Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature” as Want to Read:
The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature

4.08  ·  Rating details ·  18,873 ratings  ·  783 reviews
“In a work of outstanding clarity and sheer brilliance Steven Pinker banishes forever fears that a biological understanding of human nature threatens humane values.”
—Helena Cronin, author of The Ant and The Peacock

“A mind blowing, mind openingexpos. Pinker's profoundly positive arguments for the compatibility of biology and humanism are unrivalled for their scope and depth
...more
Paperback, 528 pages
Published August 26th 2003 by Penguin Books (first published 2002)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Blank Slate, please sign up.
Popular Answered Questions
MJD Still ongoing, and the version I got has a final chapter at the end, written in 2016, that gives updates on all the chapters given new scientific…moreStill ongoing, and the version I got has a final chapter at the end, written in 2016, that gives updates on all the chapters given new scientific discoveries and new trends in academia and popular culture.(less)
Ross Very much so. It's written for a general audience and all terminology is explained in lay terms.

Community Reviews

Showing 1-30
4.08  · 
Rating details
 ·  18,873 ratings  ·  783 reviews


Filter
 | 
Sort order
Jenn Pellerin
Jun 03, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Recommended to Jenn by: Jamie
I'm an atheist. I've always been and always will be (god willing). When I was a kid, I used to envy the religious folks who seemed to be having such deep meaningful fun all the time. It's not that I hate religion, or the idea of god, it's just that I can't really get my mind around it after a childhood devoid of spirituality. Newsflash: if you don't take a lot for granted, religious theory makes NO SENSE. The only place I've ever found deeper meaning is in biology and physics and neurology. SO.. ...more
Nebuchadnezzar
I contend that there are two Steven Pinkers. Pinker 1 is an eloquent, witty, and insightful writer on the issues of cognitive psychology and linguistics who has the rare talent of making his subjects accessible and appealing to academic and lay audiences. Pinker 2 retains the writing ability, but instead uses it for pushing his pet theories, usually political in nature (cf. his most recent Better Angels of Our Nature). This book comes straight from the pen of Pinker 2.

There are really two main c
...more
Manny
Feb 03, 2009 rated it really liked it
Shelves: science
Steven Pinker takes on the old nature/nurture question, and does an excellent job of it. Are we the products of our genes or our upbringing? Pinker tells you in the first few pages what the new consensus is: both, but genes are probably more important.

He has some wonderful stories to back up the general points. Here's one that particularly appealed to me. During the 60s and 70s, you often heard that boys and girls are indoctrinated from an early age so as to conform to conventional gender roles.
...more
Ian19
Aug 24, 2011 rated it it was amazing
This book grew on me as I read it. At first, I suspected Pinker of cherry-picking targets from the extreme fringe of cultural constructivism. However, after I spent some time in a Sociology of Gender class at college, I discovered that the total denial of innate psychological programming is indeed as pervasive among the social sciences as Pinker suggests. His characterization of post-modernist philosophy, cultural anthropology, and some factions within psychology are very consistent with the ide ...more
Lena
Sep 27, 2008 rated it really liked it
The Blank Slate is Steven Pinker's ambitious attempt to close the gap between the conventionally accepted dogma that human beings come into this world free of innate characteristics, ready to be molded and shaped by society, and what science has begun to reveal about genetic predisposition.

Prior to reading this book, I had no idea that the origin of human nature was such a contentious topic amongst modern intellectuals. Seems that a lot of people think acknowledging that something like violence
...more
Daniel
Jul 14, 2008 rated it it was ok
Louis Menand has written a typically excellent piece on Pinker's arrogance: http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2002...
I found this book simultaneously interesting and exasperating, because the author is obviously a highly educated, well-read man who thinks he knows everything about every subject. There is a whole class of these public intellectuals (the late Carl Sagan, Richard Dawins, et al) who play this game: they use the public authority they have gained by virtue of (at least modest) academic
...more
Tristan
Sep 25, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
"I'm only human
Of flesh and blood I'm made
Human
Born to make mistakes"


--The Human League, Human


Most of us instinctively feel the acquisition of scientific knowledge follows a linear path, first operating from a solid factual base, and then modifying itself as it goes along in an objective fashion. Ultimately, a common agreeance on a certain topic will be reached, and the findings will translate into well-considered policy.

