Bre Faucheux's Blog, page 42

Milo and Stefan in one podcast. Oh my!

So this pretty much made my entire day and I spent the last hour listening to it. I recommend everyone else does so as well. It doesn’t matter if you listen to it while at your desk or if you listen to it while doing the laundry. It’s worth a listen. Stefan Molyneux and Milo Yiannopoulos have helped to shape my world views in a way that has made me feel as though I’m more aware of what’s happening in the world that I ever was before.

Milo and Stefan discuss universities and what went so terribly wrong with the SJW youth culture that’s determined to see America suffer. They even go into the gender issues that I discussed in my previous videos and helped to reaffirm for me that I wasn’t off track in many of things I was saying.

I greatly admire these two fighters for freedom of speech. Please take the time to listen.

The plot thickens…

If you thought #SpiritCooking was bad, or that FBI Director Comey running away with his tail stuck firmly between his pencil thin legs was the worst of it, looks like we might have another surprise on our hands.

On Sunday evening, side-by-side images of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta and his brother Tony next to police sketches of potential suspects in a 2007 kidnapping of a three-year-old girl took over the internet.

The resemblance is striking, and Reddit, 4chan, and Twitter rapidly took up the case.

Madeleine Beth McCann should have celebrated her 13th birthday with her family in England this year, but she vanished from her bed during a family vacation to Portugal in 2003. The case gripped the entire world, becoming one of the most high profile missing persons cases in history. Coverage of her kidnapping was comparable to the press interest in the death of Princess Diana.

The circumstantial evidence goes far beyond the striking resemblance.

John Podesta’s first email on Wikileaks is dated May 4th 2007.

-Truthfeed.com

There have already been suspicions via the Wikileaks that there might be a pedophile sex trafficking operation going on inside the Clinton Foundation. And now John Podesta and his brother Tony Podesta have been been rumored to be in Portugal at the very time that a young girl was kidnapped. That resemblance though… Two brothers of that likeness?

And here I thought nothing creepier could come out so close to the election.

 

BookTube NaNo-ers signal their virtue

So… the BookTube community has done it again. Signaled their leftist virtue by supporting “diversity.” What’s even worse is that their covering up their leftist narrative by saying it’s in support of NaNoWriMo.

For those who aren’t aware, NaNoWriMo stands for National Novel Writing Month. November is a month when writers come together as a community and try to finish a 50k word novel by the end of the month. Which usually means writing around 1,650 words or so a day.

I’ve participated in NaNo a number of times, and I’ve won twice. I chose not to participate this year as I’m still editing the huge novel I wrote last year for NaNo.

I woke up this morning to find the above video in my subscription feed and proceeded to groan.

First and foremost, let’s get to the truth behind this video that likes to mask itself as an encouragement for authors to write diversely. Meaning, let’s avoid pissing off minorities that might be offended if they’re not included. Because let’s face it, when you don’t add a diverse cast of characters, you’re racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, and transphobic.. whatever that means. But keep in mind that if you do include a diverse cast of characters, you’re committing the grave sin of cultural appropriation. Particularly if you’re white. Don’t you DARE try writing a person of color into your story if you don’t have a darker pigment to your skin. But also be aware that not doing so is also a sin.

You’re not going to win this battle. The diversity police have no logic. Only rhetoric.

I’ve received messages from aspiring writers who are afraid of publishing their work because of bullshit like the video above. They’re afraid that writing what’s in their mind and heart or “what they know” will be perceived as racist or ignorant to those who deem their knowledge lesser for not including (insert minority, sexuality, or disability here). Or not portraying said  (insert minority, sexuality, or disability here) accurately enough to their own standards of what is accurate or sometimes even moral.

Don’t let these leftists intimidate you during one of the most special months for authors. Don’t allow their narrative of being “inclusive” (while the only kind of inclusion they don’t care about is your unpopular opinion), sway you to do their bidding. Don’t write diversely for the sake of diversity.

Write what you want. Write what inspires you. Write the characters as you see them. And strive for accuracy. If you’re writing a novel set in 16th century England, you won’t be able to be too diverse. If you’re writing a novel set in South Africa, write it as accurately to the demographics as you see fit.

Now… a rant about all the reasons this video needs more thumbs down.

Ariel… what authors weave into their story is actually none of your damn business unless they want to share it with you. Authors SHOULD NOT have to go to their (insert minority, sexuality, or disability labeled) friend to get better clarity as to what it’s like to be them. Fuck your space spaces. You are limiting another person’s experiences to their ethnicity or sexuality as though that is their defining trait and it plays into every aspect of their life.

