Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design” as Want to Read:
The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design

by
4.09  ·  Rating details ·  31,284 ratings  ·  994 reviews
***30th Anniversary Edition***

Cover note: Each copy of the anniversary edition of The Blind Watchmaker features a unique biomorph. No two covers are exactly alike.

Acclaimed as the most influential work on evolution written in the last hundred years, The Blind Watchmaker offers an inspiring and accessible introduction to one of the most important scientific discoveries of
...more
Paperback, 30th Anniversary Edition, 466 pages
Published April 6th 2006 by Penguin (first published January 1986)
More Details... Edit Details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Average rating 4.09  · 
Rating details
 ·  31,284 ratings  ·  994 reviews


More filters
 | 
Sort order
Start your review of The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design
Ahmad Sharabiani
The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design, Richard Dawkins
The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design is a 1986 book by Richard Dawkins, in which the author presents an explanation of, and argument for, the theory of evolution by means of natural selection.

عنوانها: ساعتساز نابینا؛ ساعتساز کور؛ نویسنده: ریچارد داوکینز؛ تاریخ نخستین خوانش: روز نخست ماه دسامبر سال 2014 میلادی

عنوان: ساعتساز نابینا؛ نویسنده: ریچار
...more
Paul Bryant
Jun 06, 2011 rated it liked it
Shelves: abandoned, godreads
I should explain the point about the watchmaker.

A SMALL ROCK

If you’re walking along in the countryside and you come across a rock, you don’t say, well, where the hell did that come from and who made it? It’s a rock. No one cares. There’s no notices stuck on trees or printed in local free newspapers anywhere saying “have you seen this rock? Description – roughly three inches by four by three; last seen in the Dorchester area; undistinctive grey colouring; answers to the name of “rock”; reward –
...more
Manny
Nov 22, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science
Dawkins loves explaining evolutionary theory, and this is one of his best books. My favourite bit is the section on long-tailed birds (peacocks, etc). From the point of view of simple utility, they are rather baffling. What use could you possibly have for that long, stupid tail?

But, as Dawkins keeps reminding us, it's not about survival of the species, or even of the individual, but rather of the gene. Suppose there's a sex-linked male gene that disposes towards long tails, and a sex-linked fema
...more
Bradley
Apr 03, 2017 rated it it was amazing
As the title's extension spells out, this is a definitive (as of '87) rebuttal against all comers in favor of Darwinism, but don't let my saying so prove it. Read it for yourself.

All his arguments are crystal clear, but he takes extra time to caricature the caricature of Darwinists, pointing out exactly how the ad absurdum argument really works while also elucidating the fine points of what Darwinism IS versus what it is NOT.

He steps us through the first third of the book showing us how Selectio
...more
Riku Sayuj
Dec 01, 2011 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Riku by: Manjunath Muddaraju
It is a good thing that Dawkins himself takes the trouble to think about which chapters of his books will be of vanishing interest in the near future. Of course, he turned out to be more accurate than he must have wished for. This must be the most boring of all Dawkins’ books, but I do not want to give up on him till I read ‘The Extended Phenotype’ which just might prove to be the best (scientifically) of all his works. With whole chapters devoted to the driest taxonomy problems and to disprovin ...more
Amirography
Oct 10, 2017 rated it it was amazing
A rather well-written book. I like the writing style of Pr. Dawkins.
It was not as challenging as "Selfish gene". But I guess its complexity is pretty relevant to the level of articulation many have. However, it was a great read and made me think more about the topic.
Mostephl
Sep 01, 2008 rated it it was amazing
wow and double wow. i read this through and turned back to p.1 to read it again.

