Roy Christopher's Blog, page 16

October 22, 2021

Boogie Down Predictions: Hip-Hop, Time, and Afrofuturism

<p>Due to global supply-chain issues, our edited essay collection, <a href="https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/boogie..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Boogie Down Predictions: Hip-Hop, Time, and Afrofuturism</em></a>, has been pushed back until early next year, but <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/191368928X/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">it’s already available for pre-order!</a> If you're interested in owning a copy, you can help the book immensely by <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/191368928X/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">preordering</a> it. If you're unsure, here's a bit about how it came together, a look at the cover, the blurbs, the table of contents, and an early review from <em>The Wire</em> magazine. Read on!</p><h1><em>Boogie Down Predictions: Hip-Hop, Time, and Afrofuturism</em></h1><p>Over the past few years, I gathered up some friends, and we’ve been working on an edited collection, sort of a companion to my book, <a href="https://roychristopher.com/dead-prece..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Dead Precedents: How Hip-Hop Defines the Future</em></a> (Repeater Books, 2019). Time was one of the aspects of both hip-hop and science fiction that I didn’t get to talk about much in that book, so I started asking around. I found many other writers, scholars, theorists, DJs, and emcees, as interested in the intersection of hip-hop and time as I was. As I continued contacting people and collecting essays, I got more and more excited about the book. Now, the mighty Strange Attractor Press is putting it out. Check out the cover by Edwin Pouncey a.k.a. Savage Pencil!</p><p><img alt="BOOGIE DOWN FRONT COVER col enhanced.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... out the jacket copy, the blurbs, and the table of contents!</strong></h1><p>Through essays by some of hip-hop’s most interesting thinkers, theorists, journalists, writers, emcees, and DJs, <em>Boogie Down Predictions</em> is a quest to understand the connections between time, representation, and identity within hip-hop culture, as well as what that means for the culture at large. Introduced by Ytasha L. Womack, author of <em>Afrofuturism: The World of Black Sci-Fi and Fantasy Culture</em>, this book explores these temporalities, possible pasts, and further futures from a diverse, multi-layered, interdisciplinary perspective.</p><blockquote><p>“This book, edited by Roy Christopher, is a moment. It is the deconstructed sample, the researched lyrical metaphors, the aha moment on the way to hip-hop enlightenment. Hip-hop permeates our world, and yet it is continually misunderstood. Hip-hop’s intersections with Afrofuturism and science fiction provide fascinating touchpoints that enable us to see our todays and tomorrows. This book can be, for the curious, a window into a hip-hop-infused Alter Destiny—a journey whose spaceship you embarked on some time ago. Are you engaging this work from the gaze of the future? Are you the data thief sailing into the past to U-turn to the now? Or are you the unborn child prepping to build the next universe? No, you’re the superhero. Enjoy the journey.” <br/>— <strong>Ytasha L. Womack</strong>, from her Introduction</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>“<em>Boogie Down Predictions</em> offers new ways of listening to, looking at, and thinking about hip-hop culture. It teaches us that hip-hop bends time, blending past, present, and future in sound and sense. Roy Christopher has given us more than a book; it’s a cypher and everyone involved brought bars.” <br/>— <strong>Adam Bradley</strong>, author, <em>Book of Rhymes: The Poetics of Hip-Hop</em></p></blockquote><blockquote><p>“The study of hip-hop requires more than a procession of protagonists, events, and innovations. <em>Boogie Down Predictions</em> stops the clock—each essay within it a frozen moment, an opportunity to look sub-atomically at the forces that drive this culture.” <br/>— <strong>Dan Charnas</strong>, author, <em>The Big Payback: The History of the Business of Hip-Hop</em> and <em>Dilla Time: How A Hip-Hop Producer Reinvented Rhythm and Changed the Way Musicians Play</em></p></blockquote><blockquote><p>“How does hip-hop fold, spindle, or mutilate time? In what ways does it treat technology as, merely, a foil? Are its notions of the future tensed…or are they tenseless? For <em>Boogie Down Predictions</em>, Roy Christopher’s trenchant anthology, he’s assembled a cluster of curious interlocutors. Here, in their hands, the culture has been intently examined, as though studying for microfractures in a fusion reactor. The result may not only be one of the most unique collections on hip-hop yet produced, but, even more, and of maximum value, a novel set of questions.” <br/>— <strong>Harry Allen</strong>, Hip-Hop Activist &amp; Media Assassin</p></blockquote><p><hr/><h1><strong>Table of Contents:</strong></h1><p>Preface – Roy Christopher<br/>Introduction – Ytasha L. Womack<br/><br/><strong>I. TIME</strong><br/>1. Take Me Back: Ghostface’s Ghosts – Steven Shaviro<br/>2. Two Dope Boyz (In a Visual World) – Tiffany E. Barber<br/>3. Close to the Edge: The Extended Take in Hip-Hop Music Video – Jeff M. Heinzl<br/>4. Glitched: Spacetime, Repetition, and the Cut – Nettrice R. Gaskins<br/>5. The Theology of Timing – Omar Akbar<br/>6. Breakbeat Poems – Kevin Coval<br/>7. The Free Space/Time Style of Black Wholes – Juice Aleem<br/>8. Chopping Neoliberalism, Screwing the Record Labels: DJ Screw, Atavistic Hipsters and Temporal Politics – Aram Sinnreich &amp; Samantha Dols<br/><br/><strong>II. TECHNOLOGY</strong><br/>9. Scratch Cyborgs: The Hip-Hop DJ as Technology – André Sirois<br/>10. Public Enemy and How Copyright Changed Hip-Hop – Kembrew McLeod<br/>11. Done by the Trickle Trickle: Jbeez With the Ley Liners – Dave Tompkins<br/>12. Preprogramming the Present: The Musical Time Machines of Gabriel Teodros – Erik Steinskog<br/>13. The Cult of Rammellzee – Joël Vacheron<br/>14. Hip-Hop’s Modes of Production are Futuristic – Chuck Galli<br/>15. #ThisIsAmerica: Rappers, Racism, and Twitter – Tia C. M. Tyree<br/><br/><strong>III. THE FUTURE</strong><br/>16. Further Considerations on Afrofuturism – Kodwo Eshun<br/>17. Afrofuturism and the Intersectionality of Civil Rights, the Space Race, Hip-Hop, and Black Femininity – K. Ceres Wright<br/>18. Afrofuturism in clipping.’s <em>Splendor &amp; Misery</em> – Jonathan Hay<br/>19. Behold the RZA-rection of Bobby Digital: MythScience and the Ontopolitics of Exodus in Afrofuturist Hip-Hop – Tobias C. van Veen<br/>20. Constructing a Theory and Practice of Black Quantum Futurism – Rasheedah Phillips<br/><br/>Many thanks to those who contributed and those who wished us well. An extra special shout goes out to Travis Terrell Harris.</p><hr/><h1><strong>A Review from the September 2021 issue of <em>The Wire</em>:</strong></h1><p>Also, there&rsquo;s a nice review of the book in the September issue of <em>The Wire</em>:</p><p></p><p><img alt="0" src="http://roychristopher.com/img/BDP-Wir... alt="BDP-stickers-stack.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... Down Predictions</em> drops on February 22, 2022, but <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/191368928X/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">you can pre-order it here! Preorders are essential to the success of books, so if you&rsquo;re interested, please consider putting one in.</a> Spread the word and the love!</p><p>Thank you!</p><p>More updates to follow.</p><hr/><p><img alt="2021-books.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i..., in case you missed them, I have three (3!) new books out:</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://punctumbooks.com/titles/follo..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Follow for Now, Vol. 2: More Interviews with Friends and Heroes</em></a> (from punctum books)</p></li><li><p><a href="https://roychristopher.com/fender-the..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Fender the Fall</em></a> (a sci-fi novelette from Alien Buddha Press)</p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Abandoned Accounts</em></a> (poetry collection from First Cut)</p></li></ul><p>Thank you all for your continued interest and support! It is appreciated.</p><p>Hope you&rsquo;re well,</p><p>-royc.</p></p><p>http://roychristopher.com</p>
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 22, 2021 07:22

