liking something they know their friends or peers don't, or that their friends have dismissed without experiencing. If it's something they know people have disliked, and have disliked for reasons that seem consistent and reliable, there is an element of polarity response and a bit of the kind of power trip more people should probably experience more often.
There certainly isn't any true embarassment or people wouldn't actually participate.
There can be a kind of embarrassment where people admit to enjoying some aspect of books(/movies/music/venues/...) that they don't generally expose as part of their public persona. It's a way to express some of their personality even when they need to keep a positional front, like when a boss of mine acted enbarassed to be reading some fairly "trashy" YA fantasy. It was outside of her positional behavior but allowed us to connect in a personal way (it helped that she knew I read similar things). The "embarassment" comes from mingling different personas.
A similar situation was when a student intern with a fairly social/party-oriented/needing-advice attitude offers insight on relatively advanced literatire in the field. It didn't fit with the way he went out and socialized with his coworkers and he was worried that it would distance himself from them. The "guilty pleasure" aspect of studying our field--extensively--in his personal time is a social idiom that allows people to ignore it when appropriate but also opens it up for inclusion, especially in contexts where his presenting persona wouldn't be included but the "guilty pleasure" would be (for him: discussions of academic advances in his field that are beyond his current education; for the boss: joking and discussing books at lunch without a "the boss is here" constraint).
[Actually, the "guilty pleasure" also opens up a social norm called "signifying," part of which is jokes at the expense of the signifyer--but in a context adopted as "guilty" and non-offensive to insult, since they were introduced as not being part of the present public persona.
In many cultures, especially cultures that percieve themselves as having low amounts of power or cultures with highly hierarchical power structures, signifying is a major element in group formation and identifying inclusion.:]
As for your response, we users can't delete you. If you don't want to be here, you have to deactivate your own account or email the admins. If this is the only page you've seen on Goodreads and the only page you intend to see, then it is what the site is all about. There are other pages about other things: lists, books, groups, authors, trivia, or people.
Pick what you want to participate in and do so; if you're participating in things you don't enjoy... well, that's probably not a problem with a web site :-)
Congratulations on completing college. It's something I never did and I'm impressed with and proud of the people who do.
I hope you got something out of it that you do want more of, rather than just things you want to avoid.
Thanks Seth for this explanation as actually I haven't ever seen Guilty Pleasures before. I have some rebellious tendencies so like to read some things that others consider to be "not the thing". I am almost never embarrassed about it so glad to read that is just an expression.
I was only half teasing about being deleted as I get so mad about people trashing Twlight. I shouldn't let it bother me but it does. I now get the urge to attack their fav books.
I got thru by sheer perseverance years ago. (not much good did it do me tho) Thanks for making this list. I have left quite a few groups etc when it dawned on me I wasn't really having FUN. Please vote on my "black" list sometime when you have a chance.
Ye Olde Kranky one,
Alice
I was only half teasing about being deleted as I get so mad about people trashing Twlight. I shouldn't let it bother me but it does. I now get the urge to attack their fav books.
I got thru by sheer perseverance years ago. (not much good did it do me tho) Thanks for making this list. I have left quite a few groups etc when it dawned on me I wasn't really having FUN. Please vote on my "black" list sometime when you have a chance.
Ye Olde Kranky one,
Alice

I'm actually not embarrassed about any of the books on this list that I've read and enjoyed. My "guilty" pleasures don't carry any guilt.
I didn't vote on this...and this is the kind of list that breeds negativity. I'm actually embarrassed that it exists on a site like this.

(Yes I know I was an asshole in high school)




Great list, by the way! I love me some guilty pleasures (and always give them a 5-star review on GR!)

Why cause I might get some recommendations cause sometimes I enjoy books like that. ;)



I'm asking mainly out of curiosity, as I was surprised to see it listed here.

I'm asking mainly out of curiosity, as I was surprised to see it listed here."
It is not. Actually, it's high literature, the 'War and peace' of United States. The fact that it's put in this list, seems to be that it's a novel bout romance and whose main character is a woman. But, honestly, I couldn't disagree more with who put 'Gone with the wind' in this list.