Ideally, that is how it should work, with scientists serving as neutral ob
...more
Daniel Clausen

In some ways, this book is both a tragedy and an inspiration.

How is it a tragedy? It's a tragedy because the book is responding to very ideologically-based, simple arguments for the Blank Slate, the Noble Savage, and the Ghost in the Machine that I think don't really need to be addressed. Many of the points in the book I was thoroughly convinced of before reading the book -- I knew that genetics played some role in determining personality and aptitude; I was convinced of the probabilistic appro
...more
David
Dec 17, 2009 rated it it was amazing
What an impressive book! I have been reading a number of Steven Pinker's books, and they are all excellent. I was particularly interested in how politics and social activists have worked to slow down the progress of science. The concept of a "blank slate", though socially attractive, has held back science and our understanding of human nature.

The chapter on children was especially interesting. Pinker rightly gives much credit to Judith Harris' excellent book The Nurture Assumption: Why Children
...more
L.E. Duncan
Apr 18, 2013 rated it it was ok
So here's a case where you have a book about how much of our personalities and, well, nature is innate, rather than nurtured into us by our parents or our environment. If The Blank Slate were two hundred pages and focused just on brain science, it'd be one thing. The trouble is that it ends up reading as if Pinker gathered every single study that seemed to support his position and threw it into a blender, and then threw in a number of screeds against groups he has a bone to pick with. The result ...more
Owlseyes on notre dame, it's so strange a 15-hour blaze and...

(Steven Pinker in Oporto, on the 11th of November 2017. My photo.)

"Nature, Mr Allnut , is what we are put in this world to rise above" Katherine Hepburn to Humphrey Bogart in The African Queen

"Hillary Clinton may have advanced the dumbest explanation in the history of psychobabble, but she does not deserve the charge of trying to excuse the president's [husband] behavior"

Pinker makes the case against a man who gets his formation/make up only from the outer forces of parenting, education, etc. H
...more
Ezra
Jun 26, 2008 rated it it was ok
so. steven pinker got a lot of press out of this thing. it is essentially a sustained and detailed case for the predominance of genetic factors in determing human behavior. mr pinker is (if i recall) mainly a developmental neuroscientist (if that's a legitimate description...?). he provides a tremendous and very enjoyable welath of case studies and background for the various psychological, philosophical, sociological and biological problems which he subjects to the peculiar dialectical lens of n ...more
Sundus
Jul 13, 2017 rated it really liked it
Wow What an interesting and exquisitely written book!!!

This is my first read by this author “Steven Pinker”. He is a psychologist and author of several books and articles on cognition and linguistics. In The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature he refuted the widely held belief that the human mind at birth is a tabula rasa /blank slate to which the environment (nurture) gives form and substance.

He further explained that neither genetics nor environmental conditions are solely respon
...more
Gendou
Dec 29, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Pinker argues cleanly and decisively against the theory of the Blank Slate (and its corollary, the Noble Savage). You might say he wipes the Blank Slate clean. Or that he breaks it over his knee.

