Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design” as Want to Read:
The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design

4.09  ·  Rating details ·  27,079 ratings  ·  837 reviews
***30th Anniversary Edition***

Cover note: Each copy of the anniversary edition of The Blind Watchmaker features a unique biomorph. No two covers are exactly alike.

Acclaimed as the most influential work on evolution written in the last hundred years, The Blind Watchmaker offers an inspiring and accessible introduction to one of the most important scientific discoveries of
Paperback, 340 pages
Published 2006 by Penguin (first published 1986)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
Rating details
Sort: Default
Paul Bryant
Jun 06, 2011 rated it liked it
Shelves: abandoned, godreads
I should explain the point about the watchmaker.


If you’re walking along in the countryside and you come across a rock, you don’t say, well, where the hell did that come from and who made it? It’s a rock. No one cares. There’s no notices stuck on trees or printed in local free newspapers anywhere saying “have you seen this rock? Description – roughly three inches by four by three; last seen in the Dorchester area; undistinctive grey colouring; answers to the name of “rock”; reward –
Ahmad Sharabiani
The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe Without Design, Richard Dawkins
The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design is a 1986 book by Richard Dawkins, in which the author presents an explanation of, and argument for, the theory of evolution by means of natural selection.
عنوانها: ساعتساز نابینا؛ ساعتساز کور؛ نویسنده: ریچارد داوکینز؛ تاریخ نخستین خوانش: روز نخست ماه دسامبر سال 2014 میلادی
عنوان: ساعتساز نابینا؛ نویسنده: ریچار
Nov 22, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science
Dawkins loves explaining evolutionary theory, and this is one of his best books. My favourite bit is the section on long-tailed birds (peacocks, etc). From the point of view of simple utility, they are rather baffling. What use could you possibly have for that long, stupid tail?

But, as Dawkins keeps reminding us, it's not about survival of the species, or even of the individual, but rather of the gene. Suppose there's a sex-linked male gene that disposes towards long tails, and a sex-linked fema
Riku Sayuj
Dec 01, 2011 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Riku by: Manjunath Muddaraju
It is a good thing that Dawkins himself takes the trouble to think about which chapters of his books will be of vanishing interest in the near future. Of course, he turned out to be more accurate than he must have wished for. This must be the most boring of all Dawkins’ books, but I do not want to give up on him till I read ‘The Extended Phenotype’ which just might prove to be the best (scientifically) of all his works. With whole chapters devoted to the driest taxonomy problems and to disprovin ...more
Apr 03, 2017 rated it it was amazing
As the title's extension spells out, this is a definitive (as of '87) rebuttal against all comers in favor of Darwinism, but don't let my saying so prove it. Read it for yourself.

All his arguments are crystal clear, but he takes extra time to caricature the caricature of Darwinists, pointing out exactly how the ad absurdum argument really works while also elucidating the fine points of what Darwinism IS versus what it is NOT.

He steps us through the first third of the book showing us how Selectio
Oct 10, 2017 rated it it was amazing
A rather well-written book. I like the writing style of Pr. Dawkins.
It was not as challenging as "Selfish gene". But I guess its complexity is pretty relevant to the level of articulation many have. However, it was a great read and made me think more about the topic.
Sep 01, 2008 rated it it was amazing
wow and double wow. i read this through and turned back to p.1 to read it again.

blind watchmaker has been amazingly influential in the way i think about just about everything- the world, existence, life forms, physics- down to the micro, myself and my craft. it's sent chills down my spine, made me euphoric and angry. the first for finally addressing questions that have long been in my mind (but receive no echo in society as i've known it), the second for the willful repression of information an
Saleh MoonWalker
یکی از کارهای فوق العاده استاد داوکینز که خواندنش به همه توصیه میشه. عنوان اثر کاملا خود-توضیح دهنده ست و به بررسی تکامل و شواهدی که نشان می دهد این دنیا بدون طراح خلق شده و در حقیقت موجودات پیچیده بیولوژیک در واقع با تکامل به این مرحله رسیده اند و خالقی در خلق آنها نقشی نداشته است، می پردازد. از نکته های خوب این اثر میتوان به زبان به کار رفته در آن اشاره کرد. داوکینز علاوه بر استادی در زمینه تخصصی خود، توانایی لازم برای انتقال دانش خود به افراد دیگر در سطح های مختلف دانش را نیز دارد. تکامل یک ت ...more
Roy Lotz
Jul 14, 2013 rated it really liked it
Two summers ago, I did myself the favor of reading The Selfish Gene. Well, I didn’t quite read it; rather, I listened to Dawkins and his wife, Lalla Ward, narrate the book, as I took long walks in the forest near my house. Incidentally, I think Dawkins (and, to a slightly lesser extent, Lalla) has a magnificent voice; it’s a pleasure to hear him speak.