Don’t be fooled when these lefties say that writing diversely shouldn’t be something to be scared of. It is. They will come after you regardless of what you do. If you write diversely, they will come after you. If you don’t write diversely, they will still come after you.

Write what you want to write during this month of Nano. And don’t let the diversity police tell you that you’re more or less virtuous for choosing to write what you want.

Identity politics has absolutely no place in creative expression. And neither do the diversity police.

By the way, Ariel, being Canadian and Honduran makes you two different ethnicities. Not two different races. Most anthropological studies formally and scientifically recognize the existence of three to four races. Caucasian, mongoloid or Asian, negroid or black and australoid. According to this classification which was created by Professor of Antrhopology Carleton S. Coon in 1962, you’re white. There are more recent classifications that include Native American bloodlines, but it’s relatively new and is rarely used. And given that Honduras was repeatedly colonized by Europeans and various tribes, there’s no real way of knowing your racial origins without some genealogical study.

Fighting fire with artillery

“Once the enemy sets a precedent by utilizing a certain tactic, you are not only free to utilize that tactic against him, but you must do so if you wish to prevent him from continuing to use it successfully against you.”

…

“The way this tends to work out in a practical sense is that SJWs are all attack and no defense. If you can survive the attack and counterattack, you will often be surprised to learn how easy it is to send them reeling in disarray.”

…

“Show them no mercy because they do not believe in it and they do not deserve it.”

SJWs Always Lie by Vox Day

“The days of sitting on the fence and not opposing social justice warrior censorship because you don’t agree with everything that (insert controversial figure) says are gone. It’s shit or bust. It’s free speech or no speech and it’s time to pick a side.”

Paul Joseph Watson

Why did I pick these quotes for today’s blog post? Because I hear time and time again that when fighting a battle, one must not lose themselves in the fight. While I do agree with this, it’s become clear to me that in order to defeat an enemy that has no moral compass, one must allow themselves to do things that they might not have enjoyed doing previously.

In my initial diversity video, I pointed out that Samantha from ThoughtsOnTomes posted a screenshot of one of her subscribers innocently asking her why she downgraded a book from five stars to four stars because it wasn’t diverse enough. Samantha shamed her for even asking the question. I said in my video that one should never shame one of their subscribers for innocently asking a question. It’s a form of public humiliation for the purpose of gaining a few virtue signaling social media brownie points with the other leftist morons in the BookTube community.

I stand by this. To an extent. I’ve recently enjoying posting idiot comments I’ve received on YouTube to my Twitter account. I justify this because these people posting idiotic comments are not my subscribers. They are not loyal followers. They are not innocent. I said in my red pill video that bigots need a larger platform. So I give them one via my Twitter account, or occasionally on my blog. Because once your enemies develop a certain tactic and use it against you, you are free to do the same. Or as Vox Day would say, we should fight fire with artillery. I will be that artillery.

In light of this… here are some stunners I received this week. Just for the fun of it.

Apparently protecting women and children from gang rape isn’t a worthy cause anymore because feminism has taken things too far. Maybe this is why a rapist was let off this week after raping a child in the Austria? Apparently saving children from rape isn’t a ‘damn good reason.’

Basement virgin. Enough said.

 

Blue lives matter. Period.

Let this serve as a warning. If you share something that showcases your stupidity, I will laugh at it and share it with my friends. Because biggots need to have a platform and they should be heard. I’m just helping to give these folks a bigger microphone.

 

No future left to fight for?

Russian President Vladimir Putin has slammed the Austrian legal system after claiming that the infamous “sexual emergency” migrant pool rapist was to be acquitted of molesting a young boy.

The Russian president rarely comments on the internal affairs of European countries, and even less on specific court cases. However, Mr. Putin refused to stay silent this week as he slammed the Austrian justice system over a case in which the infamous “sexual emergency” migrant rapist was alleged to have been acquitted by an Austrian court who will seek a retrial on the case, reports OE24.

According to Mr. Putin, the court’s decision was the result of a “dissolution of traditional national values”. He added: “In a European country a child is raped by a migrant. The court acquitted him for two reasons: he speaks the language poorly and he did not understand that the boy, yes it was a boy, didn’t want this.”

Putin called the resulting court ruling inconceivable and said that a nation that refuses to defend its children has no future. “This is the result of the dissolution of traditional national values and a sense of guilt towards migrants,” he said.

Anyone that goes to visit my previous videos regarding gender roles and the migrant crisis will quickly learn from the comments below that there are many men who believe there’s nothing left worth fighting for. Western civilization is descending into chaos from the migrant crisis and feminism, therefore why should they fight to save it?

