Looking Forward and Backward at Book-to-Screen Adaptations

Mateo Askaripour is a Brooklyn-based writer whose first novel, Black Buck—which Colson Whitehead calls a “mesmerizing novel, executing a high wire act full of verve and dark, comic energy”—was an instant New York Times bestseller and both longlisted and shortlisted for numerous awards. Askaripour was chosen as one of Entertainment Weekly’s “10 rising stars to make waves,” and TODAY show host Jenna Bush selected Black Buck for her Read with Jenna book club. These days, Askaripour's hard at work on his second novel, other projects, and doing his best to pay it forward.
Askaripour also occasionally writes columns for us. We asked him to weigh in on Hollywood's obsession with the written word, and to share some of the recent and upcoming book-to-screen adaptations to be on the lookout for.
Askaripour also occasionally writes columns for us. We asked him to weigh in on Hollywood's obsession with the written word, and to share some of the recent and upcoming book-to-screen adaptations to be on the lookout for.
Ah, book-to-screen adaptations. Seems like there’s a new one every week, and with it comes the skyscraper highs of seeing your favorite stories brought to life, only rivaled by the seafloor lows of having your most cherished works of literature maimed, butchered, and blasted into Technicolor smithereens.
Therein lies the Advent calendar–esque surprise of literary adaptations: You never know what you’re going to get. For me, Barry Jenkins’ adaptation of James Baldwin’s If Beale Street Could Talk maintained the undying love between the two main characters, Fonny and Tish, and masterfully captured their ensuing tragedy with both empathy and a courageous cinematic eye. I felt the same about his visceral adaptation of Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad, which is a devastating piece of work requiring the guidance of a deft hand deeply attuned to the hope that hums in our hearts rather than the ever-present heaps of hate around us, as well as real leadership, on and off set, to care for the actors and crew. These renditions did their source material justice, only enhancing my experience in engaging with them while never eclipsing the inherent power of the books.
But is the adaptation ever better than the real thing? Sometimes. Hulu’s Little Fires Everywhere, based on Celeste Ng’s number-one New York Times bestseller, presented a fuller, more complicated narrative, piercing my core in a way the novel didn’t. I hear Emmy-nominated Normal People (also Hulu), based on literary wunderkind Sally Rooney’s sophomore novel, is also must-see TV that may be better than the book. Same with FX on Hulu’s Fleishman Is in Trouble, based on the novel by Taffy Brodesser-Akner (I swear Hulu doesn’t pay me for these mentions), Netflix’s Bridgerton, stemming from Julia Quinn’s series, and countless others I’ll likely never get to.
Then there’s the question of how faithful an adaptation is to the novel, short story, or article it’s based on. Some folks want to see dialogue, word for word, shooting forth from an actor’s mouth exactly when and where it was in the original material. Others don’t mind a slight diverging of the two: an expansion of the world, more time for secondary characters, a few new plotlines that make you scoot to the edge of your couch and say, “This wasn’t in the book, and I love it.” Personally, I couldn’t make it past episode one of The Handmaid’s Tale, because I mainlined Margaret Atwood’s story and thus became immediately allergic to even its slightest corruption.
Still, if you’re like me, you’re committed to reading the book before you see the adaptation. Though I’ve often found that sometimes reading the book curbs my cinematic appetite, and I never end up watching the adaptation. HBO’s The Plot Against America, based on Philip Roth’s book, comes to mind. And then there are the adaptations I haven’t been able to watch because their books are gathering dust on my bookshelf. Cough, Dune, cough, cough.
The thing is, even if we would sometimes rather these precious pages of ink and wonder to sidestep the world of pixels and sound, there is immense value in book-to-screen adaptations. And I’m not just talking about the cha-ching of La-La Land’s cash registers. How many people, regardless of age, would be reading Walter Tevis if not for Netflix’s The Queen’s Gambit? That show, which made chess cool—it’s always been cool, but you know what I mean—and on par with Russell Crowe fighting for his life in Gladiator, introduced me to a versatile writer whose works I’ve come to love. How many people who watched Netflix’s Oscar-winning All Quiet on the Western Front actually read Erich Maria Remarque’s 1929 novel of the same name? These adaptations preserve and extend legacies, and show us that stories, the very best of our human ingenuity, always have, and always will, stand the test of time.
Below you’ll find a list of recent and upcoming film and TV adaptations. A list, just like that quilt you started last winter, which is by no means complete. Grab some popcorn, recline the La-Z-Boy, and let us know what’s missing, which adaptations exceeded or missed your expectations, as well as those that you’re looking forward to most.
Lights, camera, action!
Recent Adaptations
Upcoming Adaptations
Comments Showing 1-27 of 27 (27 new)
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Amanda
(new)
Apr 12, 2023 07:04PM

flag


Also, I think they should have mentioned Book Thief and the James Bond books. Book thief is a great adaptation, and the book is just so beautiful to express into the right words. And Bond is kind of epic in the written form, I have to say I enjoyed the only Bond novel I read more than I enjoyed any movie.



there is already a swedish adaptation which was made in 2015. i really liked that one :)

Your should give the 2015 sweedish original a chance too. It's called "En man som heter Ove". It's not filled with Hollywood bling but it is a good movie.


In recent times, I loved both the tv adaptation of Big Little Lies (wow, another link to Lynch with Laura Dern's triumphant performance!) but also devoured Liane Moriarty's book - I was literally walking along the pavement to my place of employment still reading it in my hands, I didn't want to give it up and close the book covers! Surprisingly, moving the action from Australia to the US worked incredibly well in the tv adaptation, I didn't mind either version and the location in both settings did not detract from the plot. A marvel of both literature and television!



Totally agree that the movie was great!

To me, the quintessential movie-is-better is The Rocketeer. The amazing designs of the movie, from the iconic look of the hero down to even the bulldog-shaped diner, come straight from the book, so you can’t fault Stevens on that account. But the story itself is random/meandering and characters not very deep. Even the stock adventure characters from the Disney film are more interesting, and the ersatz Flynn as villain was a genius move.




I also thought it was great!!





Lessons In Chemistry? One of my fave books ever but hard to imagine how all the inner dialogue of the dog and people will translate to screen..those were the best parts.