Billy Jensen's Favorite Fictional Citizen Detectives
Billy Jensen is an investigative journalist who focuses squarely on unsolved murders and missing persons. He helped finish Michelle McNamara’s 2018 New York Times bestseller, I’ll Be Gone in the Dark, after her untimely death.
His new book, Chase Darkness with Me: How One True-Crime Writer Started Solving Murders, is both a memoir and a how-to-guide for solving cases using social media, crowdsourcing, and shoe leather.
Here he shares some of his favorite fictional counterparts in the war against crime.
His new book, Chase Darkness with Me: How One True-Crime Writer Started Solving Murders, is both a memoir and a how-to-guide for solving cases using social media, crowdsourcing, and shoe leather.
Here he shares some of his favorite fictional counterparts in the war against crime.
True crime as a genre has always had one major flaw: It is a universe with a thousand supervillains but very few superheroes.
Bundy, Gacy, Manson, Dahmer, Zodiac, BTK, Jack the Ripper—the rogues' gallery goes on and on. But ask the average true-crime reader to name a superhero. You might hear John Walsh, maybe Elizabeth Smart or John Douglas. But the heroes of these tales are often in the shadows, working as a team to bring the villains to justice.
Imagine Harry Potter with Voldemort, Lestrange, and Umbridge up against a faceless army of justice instead of Harry, Ron, and Hermione. We need heroes. Real heroes. More than ever before. I am trying to change that narrative in true crime and bring the heroes to the forefront, telling the stories of the crime analysts, the detectives, the prosecutors, the survivors, and, yes, the citizen detectives.
Some of the greatest and most revered characters in all of fiction have taken the form of the citizen detective, the amateur sleuth. An ordinary person who has taken upon themselves to right a wrong, to set order out of chaos. To make everything right.
Here are my four favorites:
Isaiah Quintabe
Sherlock Holmes
Batman
Nancy Drew
Bundy, Gacy, Manson, Dahmer, Zodiac, BTK, Jack the Ripper—the rogues' gallery goes on and on. But ask the average true-crime reader to name a superhero. You might hear John Walsh, maybe Elizabeth Smart or John Douglas. But the heroes of these tales are often in the shadows, working as a team to bring the villains to justice.
Imagine Harry Potter with Voldemort, Lestrange, and Umbridge up against a faceless army of justice instead of Harry, Ron, and Hermione. We need heroes. Real heroes. More than ever before. I am trying to change that narrative in true crime and bring the heroes to the forefront, telling the stories of the crime analysts, the detectives, the prosecutors, the survivors, and, yes, the citizen detectives.
Some of the greatest and most revered characters in all of fiction have taken the form of the citizen detective, the amateur sleuth. An ordinary person who has taken upon themselves to right a wrong, to set order out of chaos. To make everything right.
Here are my four favorites:
This is 2000s Los Angeles noir. Your protagonist isn’t a down-on-his-luck old white guy with a drinking problem. Isaiah Quintabe (IQ) is a hardscrabble African American high school dropout genius who solves neighborhood mysteries for whatever payment he can get. He’s quiet, super observant, flawed, angry, and darkly witty. He’s got a sidekick named Dodson who is less a Watson and more a Walter Sobchak to his Sherlock, bringing him cases but also a lot of trouble. The first book has a real Hound of the Baskervilles angle, but the new take on the consulting detective is so damn cool, you embrace the hounds. Out of all these citizen detectives, I want to be friends with IQ the most—just to be able to text him at 2 a.m. about a real case I’m working on.
Notable Effort: No gadgets like Batman. No experiments like Sherlock. IQ just observes and deduces. He’s had to survive on his own on the streets, so he uses everything at his disposal.
Favorite Quote: I love this put-down of a bully IQ encounters: “Isaiah looked at him like he’d come to the door selling five-dollar candy bars you could buy at the store for a dollar. He hated threats.”
Notable Effort: No gadgets like Batman. No experiments like Sherlock. IQ just observes and deduces. He’s had to survive on his own on the streets, so he uses everything at his disposal.
