Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming” as Want to Read:
Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming

4.18  ·  Rating details ·  6,098 ratings  ·  764 reviews
The U.S. scientific community has long led the world in research on such areas as public health, environmental science, and issues affecting quality of life. Our scientists have produced landmark studies on the dangers of DDT, tobacco smoke, acid rain, and global warming. But at the same time, a small yet potent subset of this community leads the world in vehement denial o ...more
Hardcover, 274 pages
Published May 25th 2010 by Bloomsbury Press
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Merchants of Doubt, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
Buyi There is an audible version. There is also a dvd movie version

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.18  · 
Rating details
 ·  6,098 ratings  ·  764 reviews

More filters
Sort order
Start your review of Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming
About a week ago, Not and I were browsing in a Melbourne bookstore when I noticed Merchants of Doubt. "Should we buy it?" I asked, after glancing at the back cover. Not was unenthusiastic. "It'll be one of those books," she said - by which, as I immediately understood, she meant that it would be another partisan book about a hot topic, which dishonestly reported one side of a complicated and unclear debate while ignoring the other side.

"So what kind of book would you buy?" I asked. "The kind I'
Nicole R
I am a scientist. I have a PhD in biological sciences and spent the vast majority of my 20's studying the impacts of a marine invasives species and how climate change facilitates the spread of these non-native species. I hold research scientists in high regard even though my career path has ventured down a different path. For a few years I worked on The Hill where science was politicized and attacked, and now I work with the general public as I struggle to get the average person to understand an ...more
Apr 27, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science, history
Impossible to recommend this one too highly. A testament to the power of cognitive dissonance, is my reading of this. This is the story of a group of physicists who helped to build the atomic bomb to help defend free enterprise. Unlike many of those who worked with them on this project (that later went on to see the bomb as the world’s greatest threat to our continued existence and therefore who tried to remove this threat by then working to ban the bomb) they spent the rest of their careers tal ...more
Simon Clark
Aug 10, 2020 rated it it was amazing
One of the absolutely essential reads on climate change and quite how we got into the mess of denialism at the very highest level of government that we're in today. In a sentence, the book documents the same playbook used by various industries from tobacco to foster doubt in the minds of consumers, allowing these industries to continue operating.

It is an incredibly frustrating, depressing read and a cautionary tale about the power of unchecked information and unchecked capitalism. As well as a
David Rubenstein
Jun 12, 2011 rated it it was amazing
This is a truly impressive book. The subtitle really says it all; "How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming". The authors did an immense amount of research, revealing how and why a small group of scientists had such a powerful, and negative impact on important issues. The issues were: the danger of cigarette smoke, strategic defense, acid rain, secondhand smoke, the ozone hole, global warming, and the recent vilification of Rachel Carson. The ...more
Jul 25, 2011 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science
I would first like to comment on the idea that a "small group of people" caused all of this. I think that is misleading, and the subtitle of the book is misleading. Here is a list of just some people and groups that I think help all of these attacks on science and reason to happen:

1. Corporations like Phillip Morris, Exxon, Monsanto, Dow Chemical. The list can go on. I say those names and I am stunned by what appears to me the total greed and lack of morality they can exhibit. I belong to a Viet
Clif Hostetler
Dec 30, 2013 rated it really liked it
Shelves: current-events
I used to believe that selling one's soul to the devil was something that only happened in fictional stories. This book makes it clear that it's a real life option for credentialed scientists who accept salaries and research grants from businesses with interests in obfuscating the truth by covering it with questions.

The book provides a history of the battle between economic interests versus health and environmental interests. The topics covered by the book are well summarized by the seven chapt
Maru Kun
The story begins, where else, with smoking - that ur-science denial project which spawned many of the weapons of modern-day sowing of doubt. Amazingly denying the dangers of smoking is a project which still lumbers on in dark corners of the developing world hiding from the scrutiny of western media.

The story moves on to acid rain, then passive smoking, ozone depletion and - one I wasn't expecting - a born-again denialist program praising the long forgotten benefits to human wellbeing of DDT.

Nandakishore Mridula
Apr 20, 2015 marked it as to-read
Shelves: science
On another internet forum I used to frequent, there was a hot argument whether science was "good" or "bad". Two or three members were convinced about the inherent "badness" of science - they were great believers in metaphysics and spirituality. Another member and I were arguing for the inherent value neutrality of science.

There was one guy who was pro-science, but vehemently against value-neutrality. He argued that science, unless inherently coupled with ethics, is bad. While I appreciated this
Hákon Gunnarsson
If I could recommend one book to climate crisis sceptics, I think this would be it. It's a history book. So it's not about the science that proves that fossil fuel are causing this crisis, and it's not about the solutions how we might fight it. What it is about is the professional sceptics, or as the authors, Naomi Oreskes, and Erik M. Conway call them, merchants of doubt.

