Harmony Evans's Blog, page 581
January 3, 2024
Libertarian Journalist John Stossel Slams Elizabeth Warren and Defends Elon Musk: ‘We Need More Makers and Fewer Takers’ (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
Libertarian journalist John Stossel has written a new column and created a video to go with it, which blasts government ‘takers’ like Elizabeth Warren and supporting innovative ‘makers’ like Elon Musk.
Stossel correctly points out that people like Elizabeth Warren don’t produce anything. All they do is target the productive and take their wealth to redistribute it as they see fit.
If we had an effective education system, every American child would understand this concept by the third grade.
Here’s an excerpt from Stossel’s column, via the Daily Signal:
Are You a Maker or a Taker?
Politicians are often takers.
They take our money (and freedom) in the name of achieving goals they rarely achieve.
Elon Musk and Sen. Elizabeth Warren may be the best examples of maker and taker. They’re the stars of my video this week.
Warren shouts, “Tax the rich!”
She especially wants to tax Musk, the richest man in the world.
In her eagerness to grab his money, she spun a scandal in the media, claiming Musk paid no taxes. She went on TV again and again to tell people that in 2018, “He paid zero!”
It was true. In 2018, Musk paid no federal income tax. But that was only because his pay was entirely in the form of “stock options,” and that year, they gave him no income.
But at the very moment Warren launched her “zero tax” screed, Musk was paying the U.S. government $12 billion—more tax than anyone has ever paid in history.
Warren didn’t mention that.
I wish Musk paid much less tax. It would be better for the world if he spent the $12 billion himself—rather than giving it to Warren and her cronies.
Stossel’s video about this is excellent. Watch below:
.@elonmusk does things that our government FAILED at.
He invented the world’s best rockets, slashed the cost of space flight, and launched satellites that connect even the poorest, most remote parts of the world.
Our world needs more MAKERS like Musk; fewer TAKERS like: pic.twitter.com/jjFCbzEe9G
— John Stossel (@JohnStossel) January 2, 2024
Stossel absolutely nailed this. People like Musk make our lives better. People like Warren contribute nothing but want to benefit from the innovation provided by others.
The post Libertarian Journalist John Stossel Slams Elizabeth Warren and Defends Elon Musk: ‘We Need More Makers and Fewer Takers’ (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit appeared first on Harmony Evans.
Microsoft brings 8 big games to Xbox Game Pass in January
Yesterday we reported on the great value Xbox Game Pass subscribers got during 2023 and Microsoft has just announced the first batch of titles for January and there are some big names in amongst them.
News had been circulating that Grand Theft Auto 5 was leaving the service after just six months and this is true, but who doesn’t own that by now?
Focusing on what is to come we have Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, which is a game that will please many people with a great Viking setting and many hours of gameplay. Resident Evil 2 remake also makes an appearance in the middle of the month for horror fans. The remake version is the definitive version to play.
Elsewhere, if you are a sports fan the excellent Super Mega Baseball 4 arrives in little over a week via EA Play, and its cartoon graphics and superb gameplay will be a great way to remove some of the January blues. Other decent games in the list are Hell Let Loose and We Happy Few.
What’s coming to Game Pass in January?
the first of many 2024 coming soon postshttps://t.co/s0XixEFsYi pic.twitter.com/Q0MGr9esol
— Xbox Game Pass (@XboxGamePass) January 3, 2024
The games announced on the Xbox Game Pass X account so far are:
Close to the Sun – January 3rdHell Let Loose – January 4thAssassin’s Creed Valhalla – January 9thSuper Mega Baseball 4 EA Play – January 11thWe Happy Few – January 11thResident Evil 2 – January 16thThose Who Remain – January 16thFigment (TBC)Last month saw another major incoming of new games so with some of these titles following up that, it has been a great holiday season for Game Pass subscribers.
What is leaving Game pass In JanuaryAs mentioned, GTA V departs in just two days time and four other games leave the service in the middle of the month.
GTA V (January 5th)Garden Story (January 15th)MotoGP 22 (January 15th)Persona 4 Golden (January 15th)Persona 3 Portable (January 15th)
Paul McNallyPaul has been around consoles and computers since his parents bought him a Mattel Intellivision. He spent over a decade as editor of popular print-based video games and computer magazines, including a market-leading PlayStation title. Has written gaming content for GamePro, Official Australian PlayStation Magazine, PlayStation Pro, Amiga Action, Mega Action, ST Action, GQ, Loaded, and the Daily Mirror. Former champion shoot ’em-up legend.
