Flights of Fantasy discussion
Randomnessosity
>
Randomnessosity
message 1:
by
MrsJoseph *grouchy*, Bad Girls Deadlift
(new)
Dec 06, 2013 09:19AM

reply
|
flag

Middle Grade....

Middle Grade...."
:face palm:

YA/MG/Middle of 3rd grade/ 2nd 3rd of 1st grade/ 1st day of Kindergarten...
I can keep going. ;)

Well Christa mentioned a new one, the other day, thats coming down the pipe: "New Adult"


So, I say this, and then I download an Audible freebie PNR story. I'm such a hypocrite. *sigh*

I just got Sanderson's youth book from the library Alcatraz Versus the Evil Librarians. Anyone read it?

I just got Sanderson's youth book from the library Alcatraz Versus the Evil Librarians. Anyone read it?"
I have. I liked it, though I don't think it's anywhere near as good as his usual fare. It was a fun story though. I will read the rest of them at some point.

Isn't 50 Shades just adult?
I still don't entirely understand NA, except it's like YA, but with sex.
And, yes, MG is middle grade. Also referred to as juvenile and, at Borders anyway, Independent Reader.
I asked for the combo 'cause a lot of people lump MG books in with YA, and it makes my inner cataloguer cringe. Combining them means I don't have to wade into the "it's nit YA, it's MG" arena, and my anal retentiveness can be assuaged.
'Cause it's all about me, yo. ;)

It's on the New Adult Listopia... but I don't know if it's correct that it's there.


I got the impression it's kind of currently catering to people who were reading YA romance, but decided they wanted actual sex.
Which is darkly humorous to me, since one of the reasons I often here for adults reading YA romance is to get away from the graphic sex.

NA should technically be Young Adult, and YA should just be Teen. MG covers pre-teens and tweens (a term I still don't quite understand, but that my 13 year old likes to use).
I find New Adult a very patronising category myself. Then again, I feel the same way about Young Adult marketing -- at that age you have to read regular 'adult' titles for school, so why the hell wouldn't you be considered mature enough to read them for leisure? When I was a kid, the book shops had two age categories -- kids & teens, and adult. Although I've continued reading kids & teens books all my life, because many of them are very good, I wandered into the adult section of the book shop at age nine and never left. Somehow I survived it.
...ahem. Sorry. Pet peeve took over. :)
...ahem. Sorry. Pet peeve took over. :)

There are a few NA authors who have written actual gems in the field - but as I am disgusted by most of that kind of angst I still avoid. The books that have turned into gems have dealt with sex, etc but more so focused on themes like "who am I?" and those kinds of angsty questions that young adults have to answer as they leave home and venture out into the world.

I stopped reading a lot of YA because so much of it is just... formulaic crap lately. I won't even go near NA. I have no desire to be constantly pissed off at the stupidity of what i'm reading. LOL

OMG, the pressure!

NA should technically be Young Adult, and YA should just be Teen. MG covers pre-teens and tweens (a term I still don't q..."
Well, my library classifies YA as Teens, so I guess they agree with you. ;)
Yeah, I don't have a problem with teens/barely adults reading sex-filled books. It's nothing their imaginations aren't doing anyway. Most people vastly overestimate the 'innocence' of youth. And a lot of the classics that you have to read for school are totally sex-filled. LOL. Well, on some educational curriculums anyway.
This is why I hate NA/YA as a marketing category. It seems designed to pander to people who want young men and women who should be reading everything to be reading what's 'age-appropriate'. It doesn't meet an actual need from the children themselves, who could and should just be freely mixing kids and teens fiction with regular adult fiction the way that those of us who grew up before the YA phenomenon did, and the way that school will require them to do anyway.
(Don't get me wrong, my pet peeve is purely with YA/NA as a marketing ploy, not with the books themselves. I'm in my late twenties and enjoy fiction written with kids and teens in mind just as much as I did when I was one -- probably more. :D)
This is why I hate NA/YA as a marketing category. It seems designed to pander to people who want young men and women who should be reading everything to be reading what's 'age-appropriate'. It doesn't meet an actual need from the children themselves, who could and should just be freely mixing kids and teens fiction with regular adult fiction the way that those of us who grew up before the YA phenomenon did, and the way that school will require them to do anyway.
(Don't get me wrong, my pet peeve is purely with YA/NA as a marketing ploy, not with the books themselves. I'm in my late twenties and enjoy fiction written with kids and teens in mind just as much as I did when I was one -- probably more. :D)

I've seen that kind of relationship between teens(NAs?) in high school. Bad boy and doormat. It was horrible to watch and I hate that it's being promoted and cool or sexy or "romantic."

