The 100 Most Popular Sci-Fi Books on Goodreads

Dystopias, alien invasions, regenerated dinosaurs, space operas, multiverses, and more, the realm of science fiction takes readers out of this world to tackle all-too-real issues, including oppression, bigotry, censorship, and the horrors of war. To celebrate the most inventive of genres, we’re exploring readers’ 100 most popular science fiction novels of all time on Goodreads.
As all good sci-fi readers know, the science behind the story is half the fun. To create our list, we ran the data to reveal the most reviewed books on our site. Additionally, each title needed at least a 3.5-star rating from your fellow readers to join this list. And, since science fiction is known for its continuing voyages, in the case of multiple titles from the same series, we chose the one with the most reviews.
Here are the top science fiction novels on Goodreads, listed from 1 to 100. We hope you discover a book or two you’ll want to read in this lineup, whether it’s a classic of the genre or one of the newer entries to sci-fi.
How many of these books have you read? What’s your favorite sci-fi novel of all time? Let’s talk books in the comments!
Comments Showing 401-450 of 521 (521 new)
message 401:
by
Deni
(new)
Jul 17, 2020 05:57AM

flag

I agree. I read her trilogy, The Fifth Season. One of the best. Strong female characters. I still think about Nassun.



On a pure space opera list, David Brin's "Uplift" series and two of A. E. Van Vogt's books should be in the top 100.



And Heinlein wasn’t ideological?

Yes! "On the Beach!" One of Shute's best - great movie too!"
Both excellent, but not really sci fi, IMO.

Those are excellent!

Because it’s fun?

Are you trying to be funny? ;)

Mine too!

Personally I have not included anything I read in school, save for items from Grade 13 as I had to buy those books. Same with university. If I bought a book then it might be here, if I recall the title or if I still have it.

I agree that it was sad to see so few global books. I myself didn't realize how skewed my bookshelf was until a few years ago. Since then, I've made a effort to read AT LEAST one book a month from another country & have found some real gems.
I also started an online book club to read global books along with a web site which lists books from other countries. If you're looking for more sci fi written by authors outside of the US/UK/Canada, check out our current list of global sci fi here:
https://www.AWorldAdventureByBook.com...


* Lois McMaster Bujold: the Vorkosigan Saga
* C.J. Cherryh: both the Foreigner series and the Chronicles of Morgaine
* Douglas Adams: both the Hitchhiker's Guide series and the Dirk Gently books
* David Weber: both the Honor Harrington and the Safehold series

There seems to be a predilection on Goodreads' part not to let YA stuff on these lists. There are quite a few posts on the Fantasy side bemoaning the absence of a certain young wizard from that list, as well as a certain son of Poseidon.

"Why isn't X on this list?" Because it's purely a list of what has been read the most (more specifically, rated on the site). It has almost nothing to do with quality. Some of the works that are higher up in the list are so high up because they are often assigned for reading in school.

"Why isn't X on this list?" Because it's purely a list of what has been read the most (more specifically, rated on t..."
Because it doesn't make any sense. Let's say for example take The Minority Report. Compare this book's stats to 100th book of this list & you will find that The Minority Report has more ratings on the website than that 100th book. So how the hell did it not make the list? I'm pretty sure even if there are some other kind of stats which they might have used to make this list it's still more popular than that 100th book.

Gene wrote: "Is there any reason "The Expanse" series books are not mentioned?" (And similar comments.)
It's an auto-generated list, based on disclosed parameters. Audience to blame; and also, which novels are counted to the genre.
Людовика wrote: "Wow! Whole THREE books by not English-speaking authors! Congratulations."
See above; it figures. I guess you needn't be open-minded when there's so much output in your mother tongue. (Goes for TV and film as well; music, it seems, to a far lesser extent.)
"Joseph wrote: "Not read 1984 since I was in school. Must re-read it. I dont remember it being good enough to be in the top 50. Influential? Sure. But thats not the list title."
Agreed, partially. Didn't like the novel. Think it's in the list partially because many non-English speakers DO read English as well as their native authors. Also, it's a popular secondary school-level literature read. Sheer all my country(wo)men were half-forced to read that book. All that distorts the image.
Colin wrote: "Phil Hartley wrote: "Really? No Sanderson? Mistborn is absolutely epic, no Feist? Lawrence? GRRM? Gemmell? This list is terrible, old does not equal best."
It's SF not Fantasy"
Agreed with Colin (except: GRRM wrote SF decades ago already). And a good thing, too, that SF gets its own attention. I like Fantasy, too, but often having SF be shoved under Fantasy is a travesty.
Wendy wrote: "My favourite sci-fi book of all time is 2001 a space odyssey. It's the best sci-fi book in existence."
Agreed.
Katie wrote: "Read 51 of these, for those commenting on the missing names etc. it is the all time most popular SF books on Goodreads so you are not likely to see all of your favourites, it is in my view a pretty good list to get you started in the genre and a feel for its development, really new books are not going to appear because they have not as yet got a following which will make them the best sellers of the future, give it time."
Well put.

But my point still stands. This list is not accurate there are books which are missing & they are more popular than some of the lower ones.


Yes, I did notice a few discrepancies like that. #76 and #77 have 43k and 28k reviews respectively, whereas the books around them have 70k+ reviews. #95 has less reviews than #99. I can only wildly guess that the author of this blog post did add some editorial spin to it. Minority Report is a fairly popular film, whereas that Ann Leckie novel at #100 is not, so they gave a bump.
OR, because the number of reviews listed does not differentiate between scoreless reviews and scored reviews, whereas this list only takes into account scored reviews, that the discrepancy there is explained by that. But that is quite a large gulf in numbers to account for.
My point still stands, though. Most of the comments I was referring to are saying various versions of "I can't believe X isn't on this list when something like Y is, X is way better!" But this list is not making that kind of qualitative argument.


As I already said this list is so stupid & flawed I can't believe there are idiots actually defending this.
Goodreads decided to make a 100 most popular list on the basis of total no. of reviews & not on the total no. of ratings. How many percentage of people even write reviews lol like 20-30% at most I think? Can't get more stupid than this.

As I already said this list is so stupid & flawed I can't believe there are idiots actually defending this.
..."
They do use ratings, but they use average ratings, not number of ratings. It requires more effort to write a review of a book then to rate it, thus by looking at the number of reviews you are basing these rankings on the most committed readers to some extent.



Plus there are many not mentioned here that wrote better books than some that have been mentioned.



I thought it was fairly disappointing, but cynically unsurprising. Yes - as so many have noted - there are many much better books that are not on that list. Unfortunately, they're just not as widely popular as many of the mediocre ones that are.

I thought it was fairly disappointing, but cynically ..."
I think people wish their favorites were more popular. Any "best" list would be rather subjective anyways...

I thought it was fairly disappointing, b..."
Yeah, pretty much what you said. I long ago decided that my favourite authors were not going to be other's favourites. I can live with it. You asked earlier about lists. I know Goodreads does a Mystery and Thrillers week and I believe they have done a horror week. Aside from those I don't know. I would think they do a Western week at least, but since I have very few westerns in my library I have never really paid attention for that,