The post Microsoft brings 8 big games to Xbox Game Pass in January appeared first on Harmony Evans.
Unsealed Docs Reveal Michael Jackson Visited Epstein’s House in Palm Beach | The Gateway Pundit
As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, Judge Loretta Preska has officially unsealed documents revealing some of Jeffrey Epstein’s high-profile associates.
On page 139 of the unsealed documents, it included a deposition given by Jeffery Epstein victim Johanna Sjoberg.
In the deposition, Sjoberg was asked if she ever met anybody famous when she was with Jeffry Epstein, to which Sjoberg replied Michael Jackson.
Sjoberg continued to share that she met Michael Jackson at Epstein’s home in Palm Beach, Florida.
She was then asked if she had ever given Michael Jackson a massage, to which Sjoberg replied, “No.”
Later in the deposition, Sjoberg noted famed magician David Copperfield also visited Epstein’s home to perform magic tricks.
LOOK:
Per :
One document included a deposition given by Johanna Sjoberg, whom Maxwell allegedly procured for the purpose of performing sex acts on Epstein.
Sjoberg said in her deposition that Epstein “said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls”.
Sjoberg also said that the late musician Michael Jackson was at Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion, as well as the famed magician David Copperfield.
“Did you ever meet anybody famous when you were with Jeffrey? she was asked. “I met Michael Jackson … at [Epstein’s] house in Palm Beach.” Asked whether she massaged Jackson, Sjoberg said: “I did not.”
As for Copperfield, Sjoberg said that he attended dinner at one of Epstein’s homes and “he did some magic tricks”.
Michael Jackson and Stephen Hawking are two names that appear in the Epstein documents. pic.twitter.com/EmdUg26x80
— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) January 4, 2024
The post Unsealed Docs Reveal Michael Jackson Visited Epstein’s House in Palm Beach | The Gateway Pundit appeared first on Harmony Evans.
Analysis: Legal Scholar Asserts U.S. Constitution Disqualifies Nikki Haley from Presidential or Vice-Presidential Candidacy | The Gateway Pundit
Paul Ingrassia, has reignited the fiery debate over what it means to be a “natural born citizen” under the U.S. Constitution—a debate with significant implications for potential presidential candidate Nikki Haley.
Published on American Greatness, Mr. Ingrassia, a Law Clerk, a two-time Claremont Fellow, and a member of President Trump’s National Economic Council, meticulously examined the constitutional provision that has been at the heart of eligibility controversies involving political figures from John McCain to Kamala Harris.
At the core of his argument is Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, which Ingrassia insists unambiguously mandates that only “natural born citizens” of the United States are eligible to assume the presidency.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
The distinction between “natural born citizen” and “birthright citizenship” is central to Ingrassia’s analysis. The former term, he reminds us, is expressly reserved for those born on American soil to U.S. citizen parents, a requirement not emulated for other federal offices. This stringent criterion traces back to the Founding Fathers’ fears of foreign influence at the highest level of government.
The debate isn’t new. Presidential campaigns of John McCain (R), Barack Obama (D), Ted Cruz (R), and Kamala Harris (D) have all faced scrutiny under this clause.
Legal scholars continue to explore this terrain, with some, like Lawrence Solum, suggesting that being born in the U.S. to citizen parents suffices for being considered a natural-born citizen.
John Eastman’s arguments regarding Kamala Harris further highlight the complexity of this issue, proposing that the status of one’s parents at birth is crucial in determining eligibility.
In Nikki Haley’s situation, reports indicate that her parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of her birth in 1972. This fact, according to the Constitution’s standards as interpreted by Ingrassia, disqualifies her from presidential or vice-presidential candidacy under the Twelfth Amendment.
Ingrassia highlights that although she may claim citizenship by birthplace, this does not satisfy the ‘natural-born’ requirement as enforced by the Constitution.
The discussion, Ingrassia notes, diverges from the precedent of Wong Kim Ark, where the Supreme Court addressed birthright citizenship but did not conflate this with the specific breed of natural-born citizenship needed for presidential eligibility.