I completely agree. I know girls who buy into that crap. The whole 'he's being mean and distant so that means he really likes me, right?' crap. And even if that were true, that the guy really liked them, who wants to date someone like that?
MrsJoseph (taking back my data & giving GR the middle finger) wrote: "I don't have a problem with the sex but I do have a problem with the relationships - and I don't think that should be marketed toward young kids. If they find it themselves is completely different..."
Yes, I think it'd be better if that sort of stuff was just marketed under regular adult fiction like it used to be, and if kids find it, well fair enough.
Of course, since I absolutely hate all of this bad boy/'alpha male' and women-as-doormats stuff, I'd love to see healthier relationships depicted more frequently in fiction marketed at every age.
Or rather, I would like to see people who write about dysfunctional relationships actually include the recognition that they are dysfunctional, rather than glorifying them and painting them as romantic.
But that's a rant for another day, and I know I'm preaching to the choir. :)
Yes, I think it'd be better if that sort of stuff was just marketed under regular adult fiction like it used to be, and if kids find it, well fair enough.
Of course, since I absolutely hate all of this bad boy/'alpha male' and women-as-doormats stuff, I'd love to see healthier relationships depicted more frequently in fiction marketed at every age.
Or rather, I would like to see people who write about dysfunctional relationships actually include the recognition that they are dysfunctional, rather than glorifying them and painting them as romantic.
But that's a rant for another day, and I know I'm preaching to the choir. :)

On the plus side sometimes you get the chance kick a "bad boy's" a**.

On the plus side sometimes ..."
*nods* every cloud...



My mom and auntie just discovered Scandal (via Netflix) yesterday... they are about to start episode 16 of the second season . I haven't watched the show yet, and if its that addictive, I don't think I will until next summer when i don't have work during the week! LOL

Catfish, scallops, shrimp, stuffed crab, hush puppies, baked potato, and fried pickles. And a cup of gumbo.
That was just my plate...hehe

On the plus side sometimes ..."
I think the problem is the confusion between "bad boy" and "bad person of the male gender". I've dated "bad boys" and none of them were dangerous, mean or disrespectful to me. They were more about giving the finger to societal conventions, not being afraid to be a badass when the situation called for it, and possibly wearing a leather jacket when it might be a tad to warm out. (The last bit attracts me, I admit.)
See, this is what happens when the music scene moves away from Hair Bands. When we had Hair Bands, we knew what bad boys were. Also, this is what happens when YA authors try to give their readers what they want, which is not possible because most of them have no idea what they want! It isn't their fault, they haven't lived enough yet, but that can NOT be helped by giving them male protags that give men a bad name.
If I look back at my mid- to late-teens and think about the kind of guy I wanted back then, something interesting happens - I realize that I wanted pretty much the same kind of guy I do now (well, a slightly older version of him now) but how I would have described him then would have been completely different. Back then, my hormone-addled brain could not have properly described the difference between a strong man who knows what he wants, and a bully. But now I definitely can, and these authors should be able to do so. So why the F don't they???
Felina wrote: "What's everybody doing this evening? I'm just watching Drag Race and Face Off with my SIL. I keep checking in but this place is a ghost town."
Now that I'm done soapboxing about bad boys, I'll be playing Mass Effect 2.


I'll save the sermon as an emergency one.

I've been tempted to become a member, but my husband really hates the subscription idea, and doesn't think I'll get my money's worth. He's probably right..*shrug*
I've been marathoning through Babylon 5 at the recommendation of someone dear to me. I'm a little over halfway through season one and was starting to get really into it... of course, then I fell asleep. :)
Now it's 4 AM and I'm too awake to go back to sleep, and too tired to do much.
Now it's 4 AM and I'm too awake to go back to sleep, and too tired to do much.

I've been reading and watching a Big Bang Theory marathon.
Books mentioned in this topic
Eight Dates: Essential Conversations for a Lifetime of Love (other topics)The Obsidian Dagger: Being the Further Extraordinary Adventures of Horatio Lyle (other topics)
The Doomsday Machine: A Further Astonishing Adventure of Horatio Lyle (other topics)
The Extraordinary and Unusual Adventures of Horatio Lyle (other topics)
The Dream Thief (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
John Scalzi (other topics)Bertrice Small (other topics)
John W. Campbell Jr. (other topics)
John W. Campbell Jr. (other topics)
John W. Campbell Jr. (other topics)
More...