Favorite Quote: I love this put-down of a bully IQ encounters: “Isaiah looked at him like he’d come to the door selling five-dollar candy bars you could buy at the store for a dollar. He hated threats.”
One of my favorite parlor games to play at the bar: Who was a better detective, Sherlock Holmes or Batman? You will immediately drive away most other patrons and have both the bartender and the jukebox to yourself.
Sherlock is the alpha. But he’s miserable and has a drug habit. Batman has the tragic backstory, but also an unlimited bankroll and wonderful toys. Holmes' deduction powers are second to none. As are his experiments (tobacco ash, anyone?).
Holmes would have surely weighed in on the debate, as he showed disdain for other fictional detectives: "Now, in my opinion, Dupin was a very inferior fellow. That trick of his of breaking in on his friends' thoughts with an apropos remark after a quarter of an hour's silence is really very showy and superficial. He had some analytical genius, no doubt; but he was by no means such a phenomenon as Poe appeared to imagine." BURN.
Of course, Holmes performs this very trick on Watson from time to time, most notably after Watson slams down the newspaper in The Adventure of the Resident Patient. So I like to think Arthur Conan Doyle was just being cheeky about Mr. Poe, the originator and patron saint of the detective genre.
Notable Effort: His fieldwork in "The Boscombe Valley Mystery" (The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes). Picking a favorite Holmes deduction is like picking a favorite Beatles song, but his willingness to get dirty while attempting to solve the murder of a local landowner always sticks out for me. His efforts showed he wasn’t just a city-dwelling fancy lad but was willing to get dirty. As Watson wrote, “To Holmes, as I could see by his eager face and peering eyes, very many other things were to be read upon the trampled grass. He ran round, like a dog who is picking up a scent.” He picks up all manner of twigs and bark, before he deduces that the killer is a tall, left-handed, cigar-smoking man with a limp.
Favorite Quote: “I am not the law, but I represent justice so far as my feeble powers go.” I quoted this one, from The Adventure of the Three Gables, in Chase Darkness with Me and will get it tattooed on my body at some point.
Sherlock is the alpha. But he’s miserable and has a drug habit. Batman has the tragic backstory, but also an unlimited bankroll and wonderful toys. Holmes' deduction powers are second to none. As are his experiments (tobacco ash, anyone?).
Holmes would have surely weighed in on the debate, as he showed disdain for other fictional detectives: "Now, in my opinion, Dupin was a very inferior fellow. That trick of his of breaking in on his friends' thoughts with an apropos remark after a quarter of an hour's silence is really very showy and superficial. He had some analytical genius, no doubt; but he was by no means such a phenomenon as Poe appeared to imagine." BURN.
Of course, Holmes performs this very trick on Watson from time to time, most notably after Watson slams down the newspaper in The Adventure of the Resident Patient. So I like to think Arthur Conan Doyle was just being cheeky about Mr. Poe, the originator and patron saint of the detective genre.
Notable Effort: His fieldwork in "The Boscombe Valley Mystery" (The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes). Picking a favorite Holmes deduction is like picking a favorite Beatles song, but his willingness to get dirty while attempting to solve the murder of a local landowner always sticks out for me. His efforts showed he wasn’t just a city-dwelling fancy lad but was willing to get dirty. As Watson wrote, “To Holmes, as I could see by his eager face and peering eyes, very many other things were to be read upon the trampled grass. He ran round, like a dog who is picking up a scent.” He picks up all manner of twigs and bark, before he deduces that the killer is a tall, left-handed, cigar-smoking man with a limp.
Favorite Quote: “I am not the law, but I represent justice so far as my feeble powers go.” I quoted this one, from The Adventure of the Three Gables, in Chase Darkness with Me and will get it tattooed on my body at some point.
There are so many great Batman graphic novels. Alan Moore’s The Killing Joke, Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns are both classics. But Scott Snyder’s The Court of Owls, Geoff Johns’ Batman: Earth One, and Neil Gaiman’s Whatever Happened to the Caped Crusader? are all stellar examples of the character referred to as the World’s Greatest Detective. Unlike the others on this list, Batman has to deal with superpowered villains, time travel, aliens, and has a lot more “friends” who he has to team up with from time to time.