But that’s a matter of taste; what is not a matter of taste is the quality of that book. Agree or disagree with Dawkins, one must admit that The
Farid Ahmadian
Jan 01, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
هنوزم در تعجبم که چنین کتابی چه طور اجازه نشر در ایرانو گرفته؟ گرچه ظاهرا تنها کتاب منتشر شده از آقای ریچارد داوکینز در ایران هست ولی بسیار خوشحالم که این کتاب ترجمه شده و من هم خوندمش.
بهر حال این کتاب رو یکی از دوستان در رد آفرینش بهم معرفی کرد و حقیقتا تسلط نویسنده بر روی مباحث فرگشت باعث شده تا به زبان ساده مفاهیم علمی به خواننده های عادی منتقل بشن.
در این کتاب با مفاهیم علمی بسیار زیادی آشنا شدم و از خوندنش بسیار لذت بردم و به همه ی دوستان هم توصیه میکنم حتما بخوننش، ولی برای من به هیچ عنوان
Jan 25, 2008 rated it it was ok
Shelves: science
This book was okay, but since I already am convinced evolution occurs by natural selection, I felt like he was not preaching to the choir, but trying to convince the choir. Of course, I got tired of it after a while (but I had to keep going, because I had to read it for a class). He comes up with many different arguments/theories for how evolution/natural selection could occur, many of which are interesting, but I would just rather read a science book rather than a philosophical book on evolutio ...more
Aug 10, 2016 rated it really liked it
Shelves: biology
Having thoroughly enjoyed Dawkins’ outstanding The Selfish Gene, my initial impression of The Blind Watchmaker was a bit of a letdown. Dawkins wrote the book to counter creationist thinking, but for a firm believer in Darwinian evolution, his lengthy arguments were unnecessary. However, if Dawkins converted any creationists, I would consider the book a great success. With that said, there were a number of things I did like. Below are some items that caught my attention.

Darwin’s concept of gradua
Mohamed  Abo-Elgheit
صانع الساعات الأعمى

كتاب جيد، وترجمة جيدة …
كاتب يتكلم كثيراً، مجادل أكثر منه عالم، يرهقك أحيانا من كثرة ما يخلط من أفكار بالفكرة الأساسية، غير أن حجته في النهاية وفي أغلب الأحوال تستحق التأمل.

الذي يريد أن يقوله دوكنز في هذا الكتاب هو أن التطور لا يمكن إلا أن يكون داروينياً. يرى دوكنز أن كل من يريد أن يفسر ظاهرة تطور الأنواع بطريقة أخرى غير الداروينية، إما أن يصل في النهاية إلى حارة مسدودة، أو لا يصل على الإطلاق.

والداروينية هي تفسير للتطور على مبدأ الانتخاب الطبيعي: الطبيعة تنتقي العناصر الأكثر
Simon Cleveland, PhD
Jun 23, 2009 rated it it was amazing
Dawkins is one of my top picks for the most articulate, engaging and proficient scientists I've read to date. The Blind Watchmaker turned out to be a very prolific piece. I was baffled by his logical analogies, most excellent examples and extremely engaging vernacular.
In this work, one learns much about the evolutionary adaptations of numerous species, of which the sonar technology of baths, dolphins and other mammals seemed most shocking.
His reasoning of what constitutes miracles, probability
Seth Hanson
Feb 01, 2012 rated it really liked it
At the time, this was a tough book for me to read. Considering the way I was raised - in a heavily religious atmosphere - it was hard for me to accept the theory of evolution. However, Dawkins very clearly lays out the theory in a way that anyone can understand if they are willing to open their mind just a little and put in just a little effort. It might be hard to accept but its even harder to dispute. Reality is like that. I think everyone should be required to read this book.
Amir ali
Jun 21, 2013 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: فلسفه
کتاب «ساعتساز نابینا» نام تنها اثری است که از ریچارد داوکینز در داخل کشور ترجمه و چاپ شده است. چاپ کتابی از این اندیشمند که یکی از معروفترین آتئیستهای حال حاضر جهان میباشد در ایران علاوه بر اینکه مایه شگفتی است حرکتی بسیار قابل ستایش است، چرا که علاوه بر اینکه جوانان جویای علم را با زبانی ساده و قابل فهم با نظریات روز علم زیستشناسی آشنا میسازد، فرصتی را نیز فراهم میکند تا به دلایل این نویسنده برای رد آفرینش انسان و طبیعت آشنا شده و در مورد آن به تفکر پردازخته و حتی با پیشرفت نظری، امکان نقد و بح ...more
Jun 16, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition of my aims in the book is to convey something of the sheer wonder of biological complexity to those whose eyes have not been opened to it. But having built up the mystery, my other main aim is to remove it again by explaining the solution...