October 13, 2021

Sleeper Effects: Aiming Your Appetite

<p>Why does the world now look more like a William Gibson novel than one by Arthur C. Clarke? Gibson’s friend and cyberpunk peer Bruce Sterling explains:</p><blockquote><p>Because he was looking at things that Clarke wasn’t looking at. Clarke was spending all his time with Wernher von Braun, and Gibson was spending all his time listening to Velvet Underground albums and haunting junk stores in Vancouver. And, you know, it’s just a question of you are what you eat. And the guy had a different diet than science fiction writers that preceded him.</p></blockquote><p>In Doug Pray’s 2001 DJ documentary <em>Scratch</em>, which features<em> </em>interviews with many prominent turntablists, one of the questions was, “What made you want to be a DJ?” A large majority of the interviewees named Herbie Hancock’s 1983 hit “Rockit” as the defining impetus for their becoming DJs. This struck me as odd since the main thing that people remember about that song is the video’s disturbing robotic mannequins. </p><p>“Rockit” is also a total anomaly in the Herbie Hancock catalog, but it brought scratching to the mainstream of the mid-1980s with its infectious hook, based on the frenetic but rhythmic scratches of GrandMixer DST alongside Hancock’s catchy keyboards and mechanized vocals. It also had a major role in setting off what would become the turntablism movement—the DJ as musician. The documentary—and other media artifacts like it—represent sleeper effects we're not likely to acknowledge in the moment. We don't necessarily choose the few things that most influence us.</p><p><img alt="rad-poster.jpeg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... read a similar series of interviews with professional BMX riders a few years ago, and the same question was posed to the day’s top pros. Again, a large majority cited one cultural artifact as their starting point. This time, it was the 1986 Hal Needham movie <em>Rad</em>. Given my age, and the fact that I was already deep into BMX when <em>Rad </em>came out, I never thought that it would affect the sport the way it obviously did. I clearly remember going to see it the night it opened in my town in Alabama. It was an event among our local crew of BMX riders and skateboarders. I knew nearly everyone in the theater that night.</p><blockquote><p>“The essence of culture is found in all its artifacts.”<br/>— Pete Robinson in Donald Antrim’s <em>Elect Mr. Robinson for a Better World</em></p></blockquote><p>Bruce Sterling's use of the cliché "you are what you eat" above really gets at this phenomenon. Aiming your appetite at the right food is the missing step.</p><p>For me, it keeps coming back to my experiences making zines as a teenager. That hidden circuit of media, a grassroots exchange of information and ideas that slips through the cracks of popular culture is powerful stuff. As Mark Lewman, ex-Editor of <em>Freestylin’ Magazine</em>, head of Club Homeboy, and maker of “Chariot of the Ninja” zine, points out, “The first zine I did once I moved to California was called 'Homeboy'. I did one issue and some stickers, and it ballooned into a mail-order lifestyle company with 15,000 members, and became one of the first youth culture magazines, a pastiche of art and sport and randomness. So, the power of zines is pretty unlimited as far as I can tell.”</p><p><img alt="Photo Oct 10, 2 12 49 PM.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... spite of the proliferation of the internet, zines are not entirely a thing of the past. Every time we do something on our own instead of just taking what’s given to us, we strike a blow to the massive media machine that constantly shoves products and personality down our throats. Making your own zine is not only immeasurably rewarding —just ask anyone who’s ever done one —but it gets your point of view out there and incites dialog between readers, artists, and other zine-makers that wouldn’t necessarily take place.</p><p>Independent journalists wield the power to expose local underground talent as well. There are always obscure riders in sporadic locales ripping like top pros. The way to get them noticed is not to complain about the media’s lack of attention, but to give people a reason to pay attention. As one-time <em>Faction</em> BMX magazine editor John Paul Rogers puts it, “Quit bitching and get off your ass and do something about it.” </p><p>Again, in spite of the internet, those regional ties are still strong. One of the arguments you hear about the power of social media is its location-based communities. Information available from the conflation of virtual and actual is essential to users, consumers, and practitioners of all sorts. Now it's how we find what we like and each other. Zines used to make these connections with perhaps deeper but less broad effect.</p><p><img alt="royc-9muses-chaos.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... by Dennis Sevilla.</p></blockquote><p>These few examples demonstrate clearly to me that culture is about our relationships to cultural artifacts, and not necessarily their intended purposes. It’s about the effects of artifacts, and not the artifacts themselves. If it's a matter of what we eat, it might be the side dish that has the most impact.</p><p>I always cite James Gleick‘s 1987 chaos-theory exposé <a href="https://www.indiebound.org/book/97801..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Chaos: Making a New Science</em></a><em> </em>as a turning point in my adult life. <a href="https://medium.com/bookshelf-beats/ro..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">As I told Gino Sorcinellio</a> a few years ago, "I hadn't been a heavy reader up to that point, but I haven’t stopped reading several books at a time since reading <em>Chaos...</em>" Reading that book turned me back into a reader and set me on my way to graduate school. There was no way to know that would be the case. You have to both be careful what you take in while following your curiosity wherever it leads.</p><p>Hope you're well,</p><p>-royc.</p><p>P.S. In celebration of its 35th anniversary, <a href="https://www.fathomevents.com/events/R..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Rad</em> is back in theaters</a> tomorrow for a one-night only fit of nostalgia. Yeah, I'm going... Join me!</p>
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 13, 2021 13:12

