Vi’s
Comments
(group member since Jun 04, 2011)
Vi’s
comments
from the Nothing But Reading Challenges group.
Showing 1,241-1,260 of 1,769
OK - I finally found the things that I was looking for:Question Asked by Jolene:
2) for both the color and theme --- does the team get multiple points per person if an individual reads several books with the theme or cover color. Example: I read 4 books with our theme, than the team gets four points.
Sonia's Answer: (post #156)
2)No. Only one point per person per color and one point per person per theme. And that is till the 50% is achieved, after that is points per team.
So, even if you read multiple blue/white color books, only ONE book will count. That is the max. And it applies to the theme as well. So a minimum of ONE book for the color and ONE book for the theme should be read. Choose wisely and you can reach your page goals along with the theme and color without reading THAT many extra books.
ETA:
And remember, you can change your page goal till May 8th PDT 8:00 AM. After that you can't change.
Re:
- I was thinking black looked predominant too.IIRC, for this RaT, we can read books <160 pages. Sonia has allowed that. It will not count for the Tower Teams Challenge of course; just the RaT. But I'm not sure if they'll let it count for the cover/theme though.
Rebecca wrote: "No worries Vi - they decided late in the game to give us an extra day!
For
I think the predominant color is black. Anyone else?I also think [bookcover:The Po..."
Oh - goes to show how well I read the thread. And it was bolded too! Thanks, Rebecca! Edited in the post as well.
So, two more days for the monthly challenge - Have you people read ALL the short books that you can lay your hands on? C'mon team!On May 1, the Read-A-Thon starts on 8 AM PDT (Please convert to your timezone; the ever-helpful
We need to read TWO books - one for Color (white, pearl or blue) and one with a strong female character. Have you shortlisted books for these two categories? Post your choices here so that
Kristin - take care!I finished
(245 pages) and Author starts with A working for the mini.
- 420 pages. Both were good reads. The cover shows open sky which I think works for the mini. I'm job hunting so I have to force myself to.. hunt. But I have
&
started today.
If we talking libraries, then I will have to start on Geo-restriction which will turn into a really big rant. But I'll side-step it.I've started
for the sole reason that it's bound to be short. Weekend's going to be busy so short books are going to win it for me.How's everybody's reading going along? Is anybody participating in Dewey's Read-A-Thon? Which is supposed to be today IIRC.
Seconding Leslie - seriously awesome, Rebecca!. When Marguerite asked, I just clicked on all our members only.
I've got to say - I'm agreeing with everything you say. Just reinforcing what you said. :)True - I re-read those series periodically too. Her Quinn brothers series is one I've re-read multiple times.
Again, I agree with the recent series being disappointments. Totally. A member at one of my group basically said this - all her characters are so perfect and nice - there aren't any flaws on any of these people. And they always do the right thing which he basically said he didn't prefer. (He does read the In Death series, IIRC). As you said, I realized it was true but didn't really bother me. But lately, it does.
For example, in WB, I found both the characters not to have that big a hang-up. Especially the h. Not sure if you'll agree but everything was done in so right way that it was frustrating.
I want to hope it gets better because the In-Death is also getting a little formulaic. Those are like a staple read. Do you read In-Death series?
Midu, how are you? Feeling better? Graduated from khichri yet?I'm starting the third -
- as well tomorrow - all planned out!
Lol! Me, a spy?!! I was just checking up on an old teamie :DSo true! I totally agree. She releases books periodically (you can see 2 In Death + 1 standalone + 1 new trilogy book per year) which is something I like but lately, the books have become more formulaic. Like take the recent books - it's like she's showcasing a different walk of life in each of that one. Chasing Fire and The Search being her more recent ones. Both these, I felt the settings and the profession took the centrestage with the characters coming up way short. Really, you can interchange any of the characters from any of the books and you won't see a difference. (Yeah, I've thought about it a little..)
I re-read two of her earlier books recently and I could really see the difference.
Oo, really? I finished WB a couple of days ago and I thought it was a very typical NR. I skimmed a few pages and didn't miss anything at all. A little disappointed. I'll wait for you to finish it!
Currently we are at 69 books and a light click at other teams shows that we are the first. Electric Lime is close at 63. This number can change anytime - the cache might update later.