I chose Identity Crisis by Brad Meltzer for this very reason. The story begins with a murder of one of their own: Sue Dibny, who carried on a wonderful love story as the wife of Elongated Man. The killing sets off a chain of reactions that bubble up narratives of memory, trauma, abuse of power, and Batman fighting the very heroes he once fought beside.
Notable Effort: At first glance, Sue Dibny looks as if she was burned to death. But Batman, looking at autopsy pics, realizes that she actually died from an infarction in her brain. In a moment of clarity he realizes what occurred and races to save the others.
Favorite Quote: “People think it's an obsession. A compulsion. As if there were an irresistible impulse to act. It's never been like that. I chose this life. I know what I'm doing. And on any given day, I could stop doing it. Today, however, isn't that day. And tomorrow won't be either."
I chose Identity Crisis by Brad Meltzer for this very reason. The story begins with a murder of one of their own: Sue Dibny, who carried on a wonderful love story as the wife of Elongated Man. The killing sets off a chain of reactions that bubble up narratives of memory, trauma, abuse of power, and Batman fighting the very heroes he once fought beside.
Notable Effort: At first glance, Sue Dibny looks as if she was burned to death. But Batman, looking at autopsy pics, realizes that she actually died from an infarction in her brain. In a moment of clarity he realizes what occurred and races to save the others.
Favorite Quote: “People think it's an obsession. A compulsion. As if there were an irresistible impulse to act. It's never been like that. I chose this life. I know what I'm doing. And on any given day, I could stop doing it. Today, however, isn't that day. And tomorrow won't be either."
She was born out of necessity—and as a cash grab. Edward Stratemeyer, creator of The Hardy Boys, began to realize that girls were reading his books about the boy amateur detectives. So he created Nancy, who quickly eclipsed the boys in both influence and popularity. When Oprah, Hillary, Babs, and RBG all cite you as an inspiration, you are doing something right.
The stories were all written by ghostwriters under the pen name Carolyn Keene, but credit for the character’s development needs to go to Mildred Wirt, who wrote 23 of the first 30 books. Nancy has evolved with time, utilizing new investigative techniques, but always with a go-bag with everything she needs to jump right into an adventure. The stories have been updated throughout the years to remove some of the awful language and xenophobic cultural representations and stereotypes, but Nancy’s core character has remained. And she is the clear predecessor to Veronica Mars, one of my favorite TV citizen sleuths.
Notable Effort: In The Hidden Staircase, Nancy faces two problems: Someone is sending threatening messages to her lawyer dad, and there is a ghost stealing things in an old mansion. She solves her father’s kidnapping and then uses her knowledge of secret passages to discover the first rule of mysteries: It’s never a ghost.
Favorite Quote: “One thing is for sure, she thought. Work is the best antidote for worry. I'll get back to Twin Elms and do some more sleuthing there."
The stories were all written by ghostwriters under the pen name Carolyn Keene, but credit for the character’s development needs to go to Mildred Wirt, who wrote 23 of the first 30 books. Nancy has evolved with time, utilizing new investigative techniques, but always with a go-bag with everything she needs to jump right into an adventure. The stories have been updated throughout the years to remove some of the awful language and xenophobic cultural representations and stereotypes, but Nancy’s core character has remained. And she is the clear predecessor to Veronica Mars, one of my favorite TV citizen sleuths.
Notable Effort: In The Hidden Staircase, Nancy faces two problems: Someone is sending threatening messages to her lawyer dad, and there is a ghost stealing things in an old mansion. She solves her father’s kidnapping and then uses her knowledge of secret passages to discover the first rule of mysteries: It’s never a ghost.
Favorite Quote: “One thing is for sure, she thought. Work is the best antidote for worry. I'll get back to Twin Elms and do some more sleuthing there."
Who are some of your favorite fictional detectives? Share your recommendations in the comments!