October 7, 2021

Shatterday: The Quantum Creativity of James Ward Byrkit

<p>We’ve all been at a dinner party where the dynamic seemed to sour as the night progressed. One person is being uncooperative, the conversation turns to uncomfortable subjects, or the personalities assembled just don't quite sync up. What if the dynamic not only went bad but also splintered into multiple realities? James Ward Byrkit’s 2013 film, <em>Coherence</em>, chronicles just such a gathering.</p><p>Filmed over five nights in his own house, <em>Coherence</em> documents a dinner party gone astray as a comet flies by setting off all sorts of quantum weirdness. The story is small enough to tell among friends over dinner but big enough to disrupt their beliefs about reality. The film is <a href="https://buttondown.email/roychristoph..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">the product of pulling back</a>. After working on big-budget movies (e.g., <em>Rango</em>, the <em>Pirates of the Caribbean</em> series, etc.), Byrkit wanted to strip the process down to as few pieces as possible. Instead of a traditional screenplay, he spent a year writing a 12-page treatment. With the dialog unscripted, the film unfolds like a game. Each actor was fed notecards with short paragraphs about their character’s moves and motivations. Like a version of <em>Clue</em> written by Erwin Schrödinger, <em>Coherence</em> works because of its limited initial conditions, not in spite of them.</p><p><img alt="coherence.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... (2013): A story small enough to tell among friends over dinner but big enough to disrupt their beliefs about reality.</p></blockquote><p>Byrkit’s latest project is an anthology of episodes using the same process, actors, and seeming instability of <em>Coherence</em>. The series is called <a href="https://www.shatterbelt.tv/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Shatter Belt</em></a>, and each episode is a different story, like <em>Black Mirror</em> or <em>Soulmates</em>. Byrkit is currently filming and <a href="https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">raising money for it</a> simultaneously. I caught him in between takes to ask a few questions.</p><p><hr/><p><img alt="Shatter-Belt-Oswalt.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... Christopher: </strong><em>Shatter Belt </em>picks up where <em>Coherence</em> left off, right? The reality-splintering event happened in <em>Coherence</em> and <em>Shatter Belt</em> follows the aftermath.</p><p><strong>James Ward Byrkit:</strong> So, <em>Shatter Belt</em> is not the sequel to <em>Coherence</em>, but it’s definitely a follow-up, meaning we’re using much of the same process and philosophy and thematic elements and actors of that film. <em>Shatter Belt</em> is a collection of short stories that involve consciousness and the nature of reality, each episode a self-contained story à la <em>Twilight Zone</em>. Like <em>Coherence</em>, the ideas are immediate and pure, unfiltered by studio executives or the Hollywood process. These are micro-budget productions of giant concepts. Like <em>Coherence</em>, there is almost no crew of any kind. No art department, no costume department. No special effects. The actors have to be on their A-game to even get through a day because of the flexibility required.</p><p>After years of trying to get smart, challenging, sci-fi projects greenlit the old-fashioned way, it became clear that again, my only option was going to be just picking up a camera and to start shooting. No permission needed.</p><p><strong>RC: </strong>The no-permission approach to filmmaking has as long a lineage as the giant-production model. As many people are, I am intrigued by the end result of films like <em>Coherence</em>. The elegance of the final product betrays its complexity.</p><p><strong>JWB: </strong>&ldquo;The elegance of the final product betrays its complexity.”—that might be one of the best descriptions ever of what’s really going on. These micro-budget projects will by necessity look scrappier and less polished and give the impression that we are just winging it. But if anything, there is more thought, more layers of meaning in every scene. It’s the nature of being unfiltered by the studio process that allows these projects to achieve a strange purity of vision, even with all of the restrictions on production. I’ve worked for the last several years writing for other people, and it’s been rewarding on a certain level, but having the ability to tell a story without executive oversight brings an entirely different power to the forefront of the process. <em>Shatter Belt</em> is the most challenging project I’ve ever done, and yet already feels the most rewarding. There would be no way to make something so unique within the Hollywood model.</p><p><img alt="byrkit-oswalt-shatter-belt.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... Byrkit and Patton Oswalt on the set of <em>Shatter Belt</em>.</p></blockquote><p><strong>RC: </strong>As much as <em>Shatter Belt</em> shares with the <em>Twilight Zone</em>, it also seems to overlap with <em>Fringe</em>, <em>Black Mirror</em>, and in some ways even the <em>X-Files</em>. I&rsquo;m saying that from way outside the project. Do you see it fitting in with those as well?</p><p><strong>JWB: </strong>I love <em>Black Mirror</em> because it’s true science fiction, meaning that it postulates reasonable scientific and technological advances and how they might affect people. While <em>Shatter Belt</em> stories could have some technology propelling them, the focus is a bit more on the weird relationship of our conscious minds to the rules of reality. So, it’s all about priorities, and I can only hope that we find our singular tone like <em>X-Files</em> and <em>Fringe</em> managed to do.</p><p><strong>RC:</strong> Weirdly, it seems that in making both of these projects you&rsquo;ve had to grapple with the same problems that an Everett many-worlds interpretation of quantum realities presents. I know you spent a year plotting out the possibilities of <em>Coherence</em>, but how do you keep these stories from spinning off into complete chaos?</p><p><strong>JWB:</strong> This is a question that might be better saved when we really do roll out a <em>Coherence</em> sequel, which has been in the works for a year. And yes, that’s often the main focus, keeping the stories relevant and connected even as the chaos creeps in. I find weeks of letting the stories play out organically in my head during long walks will slowly reveal an overall shape and recurring ideas that can then be the beginning of a structure.</p><p><img alt="smoking-head-no-text.gif" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... </strong>Do you know where or when we will be able to watch <em>Shatter Belt</em>?</p><p><strong>JWB: </strong>We have absolutely no idea where <em>Shatter Belt </em>will land, because we specifically did not take out the idea and pitch it to anyone before we started. Interestingly, our Chinese fans have already been the most supportive, and we may try to make a sale there before anywhere else, due to the popularity of <em>The Night the Comet Came</em> (<em>Coherence</em>) there.</p><p><strong>RC: </strong>What else is coming up?</p><p><strong>JWB: </strong>This is pretty all-encompassing for now, although there are always several things swirling around, calling like sirens from the ship-dashing rocks. David Goyer and I have a time-travel series based on an incredibly popular title that is waiting for the right time to travel. Right now, the focus is on raising money for <em>Shatter Belt </em>and getting a few more episodes shot so that the shape of the series starts to reveal itself.</p><hr/><p>Thanks to Jim Byrkit for taking the time and to Alyssa Byrkit for her continued assistance.</p><p>You can help get <em>Shatter Belt</em> made and learn the secrets of <em>Coherence</em> by renting the <a href="https://vimeo.com/ondemand/coherencee..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Coherence Explained video</a> featuring James Ward Byrkit answering viewer questions, a discussion between him and Patton Oswalt, and a visit to the <em>Coherence</em> house. Do watch or rewatch the film first. You can also contribute to <a href="https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">the Kickstarter campaign</a> and receive behind-the-scenes updates on the making of the show, among many other rewards.</p><hr/><p>By the way, if you enjoy interviews like this one, my new anthology, <a href="https://punctumbooks.com/titles/follo..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Follow for Now, Vol. 2: More Interviews with Friends and Heroes</em>, is now available in paperback and open-access .pdf from punctum books</a>. Thirty-seven interviews with creative minds of all kinds, including thinkers like Carla Nappi, Rita Raley, Dominic Pettman, Ian Bogost, Jodi Dean, Mark Dery, Douglas Rushkoff, Tricia Rose, and Dave Allen, and musicians like Tyler, The Creator, Matthew Shipp, Sean Price, Rammellzee, and Sadat X, as well as writers like Ytasha L. Womack, Chris Kraus, Pat Cadigan, Bob Stephenson, Simon Critchley, Simon Reynolds, Malcolm Gladwell, and William Gibson. &ldquo;Relentlessly stimulating and insight-packed,<em> Follow for Now</em> is the kind of book I’d like to see published every decade, and devoured every subsequent decade, from now until the end of humanity,” writes Maria Popova of <em>Brain Pickings</em>. <a href="https://buttondown.email/roychristoph..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Here&rsquo;s a bit more about it</a>. </p><p>The O.G. <a href="https://followfornow.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Follow for Now</em></a> is also still available. They make great gifts. <a href="https://punctumbooks.com/titles/follo..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">Get one or both!</a></p><p>Hope you&rsquo;re well,</p><p>-royc.</p><p>http://roychristopher.com</p>&l...
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 07, 2021 10:12

