101 books
—
2 voters
Social Science Books
Showing 1-50 of 31,113

by (shelved 309 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 851,710 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 290 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 889,334 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 276 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 847,357 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 237 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 448,563 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 221 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 616,953 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 213 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 1,219,187 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 212 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.17 — 571,595 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 180 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 468,475 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 151 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.20 — 64,145 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 148 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.12 — 129,948 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 146 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.00 — 331,656 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 134 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.47 — 111,127 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 129 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.93 — 74,116 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 125 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.19 — 281,635 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 124 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.52 — 115,694 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 120 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.97 — 190,105 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 117 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.36 — 198,643 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 112 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.34 — 160,334 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 112 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.84 — 93,383 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 108 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.53 — 157,618 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 102 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.65 — 194,805 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 100 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 29,356 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 100 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.00 — 133,860 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 95 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 170,785 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 94 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 552,966 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 94 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.85 — 104,304 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 88 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 174,413 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 87 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 58,067 ratings — published 2023

by (shelved 85 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.09 — 60,284 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 85 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 120,051 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 82 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.91 — 42,199 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 82 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.80 — 189,550 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 79 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.84 — 493,477 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 79 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.68 — 191,607 ratings — published 1848

by (shelved 77 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.85 — 8,796 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 76 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.20 — 31,922 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 75 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.16 — 36,719 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 74 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.91 — 14,831 ratings — published 1904

by (shelved 74 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.22 — 172,651 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 72 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.36 — 118,652 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 71 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.97 — 52,053 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 70 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.23 — 54,179 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 70 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.02 — 32,677 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 69 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.33 — 148,214 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 66 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.81 — 111,660 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 66 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 77,260 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 65 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.40 — 359,534 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 65 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.37 — 844,732 ratings — published 1946

by (shelved 63 times as social-science)
avg rating 4.44 — 44,679 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 62 times as social-science)
avg rating 3.75 — 206,349 ratings — published 2001

“Woman's sexual problems are, in this sense, by-products of the suppression of her basic need to grow and fulfill her potentialities as a human being, potentialities which the mystique of feminine fulfillment ignores.”
― The Feminine Mystique
― The Feminine Mystique

“...obscurantist feature in social scientists trying to combine pluralism with environmentalism. They are so preoccupied with the role of prejudice in creating hostile environments that they perpetually deny the obvious, that stereotypes are rough generalizations about groups derived from long-term observation. Such generalizations are usually correct in describing group tendencies and in predicting certain collective actions, even if they do not adequately account for differences among individuals. Nonetheless, as Goldberg explains, the self-described pluralist and prominent psychologist Gordon Allport went out of his way in The Nature of Prejudice (1954) to reject stereotypes as factually inaccurate as well as socially harmful. For Allport and a great many other social Scientists, nothing is intuitively correct unless it is politically so.”
― After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State.
― After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State.
The following shelves are listed as duplicates of this shelf:
social-sciences