Check out more recent articles:
40 New and Upcoming Graphic Novels to Discover
The Most Popular Books About Books for Avid Readers
Jenna Bush Hager Shares Her Book Club Secrets
Check out more recent articles:
40 New and Upcoming Graphic Novels to Discover
The Most Popular Books About Books for Avid Readers
Jenna Bush Hager Shares Her Book Club Secrets
Comments Showing 1-50 of 54 (54 new)
message 1:
by
Denise
(new)
Aug 01, 2019 08:55PM

flag

Hercule Poirot. A classic indeed.


Benny Cooperman by Howard Engel, Jack Taggert by Don Easton, John Cardinal by Giles Blunt, Lane Winslow by Iona Whishaw, Belle Palmer by Lou Allin, Sean O'Brien by Tom Lowe, Kate Page by Rick Mofina, Travis McGee by John D MacDonald, Nero Wolf by Rex Stout & Lew Archer by Ross MacDonald to name a few!

Thomas Lynley/Barbara Havers by Elizabeth George
Adam Dalgliesh by P.D. James
Andrew Dalziel/Peter Pascoe by Reginald Hill
Philip Marlowe by Raymond Chandler
Kurt Wallander by Henning Mankell
Harry Bosch by Michael Connelly
Ruth Galloway by Elly Griffiths
Vera Stanhope by Ann Cleeves
Miss Marple by Agatha Christie
Kinsey Millhone by Sue Grafton


Hercule Poirot. A classic indeed."
Miss Marple too.



Thomas Lynley/Barbara Havers by Elizabeth George
Adam Dalgliesh by P.D. James
Andrew Dalziel/Peter Pascoe by Reginald Hill
Philip Marlowe by Raymond Chandler
Kurt Wall..."
Great list! Some of my favorites.

My go-to, read over and over, mystery writer is Dick Francis. I never thought I'd love a bunch of mysteries where each one involves a racing horse or jockey in the plot. Francis knew his craft!
Other favorites: Sue Grafton with ABC series of books, and Harlen Coben and his stand-alone mysteries: who couldn't love him?



My go-to, read over and over, mystery writer is Dick Fra..."
I'm pleased to see that I'm not the only one re-reading Dick Francis. Love his books.
Lew Archer by Ross MacDonald & Travis McGee by John D Macdonald then from more modern times there are Sean O'Brien by Tom Lowe, Belle Palmer by Lou Allin, Meg Harriss by R. J. Harlick, Dan Sharp by Jeffrey Round, Benny Cooperman by Howard Engel, Lane Winslow by Iona Whishaw, Jonah Geller by Howard Shrier, Annie & Jake Lincoln by Rayven T Hill and John Granville & Sam Scott by Sharon Rouse to name a few!



Elizabeth wrote: "Sherlock Holmes stories/Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Can't trust the opinion of illiterates who list ten authors when the question is, "Who is the best amateur detective?'"
Please re-read the question! it does not say "Who is the best-"It asks "Who are some of your favorite fictional detectives?" ! I see a lot of comments here from us "illiterates" who actually answered the question correctly! BTW those I listed are actually only a few of my "Favourite" fictional detectives and there are many more especially if I include all my favourite fictional Police detectives too. Have you read any of Brenda Chapman's fine "Stonechild and Rouleau" series or Stanley Evan's "Seaweed" series or Don Easton's "Jack Taggart" series and there are many more?
Please re-read the question! it does not say "Who is the best-"It asks "Who are some of your favorite fictional detectives?" ! I see a lot of comments here from us "illiterates" who actually answered the question correctly! BTW those I listed are actually only a few of my "Favourite" fictional detectives and there are many more especially if I include all my favourite fictional Police detectives too. Have you read any of Brenda Chapman's fine "Stonechild and Rouleau" series or Stanley Evan's "Seaweed" series or Don Easton's "Jack Taggart" series and there are many more?



You are so right!!!! All through my girlhood she was my hero and I so wanted to be her! From her curly hair to her gung ho attitude - she was awesome!!!!!