October 3, 2021

The Medium Picture Object Thing: A Photo Essay

<p>Released in 1979, Douglas Hofstadter's first book, the Pulitzer-Prize winning <em>Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid</em>, is an expansive volume that explores how living things come to be from nonliving things. It's about self-reference and emergence and creation and lots of other things. It's well worth checking out.</p><p><img alt="GEB-object.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... the cover of his heady tome, Hofstadter carved two wood-block objects such that their shadows would cast the book's initials when lit against a flat backdrop. He went the extra step of working in the initials for the subtitle as well.</p><p>Earlier this year, I was inspired to emulate Hofstadter's sculpture. I found a way to put the initials for my media-theory book-in-progress, <a href="https://roychristopher.com/the-medium... Medium Picture</em></a>--TMP--into a similar configuration. This is one of my early sketches.</p><p><img alt="Photo Jun 07, 12 57 04 PM.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... sketches I did at least made the thing appear possible, so I started exploring physical options. After trying different materials and digging around craft stores, I finally found some letters that were about the right shape and would save me a lot of time toward the final object.</p><p><img alt="Photo Apr 04, 10 06 47 AM.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... was fortunate to find letters with similar proportions to the ones I'd been drawing. The first thing was to cut the M to make the P the top of the T. Like so:</p><p><img alt="Photo Apr 04, 11 19 02 AM.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... alt="Photo Apr 04, 1 13 59 PM.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... some papier-mâché tweaking, calk to round the leg of the M, and a coat of white paint, the object was ready to test.</p><p><img alt="Photo Jun 12, 9 35 01 AM.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... alt="Photo Jun 12, 10 11 17 AM.jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... that it physically existed, I knew the real test would be hanging it, lighting it, and capturing its shadows correctly. I built a contraption for just that out of things found around my parents' house.</p><p><img alt="Photo Jun 18, 3 01 13 PM (1).jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... was as sketchy as it looks. The object was suspended with two pieces of fishing line, and I had to turn off the air conditioning to get the thing to hang still for the picture. I found some pieces of foamcore in my sister's old closet for the backdrop and gathered up tiny flashlights from all over the house. </p><p><img alt="Photo Jun 18, 3 21 17 PM (1).jpg" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... the LED flashlights propped and taped in place, this is the final set-up.</p><p><img alt="TMP-web.png" src="https://buttondown.s3.amazonaws.com/i... this is the final shot. It's not quite as intricate or as elegant as Hofstadter's, but I'm pretty stoked on it. I think it will make a striking cover image and a fitting tribute to his work.</p><p>I belabored this process here because about half the people who see the final image ask me what software I used to make it. I know this could've been done digitally in any 3-D imaging suite, but I wanted to make it for real, just as Douglas Hofstadter had done.</p><p>Going through this process brings to mind a previous piece from late last year: <a href="https://buttondown.email/roychristoph..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">In Praise of Pulling Back</a>, which is about how creative constraints can actually be helpful. Check it out, if you haven't already.</p><p>Also, in case you missed them, I have three (3!) new books out:</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://punctumbooks.com/titles/follo..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Follow for Now, Vol. 2: More Interviews with Friends and Heroes</em></a> (from punctum books)</p></li><li><p><a href="https://roychristopher.com/fender-the..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Fender the Fall</em></a> (a sci-fi novelette from Alien Buddha Press)</p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09..." rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Abandoned Accounts</em></a> (poetry collection from First Cut)</p></li></ul><p>Hope you're well,</p><p>-royc.</p><p>http://roychristopher.com</p>
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on October 03, 2021 08:27

September 16, 2021

O Bother, Why Art Thou? Follow for Now, Vol. 2

Quick note: My new interview anthology, Follow for Now, Vol. 2: More Interviews with Friends and Heroes, is now available from punctum books! More details and table of contents below.

Read on!

O Bother, Why Art Thou?

In the late aughts, I did a talk at several events and on several college campuses called “How to Do Stuff and Be Happy.” The title was a joke, but the advice was real. It was a bunch of things I’d learned in the pursuit of various interests, mostly writing and publishing. Someone asked me recently why I bother to do I do any of the things I do. What follows emerged from an attempt to answer that question.

royc-geekend-2010-pr.jpg

[“How to Do Stuff and Be Happy” at Geekend 2010. Photo by Patrick Rodgers.]

I started making zines in my teens. My friend Matt Bailie and I saw the first zine-review article in Freestylin’ Magazine and decided we should make one ourselves. It was the spring of 1986. We were just about to start high school.