blind watchmaker has been amazingly influential in the way i think about just about everything- the world, existence, life forms, physics- down to the micro, myself and my craft. it's sent chills down my spine, made me euphoric and angry. the first for finally addressing questions that have long been in my mind (but receive no echo in society as i've known it), the second for the willful repression of information an
...more
Laura
Jan 25, 2008 rated it it was ok
Shelves: science
This book was okay, but since I already am convinced evolution occurs by natural selection, I felt like he was not preaching to the choir, but trying to convince the choir. Of course, I got tired of it after a while (but I had to keep going, because I had to read it for a class). He comes up with many different arguments/theories for how evolution/natural selection could occur, many of which are interesting, but I would just rather read a science book rather than a philosophical book on evolutio ...more
Roy Lotz
Jul 14, 2013 rated it really liked it
Two summers ago, I did myself the favor of reading The Selfish Gene. Well, I didn’t quite read it; rather, I listened to Dawkins and his wife, Lalla Ward, narrate the book, as I took long walks in the forest near my house. Incidentally, I think Dawkins (and, to a slightly lesser extent, Lalla) has a magnificent voice; it’s a pleasure to hear him speak.

But that’s a matter of taste; what is not a matter of taste is the quality of that book. Agree or disagree with Dawkins, one must admit that Th
...more
Simon Cleveland, PhD
Jun 23, 2009 rated it it was amazing
Dawkins is one of my top picks for the most articulate, engaging and proficient scientists I've read to date. The Blind Watchmaker turned out to be a very prolific piece. I was baffled by his logical analogies, most excellent examples and extremely engaging vernacular.
In this work, one learns much about the evolutionary adaptations of numerous species, of which the sonar technology of baths, dolphins and other mammals seemed most shocking.
His reasoning of what constitutes miracles, probability
...more
Seth Hanson
Feb 01, 2012 rated it really liked it
At the time, this was a tough book for me to read. Considering the way I was raised - in a heavily religious atmosphere - it was hard for me to accept the theory of evolution. However, Dawkins very clearly lays out the theory in a way that anyone can understand if they are willing to open their mind just a little and put in just a little effort. It might be hard to accept but its even harder to dispute. Reality is like that. I think everyone should be required to read this book.
Max
Aug 10, 2016 rated it really liked it
Shelves: biology
Having thoroughly enjoyed Dawkins’ outstanding The Selfish Gene, my initial impression of The Blind Watchmaker was a bit of a letdown. Dawkins wrote the book to counter creationist thinking, but for a firm believer in Darwinian evolution, his lengthy arguments were unnecessary. However, if Dawkins converted any creationists, I would consider the book a great success. With that said, there were a number of things I did like. Below are some items that caught my attention.

Darwin’s concept of gradua
...more
Jose Moa
Nov 29, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: biology, science
This book is a more nail in the coffin of creationism.
It develops the darvinian theory of evolution,change and selection,but at a more deep level than the original Darwins theory,the deeper level of molecular biology and molecular genetics,subjects this unknown in the Darwins time as the quantum electrodinamics was unknown in the Maxwells time but explains at a deeper level the electromagnetic fenomenology.

The first chapters explains the incredible aparition of wonderful organs as the human eye
...more
Orhan Pelinkovic
Apr 19, 2020 rated it it was amazing
If you are interested in evolutionary biology I would highly recommend this book. The author is very aggressive in convincing the reader in evolution by means of cumulative natural selection compare to all the other beliefs (natural selection in one step, creationist, etc.)

I've read the Serbo-Croatian translation Slepi Časovničar autora Ričarda Dokinsa Heliks 2010 publishing / 496 pages / 133,407 words.
Jim
Jun 16, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
...one of my aims in the book is to convey something of the sheer wonder of biological complexity to those whose eyes have not been opened to it. But having built up the mystery, my other main aim is to remove it again by explaining the solution...

He managed the above, but I didn't enjoy this as much as The Selfish Gene or The God Delusion. It delves deeper & wanders around Darwinian Evolution & other theories more than I want or need. I hadn't planned to read this since I understood this from h
...more
Stuart
Analyzes all the various flavors of Darwinist evolution and some competing theories
Richard Dawkins is a very lucid and intelligent proponent of evolutionary theory and biology when he isn't getting into vitriolic debates with Creationists, which is an exercise in futility for both sides I'd say. I admire him for trying, but frankly trying to use logic and scientific reasoning with people who think the world is 6,000 years old, was created by an all-powerful being who somehow still tolerates Dona
...more
Brit Cheung
Some parts of the book are quite intriguing while a few chapters carry some ponderousness, leaving me in a bewilderment of what Dawkins intends to convey .