My go-to, read over and over, mystery writer is Dick Fra..."
Dick Francis hits all the bases for me - even though all his books are in the horse racing world they are so different. His wife had a lot of input and so the female characters are very well written.



You are so right!!!! All through my gir..."
SO AGREE!
Sophie wrote: "Febrizal wrote: "Where Agatha Christie?. I think the novel from Agatha Christie is still the best"
Hercule Poirot. A classic indeed."
agatha christie referred to Poirot as DETESTABLE (deserving of HATE) and a 'Conceited Creep'. No author who would malign a character so viciously is worthy of a reader's time. I'm good with Sherlock Holmes.
Hercule Poirot. A classic indeed."
agatha christie referred to Poirot as DETESTABLE (deserving of HATE) and a 'Conceited Creep'. No author who would malign a character so viciously is worthy of a reader's time. I'm good with Sherlock Holmes.

- - Trixie Belden, (Yay for tomboys-my introduction to mysteries) China Bayles, for when I'm in a rainy day mood
--- Flavia de Luce, A 30-year-old in a 12 year olds body. Hilariously dark and different.
As for Sheriffs, the Walt Longmire series and the Bill Gastner/Estelle Reyes-Guzman, Posada county series....

SPAM! Not sure what the above post has to do with detective stories. Even if it did, four of the same post is SPAM.
NOT a christie wrote: "SPAM! Not sure what the above post has to do with detective stories. Even if it did, four of the same post is SPAM."
Did you flag it? This appears 10 times on another article. This is out of hand and GR does nothing!
Did you flag it? This appears 10 times on another article. This is out of hand and GR does nothing!
Philip wrote: "NOT a christie wrote: "SPAM! Not sure what the above post has to do with detective stories. Even if it did, four of the same post is SPAM."
Did you flag it? This appears 10 times on another articl..."
Nope. Should have. I will now. I saw it last night/ this morning and I wasn't wide awake.
Did you flag it? This appears 10 times on another articl..."
Nope. Should have. I will now. I saw it last night/ this morning and I wasn't wide awake.
I just flagged it. Should I flag all four or just the one? What was the sense is posting the same message four times on one page? That's what I don't get.
NOT a christie wrote: "I just flagged it. Should I flag all four or just the one? What was the sense is posting the same message four times on one page? That's what I don't get."
Same comment was posted about 10 times on another article! What I don't get is why GR can't do anything about this crap, or maybe they just won't? Should be easy to screen these duplicates but I'll agree it might be a bit more difficult to block the different individual ones.
Same comment was posted about 10 times on another article! What I don't get is why GR can't do anything about this crap, or maybe they just won't? Should be easy to screen these duplicates but I'll agree it might be a bit more difficult to block the different individual ones.
Hi Philip. I don't get it either. Surely they can block the person and keep her/ him from posting anymore. I'm pretty sure people have to be members before posting. And GoodReads has guidelines. Why have guidelines without having the ability to enforce them?
I have one idea that I'm going to try. I'll try to find Goodreads contact info and then send a link to those four messages. Not sure it will work but I'll give it a go.
Hmmm....... I wonder if Goodreads has a Facebook page. If so, maybe I can reach them there. Spam posts are pathetic. Especially four at a time. What's the point?
I have one idea that I'm going to try. I'll try to find Goodreads contact info and then send a link to those four messages. Not sure it will work but I'll give it a go.
Hmmm....... I wonder if Goodreads has a Facebook page. If so, maybe I can reach them there. Spam posts are pathetic. Especially four at a time. What's the point?
Nanette wrote: "Sherlock Holmes and Watson;Ngaio Marsh’s Alleyn and D.I.Fox;Dorothy Sayers’ Lord Peter Wimsey; Agatha Christie’s Hercule Poirot and Tommy & Tuppence Beresford; Nero Wolfe and Archie Goodwin;P.D.Jam..."
