188 books
—
5 voters
Fallacies Books
Showing 1-37 of 37

by (shelved 3 times as fallacies)
avg rating 3.96 — 3,160 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 2 times as fallacies)
avg rating 3.81 — 5,162 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as fallacies)
avg rating 3.75 — 591 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as fallacies)
avg rating 3.78 — 725 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as fallacies)
avg rating 3.50 — 1,432 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.83 — 99 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.85 — 601 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 4.24 — 1,477 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.87 — 29,574 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.95 — 21,056 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 4.03 — 35,831 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 4.12 — 130,056 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 4.17 — 572,912 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 4.15 — 3,016 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.84 — 17,729 ratings — published 1954

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.88 — 10,826 ratings — published 1952

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.87 — 1,468 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 4.45 — 6,036 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.82 — 22,269 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.44 — 27,012 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.84 — 6,264 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.95 — 13,452 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.91 — 261,312 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.83 — 18 ratings — published 1956

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.50 — 17,611 ratings — published 1831

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.83 — 241 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.57 — 7,213 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 4.12 — 24 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.82 — 3,169 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.67 — 1,613 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.86 — 35,992 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.68 — 400 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.94 — 7,247 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.94 — 594 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 2.73 — 22 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.35 — 421 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as fallacies)
avg rating 3.75 — 11,048 ratings — published 2006

“There is a difference between criticizing people and criticizing a people's uninformed ideals. That is, unless one defines himself or others by their ideals, then he is offended, and usually offended secretly. Because oddly enough, this person is the same person quickest to resort to dismissive name-calling, such as 'bigot' or 'zealot'. And oddly enough, he is always the one, the 'open-minded' one, who adamantly protests for, not only himself, but others not to listen to any type of scholarly theological truth inherently for the sake of his own personal, moral beliefs.”
― Killosophy
― Killosophy

“Some theist fall in this categories
Using:
1. **Circular Reasoning**: Assuming the conclusion in the premise, essentially restating the same idea without providing new information.
2. **Argument from Ignorance**: Asserting something as true simply because it hasn't been proven false, or vice versa.
3. **Appeal to Authority**: Using the opinion or testimony of an authority figure as evidence in an argument.
4. **False Dichotomy**: Presenting an argument as though there are only two options when there could be more.
5. **Argument from Personal Incredulity**: Rejecting a claim because one finds it difficult to understand or believe.
Those are most fallacies which believers use”
― God Who Cares?
Using:
1. **Circular Reasoning**: Assuming the conclusion in the premise, essentially restating the same idea without providing new information.
2. **Argument from Ignorance**: Asserting something as true simply because it hasn't been proven false, or vice versa.
3. **Appeal to Authority**: Using the opinion or testimony of an authority figure as evidence in an argument.
4. **False Dichotomy**: Presenting an argument as though there are only two options when there could be more.
5. **Argument from Personal Incredulity**: Rejecting a claim because one finds it difficult to understand or believe.
Those are most fallacies which believers use”
― God Who Cares?