Nothing But Reading Challenges discussion
Team Challenges Archive
>
TT2-JUNE/JULY Challenge: 7% Solution - or 49 in 49. (Rules, Categories, etc.)
message 201:
by
Ellinor
(new)
Jun 02, 2013 04:25AM

reply
|
flag
Ellinor wrote: "I have a short question: I just finished a book which has less than 160 pages. If I remember correctly from the May RaT we were allowed to use books with less than 160 pages then. Will that also be possible this time?"
Unfortunately, there's not a short answer, Ellinor. You may only use a book less than 160 pages if you have a "blinkie" cupcake, which you currently do not, as you have no cupcakes from the R-a-T.
However, you still have the opportunity to earn a "blinkie" cupcake here.
If you don't understand "blinkies," don't worry about it. The person I think I'll be able to help out Magenta Mix-up will.
Unfortunately, there's not a short answer, Ellinor. You may only use a book less than 160 pages if you have a "blinkie" cupcake, which you currently do not, as you have no cupcakes from the R-a-T.
However, you still have the opportunity to earn a "blinkie" cupcake here.
If you don't understand "blinkies," don't worry about it. The person I think I'll be able to help out Magenta Mix-up will.
I've finished Wild Montana Sky. Can I count it as seven letters in the title, since Montana has seven letters?"
Sorry, no. Seven letters in the title would only count if it was one (or fewer) words. However, the author's last name for that book works.
Sorry, no. Seven letters in the title would only count if it was one (or fewer) words. However, the author's last name for that book works.
Turtlecollector wrote: "Would this book be considered a T for the spelling with the title?
12th of Never"
Turtlecollector, the Mods have decided NOT to allow this one. We don't want to set that precedence. We may use numbers somehow in the future, or even Round III.
This is based on numbers like 1, which could be read as one or first.
12th of Never"
Turtlecollector, the Mods have decided NOT to allow this one. We don't want to set that precedence. We may use numbers somehow in the future, or even Round III.
This is based on numbers like 1, which could be read as one or first.
Clarification: Cat#2 & #3 (Ahead and Behind)
For Categories #2 & #3 of the 7% Solution Challenge the Team ahead and behind does NOT change every week. It is determined by the last Sunday Updates in May and June.
When July 1st comes, members may begin using additional colors, if you have any change in who is ahead or behind you on the last Sunday Update in June. You may continue using the old colors, too.
For Categories #2 & #3 of the 7% Solution Challenge the Team ahead and behind does NOT change every week. It is determined by the last Sunday Updates in May and June.
When July 1st comes, members may begin using additional colors, if you have any change in who is ahead or behind you on the last Sunday Update in June. You may continue using the old colors, too.



Can someone please summarize for me what is required in order to get credit for a buddy read? I've read through this whole thread at least twice, but the rules have changed several times, and I'm confused. If it helps at all, the book in question is Dracula, which is, I think, an existing buddy read somewhere here in NBRC. Thanks!
~ “Buddy Reads” and the 7% Solution Challenge ~![]()
With regards to the 7% Solution Challenge taking place within the Tower Teams Reading Challenge, the Mods have decided that you do NOT need to create a day’s worth of DQs to satisfy Category #4 - Books of the Month or any impromptu “buddy reads.”
As far as the current BOMs, the Mods would appreciate any help (and there might be a cupcake

Note: We added start dates to the threads’ titles.
Requirement for 7% Completion
Nevertheless, we stipulate that members participating in that challenge need to give more than a two sentence statement. Something more than, “I loved it. But hated the cliffhanger at the end...” repeatedly, member after member.
One example we liked was a comment or two at the end of every chapter or two where people put these under “view spoiler” (view spoiler) . This is fine with us, though that makes it difficult to access for members reading on their phones.
Therefore, there needs to be some kind of designated stopping points for discussion - by chapters with view spoilers, as mentioned, or defined sections - agreed upon or defined by someone willing to make the suggestion.
If you like, you may reserve a post that refers the Mods to your comments.
Example (For this example, they all go to the same post; hopefully, you get the idea.)
Steven - link to my comments 6/10 on The Hobbit
Steven - link to my comments 6/12 on The Hobbit
Steven - link to my comments 6/14 on The Hobbit["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>["br"]>

Sorry, my brain is a bit fuzzy tonight. I had to say goodbye to son and DIL this afternoon (they leave tomorrow for Japan), and this mama isn't happy about having her baby boy go so far away for so long. I know, I know, lots of mamas have had to deal with the same thing -- or worse -- but this is my first time!

Here is an example Emily responding to a section in the WWZ "buddy read." As is Karen's above her. Does that help?

Can we go into old buddy reads such as this oneDearly Beloved and read the book and answer the questions according to the book breakdown?
♥Robin ♥ wrote: "Can we go into old buddy reads such as this oneDearly Beloved and read the book and answer the questions according to the book breakdown?"
That one is not so old, but sure, Robin.
That one is not so old, but sure, Robin.

Aneeqah wrote: "So just to clarify once again: we can just go back through old buddy-reads and simply answer the questions as we read, no matter how old the buddy-read was?"
Correct.
Well... unless you already answered them once and are just copying your answers/posts.
Correct.
Well... unless you already answered them once and are just copying your answers/posts.

Correct.
Well... un..."
Awesome, thank you!! Like Robin, I was eyeing some older ones that I can go ahead and do now.

LOL GREAT minds think alike :)

Barb wrote: "If you do a new one, YOU will have to come up with the section breakdowns AND the discussion questions!"
Sorry for the misunderstanding, Barb. They do NOT have to do both. Just one or the other: section breaks or DQs, if someone is posting them.
Sorry for the misunderstanding, Barb. They do NOT have to do both. Just one or the other: section breaks or DQs, if someone is posting them.


I did kind of like the one I linked you to above, as they did a synopsis break and then one person posted one question. It prompted more discussion. I didn't mean to confuse you.


If a team member finishes a book in June which he/she started in May could it be counted towards the team goal for the June-July Challenge?


Vi wrote: "I know this is going to be a long shot but would you accept
for a black cover?"
No, sorry, Vi. Works great for bronze, though.

No, sorry, Vi. Works great for bronze, though.
ShoSho wrote: "What about the other edition? The One with face it's almost all black
"
Yes, that is black. Is that the cover you have?
Vi wrote: "Are we allowed to use Alternate covers?"
No. But then, how would we know which cover you have? We'll go by the cover you post.

Yes, that is black. Is that the cover you have?
Vi wrote: "Are we allowed to use Alternate covers?"
No. But then, how would we know which cover you have? We'll go by the cover you post.

I have the Kindle Edition which is the other cover. Well, it was worth a try :)

The Zombie Survival Guide: Complete Protection from the Living Dead
World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War
Rhonda wrote: "Need direction from mods - Would these titles be okay in task #7 using 7 words?
The Zombie Survival Guide: Complete Protection from the Living Dead
World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War"
Yes. Both approved.
The Zombie Survival Guide: Complete Protection from the Living Dead
World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War"
Yes. Both approved.

The Zombie Survival Guide: Complete Protection from the Living Dead
World War Z: An Oral History of ..."
YAY!!!!!! Tyvm
Books mentioned in this topic
Area 7 (other topics)Tuesday's Gone (other topics)
Tuesday's Gone (other topics)
Always Watching (other topics)
Always Watching (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Katie Kacvinsky (other topics)Larissa Ione (other topics)
Jim Butcher (other topics)