Why do people insist on connecting christie with the character a) she plagiarized from AC Doyle's Sherlock Holmes AND, worst of all, whom she referred to as "DETESTABLE" (deserving of HATE). Okay, stupid question. CASH GRAB. That is the ONLY reason Poirot is connected with that thieving woman.
Need evidence that christie was a thief? If you have read/ watched THE VEILED LADY, you might want to check out the Sherlock Holmes story on Youtube https://youtu.be/yW4GD3oRmFg The case of Charles Augustus Milverton. Christie made some changes (one woman as opposed to many) and the end.. HOWEVER, some very key scenes , even dialogue is TOO similar to be a mere coincidence. Including Sherlock AND Poirot both playing with the idea of turning their talents to the COMMITTING of crime rather than solving them.
Also, Holmes/ Watson// Poirot Hastings burglarizing a house in search of the blackmailing letter(s) .
Before I learned of christie's HATRED for the Belgian detective, I read a few books. How interesting that BOTH Watson and Hastings referred to the POWERS of their friends. Coincidence? Not bloody likely.
Long story short (too late, I know) but the ONLY reason Hercule Poirot exists at all is because his ersatz 'author' wanted to share the same literary podium with Mr. Doyle and Holmes. She didn't care about Poirot. Jane Marple she referred to as "My dear Jane' in a letter to Joan Hickson in 1946. Poirot, she wished never existed.
In some fan-fiction I'm working on, I have given christie that very wish. A life where Hercule Poirot NEVER EXISTED. .
'Cabin Fever' when an author is writing a series is one thing. But there is a difference between "I love you, Anne" (Shirley~Anne of Green Gables series, Lucy Maud Montgomery)
" but I need to see other characters.." and "I LOATHE you and wish you never existed!"
I will NEVER trust that ARROGANT THIEVING WOMAN (christie) or have any of her books in my home anymore! When an author (for the sake of making the point) maligns his or her character, they forfeit the right to be trusted by readers. And yet, so many mindlessly follow after a woman who HATED a character , while, at the same time, claiming to love the character she despised.
CHRISTIE drew the dividing line with her vicious diatribe; "Why oh WHY did I EVER create that DETESTABLE bombastic creature?" Readers can either take christie's side, in which they should ONLY read Tommy and Tuppance, Miss Marple and the stand alone stories.
The "DETESTABLE" Hercule Poirot should NOT be part of a PRO-CHRISTIE library. Then again, what if you're a Poirot fan but LOATHE christie's hatred of him? Watch the series but do NOT have the books in your home.
However, given what I've learned in the last few years, the BEST course of action for readers who want to be able to TRUST the authors they read...... SKIP christie and Poirot entirely and find an author who CARES about their characters.
I ABHOR agatha christie! She deprived this reader of the enjoyment of a character, because it became an issue of continual niggling as to WHY Poirot was so HATED. If I had it to do over again, I would have ditched BOTH. Then again, what reader starts reading a novel series under the assumption their author will turn, so heartlessly, against that character. That should NEVER be the case! If an author cares more for their own fame than for the character(s) who gives them their fame, they should do ANYTHING ELSE, but they should NOT be writers!
So now, I do my best to warn readers against christie and her poisonous animosity against a character who did NOT deserve such malicious treatment.
Or DOES he? If you are PRO-CHRISTIE , shouldn't YOU hate Poirot, just as she did ?
Why do people insist on connecting christie with the character a) she plagiarized from AC Doyle's Sherlock Holmes AND, worst of all, whom she referred to as "DETESTABLE" (deserving of HATE). Okay, stupid question. CASH GRAB. That is the ONLY reason Poirot is connected with that thieving woman.
Need evidence that christie was a thief? If you have read/ watched THE VEILED LADY, you might want to check out the Sherlock Holmes story on Youtube https://youtu.be/yW4GD3oRmFg The case of Charles Augustus Milverton. Christie made some changes (one woman as opposed to many) and the end.. HOWEVER, some very key scenes , even dialogue is TOO similar to be a mere coincidence. Including Sherlock AND Poirot both playing with the idea of turning their talents to the COMMITTING of crime rather than solving them.
