John

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about John.

https://john-shelburne.notion.site
https://www.goodreads.com/thecatfix

The King of Diamo...
Rate this book
Clear rating

progress: 
 
  (90%)
"I was captivated by the first half of this book, but things quickly took a turn. The author starts making bold accusations against some of Dallas' most well-known figures, and the story devolves into nothing more than gossip and speculation. It’s a huge letdown after such an engaging start." Dec 23, 2024 06:46AM

 
The Vapors: A Sou...

John John said: " First Impressions -

For me, the most striking part of "The Vapors" is how personal and local history converges with broader social narratives. Reading this book felt like peeling back layers of a forgotten past, especially meaningful given my kids' co
...more "

 
Business Model Ge...
John is currently reading
by Alexander Osterwalder (Goodreads Author)
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
See all 60 books that John is reading…
Book cover for Coders at Work: Reflections on the Craft of Programming
Seibel: So you started out saying software reuse is “appallingly bad,” but opening up every black box and fiddling with it all hardly seems like movement toward reusing software. Armstrong: I think the lack of reusability comes in ...more
John
Just heard the same quote when describing problems with npm
Loading...
Kevin Rodgers
“If you think about it, that is surprising, since – these days at least – a bank is in essence nothing more than a lot of people and a collection of legal contracts represented on some very complex computer systems. Put simplistically, banks are just people and computers; all the rest is nice to have but not essential. If that statement surprises you, consider this: virtually all the money you get paid, save or spend is not physical in any sense whatsoever but is merely an abstract representation in ones and zeros on some bank’s computer system somewhere.”
Kevin Rodgers, Why Aren't They Shouting?: A Banker’s Tale of Change, Computers and Perpetual Crisis

Phil Knight
“He’s one of the best storytellers in the history of Nike. My favorite, naturally, is the one about the day we went public. He sat his parents down and told them the news. “What does that mean?” they whispered. “It means your original eight-thousand-dollar loan to Phil is worth $1.6 million.” They looked at each other, looked at Woodell. “I don’t understand,” his mother said. If you can’t trust the company your son works for, who can you trust?”
Phil Knight, Shoe Dog

Michael   Lewis
“The desire to avoid loss ran deep, and expressed itself most clearly when the gamble came with the possibility of both loss and gain. That is, when it was like most gambles in life. To get most people to flip a coin for a hundred bucks, you had to offer them far better than even odds. If they were going to lose $100 if the coin landed on heads, they would need to win $200 if it landed on tails. To get them to flip a coin for ten thousand bucks, you had to offer them even better odds than you offered them for flipping it for a hundred. “The greater sensitivity to negative rather than positive changes is not specific to monetary outcomes,” wrote Amos and Danny. “It reflects a general property of the human organism as a pleasure machine. For most people, the happiness involved in receiving a desirable object is smaller than the unhappiness involved in losing the same object.” It wasn’t hard to imagine why this might be—a heightened sensitivity to pain was helpful to survival. “Happy species endowed with infinite appreciation of pleasures and low sensitivity to pain would probably not survive the evolutionary battle,” they wrote.”
Michael Lewis, The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds

Michael   Lewis
“That was the moment I gave up on decision analysis,” said Danny. “No one ever made a decision because of a number. They need a story.” As Danny and Lanir wrote, decades later, after the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency asked them to describe their experience in decision analysis, the Israeli Foreign Ministry was “indifferent to the specific probabilities.”
Michael Lewis, The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds

Michael   Lewis
“The trouble, Danny suspected, was that “the understanding of numbers is so weak that they don’t communicate anything. Everyone feels that those probabilities are not real—that they are just something on somebody’s mind.”
Michael Lewis, The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds

year in books
Wade Pitts
111 books | 94 friends

Cynthia
232 books | 71 friends

Bob Hall
78 books | 129 friends

Christi...
52 books | 165 friends

Sven Ge...
1 book | 6 friends

Tysie
323 books | 79 friends

Craig
1,201 books | 42 friends

Kate Po...
333 books | 124 friends

More friends…



Polls voted on by John

Lists liked by John