It really is a fascinating, and also a little frightening read. It's not all about climate crisis scepticism. It begins with
Tim O'Neill
Feb 18, 2020 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: politics
This Australian summer's bushfire catastrophe brought with it a deluge of climate change denialism in the press, on some TV commentary, from certain politicians (with a lot of weasel words from others) and, particularly, on social media. Long debunked claims, distorted misinformation, cherry picked data and error-laden memes were spread far and wide, supposedly "debunking" the expert assessment that the unprecedented fires and attendant drought were substantially driven by climate change. My fru ...more
W. Littlejohn
Apr 27, 2012 rated it really liked it
This immensely important and timely book demands attention from anyone determined to think critically and intelligently about the current interface of politics, economics, and science, which one might describe as the three gods of our time. The book is not flawless, to be sure. As a complete layman in such issues, I can detect certain ideological flaws, which I shall come to in due course, and it is hard not to think that the authors present a somewhat one-sided perspective on a highly contentio ...more
Dec 23, 2011 rated it did not like it
Bottom line:
- the masses are easy to manipulate
- science, just like intelligence (CIA) has become a political tool
- political "scientists" on behalf of some business lobbies have sewn seeds of doubt
- the doubt is enough to confuse the mass media, and thereby the masses
- doubt is always in the interest of the status quo, because doubt prevents action and change

This could have been a single page news article. No need to write a book, unless the scope is expanded, or some more interesting facts (so
Jul 04, 2010 rated it really liked it
I'm giving this book an extra half star because I know one of the authors and I can read between the lines and see that her contributions are more circumspect and better thought out than the compromised version that ended up in this book. Merchants of Doubt is about the misuse of science by politicians. It's a very good, methodically researched introduction to how science gets twisted in the political process. Where this book loses credibility, however, is that it shows only one side of the stor ...more
Mar 28, 2011 rated it liked it
Shelves: nonfiction
Lawyer Doug thinks: What's the big deal? As much as the authors try to spin it, the science on a lot of these issues were not definitively settled at the time. These people that the book villify - and this book is pretty venomous in its portrayal of some of the characters - are advocating a position and are using facts to frame their argument. This book make is seem like the global warming advocates are innocent and blameless, but they use the same tactics of massaging science to get their messa ...more
Carly Friedman
I could not finish this book. I struggled through four boring, tedious chapters before giving up. The premise was interesting but the content was disappointing. Each chapter focused on how an industry or governmental group was influenced by a few biased scientists and therefore ignored or discounted good research on the topic. The minutiae of the different people and their affiliations got in the way of the bigger picture.
Todd Martin
Jun 13, 2010 rated it really liked it
Back in the 1970’s, in response to irrefutable evidence that tobacco smoke represented a significant health issue, anti-regulatory forces hit upon a successful strategy that was to become the template for all future fights. The tactic was to sow doubt and to foment uncertainty about the science as a means to prevent regulatory action. And it worked.

Why is this approach so successful? Part of the answer lies in the public misunderstanding of science; what it is, and how it works. Science (in par
Darian Onaciu
Mar 25, 2018 rated it really liked it
Excellent book about how certain corporations manipulated public opinion through different means and discredited the work of legitimate scientists because it went against the economic interests of the conglomerates.

The writing is clear and concise, the arguments crisp and the tone is inquisitive and analytical.
The authors take in the whole problem, analyze it and then highlight the involvement of each party, drawing a conclusion based on all the available evidence.

If you're interested about how
Jun 24, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Merchants of Doubt by Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway

"Merchants of Doubt" is a fascinating book that tells the upsetting story of how a small power-group of conservative scientists ran destructive campaigns to mislead the public about science. The book provides a number of fascinating cases that has a direct impact on the public. This 368-page book is composed of the following seven chapters: 1. Doubt Is Our Product, 2. Strategic Defense, Phony Facts, and the Creation of the George C. Marshall
The Good:
--I vaguely remember the documentary adaptation; this book is far more memorable.
--Of significance is tracing free market fundamentalism to the Cold War, and in the cases reviewed to a few Cold War physicists who became useful tools based on their scientific prestige and ideological persuasion.
--I was not aware of (but not surprised by) the modern corporate backlash towards Rachel Carson detailed in later chapters, in its denial of DDT-resistance and in its accusation of environmentalis
Jun 07, 2015 rated it it was amazing
This is a heavy book with a lot of facts and proof to back it up that everyone should read. It shows how businesses and/or our government hire scientists to cause doubt in proven theories. It is then sold to the American public as fact. It tells us about RJ Reynolds and how cigarettes "don't" cause cancer, George H W Bush working for Ronald Reagan and their SDI program which cost the US $60 billion on lies, how we were told that acid rain and ozone holes were not real, how secondhand smoke is a ...more
Syed Ashrafulla
Nov 24, 2012 rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: politics
This is a pretty bad book attempting to convince people through a combination of snark and thin arguments, hoping the resulting murky mess will clog your brain and force you to lose the argument by simply not wanting to talk to them anymore. The authors could have made a great theme about the issues of "fair and balanced" scientific journalism. They instead chose to pick three scientists (Seitz, Singer and Nierenberg) as villians with a bunch of poor scientists on the other side as unwiling vict ...more
Erik Graff
Aug 22, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
A few years ago a diverse group of right-wingers affiliated with a variety of conservative and 'libertarian' think-tanks, corporations, foundations and publications attempted the take-over of America's sole liberal 'great books' school, Shimer College. Shimer is a small institution, but its charter, dating to the mid-19th century, is priceless and the whole notion of 'the Great Books' has traditionally attracted idealogues of the Right. Under two presidents, Rice and Lindsay, both arising from R ...more
Oct 14, 2010 rated it it was amazing
Merchants of Doubt isn’t perfect, but it’s pretty close. Contained within its pages is a careful analysis of how a handful of corporations and scientists distorted public understanding for their own narrow purposes. The book is meticulously researched while also being appropriately simplified, given the wide range of material covered. I do wish the book had more explicitly pointed out the cost to the environment and human health caused by stirring up unnecessary doubt, especially on more settled ...more
Michael Burnam-Fink
Apr 22, 2017 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: 2017, sts
Merchants of Doubt reads like a case presented by the prosecution. Oreskes and Conway look at several late 20th century scientific controversies: the link between cigarettes and cancer; the risks of nuclear weapon, the damage done by acid rain, CFCs and the ozone layer, and above all climate change, to find that these controversies extend far beyond the limits of reasonable doubt. This is no accident, but rather the result of a deliberate public relations strategy formulated by a small group of ...more
fascinating overview of how a group of scientists, with political and industrial ties, appears to have deliberately sown confusion and doubt in favour of vested interests and contrary to scientific consensus,
interesting to see same names and same techniques being used across such a variety of topics
many seemed wedded to free market economics to an extreme degree and fearful of oversight and regulation, seeing it as stepping stone towards communism
usuallyworking to protect powerful industry from
Roxanna López
Apr 13, 2020 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Rigorous and serious, passionate and informative; one of the most important books of the 21st century. It is not an easy read but a book that must be read nonetheless.
Sophie Pesek
May 07, 2022 rated it it was amazing
The best book I've read in a long time. ...more
Sarah Clement
Apr 25, 2012 rated it really liked it
I am giving this book a high rating for the quality of its research and the brilliance of its synthesis, but if I were rating it in how well it was communicated, then I would give it only 3 stars. Oreskes and Conway have engaging points to make, and the recurring themes through the book very clearly bring to light the logic of science denialism. Yet you have to work very hard as a reader to get to those themes. The authors get bogged down in historical facts that make the narrative drag and do n ...more
Apr 14, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
A scientific theory cannot be reduced to two lines and explain the subject matter without bias. But a doubt can dismantle the very same theory in just a few words.

Science has always been at war - sometimes it challenges the ideology of the masses and in more recent years, it impacts profits of large organizations. Scientific history becomes important in this context to be documented and well circulated. The propaganda isn't against science, at least not always. The propaganda attacks the way a s
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »

Readers also enjoyed

  • Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies
  • This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
  • Don't Even Think About It: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Ignore Climate Change
  • Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control
  • The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming
  • Lying
  • Firmament: The Hidden Science of Weather, Climate Change and the Air That Surrounds Us
  • The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back Our Planet
  • What We Think About When We Try Not To Think About Global Warming: Toward a New Psychology of Climate Action
  • The Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself
  • The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines
  • The Wealth of Nations, Books 1-3
  • Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era
  • Climbing Mount Improbable
  • Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
  • Hand to Mouth: Living in Bootstrap America
  • Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon
  • History's Great Military Blunders and the Lessons They Teach
See similar books…
See top shelves…
Naomi Oreskes is an American historian of science. She became Professor of the History of Science and Affiliated Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences at Harvard University in 2013, after 15 years as Professor of History and Science Studies at the University of California, San Diego.

Related Articles

Summer is winding down, but that’s OK, as long as there are good books to read. As it happens, there are some great new books coming in...
109 likes · 78 comments
“While the idea of equal time for opposing opinions makes sense in a two-party political system, it does not work for science, because science is not about opinion. It is about evidence.” 15 likes
“The industry had realized you could create the impression of controversy simply by asking questions” 11 likes
More quotes…