American Greatness reported:
In Nikki Haley’s case, it is well documented that neither one of her parents were citizens, natural born or naturalized, at the time of her birth in 1972. It has been previously reported that a South Carolina-based newspaper included a quote from the Office of Nikki Haley, stating that “her parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of her birth in 1972 and did not become citizens until 1978 and 2003.”
Thus, although the parents may have been lawful residents at the time of her birth on South Carolina soil, which may or may not confer her with the privileges of citizenship, it is important to note that she does not qualify for the Constitution’s higher requirement of natural-born citizenship.
In addition, the Twelfth Amendment states that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.” In short, because Haley is ineligible to serve as president, having not satisfied the Presidential Eligibility Clause, she also cannot serve as vice president. Now, the vast majority of legal scholarship offering an opinion to the contrary will cite the seminal Supreme Court decision, Wong Kim Ark. The relevant issue there, however, was not whether someone whose natural born citizenship was in question might serve in the highest office of the land, but rather whether such a person was entitled to the bare minimums of American citizenship.
Thus, the legal issues are completely different. The Court in Wong Kim Ark decided whether citizenship might be conferred upon an individual born on American soil to non-citizen parents. Importantly, in Wong Kim Ark, nowhere does the Court ever state that natural-born citizens are synonymous with citizens. While numerous equivalences are made between “natural-born” citizens (or “subjects;” the terms are used interchangeably throughout, even though there is a relevant legal distinction) and citizens, the Court notably took pains to distinguish between the two categories, merely analogizing the two for the purposes of ultimately arguing in favor of birthright citizenship.
Regardless of the ultimate legitimacy of the decision, which many constitutional scholars have contested over the intervening years, the important takeaway is that even in Wong Kim Ark, the supposed authority in favor of Haley’s eligibility to run for president, the Court never asserted that birthright citizenship would hereinafter absorb and eradicate the distinct category of “natural-born” citizenship.
It may well be argued that the reason the Court in Wong Kim Ark upheld that distinction was that it contemplated future cases like Nikki Haley’s, where a non-natural-born citizen might ask not merely for the bare minimum rights of citizenship but additional rights, namely the right to be eligible to run for president, which runs afoul of both the textual prerogative and original meaning of the Constitution itself.
The logic of this is intuitive: the bare necessities of American citizenship, consistent with the principles of natural right, do not entail that additional rights must be conferred on that basis alone. Nature, in other words, does not automatically confer one with the presidential office nor the bare minimum duties, such as age and time residing in the country, requirements that the Framers wrote into the Presidential Eligibility Clause.
You can read the whole article at American Greatness.
Source link
The post Analysis: Legal Scholar Asserts U.S. Constitution Disqualifies Nikki Haley from Presidential or Vice-Presidential Candidacy | The Gateway Pundit appeared first on Harmony Evans.
Disney’s Steamboat Willie no longer charming animated relic as horror game planned
It has taken less than a day since the earliest version of Disney’s most famous mouse became Public Domain.
After almost a century of holding the Copyright, Steamboat Willie is ours (almost) to do with as we like (almost) and the internet has gone into full production mode turning the once-loved dancing mouse into a plethora of absurd and frightening creations, that were never quite in the original ‘mood’ of the poor black and white rodent.
Infestation 88 from Nightmare Forge Games appeared almost instantly the character turned PD and features a very similar Steamboat Willie as one of its bad guys. The game is a co-op horror pitching you as an exterminator treating sinister infestations caused by “twisted versions of classic characters and urban legends.” It’s not all the mouse, although Willie features heavily in the trailer. Toot toot. No release date as yet other than 2024, but it’s unlikely to be another Tears of the Kingdom so it will be out sooner rather than later.
Besides video games it seems there is a movie on the way – a horror flick of course, where Steamboat Willie turns slasher. Mickey’s Mouse Trap (that title could still be asking for trouble) appeared as a trailer, again almost instantaneously.
Musically, it took just minutes to turn Steamboat Willie’s famous whistle into a dubstep remix and there will be so much more to follow.
We have been here beforeIn 2022 AA Milne’s Winnie the Pooh also entered the public domain, bringing with it another horror film, Blood and Honey. While Pooh himself remains copyright-free, aspects of his look such as his red shirt are trademarked to Disney, so cannot be used.
