This is an alternative to the popular "Best Books Ever" list, focusing on the most obscure books. Here's the rule: add any book--in any genre--so long as it has fewer than 1,000 ratings on Goodreads.
Before you add a book, please take a moment to look it up to ensure it meets the parameters for this list.
You can find the number of every book's Goodreads ratings under "book data" in the first line of the box containing the book's editorial data.
There is another list for Moderately Underrated Books (1,000 - 10,000 GRs ratings).
And for those who are feeling crowded even on this list, here are a few lists designed to give a home to even more undeservedly obscure books:
REALLY Seriously Underrated Books (100 to 500 GR ratings).
REALLY Really Underrated Books (fewer than 100 GR ratings)
Super Underrated Books (fewer than 50 GR ratings)
Ridiculously Underrated Books (fewer than 20 GR ratings)
Really Underrated Children's Books (children's books with fewer than 100 GR ratings).
Just One Rating
Alternatively, see lists of books with the most ratings.
You might also want to check out obscure books worth considering: https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/1...
Before you add a book, please take a moment to look it up to ensure it meets the parameters for this list.
You can find the number of every book's Goodreads ratings under "book data" in the first line of the box containing the book's editorial data.
There is another list for Moderately Underrated Books (1,000 - 10,000 GRs ratings).
And for those who are feeling crowded even on this list, here are a few lists designed to give a home to even more undeservedly obscure books:
REALLY Seriously Underrated Books (100 to 500 GR ratings).
REALLY Really Underrated Books (fewer than 100 GR ratings)
Super Underrated Books (fewer than 50 GR ratings)
Ridiculously Underrated Books (fewer than 20 GR ratings)
Really Underrated Children's Books (children's books with fewer than 100 GR ratings).
Just One Rating
Alternatively, see lists of books with the most ratings.
You might also want to check out obscure books worth considering: https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/1...
3,136 books ·
763 voters ·
list created July 8th, 2009
by John Burns (votes) .
Tags:
best, fiction, great, least-ratings, literature, obscure, rare, ratings, too-few-ratings, underrated, unsung
John
862 books
53 friends
53 friends
Susanna - Censored by GoodReads
3386 books
851 friends
851 friends
Greyweather
2660 books
65 friends
65 friends
Bettie
15677 books
19 friends
19 friends
Ronan Noane
1533 books
96 friends
96 friends
Phillip
5191 books
139 friends
139 friends
Beth
1718 books
616 friends
616 friends
Eva
53 books
16 friends
16 friends
More voters…
Comments Showing 1-50 of 473 (473 new)
message 1:
by
Stuart
(new)
Jul 08, 2009 04:27PM
Added The Road to Wigan Pier, I, Claudius From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius, Born 10 B.C., Murdered & Deified A.D. 54, A Fortunate Life and All Quiet on the Western Front.
reply
|
flag
Stuart wrote: "Added The Road to Wigan Pier, I, Claudius From the Autobiography of Tiberius Claudius, Born 10 B.C., Murdered & Deified A.D. 54, A Fortunate Life and [book..."I claudius has too many ratings. It belongs (and already is) in the other list. http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/24...
All quiet on the western front has WAAAAY too many ratings. Its too popular for either list. Sorry if this method seems a bit strict and uptight but its the only way to determine which are the genuinely obscure books out there and a book like AQOTWF has way too much of an advantage over all these obscure books.
Thanks you guys who voted for shadow of the wind. Way to completely ignore the one premise of this list.DELETED!
Also deleted for having too many ratings: Extremely Loud and Incredibly CloseThe Honk and Holler Opening Soon
The Gargoyle
Sorry but this is bugging me: "Before you add a book, look up it's profile...."Can you take out the apostrophe?
Also it should be "fewer than 1,000 ratings" not less than.
Lobstergirl wrote: "Sorry but this is bugging me: "Before you add a book, look up it's profile...."Can you take out the apostrophe?
Also it should be "fewer than 1,000 ratings" not less than."
Did you add any books, or did you just drop by to complain?
Lobstergirl wrote: "Sorry but this is bugging me: "Before you add a book, look up it's profile...."Can you take out the apostrophe?
Also it should be "fewer than 1,000 ratings" not less than."
Apostrophe & "less than" duly deleted.
Happy now?
Stuart wrote: "Lobstergirl wrote: "Sorry but this is bugging me: "Before you add a book, look up it's profile...."Can you take out the apostrophe?
Also it should be "fewer than 1,000 ratings" not less tha..."
I did add books, although if I wanted drop by just to complain I'd feel free to. Punctuation is that important!
Killthepopular wrote: "Lobstergirl wrote: "Sorry but this is bugging me: "Before you add a book, look up it's profile...."Can you take out the apostrophe?
Also it should be "fewer than 1,000 ratings" not less tha..."
Very happy.
Lobstergirl wrote: I did add books, although if I wanted drop by just to complain I'd feel free to. Punctuation is that important!I'm all for correct use of grammar, but isn't clarity the whole point of the endeavour? There is no doubt what someone means by 'Less than 1000 ratings'.
True. Surely being THAT bothered by things like the incorrect usage of apostrophes is just another form of OCD?
"The Girls" by Lori Lansens is on this list and has waaay more than 1,000 ratings. Just thought I'd mention this! Otherwise, really interesting list to read through.
Killthepopular wrote: "True. Surely being THAT bothered by things like the incorrect usage of apostrophes is just another form of OCD?"In the eye of the beholder, etc.