Also, Holmes/ Watson// Poirot Hastings burglarizing a house in search of the blackmailing letter(s) .
Before I learned of christie's HATRED for the Belgian detective, I read a few books. How interesting that BOTH Watson and Hastings referred to the POWERS of their friends. Coincidence? Not bloody likely.
Long story short (too late, I know) but the ONLY reason Hercule Poirot exists at all is because his ersatz 'author' wanted to share the same literary podium with Mr. Doyle and Holmes. She didn't care about Poirot. Jane Marple she referred to as "My dear Jane' in a letter to Joan Hickson in 1946. Poirot, she wished never existed.
In some fan-fiction I'm working on, I have given christie that very wish. A life where Hercule Poirot NEVER EXISTED. .
'Cabin Fever' when an author is writing a series is one thing. But there is a difference between "I love you, Anne" (Shirley~Anne of Green Gables series, Lucy Maud Montgomery)
" but I need to see other characters.." and "I LOATHE you and wish you never existed!"
I will NEVER trust that ARROGANT THIEVING WOMAN (christie) or have any of her books in my home anymore! When an author (for the sake of making the point) maligns his or her character, they forfeit the right to be trusted by readers. And yet, so many mindlessly follow after a woman who HATED a character , while, at the same time, claiming to love the character she despised.
CHRISTIE drew the dividing line with her vicious diatribe; "Why oh WHY did I EVER create that DETESTABLE bombastic creature?" Readers can either take christie's side, in which they should ONLY read Tommy and Tuppance, Miss Marple and the stand alone stories.
The "DETESTABLE" Hercule Poirot should NOT be part of a PRO-CHRISTIE library. Then again, what if you're a Poirot fan but LOATHE christie's hatred of him? Watch the series but do NOT have the books in your home.
However, given what I've learned in the last few years, the BEST course of action for readers who want to be able to TRUST the authors they read...... SKIP christie and Poirot entirely and find an author who CARES about their characters.
I ABHOR agatha christie! She deprived this reader of the enjoyment of a character, because it became an issue of continual niggling as to WHY Poirot was so HATED. If I had it to do over again, I would have ditched BOTH. Then again, what reader starts reading a novel series under the assumption their author will turn, so heartlessly, against that character. That should NEVER be the case! If an author cares more for their own fame than for the character(s) who gives them their fame, they should do ANYTHING ELSE, but they should NOT be writers!
So now, I do my best to warn readers against christie and her poisonous animosity against a character who did NOT deserve such malicious treatment.
Or DOES he? If you are PRO-CHRISTIE , shouldn't YOU hate Poirot, just as she did ?
Jessica wrote: "I see Hercule Poirot and Tommy & Tuppence, but there is also Agatha Christie's inimitable Miss Marple!"
Miss Marple and Tommy and Tuppence, fine! But NOT the "DETESTABLE" Hercule Poirot. christie treated that character with the acrimony and disdain of a woman who was forced to carry a child to term. How IRONIC that christie PLAGIARIZED Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes (character and story set up) in order to stand with Mr. Doyle.
Christie was an ARROGANT, HEARTLESS woman who remodeled Sherlock Holmes for her own fame and adoration, but who would refer to Poirot as someone who deserved to be HATED! That is what DETESTABLE means.
If you need some evidence as to christie's thievery, you should listen to a Sherlock Holmes story on Youtube. The Case of Charles Augustus Milverton . It helps if you know the episode/ book The Veiled Lady. More than a FEW coincidence there.
https://youtu.be/yW4GD3oRmFg. And remember, Arthur Conan Doyle wrote the Sherlock Holmes series first.
Then there is the interesting lining up of certain points between the two UNIQUE detectives;
* Both Holmes and Poirot are known for their deducting POWERS. (both Watson and Hastings used the EXACT SAME WORD).
* Both Watson and Hastings have narrated stories where their colleagues are referred to as "my friend" .
