Debate discussion
Fun Debates!
>
Twilight (good reviews) vs. Twilight (harsh critisism)
message 301:
by
Brigid ✩
(new)
Dec 20, 2008 06:26PM

reply
|
flag






I beg to differ ... Haters DO go into Twilight lovers groups just to say that they hate Twilight. And FYI -- Twilight lovers do not believe that Edward Cullen actually EXISTS. Come ON.
As a matter of fact, you are pretty much serving as an example as to why Twilight haters bug me: because they seem to think they have a right to categorize all ppl who like Twilight as screaming, brainless, teenage girls who think that vampires are real. And then when I try to reason with Twilight haters and just agree to disagree with them, they still insist on being RUDE and SARCASTIC to me.
Plus, all Twilight haters give the same arguments -- most of which I find pretty outrageous -- as to why Twilight is a bad book. If you want to hate Twilight, fine. But you can't convert ppl to Twilight Hater-ism. I get sick of ppl writing long rants to me about how Twilight is so horribly written and a bad influence and edward is a creepy stalker blah blah blah.
That's why I find a lot of Twilight haters obnoxious; they try to convince me that I'm such an idiotic conformist for liking Twilight, and then they start LECTURING me. Is that not annoying?

Ms Pattison came into the group and called us "Irresponsible pests" for having our own group (which i dont understand). So when we say that Twi-hards are brainless we are speaking about the ones who tell us that its rude h=to have a group where we talk about hating twilight, whereas its fine to have a group where you love it. No haters that i know are in any of the Lovers groups, but im sure there are plenty haters who have joined, which i find stupid. If you want to debate go to a debate group--dont go to the opposites group and yell at them and call them retards.
*whispers* Because it makes you look stupid.

Okay first of all i was just using you as an example to better state my point and " You have enough issues" I dont know what thats supposed to mean, but it kinda sounded like on of your dull comedic insults :)
Me and Khole are speaking from our experience with brainless Twi-hards who come into our group. Last time i checked i was not a member or Twilight Luvers or any of the lovers groups. I have no problem with Twilight lovers, except when they come into the group and call us names (Ms Pattison in not talking about you, we've had many other Twi-hard break ins)
In conclusion.......I might have been generalizing a bit, and i apologize for that. I wont call you stupid for disagreeing with me (Unless you insult me first--knee jerk reaction)

You want to know what I think is insulting?!! People who think it's ok to come in and trash our group, and while you were spamming our group Mrs. Noretta Pattinson, you specifically insulted me.


twilight is a lovestory tht makes girls want to find a guy like edward this book can be good and bad....its good when you want to keep reading and its bad when girls get obsessed with edward and dont want a single guy with flaws
♫i love the soundtrack to it ....it had some awesomess songs on it

I agree with you totally!
And I think meyer tried to make it so that Edward did have flaws its just that from the reader's perspective which is Bella's he doesn't just like in real life a lot of girls don't think their boyfriend has any flaws and that's how much they like them so for that part I think she had it pretty down pat but she didn't need to make it so anti'feminist if the people meant to read it are girls! I mean I don't understand what statement she was trying to make!
but if a girl is looking for a bf then they want a bf tht has no flaws like edward and then they seem conceited or stuckup

i don't think that aspect of twilight should be taken too seriously
yea....exactly ppl think its bad with vamps and werewolves but they never rele hurt anyone

no, im not obsessed to the point where i scream when someone says edward or to the point where i pray i become a vampire. but i like it. i can see why you don't, edward's perfection is unrealistic and sometimes annoying and stephanie meyer's writing does tend to get a little dry. but i think the whole plot was very creative, and i like bella despite the fact that's she different.


i mean, i love the book, but i certainly don't believe that vampires exist or that i should go out in search of a boyfriend as perfect as edward. i really don't think the book is a bad influence ...
i mean, what next? you're going to tell me that harry potter is a bad influence b/c it encourages children to run into brick walls and go right through them? maybe alice in wonderland is a bad influence b/c it suggests that you should jump down large holes and expect to find yourself in some magical world? i don't see how twilight is more of a bad influence than any other fantasy book.
well if girl and guys want to get married at tht age then go ahead and let them its there choice


just because something HAPPENS in a book does not mean that it ENCOURAGES it to happen!
would you say that Frankenstein, for example, encourages people to go make monsters out of dead body parts?? NO.


Many children, after watching Home Alone, started setting up traps around the house that their parents triggered. Many parents ended up in the hospital.
Home Alone is a good movie, but, if the wrong, naive people are watching it, it can become a bad influence. Same thing with Twilight. If you are a smart person, you realize that it is fiction, and that in real life it would cause many problems, although, in the book, it doesn't. But to the desperate teenage girl, with less than average marks, that wouldn't seem like the problem. And now it seems like we're targeting PEOPLE instead of the BOOK. Again, I enjoyed it, and I realized it was fiction, and that many things in there are weird and unlikely. But it's the same way with Harry Potter, and many other fantasy books, yet there's not nearly as much conflict. It's just because Stephenie Meyer threw a love story in there that many people dislike it. Young girls, naive girls, like Edward. Some older girls like Edward too, and hope to find their own Edward. Some take it to the extreme, and those are the girls who need a reality check. Or guys.
My fifth grade teacher enjoys the Twilight books very much, and she is a smart woman, married to a husband who, for their 25th anniversary, took her to Hawaii. I don't know how old she is, but obviously, reading Twilight had no effect on how old she was when she married.
We have to remember where Stephenie Meyer comes from. She comes from a place where, if you like the guy, go ahead and marry him. That's the mindset many young women here in Utah have. And, God told us to go forth and populate the earth. So, it just makes sense to have children as early as we can. But I don't think that takes away from the story any. If anything, it adds to it.
I think that it's like Wuthering Heights. The people are so in love they don't care what happens to people around them.


And, Riley, you're saying that God said to go a populate the Earth, right? Well, should I go get married right now and start having kids?



No, you should not get married right now and start having kids. Many people I have met who are Mormon believe that when the right guy comes along, you shouldn't wait. You should get married to them, and in the marriage bed have children. I don't believe in this. But Stephenie Meyer most likely does. And with that, we can deduct that she would put that in her book. And she does. I'm sure you know your own religion, but you didn't get what I was saying.

Soo.... *whistles innocently and runs away*
Books mentioned in this topic
Nightlight: A Parody (other topics)Control Freak (other topics)
New Moon (other topics)
Breaking Dawn (other topics)
The Book Thief (other topics)