Ten years later I registered the domain name of the last long-running zine I’d been making, and frontwheeldrive.com became my first website. After a false start or two, I ran the site steadily from 1999 to 2008. Two other like-minded dudes, Tom Georgoulias and Brandon Pierce, and I did interviews and wrote reviews about media and science and culture and whatever. Somewhere in there, I self-published the best of those interviews as a book called Follow for Now: Interviews with Friends and Heroes (Well-Red Bear, 2007).

follow-for-now-cover-big.jpg

One wrongheaded move I made during my transition from skateboarding and music zines to heavy, heady websites was thinking that I needed to completely replace old interests with new ones. I had just become a reader of books and was wishing I’d been one all along, so it was out with the hip-hop and punk rock and skateboarding and in with the science and literature and media theory. Eventually I realized that if not for the one there wouldn’t be the other. Music taught me how to do research. Who was on what record label, who used to be in what band with whom, who produced what, who was down with whom—these were the footnotes. I was already digging for sources, for citations. Skateboarding introduced me to art and determination and all of the music I love. Everything is research, and there’s room for all of it.

For the decade after closing frontwheeldrive.com, I reluctantly moved everything over to a blog format under my own name, roychristopher.com. One of the things I had finally realized about strictly publishing interviews with other people is that the other people are the focus. That’s exactly how that should be, but if you’re trying to build your name as a writer, as I was, the interview format doesn’t showcase your writing. Blogging, for what it’s worth, does that. It’s you and your words, and that’s it.

royc-fs-logo-bow.png

I learned another minor lesson from simply the naming of a thing: As flimsy a front as it might be, if you run a publication, people will quote it—assuming you’re giving them words worth quoting. They will proudly print, “she told Roy Christopher of frontwheeldrive.com…” If you’re nobody like me, they won’t quote you if the website bears your name. They won’t proudly print, “she told Roy Christopher of roychristopher.com…”: a small lesson, but a lesson nonetheless.

Through two decades of doing these two websites, as well as all the zine and magazine work that preceded them, I suppose I have managed to establish myself enough to be able to pitch ideas, write books, and do freelance writing here and there. One thing that differentiates my writing from some of my colleagues and peers is that I don’t rely on it for my living. The truth is that, aside from a few years in the 1990s, I’ve just never been able to pay my bills as a writer. Hell, since then being a writer has cost me money! That’s not a complaint, nor is it important.

What’s important is that whether or not you rely on something to pay your bills changes the goals and the results of that something. For instance, I was interviewing a band last week. There is nothing unique about my interviewing a band. I’ve been doing it for a while. The difference is that if I’m interviewing a band, it’s because I like them. I’m interested beyond the story I’m writing. That makes the way I do interviews different from when I was doing them on assignment for money. It changes them so much that the bands I interview usually notice the difference.

I hope the same can be said for my writing in general. Dan Hancox at The Guardian (see?) described my recent book, Dead Precedents, as “written with the passion of a zine-publishing fan and the acuity of an academic.” That’s the kind of compliment you hope for, and it comes from pursuing a certain kind of goal. One of the things I have found when teaching writing to others is that students have the most difficulty coming up with something to write about. More than any other part of the writing process, topic selection stumps them—more than the challenge of the initial blank page, or coming up with titles, thesis statements, headlines, leads, or anything else. I tell them to find something they already like, that they want to know more about, and that they want to tell people about.

That impulse, that desire to tell others about something cool, is the core reason I do just about everything I do. It’s the reason I’m a writer. It’s the reason I’m a teacher. It’s the reason I made zines. It’s the reason I made websites. It’s the reason I’m writing this right now. No one can tell you “How to Do Stuff and Be Happy,” but when you find that thing, that impulse, that thing you’ll do anyway, you’ll be on your way.

Follow for Now, Vol. 2: More Interviews with Friends and Heroes

follow-for-now-vol2-cover-web-front.jpg

The above essay serves as the preface to a my new interview anthology, Follow for Now, Vol. 2. This collection picks up and pushes beyond the first volume with a more diverse set of interviewees and interviews. The intent of the first collection was to bring together voices from across disciplines, to cross-pollinate ideas. At the time, social media wasn’t crisscrossing all of the lines and categories held a bit more sway. Volume 2 aims not only to pick up where Follow for Now left off but also to tighten its approach with deeper subjects and more timely interviews. This one is a bit more focused and goes a bit deeper than the last. It includes several firsts, a few lasts, and is fully illustrated with portraits of every interviewee.

“Relentlessly stimulating and insight-packed, Follow for Now is the kind of book I’d like to see published every decade, and devoured every subsequent decade, from now until the end of humanity.” — Maria Popova, Brain Pickings

Here’s the full Table of Contents:

MEDIA:

Carla Nappi: Historical Friction

Kristen Gallerneaux: Unattended Consequences

Dominic Pettman: Human Matters

Rita Raley: Tactical Humanities

Jodi Dean: Of Crowds and Collectives (by Alfie Bown)

Gareth Branwyn: Borg Like Me

Ian Bogost: Worthwhile Dilemmas

Mark Dery: Nothing’s Shocking

Brian Eno: Strange Overtones (by Steven Johnson)

Zizi Papacharissi: A Networked Self

Douglas Rushkoff: The User’s Dilemma

danah boyd: Privacy = Context + Control

Dave Allen: Every Force Evolves a Form

HIP-HOP:

Juice Aleem: Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark

Labtekwon: Margin Walker

M. Sayyid: The Other Side

Shabazz Palaces: A New Refutation

dälek: Build and Destroy

Matthew Shipp: Heavy Meta

Tyler, The Creator: The Odd Future is Now (by Timothy Baker)

Tricia Rose: Warrior Soul

Sean Price: Bless the M.I.C.

Rammellzee: The Wrath of the Math (by Chuck Galli)

Cadence Weapon: Check the Technique

El-P: Wake Up. Time to Die.

Sadat X: My Protocol is Know-It-All

WRITING:

Ytasha L. Womack: Dance to the Future

Bob Stephenson: Bit by Bit

Pat Cadigan: Eyes on the Skies

Mish Barber-Way: Flour Power

Chris Kraus: Wildly Contradictory

Simon Critchley: The Skull Beneath the Skin (by Alfie Bown)

Clay Tarver: Gone Glimmering

Nick Harkaway: A Dynastic Succession of Trouble

Simon Reynolds: Erase and Start It Again (with Alex Burns)

Malcolm Gladwell: Epidemic Proportions

William Gibson: The Co-Evolution of Humans and Machines (by Kodwo Eshun)

Thirty-seven interviews deep, Follow for Now, Vol. 2 is a hefty collection of ideas and inspiration from some of the most important writers, artists, and thinkers of our time. It includes the first interview with Tyler, The Creator and one of the last with Rammellzee. A lengthy discussion between William Gibson and Kodwo Eshun caps it all off.

