Science Skepticism Books
Showing 1-50 of 289

by (shelved 12 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.29 — 79,085 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 8 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.86 — 9,962 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 6 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.02 — 4,034 ratings — published 1982

by (shelved 6 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.16 — 190,229 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 5 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.40 — 156,713 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 5 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.34 — 38,944 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 4 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.94 — 30,467 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 4 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.29 — 10,667 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 4 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.90 — 280,650 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 4 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.09 — 41,353 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 4 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.21 — 471,057 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 4 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.01 — 120,791 ratings — published 1859

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.02 — 5,001 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.82 — 845 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.06 — 44,567 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.04 — 5,765 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.19 — 25,848 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.19 — 21,269 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.91 — 3,055 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.98 — 7,933 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.16 — 55,714 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.22 — 415,815 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.99 — 5,432 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.90 — 198 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.94 — 594 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.17 — 7,873 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.74 — 2,247 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.75 — 591 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.75 — 1,285 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.04 — 448,994 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.14 — 10,743 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.99 — 42,110 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.03 — 579 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.01 — 22,373 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.09 — 25,152 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.85 — 59,786 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.06 — 76,827 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.10 — 32,007 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.01 — 11,457 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.15 — 28,529 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.90 — 1,201 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.55 — 791 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.16 — 29,365 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.04 — 28,826 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.82 — 7,764 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.93 — 7,627 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.12 — 1,341 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 3.86 — 37,494 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.05 — 27,151 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as science-skepticism)
avg rating 4.05 — 10,833 ratings — published 1979
“There was a time when the public had an unquestionable faith in biomedicine and the practitioners who translated it into everyday patient care—and physicians believed that the public's trust was justified based on their educational qualifications and training. But today, many patients believe that individual clinicians must earn their trust, just as a close relative has earned it through shared experience.
...Gallop polling over the last several decades that demonstrates how much the public's confidence in most US institutions has deteriorated. Confidence in the medical system in particular fell from 80% in 1975 to 37% in 2015. Statistics from the General Social Survey confirm this troubling trend. Baron and Berinsky explain the historical reasons for this shift in attitudes, but the more pressing question is: How can individual clinicians, and the profession as a whole, regain the patients' trust? ”
― Reinventing Clinical Decision Support: Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Diagnostic Reasoning
...Gallop polling over the last several decades that demonstrates how much the public's confidence in most US institutions has deteriorated. Confidence in the medical system in particular fell from 80% in 1975 to 37% in 2015. Statistics from the General Social Survey confirm this troubling trend. Baron and Berinsky explain the historical reasons for this shift in attitudes, but the more pressing question is: How can individual clinicians, and the profession as a whole, regain the patients' trust? ”
― Reinventing Clinical Decision Support: Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Diagnostic Reasoning