I refer to these men generally as beta or gamma males. Or perhaps just weak and lacking in traditional values. Alpha males such as Vladimir Putin seem to agree with me. Now, I don’t know great deal about Putin. I’ve heard the general stuff like he was the head of the KGB, he’s ruthless, he reinvigorated the Russian economy, he invaded Georgia and Ukraine. But for fairness, I really don’t know much. On a recent coffee date, a gentleman told me that many Europeans (particularly in Italy) like Putin because he’s a man’s man and protects the interest of his people. I remained uncertain given that I didn’t know a great deal about him.

With that being said, I think he’s 100% right in this statement. A loss of traditional values may be the end of Western civilization, starting with Europe. When a young boy is raped and the rapist is let off for the sake of virtue signaling tolerance to the world, it isn’t seen as tolerance. It’s seen as weakness. Other countries and migrants will laugh and continue to rape innocent victims because they will know they can get away with it. And a nation that loses it’s sense of masculinity in favor of appeasing the criminals over the victims, will always fall prey to those who want to dominate them. It appears as though certain countries in Europe might let this fate become of them. Reading the comments in my videos, one can see some men (or bitter manchildren in my view) urging the end to come without realizing that they too will meet a sticky end.

After thousands of years, the bond men and women have shared is breaking down. The women raised the children, and the men protected their home from foreign invaders. Many men have told me that they’re reneging on that pledge and that they have no interest in protecting their women. Now it seems as though some have no interest in protecting their children either.

A betrayal of the British people

This morning Britain’s High Court ruled that the government must consult the British Parliament before invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, beginning Britain’s exit from the European Union.

The ruling is wrapped in irony. The irony of a High Court still subservient to Brussels demanding than an un-sovereign parliament, which Brexiteers wish to be sovereign, vote on whether that Court remains subservient or not, while we Leave campaigners fear the actions of the parliament we want to be sovereign.

Now the establishment is narrowing the path to Brexit, with the early 2017 timetable hanging in the balance. I believe we may be on the cusp of something we haven’t seen in our country in many decades: en masse direct action.

We know the anti-establishment side can do it. Remember the Iraq War protests, or the march against the fox hunting ban?

WHY?

The government promised to implement the will of the people. And the very definition of a referendum is that it is a vote by the general public which has been referred to them for a “direct decision”.

Taken together, this would in the minds of most sane people be regarded as direct democratic action which therefore supersedes Parliament. For what is Parliament if not the representatives of the people? And if the people have been consulted directly, then why should Parliament opine?

Why should Parliamentarians, be they Commoners or Lords, be handed, ex post facto, a greater say in a direct referendum than the average voter?

This is why today’s ruling by Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas, Sir Terence Etherton, and Lord Justice Sales is simply judicial activism of the worst kind.

Just when we thought that the west might stand a chance and have something to aspire to, the British people are given a slap in the face.

It doesn’t even phase these zombies that work for the EU’s bureaucrats that they will be the laughing stock of the entire world. Or that they are deliberately ignoring the will of their people.  They want to remain in the EU for political and financial gain. The people’s will be damned.

I felt proud of the British people when they voted to leave the EU. To many conservative Americans, it appeared as though the British had their own revolution. A break away from an authoritarian ruler that wanted nothing more than to subvert the interests of the British people.

A business woman named Gina Miller brought the case forward. A South African woman. This proves that those born in their native country should be the ones to decide the fate of their own people. Not those who hold more loyalty to their ethnicity than their nationality. While nationalism is often shamed by those who want open borders and have no clue as to the devastation such immigration policies would bring, this situation provides evidence that when those entering the country don’t assimilate and don’t leave their own national loyalties behind, it holds back the very nation they live in.

Write With Courage | Bre Faucheux

I was recently interviewed by Thor Holt, host of the Write With Courage podcast.

I hope everyone enjoys it.

Don’t forget to visit Thor Holt’s podcast on iTunes and subscribe: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/write-with-courage!/id1114696435?mt=2

Toxic masculinity

Universities across the nation are taking steps to actively purge male students of what’s been labeled “toxic masculinity.”

Examples abound of campuses hosting training sessions, group meetings, lectures and other programs to effectively cleanse what many campus leaders and left-leaning scholars contend is an unhealthy masculinity in young men today.

On campus, toxic masculinity is often blamed for sexual violence, body shaming, a “hyper-masculinized sporting culture,” acts of domestic terrorism and much more.