It’s now available from punctum books! Get yourself a pretty paperback or an open-access .pdf!

Thank you all for reading,

-royc.

http://roychristopher.com

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 16, 2021 04:00

September 10, 2021

August & September

With two new books out there (see below) and a few more in various stages of the publishing process, I've been feeling buried, writing and editing different things every day. In the meantime, I found a few fun things I wanted to share.

First, my friend and collaborator Tim Saccenti sent me these pictures the other night. The first is Dead Precedents with the hands from the cover of Run the Jewels' third album, RTJ3, which Tim shot.

The second is Follow for Now with the hands from the cover of RTJ4.

Tim and them made these! They are physical objects. Here's the story behind the hands straight from Tim and El-P on The Verge. I am honored to have my work even tangentially related to theirs.

Tim is a visionary photographer, videographer, and designer, and I've been fortunate enough to use some of his work in Dead Precedents and the forthcoming collection, Boogie Down Predictions: Hip-Hop, Time, and Afrofuturism. More on the latter soon.

fifteen-questions-screen-shot.png

Fifteen Questions Interview:

I did a fairly lengthy interview with Fifteen Questions this week. Here’s an excerpt:


There are many descriptions of the ideal state of mind for being creative. What is it like for you? What supports this ideal state of mind and what are distractions? Are there strategies to enter into this state more easily?


It probably sounds corny but feeling positive, like the work is worthwhile. There’s also that spark of inspiration that’s usually an exciting mix of both confidence and fear: the feeling that you’re fully capable of doing something mixed with the possibility that you might fail. It has to feel possible while also feeling risky.


Distractions abound. I suffer the same ones as anyone: social media, hunger, laundry. Turn off the ones you can, and deal with the rest as needed.


Doing the work every day is imperative. Sure, inspiration hits at odd and inopportune times, but working every day is the only way to get things done.


Read the whole thing here.

fevers-of-the-mind-quick-9.jpg

Fevers of the Mind “Quick 9” Interview:

I also did a Fevers of the Mind “Quick 9” interview recently. Here’s an excerpt:

I never did well on writing assignments in school. In spite of my placement in advanced classes, I scored poorly throughout high school on writing-related projects. I made C’s in both English 101 and 102 in college, but in my second-to-last semester of undergrad, one of my instructors complimented my writing. We had done several in-class essays in her Abnormal Psychology class, and one day she pulled me aside and told me what a good writer I was. This came as a surprise, given my previous track record and the fact that I’d been an Art major for the first three years of college. Regardless, it stuck with me. I took a class on writing for social science research the next semester, and though I barely made a B, I felt more at home researching and writing than I ever had trying to do traditional art. I give the credit for my newfound confidence to my Abnormal Psychology teacher.

Here’s the whole interview.

ICYMI:

Many thanks to everyone who’s copped a copy of either of my new books. Both of these are steps in new directions in publishing for me, one into poetry and the other into fiction. Both have been scary and exciting. Your support means everything.

In case you missed them, here’s a bit about each:

Professor Steve Jones with his copy of 'Fender the Fall'.
Professor Steve Jones of the University of Illinois-Chicago with his copy of Fender the Fall.

Fender the Fall , a sci-fi novella from Alien Buddha Press:

The poet Scott Cumming writes in his Goodreads review, “Short choppy chapters and sections coupled with an innovative design make for an original reading experience in what could be dubbed Back to the Future meets Primer, but funnier and less confusing than the latter.”

I put together a soundtrack for the book as I was writing it. There’s more about the book here and a look at the pages inside.

If you’re already sold, the paperback is here, but it’s also now available in a less-cool Kindle version.

My friend Rachel Carter reading 'Abandoned Accounts'.
My friend Rachel Carter reading Abandoned Accounts.

Abandoned Accounts , a collection of poems from Close to the Bone:

My friend and fellow First Cut poet HLR wrote this nice review of Abandoned Accounts on her Treacle Heart website. Here’s an excerpt:

Roy Christopher is clearly comfortable with traditional forms and he bends these ‘rules’ to tell his story in the best way possible; the poems are terse and impactful in their simplicity, and Christopher has evidently mastered the art of rhyme. In some poems, the rhymes are watertight, building pace and maintaining rhythm, punching exactly where they ought to, and other poems have looser rhyme schemes, where Christopher plays freely with language and meter while still maintaining an utterly convincing voice. None of these verses are careless: every poem says exactly what it needs to, without relying on flowery language or incomprehensible metaphor or frivolous formatting or random risk-taking. Christopher is a true wordsmith, and as a reader, I was totally absorbed by his voice.

Many thanks to HLR for the kind words.

Get your copy here!

Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop:

Coming up next are the interview anthology, Follow for Now, Vol. 2 from punctum books and the edited collection Boogie Down Predictions: Hip-Hop, Time, and Afrofuturism from Strange Attractor Press.

More on those soon!

Hope you’re well,

-royc.

http://roychristopher.com

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 10, 2021 05:59

September 6, 2021

The Roots We Share

One of my major struggles as a professor was always getting students to read. It's difficult to relate to the attitude since I became a reader myself, but I remember the resistance as an undergraduate. There were too many other things I wanted to be doing, and I didn't even have TikTok or Instagram to suck up the rare gaps in my days.

headtube-moneky-robot.png

(A collaborative drawing from HEADTUBE zine by me and Sean Walling.)

When talking about our interactions with media, my friend Doug Rushkoff uses the remote control as a metaphor. The remote was the first invention that allowed interactive television viewing, and in the process, it changed the way we consumed the medium. Instead of wanting to see what's on, we want to see what else is on. The habit has carried over into every medium since. We scroll through our feeds not looking for something to read, but to make sure we don't need to read anything. This is how students approach reading for class. They don't set out a time to do the reading. They skim the material to make sure they don't need to read it. The only way to get them to read is to test them on the material. If I ask them to read something so we can discuss it in the next class meeting, a small fraction of them will. If I tell them to read something because I'm going to give them a quiz on it in the next class meeting, all of them but a small fraction will. The problem is that students don't like taking tests, and I never liked grading them. How do we get to the good stuff without all of these contrived assessments? We have to work together.

Another example: While legitimizing the downloading of music was one of the hurdles that Apple faced with record labels when introducing iTunes, another was the breaking up of the CD into individual songs. Record labels had long been making billions off of record, tape, and CD sales. Individual hit songs were mere marketing, advertisements for the CD. What Apple wanted to do legitimized downloading but broke down the price structure of the millennial record industry. Instead of buying 15-18 songs for $17.99, now listeners could buy just the song they wanted for $.99. It streamlined the process for listeners but cut out massive profits for the labels. Full-length records didn't go away completely, but now there are other options for music fans.

