The House of Hades
discussion
Am I the only one who hates Annabeth?

So what I mean is she would call someone stupid just because that guy/gal is a child of Ares or Dionysus, even if she just met that person.
She also keeps on thinking that children of Athena are the only smart demigods, when children of Hermes, Apollo, Hephaestus, among others can be smart.
I also hate how in the PJO series she criticizes Percy for being stupid when she is the one who still had feelings for Luke, the traitor, even going so far as lifting the sky for him and still believing he could become good again.
I know it's not because of her past with Luke as Thalia had an ever longer past with Luke and yet she (Thalia) accepted that he was evil and threw him down a cliff.
To sum it up, she can be hypocritical and sometimes illogical (despite her being a daughter of Athena).
Overall, I like Annabeth.

I dislike how she is rude and wants to be so independent that she denies other people's help when she actually needs it.
Also, I feel like Riordan made her the star of the Mark of Athena just because she was loved by the fans. The problem is that she was never and isn't the main character of the series. I don't like how she suddenly became so important because of readers who liked her. What characters do in a book shouldn't be determined by how much they are liked.



I'm crying tears of joy after reading that. THANK YOU :')
Annabeth isn't a character, she's a stepping stone.
1. She only exists to be the politically correct stereotypical epitome of "girl power."
(I'm sure Rick Riordan worked really hard to rethink Astrid from How To Train Your Dragon).
2. Everyone is far too easily impressed with her, often going out of character to be so. Can we say Mary Sue?
3. SHE is otherwise only used to compliment the other characters overly conveniently.
"Why don't you brush your hair once in a while?" AKA "Let me pat you on the back for being weird and funny at every given opportunity and we'll pretend that it's a compliment saying that girls are more sensible even though we all know it's really about how funny and awesome everyone else is."
"But she's a good character because she's smart!"
VIRTUES DON'T MAKE GOOD CHARACTERS.
Honest portrayal of virtues and flaws make good characters. Annabeth is a contrived cardboard cut out. Simon from the chipmunks has more depth!
1. She only exists to be the politically correct stereotypical epitome of "girl power."
(I'm sure Rick Riordan worked really hard to rethink Astrid from How To Train Your Dragon).
2. Everyone is far too easily impressed with her, often going out of character to be so. Can we say Mary Sue?
3. SHE is otherwise only used to compliment the other characters overly conveniently.
"Why don't you brush your hair once in a while?" AKA "Let me pat you on the back for being weird and funny at every given opportunity and we'll pretend that it's a compliment saying that girls are more sensible even though we all know it's really about how funny and awesome everyone else is."
"But she's a good character because she's smart!"
VIRTUES DON'T MAKE GOOD CHARACTERS.
Honest portrayal of virtues and flaws make good characters. Annabeth is a contrived cardboard cut out. Simon from the chipmunks has more depth!
Brown wrote: "Annabeth isn't a character, she's a stepping stone.
1. She only exists to be the politically correct stereotypical epitome of "girl power."
(I'm sure Rick Riordan worked really hard to rethink A..."
AGREED!!!
1. She only exists to be the politically correct stereotypical epitome of "girl power."
(I'm sure Rick Riordan worked really hard to rethink A..."
AGREED!!!
I feel as if Annabeth is a little bossy, but you can't help and look at her childhood. I think she doesn't want to follow anyone around anymore so she just tries to act like the boss.
Also, the only reason she hated Tyson was because she had had a bad run in with a cyclops before. That's it. Afterward, she loved him to pieces and warmed up to him a lot.
I don't think she hated Rachel. I think she was just plain out jealous. I think that maybe she thought less of herself when Percy was spending a lot of time with her. I mean come on. You can't say that you wouldn't be jealous if your boyfriend was hanging out with this girl all the time?
And all you Annabeth haters have to admit that Annabeth had some moments where she just AWESOME. Like where she faced off the spider! C'MON PEOPLE! You can't say that wasn't cool!!!
Also, the only reason she hated Tyson was because she had had a bad run in with a cyclops before. That's it. Afterward, she loved him to pieces and warmed up to him a lot.
I don't think she hated Rachel. I think she was just plain out jealous. I think that maybe she thought less of herself when Percy was spending a lot of time with her. I mean come on. You can't say that you wouldn't be jealous if your boyfriend was hanging out with this girl all the time?
And all you Annabeth haters have to admit that Annabeth had some moments where she just AWESOME. Like where she faced off the spider! C'MON PEOPLE! You can't say that wasn't cool!!!