For example, a class at Dartmouth College this semester, “The Orlando Syllabus,” identifiesso-called toxic masculinity as playing a role in the mass murder spree at a Florida club during the summer. This despite the fact that the gunman, Omar Mateen, told police on the phone as he committed the massacre he did it on behalf of ISIS.

Other instances of combating toxic masculinity on campus can be found at both the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and Duke University, which launched programs specifically designed for male students to delve into “violent masculinity” and “healthier masculinity” and discuss issues like gender fluidity.

“How has the concept of masculinity contributed to the perpetration of violence in our society?” asks the UNC Men’s Project website.

Duke University started a similar program this semester for male students to reflect on topics such as patriarchy, male privilege, rape culture, pornography, machismo and “the language of dominance,” Fox News reported.

At a mandatory freshmen orientation training at Gettysburg College in August, male students had to watch a documentary which stated in part that the “three most destructive words” a boy can hear growing up is “be a man.” The freshmen also went through breakout sessions in which they were told mass shooting sprees are rooted in toxic masculinity.

:::GAG:::

This is precisely the kind of poison I was referring to in my previous two videos. How are men supposed to be encouraged to “be a man” when they’re told that everything about being masculine will lead to the destruction of the universe? And lumping in masculinity with the action of Omar Mateen, a loyal follower of ISIS?

I sincerely hope that more women such as myself speak up against feminism. We started this mess, and we have to end it. I read earlier today that over 80% of women don’t identify as feminists. So say something! Speak up. Let your men know that you’re with them and that you appreciate their masculine qualities. Don’t let them die away.

What these feminists seem to want is for everyone to play nice, be fair, and to have equality of the outcome for everyone. Funny thing is that the Russian communists realized this was a falsehood years ago. And many other former communist/socialist countries. Even Putin admits that it’s a failed idea.

Third wave feminism can easily be lumped in with Cultural Marxism/Socialism/Communism because it has the same principles. People are equal no matter what their genetic or biological differences. And the only way to combat those who differ in this opinion, is to beat them down. In this case, beating down men from the time they’re young.

We now have a society where the men have been bashing into oblivion, not wanting to protect the women, and the women are incapable of protecting themselves. I fear what is to come if more women don’t speak up.

Keep pressuring him

During the Saturday broadcast of “AM Joy” on MSNBC, American Urban Radio Networks White House correspondent April Ryan accused GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and other Republicans who despise Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton of pressuring FBI Director James Comey to reopen the criminal investigation against Clinton.

“Let’s look at the facts. James Comey has been pressured by Donald Trump and by all the other Republicans who intrinsically feel a pure hatred for anything to do with the Clintons or Hillary Clinton. So, that has been out in the public square and debated. And James Comey came back with this to give them something to get off of him,” Ryan said.

A few theories…

Comey got scared. He looked scared when he first stated that HRC wouldn’t be indicted. At first I thought maybe he had been threatened. His eyes didn’t look quite right to me.

Or…

Trump said during the second debate that he would hire an investigator to look into HRC’s emails. Meaning any mishandling of the case by Comey or his lackies would also be discovered. He could quite possibly be covering his own ass.

Then again…

After tons of pressure and shaming and his repeated appearances before committees forcing him to justify his decision not to indict HRC while others were convicted of much smaller acts of breaching national security, his conscience got to him. Although, I’m not holding my breath for this particular theory.

Whatever the reason, he was right to reopen the case. He should have indicted her to start with and yes, I still have trouble believing he didn’t. It was cowardly. But whatever motivates him now, I hope it keeps motivating him.

October isn’t even over yet. This is so much fun.

True bravery

I recently learned that it was Alana Goodman, a journalist from Daily Mail, who broke the story about Anthony Weiner’s disgusting extracurricular activities. Seriously though, how many sex scandals can the Democratic Party withstand at this point? Even Dinesh D’Souza said in his film Hillary’s America, “What is it with democrats and younger women?” I feel the greatest sympathy imaginable for the sorry bastard in the FBI who has to look at the dick pics Weiner sent to that fifteen-year-old. Cringe worthy doesn’t even begin to describe…

Nevertheless, I wanted to point out something that Mike Cernovich said in his recent Periscope. Democrats are always going on about ‘Stronger Together’ and giving women who break glass ceilings a pat on the back. Was Alana Goodman given this treatment? No. Much like James O’Keefe after his stunning investigative activism, she was beaten down and immediately discredited. Stronger Together is only a thing when you are united behind the same cause. The democratic cause.

I want to take this moment to give a massive hats off to Alana Goodman. It’s reporters like her that make me hope for a future when journalism becomes about holding people accountable again and not being a talking piece for one side or the other.

Well done, Alana!