I remember reading some years ago that a successful direct-mail campaign, that is a physical mailing of postcards advertising some good or service, had a 2% response rate. That means that 98% of the materials and effort of a successful campaign were wasted. These mailings still exist, but email has revolutionized such campaigns. With such a reduced overhead, the response rate of a successful spam campaign must be infinitesimal.

Anyway, I've been thinking about these shifts in media consumption and the subsequent waste in the context of writing. Unlike records or CDs, which are clunky and inconvenient at best, books are an unimprovable technology, but now there are other options. There are blogs and tweets and newsletters and other media altogether. As readers and writers, we have so many more options. Reading and writing are collaborative. As readers, how do we cut out the crap and get to the good stuff? As writers, how do we streamline the process of reaching readers?

I have noticed more and more our unwillingness to meet each other halfway, to see things from another's point of view. Not just as readers and writers, but as humans sharing a ball of dirt in space. It’s an inability that borders on abject refusal. The example I always use is the one time I went to a personal trainer. I had a free consultation with my climbing-gym membership in Chicago, so I went. As the guy asked me questions and ran me through exercises, he slowly stopped listening to what I was saying and put me into one of his pre-planned regimens. He already knew what he thought I needed before he even weighed me in.

The same thing happens with coworkers, teachers, students, editors, employers, friends, everyone. We need to be more able to break out of our own views and see things from others. If not, we are doomed. It’s not just empathy. It's being able to completely drop your own agenda and understand someone else's views and goals. Communication is a collaboration. We have to work together.

Photo Sep 04, 10 36 03 PM.jpg

(RESET Mercantile logo sticker, as designed by me and Justin April.)

Collaboration is not compromise, it's a chance to make a connection. Cooperation is not a problem to solve, it's an opportunity to understand. Together we can make everything better, or as I plan to cross-stitch on a throw pillow:

The fruits we bear are made sweeter by the roots we share.

Happy Labor Day! More news soon.

Hope you’re well,

-royc.

http://roychristopher.com

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 06, 2021 06:46

August 15, 2021

Fender the Fall

During a particularly dark period in my adult life, I decided I wanted to learn how to write screenplays. I’d gone through a horrible breakup, moved back home, and was working part-time at a chain record store. I was floundering around, unsure of what to do next.

One night I watched Richard Kelly’s Donnie Darko (2001) for the second time, but I saw it for the first. It struck something in me, in that time, and I wanted to figure out how to write a movie. I got the script and started studying what you put on the page to make things happen on the screen.

As a result, the screenplay I started writing was heavily influenced by Donnie Darko. I’ve worked on it off and on in the fifteen years since, and even took an introductory screenwriting class at Second City. Last year I finally novelized the whole thing into a loooong short story.

Fender the Fall is about Chris Bridges, a lovelorn physics graduate student who goes back in time to return the journal of his high-school crush in order to save his marriage and her life. The plan doesn’t go as planned.

Tagline: You don’t know what you’ve got until you get it back.

It’s now available from Alien Buddha Press! It’s 5”x8” and 136-pages long, like a good paperback should be. It’s the perfect fall read.

I was fortunate enough to get Matthew Revert to design the cover and Mike Corrao to do the typesetting. As a result, it’s a sharp-looking little book. Check it out:

Here’s what other people are saying about it:


“A fun, classic roller-coaster of a time-travel story that could have been published in the 1950s, except that it’s furnished with all manner of savvy insights into current 2020s life.” — Paul Levinson, author of The Plot to Save Socrates


Fender the Fall is a nostalgia-infused journey through time about second chances and the causality of love. It’s a formative song from your youth revisited, a favorite VHS tape found in the back of your closet.” – Joshua Chaplinsky, author of The Paradox Twins


“Hard-boiled strange loops in a froth of weird.” – Will Wiles, author of Plume


Many thanks to Matt Revert and Mike Corrao for making this thing look so good; Red Focks for putting it out there; Paul Levinson, Josh Chaplinsky, Will Wiles, Jaqi Furback, Gabriel Hart, C.W. Blackwell, Ira Rat, J. Matthew Youngmark, and Jeph Porter for their time, feedback, and kind words; and Claire Putney, from whom I stole the title.

Here’s a soundtrack I put together while writing Fender the Fall. It has songs mostly from and around the years in the story (2002 and 1991).

Order your copy of this lovely, little paperback from Alien Buddha Press now! You won’t regret it.

And don’t forget about my recent collection of poems, Abandoned Accounts, about which Bristol Noir says, “Perfectly balanced prose. With the subtext, gravitas, and confidence of a master wordsmith. A joy to read.”

One last thing: My next book for Repeater Books, Post-Self: Journeys Beyond the Human Body, comes out next March during SXSW. I’m hoping to go down there and talk about it. Voting is now open, so if you could go drop a quick vote for my talk, I would appreciate it.

Thank you!

Hope you’re well,

-royc.

http://roychristopher.com

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 15, 2021 05:51

July 30, 2021

Abandoned Accounts

I’ve been writing poetry since before I could write. I would shout them out in alliterative, repetitive, rhyming couplets, and my mom would take dictation. Once I started writing, I wrote poems, short stories, comic books, fake newspapers.

In high school, I took to making zines publicly and writing poems privately. Everyone I looked up to was a poet of some fashion. From the smart sense of Danny Elfman and David Byrne to the gothic verse of Robert Smith and Andrew Eldritch, from the street knowledge of Ice-T and KRS-One to the hardcore chants of Kevin Seconds and Ian MacKaye, poetry was the process, the worded frame for the world. So, I started writing my own again, stilted little stanzas of teen longing and angst, mostly designed to make me seem deep to my friends and interesting to girls.

Last spring, when the lockdown started, I found it difficult to focus on the larger projects I had in progress. In the months before, I’d started writing silly little poems about odd memories I had, tiny stories that didn’t fit anywhere else. I went back to those when I couldn’t think any larger. I eventually moved on to short stories and finally back to book-length writing, but not before I amassed a small collection of fitful misfit verse.

All of this is to say I have a poetry collection coming out today. Abandoned Accounts: Poems, 2020-2021 has those silly memories I started writing down, including reflections of walks in the woods at my parents’ house in the hinterlands of southeast Alabama, encounters with favorite bands and somewhat famous people, tales of travel and intrigue, and a few stray poems from as far back as 1990. It’s available in paperback and on the Kindle today!

Here’s a taste: the great Scott Cumming reading “Virga” from Abandoned Accounts:

It’s a fun little book of verse. Get a pretty blue paperback for $7.99 or the Kindle version for only $3.99!