He managed the above, but I didn't enjoy this as much as The Selfish Gene or The God Delusion. It delves deeper & wanders around Darwinian Evolution & other theories more than I want or need. I hadn't planned to read this since I understood thi
Brit Cheung
Some parts of the book are quite intriguing while a few chapters carry some ponderousness, leaving me in a bewilderment of what Dawkins intends to convey .

Just put aside the evolutionary theory and natural selection and find something amusing. In the female birds' preference for a long tail section, it seems the female birds were in a dominant position in choosing what kind of male birds she likes, be they long tails or short tails. This reminds me of a hilarious essay of James Thurber which he
Jose Moa
Nov 29, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: biology, science
This book is a more nail in the coffin of creationism.
It develops the darvinian theory of evolution,change and selection,but at a more deep level than the original Darwins theory,the deeper level of molecular biology and molecular genetics,subjects this unknown in the Darwins time as the quantum electrodinamics was unknown in the Maxwells time but explains at a deeper level the electromagnetic fenomenology.

The first chapters explains the incredible aparition of wonderful organs as the human eye
Oct 06, 2007 rated it it was ok
Enchantingly beautiful fiction, 23 Mar 2007

Musings of a fideist (a materialistic fideist).

Richard Dawkins has a breathtaking gift for expressive, catchy writing. His handling of illustration and narrative flow like silk. Yet he reminds me of an eloquent 19th century clergyman. His persistent dedication to the high altar of gradualistic explanation, however incredibly improbable, stretches credulity to breaking point. Take for example his extraordinary leap on p.134, para 1, where self-replicat
Ergun Coruh
Aug 19, 2011 rated it it was amazing
The Blind Watchmaker is probably one of the best introductory books on evolution.

Dawkins takes his time, explaining step by step how Darwinian evolution works.

Dawkins explains at great length, how species that look like a "complex design" evolve with accumulating small changes via natural selection, why natural selection is "blind"; ie. it lacks purpose, how random mutations combined with non-random natural selection is necessary for evolution to take place, and why a "complex design" does not n
Inanc Gumus
Apr 05, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science
This book was a real eye opener for me. I couldn't understood what the evolution was and was finding it non-sense. When they say: 'the nature designed this creature like this.', 'it gave them wings' etc. etc. I was thinking: 'how non-sense this is that the nature designed them, it is not possible, the nature is not a smart thing to do that'.

But, I was all wrong.

Because, the nature doesn't have to be smart to design such creatures. It even doesn't need to design. They don't emerges by luck or ch
Aug 17, 2012 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: books-read-2013
I have only ever read one other Dawkins book before, The God Delusion, and really didn't like the style or attitude of the writing, so was not completely looking forward to this one.

The primary aim of the book is to look at all the evidence and theories that make up the Darwinian theory of evolution and natural selection. He considers all the evidence from real life examples, in particular the eye, and buy using a computer program that he wrote, demonstrates how new variants of a species can evo
Maar Naap
Nov 25, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
على عكس الشائع عن دوكنز في الأوساط الإسلامية أنه غير منطقي و أطروحاته ربما ترقى إلى السخافة, لم أجده كذلك في المجمل. بل يطرح رؤية ثم يستدل عليها بأدلة علمية و عقلية منطقية (سواء اقتنعت بها أم لم تقتنع). و ربما يدعو هذا إلى النظر في باقي كتبه.