The full ramifications of Steamboat Willie’s transition into the Public Domain may not yet be apparent. Copyright cannot be reapplied but Disney could potentially apply for a trademark for the world’s oldest animated mouse.
Paul McNallyPaul has been around consoles and computers since his parents bought him a Mattel Intellivision. He spent over a decade as editor of popular print-based video games and computer magazines, including a market-leading PlayStation title. Has written gaming content for GamePro, Official Australian PlayStation Magazine, PlayStation Pro, Amiga Action, Mega Action, ST Action, GQ, Loaded, and the Daily Mirror. Former champion shoot ’em-up legend.
Source link
The post Disney’s Steamboat Willie no longer charming animated relic as horror game planned appeared first on Harmony Evans.
Trump-Hating “Comedian” Jimmy Kimmel FLIPS OUT After New York Jets Quarterback Aaron Rodgers Teases that He is on Jeffrey Epstein’s Client List (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
Credit: USA Today
As Gateway Pundit readers know, Jim Hoft dropped a bombshell two weeks ago that 177 of Jeffrey Epstein’s high-profile associates are in for a New Year’s surprise as they will be named in court documents. This will arrive sometime this week.
While most of the speculation has centered on former President Bill Clinton, who is to be named as “Doe 36” in “more than fifty redacted filings, there could be an unexpected name that surfaces as well.
New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers went on the Pat McAfee show Tuesday and made stunning news that is sending shockwaves across social media: he suggested that “comedian” Jimmy Kimmel was on Epstein’s list. Yes, the same Kimmel infamous for his vile Trump-bashing rants on his ABC last night show and for getting his a** kicked by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) in basketball.
“There’s a lot of people, including Jimmy Kimmel, are really hoping that doesn’t come out,” Rodgers said.
“I’ll tell you what, if that list comes out, I definitely will be popping some sort of bottle,” he continued.
WATCH:
NEW: Quarterback Aaron Rodgers says he will pop “some sort of bottle” when the Epstein associates list is released and suggests Jimmy Kimmel will be named.
Everyone is excited
“There’s a lot of people, including Jimmy Kimmel are really hoping that doesn’t come out.”
“I’ll… pic.twitter.com/JRzjznVM7T
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) January 2, 2024
Was Rodgers trolling, or does he have some inside information about the despicable Trump-hater? We will find out soon.
Kimmel responded by flipping out on X. He angrily denied any contact with Epstein while colorfully insulting Rodgers, calling the quarterback an “assh**le” and “soft-brained wacko.”
He then accused the quarterback of endangering his family and threatened legal action.
Dear Aasshole: for the record, I’ve not met, flown with, visited, or had any contact whatsoever with Epstein, nor will you find my name on any “list” other than the clearly-phony nonsense that soft-brained wackos like yourself can’t seem to distinguish from reality. Your reckless… https://t.co/p8eug12uiS
— Jimmy Kimmel (@jimmykimmel) January 2, 2024
X users had a field day with Kimmel’s meltdown, and some made sure to bring up arguably his most infamous moment: dressing up as NBA Hall of Famer Karl Malone in blackface.
It seems like Jimmy Kimmel is in panic mode right now pic.twitter.com/mnRMRdlX2L
— DEL (@delinthecity_) January 2, 2024
Remember this too? pic.twitter.com/9ns1A7CiSh
— Swervin³² (@Swervin32_) January 2, 2024
Haha jimmy knows he cooked
— Bama on Dat Azz 23’ (@AzzzWhippin) January 2, 2024
I think he just violated your HIPPA rights
— Three Year Letterman (@3YearLetterman) January 2, 2024
Because you went in blackface as Karl Malone?
— Jonathan Grella (@JonathanGrella) January 2, 2024
You seem rattled Jimmy!!!!
— kohlarr (!puff)Ape-
(@kohlarr_) January 2, 2024
Next time keep Rodgers’ name out ya mouth, you virtue signaling hypocrite.
You sound more nervous than funny in this clip. pic.twitter.com/M45gHOflcL
— Jay Frazzledrip (@jayfrazzledrip) January 2, 2024
The unveiling of the Epstein client list has become one of the most anticipated events in years. Let’s hope the perpetrators on the list are then held accountable for their disgraceful actions.