Just put aside the evolutionary theory and natural selection and find something amusing. In the female birds' preference for a long tail section, it seems the female birds were in a dominant position in choosing what kind of male birds she likes, be they long tails or short tails. This reminds me of a hilarious essay of James Thurber which he
...more
Mario the lone bookwolf
One of the best and most understandable arguments for evolutionary theory and natural selection

Please note that I put the original German text at the end of this review. Just if you might be interested.

In the spirit of Darwin, Dawkins argues soundly, comprehensively, in this form of a non-fiction book rhetorically above average and merely correct. In contrast to his later work "The God Delusion," which is so full of polemics, he refrains from doing so. He endeavors to provide factual and scient
...more
Hamid
Aug 27, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites, science
Here are some key points I gathered from this wonderful wonderful book:

- According to Dawkins, Darwinism seems to be more in need of advocacy than other branches of science. For instance, many people have no grasp of quantum mechanics, but that doesn't make them oppose the theory as nonsense. This could have religious implications.

- One big problem with Darwinism is that everybody thinks he understands it.

- The main reason why most people disbelieve Darwinism is that our brains are built to deal
...more
Ergun Coruh
Aug 19, 2011 rated it it was amazing
The Blind Watchmaker is probably one of the best introductory books on evolution.

Dawkins takes his time, explaining step by step how Darwinian evolution works.

Dawkins explains at great length, how species that look like a "complex design" evolve with accumulating small changes via natural selection, why natural selection is "blind"; ie. it lacks purpose, how random mutations combined with non-random natural selection is necessary for evolution to take place, and why a "complex design" does not n
...more
David
Dec 21, 2008 rated it really liked it
Shelves: nonfiction, biology
I enjoyed this book very much, despite the difficulty of reading the very small typeface. Dawkins' style is almost folksy, and not at all the arrogant, condescending style that some reviewers mention. The first chapter, about echolocation in bats, is fascinating. I also enjoyed reading about the different philosophies involved in taxonomy, the classification of species. Some reviewers mention that Dawkins' explanations are "old hat", and that the computer simulations are primitive; but they do n ...more
Charles
Oct 06, 2007 rated it it was ok
Enchantingly beautiful fiction, 23 Mar 2007


Musings of a fideist (a materialistic fideist).

Richard Dawkins has a breathtaking gift for expressive, catchy writing. His handling of illustration and narrative flow like silk. Yet he reminds me of an eloquent 19th century clergyman. His persistent dedication to the high altar of gradualistic explanation, however incredibly improbable, stretches credulity to breaking point. Take for example his extraordinary leap on p.134, para 1, where self-replica
...more
Paul
Aug 17, 2012 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: books-read-2013
I have only ever read one other Dawkins book before, The God Delusion, and really didn't like the style or attitude of the writing, so was not completely looking forward to this one.

The primary aim of the book is to look at all the evidence and theories that make up the Darwinian theory of evolution and natural selection. He considers all the evidence from real life examples, in particular the eye, and buy using a computer program that he wrote, demonstrates how new variants of a species can evo
...more
Manab
Jan 18, 2020 rated it really liked it
Shelves: nonfic
While I enjoyed it, Mr Dawkins is probably the ultimate preacher for the choir. More people would be convinced watching an episode of Sagan's Cosmos than slugging through this book. I still remember how Cosmos changed the teenage me. Just remember the high-and-mighty all-smiles Sagan! This preacher, one Ricky Dawkins, with his pompous writing, repeating the same phrases, picking fight with other preachers of the same flock (like Reverend Steven J Gould) and offering the worldview that no other b ...more
Navid Asmari Saadabad
Apr 07, 2016 rated it really liked it
I suggest everyone interested in the origin of life and especially those who were born fundamentalist creationists, to read this book. I would like to quote a paragraph from the book:
“A physicist certainly doesn’t need Darwinism in order to do physics. He might think that biology is a trivial subject compared with physics. It would follow from this that, in his opinion, Darwinism is of trivial importance to science. But he could not sensibly conclude from this that it is therefore false!”
Underst
...more
Brian Cloutier
Aug 19, 2015 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The good part: Dawkins is a great writer. His style is very conversational and the book very quotable. His arguments follow a defined path but still manage to meander through welcome asides. He uses metaphors and thought experiments well, most of the book was very easy to follow.