* Holmes and Poirot have had competitive relationships with their Scotland Yard counterparts, Chief Inspector LaStrade/ Japp but eventually the competition segued into a partnership .
* BOTH Holmes and Poirot got ANTSY after a time without a case. Holmes took to violin playing after his drug situation was in hand. Poirot would become ill or speak of retiring. The detectives needed the stimulation of a tough case to keep mentally stimulated.
* Neither detective was romantically involved., though both were attractive to women . In BOTH cases, too, there was one special woman of.....questionable legal standing.... Irene Adler and Countess Rosakoff who had a hold on their respective detectives.
(YES, Poirot was more....amiable to women, where Holmes didn't trust them as a rule) . Sadly, or ruthlessly, christie had a codicil in any contract for Poirot movies that he NOT be permitted a love story. The BITCH! Thankfully, in the name of compassion, the series writers skated to the very EDGE of that legal line a few times. (The Chocolate Box, The Double Sin , Labors of Hercules) .
* Both Watson and Hastings had a dandy time trying to keep their colleagues on VACATION time when they were supposed to be on vacation, specifically for health reasons.
Shall I go on? As the saying goes, there are too may coincidences for this to be a coincidence. Poirot (aka the Belgian Sherlock Holmes) was a means to an end for christie. Nothing more.
No 'author' who shows HATRED for their character(s) should receive any respect from readers. Would YOU treat your readers the same if you were an author? Would you treat your character the way christie treated Poirot? What a waste of time that would be!
Miss Marple and Tommy and Tuppence, fine! But NOT the "DETESTABLE" Hercule Poirot. christie treated that character with the acrimony and disdain of a woman who was forced to carry a child to term. How IRONIC that christie PLAGIARIZED Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes (character and story set up) in order to stand with Mr. Doyle.
Christie was an ARROGANT, HEARTLESS woman who remodeled Sherlock Holmes for her own fame and adoration, but who would refer to Poirot as someone who deserved to be HATED! That is what DETESTABLE means.
If you need some evidence as to christie's thievery, you should listen to a Sherlock Holmes story on Youtube. The Case of Charles Augustus Milverton . It helps if you know the episode/ book The Veiled Lady. More than a FEW coincidence there.
https://youtu.be/yW4GD3oRmFg. And remember, Arthur Conan Doyle wrote the Sherlock Holmes series first.
Then there is the interesting lining up of certain points between the two UNIQUE detectives;
* Both Holmes and Poirot are known for their deducting POWERS. (both Watson and Hastings used the EXACT SAME WORD).
* Both Watson and Hastings have narrated stories where their colleagues are referred to as "my friend" .
* Holmes and Poirot have had competitive relationships with their Scotland Yard counterparts, Chief Inspector LaStrade/ Japp but eventually the competition segued into a partnership .
* BOTH Holmes and Poirot got ANTSY after a time without a case. Holmes took to violin playing after his drug situation was in hand. Poirot would become ill or speak of retiring. The detectives needed the stimulation of a tough case to keep mentally stimulated.
* Neither detective was romantically involved., though both were attractive to women . In BOTH cases, too, there was one special woman of.....questionable legal standing.... Irene Adler and Countess Rosakoff who had a hold on their respective detectives.
(YES, Poirot was more....amiable to women, where Holmes didn't trust them as a rule) . Sadly, or ruthlessly, christie had a codicil in any contract for Poirot movies that he NOT be permitted a love story. The BITCH! Thankfully, in the name of compassion, the series writers skated to the very EDGE of that legal line a few times. (The Chocolate Box, The Double Sin , Labors of Hercules) .
* Both Watson and Hastings had a dandy time trying to keep their colleagues on VACATION time when they were supposed to be on vacation, specifically for health reasons.
Shall I go on? As the saying goes, there are too may coincidences for this to be a coincidence. Poirot (aka the Belgian Sherlock Holmes) was a means to an end for christie. Nothing more.
No 'author' who shows HATRED for their character(s) should receive any respect from readers. Would YOU treat your readers the same if you were an author? Would you treat your character the way christie treated Poirot? What a waste of time that would be!