The post Trump-Hating “Comedian” Jimmy Kimmel FLIPS OUT After New York Jets Quarterback Aaron Rodgers Teases that He is on Jeffrey Epstein’s Client List (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit appeared first on Harmony Evans.
Bitcoin soars above $45,000 in New Year rally, eyes on SEC for ETF approvals
The cryptocurrency market kicked off the new year with a bang as Bitcoin surged past the $45,000 mark for the first time since early April 2022, recording a significant 7% increase on the first day of the year. This bullish trend in Bitcoin’s price is largely attributed to the growing anticipation surrounding the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s expected approval of several spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds.
A recent Reuters report hinted that the SEC might start approving applications for Bitcoin ETFs as early as this week, fueling investor optimism and driving the price surge. At the time of writing, Bitcoin’s value stands at an impressive $45,672, marking a 7% increase over the last 24 hours, according to CoinMarketCap.
The positive momentum wasn’t limited to Bitcoin alone. The broader cryptocurrency market also experienced notable gains. Ether (ETH), the second-largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, saw a 4.87% increase, while other popular altcoins like Solana (SOL) and Avalanche (AVAX) jumped by 10% and 8% respectively.
The potential approval of Bitcoin ETFs by the SEC is a significant development for the cryptocurrency industry. It represents a major step toward mainstream acceptance and could potentially open the doors for more institutional investors to enter the crypto market. ETFs are seen as a safer and more regulated investment vehicle, which could attract investors who have been hesitant to directly invest in cryptocurrencies due to concerns about volatility and regulatory uncertainty.
This latest rally in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies indicates a positive start to the year for the crypto market, which had experienced a turbulent 2022-23. Investors and enthusiasts will be closely watching the SEC’s moves in the coming days, as any official announcements regarding the approval of Bitcoin ETFs could further influence market dynamics.
Maxwell WilliamMaxwell William, a seasoned crypto journalist and content strategist, has notably contributed to industry-leading platforms such as Cointelegraph, OKX Insights, and Decrypt, weaving complex crypto narratives into insightful articles that resonate with a broad readership.
Source link
The post Bitcoin soars above $45,000 in New Year rally, eyes on SEC for ETF approvals appeared first on Harmony Evans.
January 2, 2024
Wisconsin and Pennsylvania Highlights from Explosive “Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States” | The Gateway Pundit
Earlier today, President Trump Truth’d out an all-inclusive summary report of the 2020 Election and the anomalies and discrepancies in the six key swing states. Earlier today, The Gateway Pundit published an article highlighting some of the key takeaways from Georgia that can be read here.
Here, we will focus on Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. The 32-page anonymous report can be read in its entirety at the bottom of this article.
WisconsinThe Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law,in a 4-3 decision issued in July 2022Wisconsin Election Commissioner Meagan Wolfe unilaterally declared ballot
drop boxes could be used to vote in 2020 elections, even though “WEC’s
commissioners never voted to adopt this memo.”In the city of Milwaukee, nearly half of all its votes were cast by mail, totaling
217,424 ballots. The city deployed 15 drop boxes, with election officials
claiming the drop boxes would be “under 24-hour surveillance.” However,
after the election, not a single municipality in the county produced video
surveillance of drop boxes in response to open records requestsIn 2020 there was a surge of “indefinitely confined” votes in Wisconsin, resulting
in 220,404 votes cast from individuals who were exempted from showing voter
ID. This surge of suspect votes was due to Democrat election clerks giving
advice that was deemed illegal after the election, instructing voters to identify
themselves as disabled during the COVID pandemic to avoid voter ID lawsScott McDonell, the Democrat clerk of Dane County, which encompasses the
area of Madison, told all residents they could identify themselves as indefinitely
confined because of COVID, specifically citing it as a way to get around the
Voter ID lawIndefinitely confined voters, who are supposed to be physically unable to go to
the polls due to age, disability, or illness, increased by an astounding 393 percent
in Dane County from 2016 to 2020; 492 percent in Racine County; 281 percent
in Milwaukee County; and 287 percent in the state overallThere were just 56,978 indefinitely confined votes in 2016, and roughly 70,000
in 2019. In 2020, however, there were 220,404 votes cast using indefinite
confinement status. Over 77 percent of these individuals had never been listed as
indefinitely confined before. The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau identified