Autbenj1 wrote: "I loved Annabeth in the Percy Jackson and the Olympians series but I really didn't think she was done justice in the Heroes of Olympus and I HATED reading from her point of view. My favorite thing ..."
I will totally agree with you. I hated reading from Annabeth's point of view. It was just not very active. At all
I will totally agree with you. I hated reading from Annabeth's point of view. It was just not very active. At all
I hated reading from her point of view and Percy's in HoH, because the romance was awful.
Apparently being "in a relationship" means two people worship each other every second.
Honestly, they should've just acted exactly the same as before. All he did was tack on a bunch of mushy unnecessary crap. That's not even what being in love is about. He just downgraded the way they interacted.
Apparently being "in a relationship" means two people worship each other every second.
Honestly, they should've just acted exactly the same as before. All he did was tack on a bunch of mushy unnecessary crap. That's not even what being in love is about. He just downgraded the way they interacted.
I do love though how they fell into Tartarus holding each other
<3
love fest
XD
<3
love fest
XD

Also, the onl..."
I agree with you. I don't outright hate Annabeth but she annoys me from time to time. I know she's smart and her childhood was less than stellar, but then again so were the other demigods. And she does remind me of Astrid in the Gone series and Percy is like Sam too. Annabeth is selfish but she knows that. The thing with her being "obsessed" with Percy might have to do with the fact that she's never really had anyone that hasn't been ripped out of her life, so for her to find someone who likes her and doesn't leave made her that overprotective. And she's braver than most people give her credit for. Remember that she had to hold the sky after Luke tricked her and she was 14 at the time.
Yes yes that is so true. I totally can relate!

In annabeths PoV she herself had said that she felt a little sorry for Arachne. She said both of there flaws were hubris
Thamaya wrote: "Prajakta wrote: "if you have read tat Athena-Annabeth-Archane story carefully, you will also feel little sorry for Archane. Athena and Annabeth have too much proud. Fine some1 is challenging you an..."
VERY TRUE
VERY TRUE
We're discussing Annabeth's moral character instead of her literary character. They are completely different.
Well could you explain her literary character?
:)
:)
I just mean that it doesn't matter whether she's brave or smart or loyal. Virtues aren't what make good characters, they're what make good people. It's not about who was the most sweet and humble. It's about the experience they gave the reader.
Especially when it comes to "strong females" it seems like a lot of people get concerned about the wrong issues. We need to stop thinking of characters that way.
Especially when it comes to "strong females" it seems like a lot of people get concerned about the wrong issues. We need to stop thinking of characters that way.
Omg.. that makes a TON of sense!!!!
So that leads us to the question, what kind of experience did Annabeth give us? Did we learn from her faults and shortcomings or were they ignored or glorified? Was she portrayed fairly, in a way that is honest to the readers?
I think these are questions we should ask regardless of the character's personality, if we want to judge whether they were a good character or not.
If a character is supposed to look cool for being selfish or wimpy, that is a bad character, but not because they were selfish, if that makes sense.
A selfish character who is not supposed to be looked up to is a good character, like Ebeneezer Scrooge, for example.
I think these are questions we should ask regardless of the character's personality, if we want to judge whether they were a good character or not.
If a character is supposed to look cool for being selfish or wimpy, that is a bad character, but not because they were selfish, if that makes sense.
A selfish character who is not supposed to be looked up to is a good character, like Ebeneezer Scrooge, for example.
I think the author was a bit biased when he wrote about Annabeth, and made people easily impressed with her, possibly because he wanted too much to make her a "strong female."
That's the kind of portrayal that ruins a character whether or not they have virtue (when they make the world conform to their image). Annabeth was not the worst in this sense, but it did seem somewhat biased, in my opinion.
That's the kind of portrayal that ruins a character whether or not they have virtue (when they make the world conform to their image). Annabeth was not the worst in this sense, but it did seem somewhat biased, in my opinion.


So true


But for all of you Annabeth haters, I have some advice for you, which will help you not have to meet more Annabeth lovers like me. Go crawl in a hole and die.
Sincerly,
ihearthawaii

But fo..."
Why are you here?? Literally this is the third time I'm seeing you, crawling around. What did I do to deserve this!!!!!!!!!


Hm... I would probably do the same thing as Annabeth. Get onto him all the time but still love him.

I was never hatin... I was just curious to see what other peeps said.
Annabeth and Percy act different and "cute" when they're boyfriend and girlfriend. It's annoying. Their relationship got downgraded, not improved.
I hate when people think being in love is about acting cute.
I hate when people think being in love is about acting cute.

You did NOT just quote Piper Mclean. Let's hear about her and how she handled her boyfriend.......
That means nothing because you are using "spreading love" as a definition of being in love, so you're defining it by saying it's itself?
Because Rick Riordan's characters never really do anything meaningful when they're "in love" except act more sappy than usual. I really don't think that's love or "spreading love" it's just dumb.
Because Rick Riordan's characters never really do anything meaningful when they're "in love" except act more sappy than usual. I really don't think that's love or "spreading love" it's just dumb.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Preach? I'd write a whole essay if I had the time . . .