Alicia’s
Comments
(group member since Dec 25, 2019)
Alicia’s
comments
from the Around the Year in 52 Books group.
Showing 21-40 of 1,491


I think this is one where its best not to really plan for. I think most of us come across a book throughout the year where it ends and we're smiling, shocked, crying, etc. But I definitely wouldn't want to go around reading last lines ahead of time hoping it would work.

Probably not a downvote, just a crazy tick

I’ll also upvote celebrity book club.
There are a few I’ll downvote because I feel we see a version of them every year. Then don’t know what to do with the rest of my votes.

But I've given 31 5-star ratings

Then if I have a part of a book where I’m like what?!?!? Either because I’m confused or I’m excited, I like searching all reviews and seeing if people are talking about the same things. I also like reading the Q&A after I read a book.




I really like that! I feel like in 90-95% of the books I read during the year has a woman, minority and/or LGBTQ and that doesn't include other marginalizations like disabilities, immigration status, etc. So even main character would be read a book.
I know I can adapt the prompt to fit something more narrow, but for some reason my mind just doesn't process it as fitting as it's written.


Even if there is a happily ever after or all positive things happen, there is always a mention of their "difference". I read a fair amount of mixed-race romances and while the characters are generally happy, there is always still a point where race does come up. Because in real life, race is still an issue in any mixed-race relationship. It may not affect our overall happiness, but is still something that has to be discussed. Or I always find there is at least one sentence in most books with female characters that discuss their inferiority, weakness, fragility, etc.
While marginalized is a bit broader than BIPOC, I still see marginalization parts in almost all books I read.


It could be a romance award that is predominantly women winners, but if Nicholas sparks has won once all the female authors could still be used.



The idea here is to celebrate or showcase female authors that win priz..."
I guess my issue with it then is that I have to have some knowledge about awards or do research on how many men have won it v. women. I guess I could just read an N.K. Jemison book if it gets in, but I don't know how most of us would be able to know which prizes fit and which don't that easily. But while Women's Prizes were created to "fix" that gap (which is a question of whether it fixes it or masks it), those wouldn't be eligible. So it would still end up being any woman that has won a non-women only award. Except maybe the stereotypical romance awards or something like that.
For non-binary, I would really guess ANY non-binary award winner is going to be unique in the category, so I could also just go that way.

For #1, wouldn’t that be almost all award winning female writers? A large majority of awards are open to men.
Not a big fan of this version of the nonfiction book. It’s been done a lot and the nonfiction I read isn’t necessarily something I’ve “always wanted to learn about”.
The Barbie one is very broad.
The politics one is a no from me because I’ll read enough news stories on it. Also, not sure how publicity fits into that.
For a character that is marginalized, I feel like this is present in almost all books with women, LGBT, and different ethnicities. There is always at least something that focuses on them being "different"
And “nod to weather” is weird because every book mentions weather. But I also have weather prompt fatigue.