He examines how motivations for wanting to believe in a Blank Slate come from four fears of human nature:

1. The Fear of Inequality: if people are innately different, oppression and discrimination (like sexism and racism) would be justified. But people are, in fact, different. Ignoring this fact doesn't h
...more
عبدالله الوهيبي
يتحدث ستيفن بينكر –عالم النفس اللغوي في هارفارد- في كتابه (الصفحة البيضاء) عن معتقد شديد الشيوع في القرون الأخيرة، وهو الاعتقاد بأن الإنسان يولد "صفحة بيضاء"، لا يحمل بنية فطرية سابقة، وأن المؤثر الأساسي في تشكيل الإنسان يعود للوالدين، والمجتمع. يهاجم بينكر هذا المعتقد بشدة، وهو يرى أنه يمثّل "الدين العلماني للحياة الثقافية المعاصرة"، وأن هذا المعتقد ساهم في رسم بعض أجندات العلوم الاجتماعية والإنسانية في القرن المنصرم.
ابتدأ أولاً بتقصي منابع هذه المعتقد التاريخية، منذ روسو وهوبز وديكارت، ثم شرع
...more
William2
Mar 24, 2011 rated it liked it
Second reading.
David Redden
Jul 21, 2008 rated it liked it
The Blank Slate was an informative, thought-provoking and polemic book designed to refute ordinary conceptions and intellectual arguments which cut against a sociobiological understanding of humans and human society. I detected a couple instances in which the author, Stephen Pinker, overstated scientific conclusions, leading me to doubt the accuracy of his other scientific evidence. I also have reservations about the rational-actor lens through which he interprets human nature. On the other hand ...more
Chuck McCabe
Nov 13, 2007 rated it it was amazing
Pinker examines the concept of the mind as a blank slate capable of taking any impressions that arose in England and France in the mid-18th century and became the basis for liberal democracy in the 19th and 20th centuries. The "blank slate" underlies the nurture pole of the nature/ nurture debate and looms huge in political and social policies. Drawing on an immense body of research in psychology and other social sciences, linguistics, and evolutionary biology, Pinker makes the case for the natu ...more
Elena
Nov 12, 2018 rated it really liked it
This book is not without its flaws. As others have pointed out, the picture here might just be a tad bit too simple. However, Pinker accomplishes one important feat in this book, and that is to point out that our theories of justice and morality are not hostage to the empirically falsifiable claim that there are no innate differences between individuals. Our moral commitment to respecting the human dignity, equality, freedom, and human rights of any and all regardless of gender or race is in no ...more
Brett Hilton
Aug 13, 2011 rated it it was ok
Steven Pinker is an excellent writer, but I have major problems with this book. For starters, his main argument - that the blank slate hypothesis is untenable - is something of a straw man argument. How many people today actually believe that genes don't shape our brains, and thus our minds? I'm friends with many anthropology students who have read about the blank slate hypothesis, and their criticism of sociobiology is often directed at writers in the 19th century (and EO Wilson, who himself is ...more
Farha Crystal
Jan 22, 2018 rated it really liked it
Shelves: steven-pinker
'Man will become better when you show him what he is like.' - Anthon Chekov

Won't he??? ...

Maybe, the arguments in this book can't be put any more eloquently than the quote of Anton Chekov.
...

The book was both fun and terrible to encounter how supposed "liberals" experience the cognitive dissonance by having their assumptions and dogmas challenged.

The author goes over controversies , a number of hot buttons, hot zones, Chernobyls, third rails, and so on -- including the arts ( I disagree with him
...more
رحمان
This is a good introductory book to the nature vs nurture debate if you keep in mind that Pinker is very biased. He suffers, sadly like many scientists do, from selection bias—he picks studies that support his views while ignoring those that don't. Still, if you can spot and ignore his ideology-driven arguments, you can get a good deal out of this book.

The biggest problem with Pinker is his over-reliance on Evolutionary Psychology—a relatively new discipline that tries to explain our behavior by
...more
Book
Jun 24, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: evolution
The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature by Steven Pinker

The Blank Slate is an ambitious book that goes after the blank slate fallacy that is the idea that the human mind has no inherent structure and can be inscribed at will by society or ourselves. It’s a social-biological study of nature versus nature. This excellent 528 page-book is composed of the following six parts: Part I. The Blank Slate, the Noble Savage, and the Ghost in the Machine, Part II. Fear and Loathing, Part III. Hum
...more
Fadi
Innate Temperament: A Terrifying Idea?