And what arguments he makes! The probability of miracles, potential precursors of RNA, the importance of gradual change. His goal is to show that it's possible to explain the rise of complexity from a simple world and he
...more
Inanc Gumus
Apr 05, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science
This book was a real eye-opener for me. I couldn't understand what the evolution was about and I was finding it non-sense. When they say: 'nature designed a creature like this and that.', 'it gave them wings' etc. I was thinking: 'What nonsense is this? It's not possible, nature isn't smart to design a complex creature'.

But, I was all wrong.

Nature doesn't have to be smart to design something. Living beings don't emerge by luck or chance but from necessity. Small and gradual steps make those cre
...more
Aurélien Thomas
Apr 13, 2013 rated it really liked it
Shelves: atheism, biology
NO! life on Earth has nothing to do with chance and, NO! the alternative to chance is not God. NO! the complexity of some organs is not a proof for the existence of an intelligent design. NO!, natural selection doesn't work like a monkey playing Shakespeare with a typewriter... Should I go on? Read Dawkins, he will tell you about it all!

With a contagious passion and a load of patience (because, quite frankly, you need a massive amount of it to face the rubbish circulating on such topics!) the b
...more
Terence M (Temporarily Indisposed)
I read "The Blind Watchmaker" as a paperback probably 25 or more years ago, so my 3 Stars rating was given from memory when I loaded details of my books collection into Goodreads not long after I joined in October 2011. I think I was probably less than generous with my rating at the time and these days my thinking is that the rating should have been 4 Stars minimum. I don't intend to change the rating now, but I also own "The Blind Watchmaker" as an audiobook and it's possible I might read liste ...more
Pink
Nov 05, 2014 rated it liked it
Another good Dawkins book. This is one of his older ones, but very interesting to see where technology was coming into his ideas. Worth a read if you enjoy his writing.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Science and Inquiry: September, 2011: The Blind Watchmaker 47 148 Jun 21, 2018 05:08AM  
Blind Watchmaker 8 103 Mar 30, 2018 08:48PM  
SCIENCE IS WONDER...: Introduction to evolution 1 1 Oct 27, 2016 11:32PM  

Readers also enjoyed

  • Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind
  • The Rest Is Noise: Listening to the Twentieth Century
  • The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature
  • The Origin of Species
  • Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain
  • Why Evolution Is True
  • The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales
  • This Is Your Brain on Music: The Science of a Human Obsession
  • God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
  • The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
  • The Lives of a Cell: Notes of a Biology Watcher
  • Thinking in Pictures: My Life with Autism
  • The Jazz Theory Book
  • Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space
  • "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!": Adventures of a Curious Character
  • Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
  • A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing
  • Cosmos
See similar books…

Related Articles

For more than a decade, Neil deGrasse Tyson, the world-renowned astrophysicist and host of the popular radio and Emmy-nominated televi...
75 likes · 13 comments
“There is something infantile in the presumption that somebody else has a responsibility to give your life meaning and point… The truly adult view, by contrast, is that our life is as meaningful, as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it.” 64 likes
“The Bishop goes on to the human eye, asking rhetorically, and with the implication that there is no answer, 'How could an organ so complex evolve?' This is not an argument, it is simply an affirmation of incredulity.” 33 likes
More quotes…