Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
discussion
Does anyone else besides me hate Harry Potter?

That is totaly true!!! Both of you have a great opinion on these things. :)


I agree with this statement and similar ones.

Yeah, that's one of the things I love most about Harry Potter. There's so many different levels and ways to interpret it that every time I open the book I gain a new understanding of it. From the time when I first started reading it, to now, to in the future, the books open my eyes to new things. That's why I know that, like it or not, me and the majority of the people on this earth will remember Harry Potter for a long, long time.

http://idolwars.blogspot.com


So, overall: Don't judge the books until you've read them, and at least try to get involved with them, OK?

Wow. How far did you even get into the series? The first page? Maybe the first chapter? The thing is, you have to go a bit deeper than the words to appreciate Harry Potter, to see the brilliance and complexity of the plot and characters. Most people I know who don't like Harry Potter don't like it because they don't have the attention span to get into it and appreciate it. So, instead of insulting the readers, try looking at why you don't like it. What does the answer say about you?

That goes for the creator of this discussion topic. If you don't care for a book, great! But elaborate on why you don't like the ..."
Agreed.

Sorry. A lot of first books are like that. They need to build a foundation for the rest of the series. Personally, I like the first book, and it's amazing how, reading the seventh, you can see tie ins to the first.
The thing about the plot- it's not generally a good idea to judge a book, especially the first of the series, by it's conflict. Can you imagine if Harry defeated Voldemort permanently in the first book? Where's the buildup? The emotional connection with the character? The complexity and feel of the resolution? If Harry had killed Voldemort in the first book, you would probably still be commenting on how stupid it was, but I think you would have a better basis.
Also, if you go more in depth, you'll find there's a lot more to even the first book than you see at first glance. I'm a fanatic- I've read the series ten times- and every time I see something I hadn't noticed before.


Are you sure you weren't influenced by those around you in the negative direction? What's this about kid-friendly vocabulary? One of the primary sources of learning new vocabulary is from reading books. So what are you trying to say? Keep the kids at the level they're at? Two terms: context definitions and dictionaries. I read the series for the first time in second grade, and it was kid-friendly enough for me. Challenging vocabulary is a good thing.
I also can't understand why you said it made you feel "dirty." Are we talking about the same series? The only parts I can think of that might merit that description are Voldemort scenes. No, Harry doesn't face some goofy, silly villain- he faces real evil. I think the books do a good job of showing this without going too far into description.
I totally agree with your point that just because something is popular doesn't make it good, in reading as well as life. However, that doesn't mean that everything popular is drivel, or terrible. I realize you're countering comments that "why would so many people like it if it isn't good?" which are ridiculous.
Another point that I would like to bring to your attention, is that proclaiming an extremely popular series as "drivel" may alienate you from those around you.
There's a lot of good in those books; if you can try to see it, you might understand where we're coming from.
Doe (Dominique) wrote: "I absolutely love the Harry Potter series, and always have. I read the fifth book in second grade -_-‘ I’ve read all of them so many times that my friends and family make fun of me. I think that J...."
Even though I adore this book series, I am a huge Harry Potter fan, I feel the need to disagree with that last sentence. If you don't like a book or series, you by all means can tell why or what could have been better; it is just the saying "I don't like it," and not giving a reason that is irritating. J.K Rowling probably wouldn't have made such brilliant books like Harry Potter without some contrasting input. Therefore, it's just saying you don't like something and not giving a reason that seems stupid and idiotic to me.
Even though I adore this book series, I am a huge Harry Potter fan, I feel the need to disagree with that last sentence. If you don't like a book or series, you by all means can tell why or what could have been better; it is just the saying "I don't like it," and not giving a reason that is irritating. J.K Rowling probably wouldn't have made such brilliant books like Harry Potter without some contrasting input. Therefore, it's just saying you don't like something and not giving a reason that seems stupid and idiotic to me.