“We are not, as many people assume, blank slates shaped by our environment”

In his book (The Blank Slate: The modern denial of Human Nature), Steven Pinker argues that modern science (evolutionary psychology and neuroscience in particular) has challenged three "linked dogmas" that constitute the dominant view of human nature in intellectual life:

1. The Blank Slate aka “Tabula Rasa” (adopted by the empiricists): the mind has no innate traits, and therefore all
...more
Paul
Jul 21, 2014 rated it it was ok
I can't finish this. The first third or so of the book is interesting and important, mostly because of the discussion about cognitive neuroscience. I think it's extremely important that any educated person in the modern or future world get a solid basic understanding of what we know (and don't know) about how the human brain works. Obviously that will govern our whole understanding of psychology, sociology, and human life in general. Anyone who wants his or her worldview to actually reflect real ...more
César
Dec 04, 2017 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: ensayo
4,5

Estaría bien que, pasados ya 15 años desde su aparición, Pinker publicase una puesta al día y ampliación. Puerta de entrada para aquellos interesados en la psicología basada en la biología y la teoría de la evolución y la
selección natural.
Kunal Sen
May 27, 2014 rated it really liked it
Not that I was convinced by all the arguments presented in this book, but it is an incredible joy to discover a single book that echoes so many thoughts that have been percolating in my mind, and to hear the same things I have been trying to say, argued and articulated so well.

With age I have come to dislike the idea of an ideology, any ideology. Anything that compels us to think that something is correct or good because it ought to be correct. Reality does not care how any of us feel about it.
...more
Thomas  Jackson
Apr 18, 2015 rated it it was amazing
This book was amazing, One of those books when you come out on the other side of it you can see some changes in your life and in your perception..Steven Pinker you are a badass great book. And thank you Morgan for the recommendation.
Andy
Apr 14, 2013 rated it it was ok
Pinker claims there is much opposition to the idea that biology (as opposed to parenting, etc.) is an important determinant of human behavior. This seems fishy to me because it is the exact opposite of my reality. Also, his narrow focus on a particular type of research might confuse people regarding the implications of the science.

In medical practice, there is extreme tunnel vision on biological causes of disease to the exclusion of other explanations. The reflex standard position in our societ
...more
Steven Peterson
Dec 18, 2010 rated it it was amazing
Pinker takes on a perspective regarding human nature that tended to dominate the social sciences in the 20th century (with many adherents of the position still active now), namely that humans are "blank slates" and their life course is highly malleable. He says (Pages 2-3): "That theory of human nature--namely that it barely exists--is the topic of this book. . .Challenges to the doctrine from skeptics and scientists have pushed some believers into a crisis of faith and have led others to mount ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
  • Freedom Evolves
  • The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do
  • The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation
  • On Human Nature
  • Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought
  • Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong
  • Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
  • The Moral Animal: Why We Are the Way We Are: The New Science of Evolutionary Psychology
  • The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene
  • The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature
  • Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast: The Evolutionary Origins of Belief
  • The Meme Machine
  • The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture
  • The Accidental Mind: How Brain Evolution Has Given Us Love, Memory, Dreams, and God
  • The Science of Good and Evil: Why People Cheat, Gossip, Care, Share, and Follow the Golden Rule
  • The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology
4,805 followers
Steven Arthur Pinker is a prominent Canadian-American experimental psychologist, cognitive scientist, and author of popular science. Pinker is known for his wide-ranging advocacy of evolutionary psychology and the computational theory of mind. He conducts research on language and cognition, writes for publications such as the New York Times, Time, and The New Republic, and is the author of numerou ...more
“Equality is not the empirical claim that all groups of humans are interchangeable; it is the moral principle that individuals should not be judged or constrained by the average properties of their group.” 84 likes
“Much of what is today called "social criticism" consists of members of the upper classes denouncing the tastes of the lower classes (bawdy entertainment, fast food, plentiful consumer goods) while considering themselves egalitarians.” 82 likes
More quotes…