Thank you!

More soon,

-royc.

http://roychristopher.com

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on July 30, 2021 06:23

July 4, 2021

BIG MESS: How Gene Simmons and Danny Elfman Made Me a Music Nerd

Gene Simmons might be one of the most polarizing personalities on the planet. He co-founded one of the most controversial bands of the 1970s, has allegedly had his way with thousands of women, has run magazines, written books, hosted talk and reality shows, and has revolutionized music marketing and merchandising. I’ve always had a soft spot for The God of Thunder, but I’m never surprised when I find someone who hates him. For better or worse, he’s one of the reasons I’m a music nerd.

In Edgar Wright’s 2017 movie Baby Driver, the main character, Baby (played by Ansel Elgort), is a music nerd himself. He has tinnitus from a car accident he suffered as a child. The accident also killed his parents, more importantly, his mother. She was a singer and instilled in the young Baby a love of music. Since acquiring the “hum in the drum,” he listens to music constantly. With various components of stereo equipment, he also makes his own: glitchy, analog collages made from recordings of conversations, various samples, and beats banged out on keyboards and other music machines. Never without his earbuds, Baby sings and plays along, mimicking the instruments on tables or steering wheels.

When discussing a song with her name, Debora (Lily James), Baby says the song is by “Trex.” Here is where Baby’s nerdom and mine diverge. As everyone knows, the band’s name is “T. Rex,” not “Trex,” but Baby’s mispronouncing of the name illustrates that he’s more interested in the music itself and not the bands or information surrounding them. The kind of nerd I am couldn’t tell you the key a song is in or how to play the first note, but we know the name of the band. Not only that, but we also know that the song “Debora” was recorded back before Marc Bolan had shortened his band’s name from Tyrannosaurus Rex to T. Rex and helped spread the glam through rock on a global scale.

The first record I ever bought with my own money was Gene Simmons’ KISS solo record. In 1978, the four masked men each released solo records. Gene’s wasn’t the best corner of the square (Ace Frehley’s can easily claim to that spot), but it was probably a solid second, even if a distant one. Because of things like those solo records, KISS fans knew all the members, their roles, their alter egos. The Wu-Tang Clan notwithstanding, most bands aren’t promoted as collectives, and most of their members aren’t promoted as individuals. KISS was my first favorite band and Gene was my first favorite member.

This is back when a Journey album cover or a Rob Roskopp skateboard graphic would inspire a story that could occupy your mind for months. The wayward spacebug, once captured and then escaped. The monster breaking through the target just a little more on every board. I never own either a Journey record or a Rob Roskopp deck, but you’d see the images in the magazines or at the record store or skate shop, and your mind would wander. KISS is a band that invited investigation from its young fans. From their comic-book personae, superpowers, and devilish face paint to their catchy, cheesy songs, they had a lock on the imagination of preteen boys for over a decade. We had to dig deeper, and, thanks to a massive merchandising arm, there was always more to find: comic books, pinball machines, action figures, and the movie, KISS Meets the Phantom of the Park (1978), among other things.

In the second grade, I saw KISS live in Biloxi, Mississippi on what was to be their last tour in the makeup until the inevitable reunion tours. KISS remained my favorite band for the next few formative years. In middle school, my friend Keith Vanderberg introduced me to Oingo Boingo. Oingo Boingo was the first band whose lyrics actually made me think about things. Danny Elfman’s songwriting elevated my expectations. Bands like KISS were soon on their way out of my shoebox of cassettes, and bands like Talking Heads, The Police, and The Clash were in, eventually giving way to the hardcore of 7Seconds and Minor Threat, the hip-hop of Boogie Down Productions and Public Enemy, and the indie rock of Superchunk and the Grifters.

At my first staff meeting for Tacoma, Washington’s Pandemonium! Magazine in 1994, the guy next to me pitched a story on the new Oingo Boingo record. I leaned over and whispered to him that I didn’t realize they had a new record. He said he’d just gotten back from Elfman’s house: “Give me a ride home, and I’ll give you a copy.” That record ended up being Boingo, their last as a group. Once I’d moved on from Oingo Boingo, Elfman had as well. He has scored many movies you’ve seen. He’s worked with directors like Tim Burton and Gus Van Sant, an on movies from Pee Wee’s Big Adventure (1985) to The Woman in the Window (2021), as well as many in between like Beetlejuice (1988), Batman (1989), Good Will Hunting (1997), and The Circle (2017). He even composed the theme song for The Simpsons.

Gene reemerged sometime later, impressing me with his indie-rock knowledge. In some music magazine in the early 1990s, Gene talked at some length about the lineage of Teenage Fanclub, including BMX Bandits and his love of Eugenius. This seemed not only out-of-character for him, but also oddly too well researched not to be genuine. It was impressive.

Fast-forward a few more years, and I had moved up to editor of Pandemonium!. KISS had reunited for what would be the first of several top-grossing tours in the old makeup. In a fit of nostalgia, we were planning to put them on the cover of our Halloween issue. Our staffer Dave Liljengren was handling the interview, but when Gene called him to chat, Dave was on his way out the door to something he apparently could not miss.


Dave: “Sorry, Gene. I’m walking out the door. Can you call me back at the same time tomorrow?”


Gene: “Not a problem.”


Now, you’d think that this on-and-off freelance writer for this little regional rag in Tacoma, Washington had just blown his one chance for calling Dr. Love (that’s certainly what I thought), but I’ll be damned if Gene didn’t call Dave back the next day and do the interview as planned. We didn’t end up using it (Finding out before we went to press that the October 1996 issue was going to be our last, I put another of my all-time favorite bands on the cover: the mighty Godflesh), but the point is that Gene Simmons could be bothered to call back the next day.

So, say what you will about Gene Simmons. He is all of those things: a slimy, brilliant, shameless, hokey, flamboyant, cheesy, innovative, and a giant still casting his long shadow from my distant past.

Danny Elfman, on the other hand, just released a new record of punky prog-pop. Big Mess is as dark and weird as anything he ever did with Oingo Boingo, but tinged and tainted with the times. Imagine the rambunctious new wave of that band of misfits, combined with Elfman’s orchestral knowledge of decades of film scores, then compressed by recent politics and a year-long lockdown, and you’re almost there. He even redid the Oingo Boingo song, “Insects.”

Again, Elfman was the guy who taught me that music could be about something and introduced me to the music that would shape my mind as a teen. Now, music “about something” is typically the last thing I want to hear, but Big Mess has been on repeat in my house and in my head since it came out last month. The anger, the angst, the energy: decades on, he’s still got it.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on July 04, 2021 07:45