Are you sure you weren't influenced by those around you in the negative direction? What's this about kid-friendly vocabulary? One of the primary sources of learning new vocabulary is from re..."
Sorry about that- I realized that night what she meant. Whoops. Yes, the swearing is a problem, though, unfortunately, it is pretty true to teenage boy vocabulary. I read the series to my little brother, and just bleeped out any cussing. I'm glad that there isn't too much, considering some books I've tried to read, and, if it really bugs someone, white out works great. I don't think the whole book should be disregarded because of a few unfortunate, but thankfully somewhat mild, words.

I have heard of a few people who've read the books and didn't like them, but I agree; many have only read the first book. I don't think we should reject anyone's opinions, but I do agree with above that they should at least give us reasons.






Okay that was dramatic.

Sounds like a problem on your end. It wasn't meant as an insult. Are you suggesting the being a kid is somehow lesser than not being one? Because I would argue that being a kid is a lot more fun! :]



I figured, I was just playing along :P

Your either a kid or a troll.
(sorry about the awful spelling)

i wouldnt call her an idiot, i mean, i love harry potter, but we're all alowed our opinion

It has, the plot stays the same: good has to defeat bad.
But why most people - who you would call idiots btw - love the series, is because HP changes with the reader, he gets older, more mature, more experienced.
But not only does HP grows, but so does the storyline. The four first book are independent novels. From book five to book seven, is actually the real series, or better yet, the trilogy... You cannot read book seven without reading book five or six.
Note also that J.K.Rowling's writing grows and matures... The phrases evoluate from short, childish and easy to read and understand to phrases who are more 'YA-ish', a tad bit more complicated, but it makes the books so much more interesting...
You should read the series again, but not in the superficial way, or in a 'blèh, I hate HP because it doesn't have a plotline but I read it anyway because that MR chick told me so' way. No, you have to be openminded, you have to dissect the series, analyse it word for word, think about it and if you have done so and only then, you can come back and tell us if you liked it or not. We will agree with you not liking it, but you have to at least explain why...
You cannot make a statement and not argue why you have that point of view.

Haha you missed my point, I wasn't calling her an idiot as my opinion i was just saying her first post was grammatically wrong because by her own logic she would be one of those idiots. (:
Ruby wrote: "I wish I never read Harry Potter. Then I'd have something to look foward to in life! :(
Okay that was dramatic."
wow, really? >:-(
Okay that was dramatic."
wow, really? >:-(
Mary Rose wrote: "Kayla wrote: "The stupid book has no point at all! Only complete idiots would read Harry Potter!"
It has, the plot stays the same: good has to defeat bad.
But why most people - who you would call..."
Agreed. Kayla, just read the fine print of the book.
It has, the plot stays the same: good has to defeat bad.
But why most people - who you would call..."
Agreed. Kayla, just read the fine print of the book.


Okay that was dramatic."
wow, really? >:-("
What?

It has, the plot stays the same: good has to defeat bad.
But why most people - ..."
Yeah....People hate it with a passion....but have they read it? ...

But after reading the first book, I just felt annoyed at myself for not picking it up sooner, because it's like the best book ever!!!!! And I need to contradict myself and say EVERYTHING ABOUT WIZARDS AND MAGIC IS SPESHULLL...

Either way…WTF??
This whole thing was (not so originally) created by some narcissistic dumbass with delusions of grandeur who thought: “If I write: “Anyone who likes (INPUT POPULAR BOOK HERE) are idiots”, I will get 1000+ hits by tomorrow.
And sadly, you have all fallen prey to this idiot and proved him or her right. SMH…
I know that you are all smarter than this, so just ignore the dumbass and continue on with your lives. Chances are they will go away. And if they don’t, well f*ck em’, he can’t argue with himself…
(still shaking my head….)—I can’t believe you fell for this bull—so sad...
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
This Man (other topics)
Never Too Far (other topics)
King Rat (other topics)
A Game of Thrones (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
Isn't It Pretty To Think So? (other topics)This Man (other topics)
Never Too Far (other topics)
King Rat (other topics)
A Game of Thrones (other topics)
More...
Very well said! I completely agree. I started reading the books when I was about 7, I think, and loved them as well.
Also, I don't think I've ever heard of a book that's appealed to such a wide audience, either...