48,554 people who voted as indefinitely confined in November 2020 who had
never provided photo identification or did not have photo identifications on file
with clerks, which is more than twice the vote margin of 20,682The Wisconsin Election Commission ordered nursing homes to violate the law
by not allowing Special Voting Deputies (SVDs) inside their facilities, which led
to election fraud where incapacitated elderly residents had votes cast in their
name with the assistance of nursing home staffThe Office of Special Counsel’s second interim report found nursing homes in
Milwaukee, Dane, and Racine counties with 100 percent turnout due to the
Wisconsin Election Commission’s orderInternal emails from election officials in Green Bay revealed Michael Spitzer Rubenstein, a former Democratic Party operative, served as a “de facto elections
administrator and had access to Green Bay’s absentee ballots days before the
election.”The Office of the Special Counsel referenced this case, and has evidence that this
grantee, which was funded by CTCL, was “directly involved in all aspects of
management of election officials, was entrusted with the only sets of physical
keys to the city’s central count location, managed the transportation of ballots,
and instructed the counting of unlawful ballots that had arrived at the central
count location beyond the lawful time window.”
Not mentioned in the report: Investigator Peter Bernegger disclosed in a Senate hearing last month that the Executive Director of Elections in Milwaukee, Claire Woodall-Vogg, not only returned to grab a USB stick left behind, leaving law enforcement suspicious, but also had a “huge truckload of ballots” arrive long after the polls were closed and while observers were forced out, similar to in Fulton County, Georgia. You can read that article from The Gateway Pundit here.
PennsylvaniaMonths after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, accordingto the Pennsylvania Department of State. By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an
election with this type of discrepancyRepublican lawmakers, led by State Representative Frank Ryan, were tracking
the vote discrepancy in real time in the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors
(SURE) system. Ryan, a certified public accountant, initially reported that there
were 170,830 more votes than voters in the Presidential race, more than twice the
margin in Pennsylvania. “These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged
certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely
premature, unconfirmed, and in error,” the lawmakers saidThe Pennsylvania Department of State’s office called this “obvious
misinformation,” while admitting the “only way to determine the number of
voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote
histories,” which they said Philadelphia, Allegheny, and other counties had still
not completed — an admission the election was certified without ensuring the
number of voters and votes matched in the SURE system. The election was
certified on Nov. 24, 2020, and the Department of State’s statement came on
Dec. 29, 2020Pennsylvania credited 71,893 people for voting who returned mail-in ballots
after Election Day, and these individuals were included in the voter history files.
This includes 50,285 received between Nov. 4 and Nov. 6; 11,570 received
between Nov. 7 and Nov. 11; and 10,038 that were received on or after Nov. 12.
[then-Sec of State] Boockvar claimed only 10,000 ballots were received between the close of the
polls on Election Day and Nov. 6Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $25 million into the administration of
the election in Pennsylvania in 2020. Over $10 million went to the Democrat-
controlled jurisdiction of Philadelphia, which included $5.5 million on “ballot
processing equipment” and $552,000 for drop boxes.A lawsuit filed in Delaware County revealed video evidence of election officials
discussing destroying election evidence from the November 2020 Election.63
“It’s a felony,” one official says after talking about the need to “get rid” of voting
“pads and second scanners.” Sources involved in the litigation alleged the
Delaware County officials violated numerous election laws and that the
destruction of records was “done to ensure records eventually provided actually
matched the election results that were reported in Nov. 2020.”
Not mentioned in the report: USPS-contracted trucker Jesse Morgan reported his trailer disappeared while transporting 24 gaylords of completed ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. Estimates claim the 24 gaylords (pallets) could contain between 130,000 and 280,000 ballots. A recently released and, of course, highly redacted report from the USPS Office of the Inspector General vindicated Morgan but claimed he underestimated the number of ballots and identified the wrong trailer number. You can read that article from The Gateway Pundit here.
Next, we will cover the highlights from the summary report regarding Michigan and Arizona.
summary20of20election20frau… by CannCon
Source link
The post Wisconsin and Pennsylvania Highlights from Explosive “Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States” | The Gateway Pundit appeared first on Harmony Evans.