Hmmm. Could it be that this list is achieving its goal and IS actually creating more of a readership for some of these books? If so, all the better!Then again, given the criteria stated -- "fewer than 1,000 ratings -- I'm afraid there are a few more candidates for deletion ... which is not to say that they DON'T still rightly deserve a place on the "(moderately) underrated books" list ( http://www.goodreads.com/list/show/24... ) ... or indeed, on any of this site's "must read" lists.
In that spirit, could someone with librarian status please delete (from this PRESENT list only, and ONLY on the grounds of exceeding the 1,000-ratings-threshold):
Stephen Greenblatt, "Will in the World"
Jerome Lawrence, "Inherit the Wind"
Colleen McCullough, "The First Man in Rome"
Evelyn Waugh, "Scoop"
Thanks in advance!
Lobstergirl wrote: "Stuart wrote: "Lobstergirl wrote: "Sorry but this is bugging me: "Before you add a book, look up it's profile...."Can you take out the apostrophe?
Also it should be "fewer than 1,000 rating..."
Well, the English-speaking world needs more people like you, but I object to your assertion that "It should be 'fewer than' not 'less than'." What you say is simply not the case---I mean the "should" part. Language is not logic, not carved in stone--except when it is, of course--and not owned by anyone. I find "different THAN" utterly galling, but (PACE, William Safire) we have no "academy" to oversee language change and growth. YOU MIGHT COULD SAY DIFFERENT THAN. I hate it, you hate it, but we simply cannot say it is "wrong" with any authority, IMO (Yes, I hate abbreviations, too). Peace/Love, Thom
Themis-Athena wrote: "Hmmm. Could it be that this list is achieving its goal and IS actually creating more of a readership for some of these books? If so, all the better!Then again, given the criteria stated -- "few..."
Deleted !
Thom wrote: "Lobstergirl wrote: "Stuart wrote: "Lobstergirl wrote: "Sorry but this is bugging me: "Before you add a book, look up it's profile...."Can you take out the apostrophe?
Also it should be "fewer t..."
I agree that language is mutable and ever changing and not owned by anyone. Yet we must have some standards, or at least we ought to. At the very least, I personally demand that we do. Perhaps that makes me batshit crazy, but there you have it. The 'fewer than/less than' thing doesn't bother me much, but apostrophes in the wrong place make me homicidal. And I will never give up the struggle. FIGHT ON, proper apostrophization.
Lobstergirl wrote: "Thom wrote: "Lobstergirl wrote: "Stuart wrote: "Lobstergirl wrote: "Sorry but this is bugging me: "Before you add a book, look up it's profile...."Can you take out the apostrophe?
Also it s..."
Well, I suspect if we had time we would find ourselves in substantial agreement. Certainly my students were held to strict standards, such as those regarding dangling modifiers, faulty parallelism, subject-verb agreement, and such like.
One way to settle the standards questions is by appeal to a particular style sheet, The New York Times will do.
Rdbot (Reese) wrote: "Oh, dear -- why did I allow myself to read the comments attached to this list? The O-C part of me refused to click a back or forward arrow. Having read messages 1-30, I now feel compelled to compo..."Rdbot (Reese) wrote: "Oh, dear -- why did I allow myself to read the comments attached to this list? The O-C part of me refused to click a back or forward arrow. Having read messages 1-30, I now feel compelled to compo..."
The Dirty Little Secret (And you musn't let this get out) we men have been keeping all these years is that tuxedos are comfortable. The tremendous power of Yiddish and Ebonics and such-like non-standard lingos lies in the glosses, extensions and send-ups they provide of the standard languages they spring from. Eventually we lexicon prigs just can't stand the appeal anymore and start chanting, "Schlemiel, schlemazel, Hassenpfeffer Incorporataed" or muttering in tune, "Ain' got no home,....ain' got no woman....caint
spell no words...." and so on. Gets ME through the night. Keeps my O C from becoming OCD....That's my plan, anyway. Love you people. --T.
Thanks for keeping tabs on these!(I added "Lady Susan" to the other list instead -- books with between 1,000 and 10,000 ratings.)
Rdbot (Reese) wrote: "Thom wrote: "Rdbot (Reese) wrote: "Oh, dear -- why did I allow myself to read the comments attached to this list? The O-C part of me refused to click a back or forward arrow. Having read messages ..."Not to be picky but Tom Terrific was not about a cat. It was about a kid with a thinking cap and a lazy dog named Manfred. It started on Captain Kangaroo.
I admit I had to look it up on Wikipedia - I remembered the bit about the kid with the hat but not the dog.
Removed for ratings in excess of 1,000: The Lives of Christopher Chant, The Dark Lord of Derkholm, The End of Eternity, The Good Soldier, Mornings on Horseback: The Story of an Extraordinary Family, a Vanished Way of Life & the Unique Child Who Became Theodore Roosevelt, Adverbs, Pnin, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Behind the Scenes at the Museum, Being Dead: A Novel, The Patchwork Girl of Oz, and Tik-Tok of Oz.
This one needs to be removed from the Fewer than 1000 list: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/89...
Antiauk wrote: "This one needs to be removed from the Fewer than 1000 list: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/89..."Done.
Removed on the same grounds: A Living Nightmare and further books from the "Cirque du Freak" cycle, all of which have considerably in excess of 1,000 ratings: Tunnels of Blood, Vampire Mountain, Trials of Death, The Vampire Prince, Hunters of the Dusk, Allies of the Night, Killers of the Dawn, Lord of the Shadows, The Lake of Souls, and Sons of Destiny.
Related News
Need another excuse to treat yourself to a new book this week? We've got you covered with the buzziest new releases of the day, according to early...
Anyone can add books to this list.













