The 100 Most Popular Fantasy Books on Goodreads

Dragons, demons, kings, queens, and the occasional farm boy (with a special destiny, of course): Fantasy literature has it all! To celebrate our favorite fictional worlds and characters, we went on a quest for the 100 most popular fantasies of all time on Goodreads, as determined by your fellow members.
Of course, as fantasy readers know, the journey itself matters just as much as the destination. To create our list, we first sought out the most reviewed books on our site. Additionally, each title needed at least a 3.5-star rating to join our fellowship of titles. And, since fantasy is known for its epic sagas, in the case of multiple titles from the same series we chose the one with the most reviews.
Here are the top fantasy books on Goodreads, listed from 1 to 100.
How many have you read? Tell us in the comments below, and don’t forget to add titles that catch your eye to your Want to Read shelf!
Comments Showing 1-50 of 291 (291 new)
I'm surprised that one of Sabaa Tahir's isn't on this list.


There's a couple on here that I've forgotten about that I had read (and will probably go reread now!)

Are there any other requirements the book has to meet that you forgot to mention above?

Seriously, this fantasy list is bizarre. The earlier SF list was annoying in that it excluded children's and YA books without actually saying that it was excluding children's and YA books.
But this list obviously doesn't have the same restriction--see the presence of The Hobbit; The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe; A Wrinkle in Time; A Wizard of Earthsea; Howl's Moving Castle; and The Neverending Story--while still excluding some hugely popular children's and YA fantasy.
A partial list of books that, according to the stated criteria, should've appeared on this list: Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, The Lightning Thief, Eragon, The Golden Compass, City of Bones, Twilight, Six of Crows, Red Queen, Throne of Glass, Graceling, Daughter of Smoke and Bone, The Cruel Prince, and Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children.
Goodreads, if you didn't want your 100 Most Popular Fantasy Books list to be 70% children's and YA (which is an understandable desire), then why not just make two lists, one for adult fantasy and one for juvenile fantasy? Rather than making an adult fantasy list with a random smattering of juvenile fantasy, with no obvious rationale determining why certain juvenile works were included over others.


Pawn of Prophecy by David Eddings
Swords and Deviltry by Fritz Leiber
First books in a few other series that would seem to meet the criteria mentioned.

Seriously, this fantasy list is bizarre. The earlier SF list was annoying in that it excluded children's and YA books without actually saying that it was e..."
You are so right, this does appear to be a little arbitrary. If Narnia can be on the list, Harry Potter should be there too.

I marked a bunch for my TBR, though."
I'm honestly surprised by how many I HAVE read. I usually rant about how much I hate fantasy, yet here we are.

Pawn of Prophecy by David Eddings
Swords and Deviltry by Fritz Leiber
First books in a few other series that would seem to meet the criteria mentioned."
Deryni Rising and Swords and Deviltry don't have enough GR ratings/reviews to make the top 100. (Compare them to The Curse of Chalion at the bottom of the list, currently at 31,499 ratings and 2,221 reviews.)
You're right that Pawn of Prophecy--at 91,241 ratings and 2,963 reviews--should be on the list, though.

Seriously, this fantasy list is bizarre. The earlier SF list was annoying in that it excluded children's and YA books without actually saying that it was e..."
Agreed! I am so tired of the usual YA Fantasy vs Adult Fantasy battles. Either makes separate lists for both of them, or give YA Fantasy the place it deserves in Fantasy book lists.
Many are scared to admit it, but fantasy as a genre has been repopularized because of YA fantasy and books by Cassandra Clare, Sarah J. Maas. While one can have an opinion that these are not the pinnacle of writing, their impact on the genre should not be ignored.

Yes, I am too. YA Fantasy and Adult Fantasy should be in the same list because pretty much anyone of all ages (not babys) can read YA Fantasy.


I enjoy the flabbergasted comments from GR members more than any list GR ever compiles. Do readers really care that much if a list leaves out a book, your favorite book, or doesn't include Neil Gaiman, always?!? Are these the same people that rant about GR being "owned by Amazon" and therefore spurious in the book world? Don't like the list? Try Listopia, where you can make you own list(s). I find it a great way to collect book types (genres, favorites, female authors, social justice themes, etc.) and send them to GR friends/followers to add to or vote on or to pass along to others. Or just wait until tomorrow, or next week, when GR will send out another list for you to embrace or flagellate, whichever works.

Yes, I am too. YA Fantasy and Adult Fantasy should be in the same list because pretty much anyone of all ages (not ..."
There are many of us adults who prefer adult literature. I agree that adult titles should be separate from YA titles for that reason.

Seriously, this fantasy list is bizarre. The earlier SF list was annoying in that it excluded children's and YA books without actually saying that it was e..."
I think they made a mistake on this list- The ones you have listed should be on here. The algarythim or whatever they used only collected things listed as "adult fantasy". They left out any children's or YA

Must say, I'm not too eager to read fiction, I've been often disappointed with the lacking impact. I guess I'm too picky, too restricted with what makes me like a novel.
Not everyone can write prose like Donna Tartt, and not everyone can tell stories like Stephen King, or make you immersed in their characters' life like Maria McCann, Elizabeth Knox or Hanya Yanagihara.
Those are one-of-a-kind type of authors. Bless them.

Boradicus wrote: "I'm surprised that one of Sabaa Tahir's isn't on this list."
Same!
Same!
Surprised to not see any of Rick Riordan's novels on the list!

If this were a curated list, I'd agree with you, but it's not. GR explains in the description that they used objective criteria to create the list. The problem--and the reason for most of the flabbergasted responses--is that the end result doesn't look very objective at all.
I don't expect to like a 100 Most Popular Books list (though it's always a pleasant surprise when it happens). Instead, what I expect from a 100 Most Popular Books list is that it present accurate information about members' reading habits. This one...doesn't seem to do that.




The division between YA and adult fantasy is blurry. I fail to see a criteria that would include The Chronicles of Narnia but exclude Harry Potter.

I marked a bunch for my TBR, though.