30 books
—
16 voters
Bad Science Books
Showing 1-50 of 234

by (shelved 11 times as bad-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 44,539 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as bad-science)
avg rating 4.29 — 78,959 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 2 times as bad-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 1,081 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 2 times as bad-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 998,129 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.07 — 311 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 2,085 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.37 — 37,561 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 180 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.41 — 321 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 21,796 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.73 — 339 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.17 — 570,863 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 373 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.33 — 146,962 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.65 — 786 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.23 — 2,761 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.41 — 277,846 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 3,367 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 1,603,674 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.55 — 1,042 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.20 — 3,355 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.14 — 50 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.27 — 336 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.41 — 37 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.55 — 60 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.83 — 224 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.38 — 174,217 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.76 — 693,758 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.25 — 313 ratings — published 1915

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.62 — 1,834 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.67 — 6,795 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 5,974 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.51 — 2,667 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.31 — 32,774 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.79 — 197 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.62 — 42 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.89 — 6,179 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.05 — 1,534 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.07 — 44,489 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.57 — 336 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.39 — 3,213 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.11 — 862 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.00 — 65 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 90 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.80 — 1,233,646 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.05 — 86 ratings — published 1885

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.91 — 42,182 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.26 — 6,302 ratings — published 2021

“Just because a supposed finding's hurled beneath the banner of 'science' does not mean it's of peak reliance, and in theory any layperson will tell you that obvious fact. It is in practice that the word itself, 'science', rings like a dinner bell for those hungry to expel religious dogmas.”
―
―
“It is hard to see how scientific theories that don't correspond with reality and consequently don't work can benefit marginalized people, or anyone.”
―
―