الكتاب يتحدث أساسا عن قضية التطور و أسسها من طفرات عشوائية و انتخاب طبيعي (غير عشوائي حسب وصفه) مع
إتاحة الزمن الكافي, و هو ما يقاس بملايين السنين. و عن أن هذا التطور قادر بذاته بلا توجيه من أحد (إله) على صنع كل ما يبدو في الكون على أنه تركيب زكي و تنظيم معق
Navid Asmari Saadabad
Apr 07, 2016 rated it really liked it
I suggest everyone interested in the origin of life and especially those who were born fundamentalist creationists, to read this book. I would like to quote a paragraph from the book:
“A physicist certainly doesn’t need Darwinism in order to do physics. He might think that biology is a trivial subject compared with physics. It would follow from this that, in his opinion, Darwinism is of trivial importance to science. But he could not sensibly conclude from this that it is therefore false!”
هادی امینی
وقتی کتاب "خدا، انگاره ورشکسته" از همین نویسنده رو شروع به خوندن کردم، احساس کردم چه ترجمه بدی و چقدر گیج کننده و بالاخره تحملش نکردم و گذاشتمش کنار. حالا میفهمم که گیج کننده بودن خاصیت نویسنده بوده. هرچند ضعف مترجم هم تاثیر فزایندهای داشته. کلا آقای داوکینز برای توضیح مسایل به شکل ابتدایی خیلی حاشیه میره، تا جایی که سررشته مطلب از دست خواننده در میره (حداقل توی این کتاب).
اما این کتاب، یک کتاب زیستشناسی برای تشریح داروینیسم بود و آخر سر در حد چند صفحه به این نتیجه رسیده بود که خدا وجود نداره. ال
Dec 21, 2008 rated it really liked it
Shelves: biology, nonfiction
I enjoyed this book very much, despite the difficulty of reading the very small typeface. Dawkins' style is almost folksy, and not at all the arrogant, condescending style that some reviewers mention. The first chapter, about echolocation in bats, is fascinating. I also enjoyed reading about the different philosophies involved in taxonomy, the classification of species. Some reviewers mention that Dawkins' explanations are "old hat", and that the computer simulations are primitive; but they do n ...more
Oct 25, 2018 rated it liked it
Shelves: science-sci-fi
3.5/5 Am I right in saying that Darwin is relatively less famous than Einstein and Newton ? What a mind-boggling theory of such astonishing scope and implications, it is almost inconceivable that a single human being could have given us the theory of evolution.
I think I studied it in class 9 and read it as another scientific theory. The conflict with religion didnt even enter my mind. Haa bhai hum evolve hue hai, Ok. Realised recently it is crucial for believers in Abrahamic religions to prove i
Юра Мельник
В цій книзі може 2 сторінки так чи інакше присвячені стосункам науки і релігії, а на інших сторінках Докінз розповідає про випадпові генетичні мутації і природний відбір та їхній вплив на виникнення такого рівня складності біологічного світу, яким ми його бачимо сьогодні.
Суто для мене корисними стали десять з половиною із одинадцяти розділів, я дізнався навіть більше ніж із книжки "Чому еволюція правдива", хоча остання була написана за двадцять років після "Сліпого годинникаря", однак ще більш
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Science and Inquiry: September, 2011: The Blind Watchmaker 47 143 Jun 21, 2018 05:08AM  
Blind Watchmaker 8 102 Mar 30, 2018 08:48PM  
SCIENCE IS WONDER...: Introduction to evolution 1 1 Oct 27, 2016 11:32PM  
  • Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life
  • Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design
  • Eight Little Piggies: Reflections in Natural History
  • Sociobiology: The New Synthesis
  • What Evolution Is
  • Why Evolution Is True
  • God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory
  • Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
  • Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes Us Human
  • Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom
  • The Counter-Creationism Handbook
  • Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are
  • God: The Failed Hypothesis: How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist
  • Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea
  • Life: A Natural History of the First Four Billion Years of Life on Earth
  • Only a Theory: Evolution and the Battle for America's Soul
  • The Theory of Evolution
  • The Meme Machine
“There is something infantile in the presumption that somebody else has a responsibility to give your life meaning and point… The truly adult view, by contrast, is that our life is as meaningful, as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it.” 62 likes
“The Bishop goes on to the human eye, asking rhetorically, and with the implication that there is no answer, 'How could an organ so complex evolve?' This is not an argument, it is simply an affirmation of incredulity.” 27 likes
More quotes…