X Holdings faces 71.5% valuation cut by Fidelity following turbulent year
Fidelity Investments, a major mutual fund company, has significantly reduced its valuation of X Holdings, the parent company of X (formerly known as Twitter), now under the ownership of Elon Musk. According to TechCrunch, the latest disclosure reveals a drastic 71.5% markdown from the original investment value, signaling potential concerns about the company’s future prospects.
In October 2022, Fidelity invested $19.2 million in X Holdings. However, by October 2023, the fund manager had already cut the valuation by 65%. The recent November 2023 disclosure, which operates on a one-month delay, indicates a further reduction in X’s valuation.
X Holdings has experienced numerous changes over the past year, including appointing a new CEO, Linda Yaccarino, a former executive at NBCUniversal. Yaccarino, in a September 2023 interview at the Code Conference, expressed optimism about the company’s profitability by 2024.
Despite these changes, X Holdings faces significant challenges, particularly in retaining and attracting advertisers. Several major advertisers withdrew from the platform following controversial statements by Elon Musk, including Apple, Comcast/NBCUniversal, Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, IBM, Paramount Global, Lionsgate, and the European Commission. Musk’s response to the advertising boycott was blunt and dismissive, as he publicly told advertisers to “go fuck themselves” at the Dealbook Conference.
In response to these setbacks, X Holdings is reportedly shifting its focus to small and medium businesses, aiming to encourage them to invest in advertising on the platform. This strategic pivot comes amid reports from the Financial Times in December that X will experience a significant drop in ad revenue, although the company contests the New York Times’ claim of a $75 million loss, estimating it to be around $10-12 million.
Under Elon Musk’s leadership at X Holdings, he has controversially reinstated previously banned accounts, including those of Alex Jones, Kanye West, Donald Trump, Andrew Tat, and Jordan Peterson.
Maxwell WilliamMaxwell William, a seasoned crypto journalist and content strategist, has notably contributed to industry-leading platforms such as Cointelegraph, OKX Insights, and Decrypt, weaving complex crypto narratives into insightful articles that resonate with a broad readership.
Source link
The post X Holdings faces 71.5% valuation cut by Fidelity following turbulent year appeared first on Harmony Evans.
YOU THINK SO? View Co-Host Says Removing Trump From Ballots Will Create Appearance of ‘a Rigged Election’ (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
Sara Haines, a co-host on ‘The View’ said this week that removing Trump from ballots would create the appearance of a rigged election. As the old saying goes, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
As Haines made her case, the other hosts kept trying to talk over her, mostly Joy Behar, who clearly disagreed and wants Trump kept off of ballots.
Behar’s opinion is typical of the far left. They can blather on endlessly about our sacred democracy yet see nothing wrong with this at all.
FOX News reports:
‘View’ host says Democrats taking Trump off state ballots will create appearance of ‘a rigged election’
On Tuesday’s “The View”, Haines argued these efforts would cause more division and reinforce Trump’s position that Democrats are trying to interfere in the 2024 election.
Haines said she agreed with former Obama adviser David Axelrod and Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom’s arguments that Democrats must beat Trump at the polls instead.
“The point I would say here is, I actually agree with Governor Gavin Newsom and David Axelrod, these are Democrats, leading Democrats that say, this would really cause a division that’s almost insurmountable,” Haines began.
The co-host said she believed voters should be the ones to deny Trump re-election. She predicted the U.S. Supreme Court would overturn these rulings in a 9-0 vote.
“I think the division this will cause, because what will happen is, that martyrdom will be one step more. We have a nation that doesn’t believe in democracy, doesn’t believe in voting, everyone that loses says it was rigged and failed. I think this will create a vision, a visual to people that this was a rigged election. I do,” Haines argued.
Here’s the video:
The View’s Sara Haines says that Trump being removed from the ballot “will create a vision, a visual to people that this was a rigged election.”
— The Post Millennial (@TPostMillennial) January 2, 2024
The Supreme Court should overturn these decisions and it should be a unanimous vote.
The post YOU THINK SO? View Co-Host Says Removing Trump From Ballots Will Create Appearance of ‘a Rigged Election’ (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit appeared first on Harmony Evans.
