Bre Faucheux's Blog, page 38

December 16, 2016

I am a white advocate

Father, I have sinned. For I have been touched by temptation.


I’ve been listening to leaders of the Alt-Right via talk radio and YouTube for the last several months. Not the trolls on Twitter, but the actual leaders who identify as Alt-Right. While I don’t currently identify as Alt-Right, I do find many of their grievances valid. Then they start talking about the Jews and they totally lose me. Maybe I’m a cliche, but that’s the one red pill I’m not willing to swallow because I have too many Jewish friends that I adore to pieces.


There. I said it. It’s no secret.


While listening to a talk by Jared Taylor, he said in a video that he didn’t approve of the label Alt-Right. He preferred ‘white advocate.’ I thought this was as poetic as it was smart.


Several months ago, I started listening to Stefan Molyneux. Stefan introduced me to all sorts of people with a wide range of ideas. He interviewed Jared Taylor, Vox Day, Duke Pesta, and countless others that I found endlessly fascinating. I started listening to others that he talked to such as Paul Joseph Watson. Then Paul introduced me to Steven Crowder. I started reading Vox Day’s blog. Then one of my subscribers told me to start listening to Millennial Woes, so I checked out his channel. Then I heard Millennial Woes do a talk with Richard Spencer and I was introduced to even more ideas I had never heard before. Ones that rang true and were backed by tons of evidence, intelligence, and thought provoking  concepts that I had quietly suspicioned, but never knew had a following.


I learned about how the demographics of my country were starting to change in a very bad way. Before the Kennedy immigration bill in the 1960s, the U.S. was a predominantly white European country. After this bill, the U.S. experienced a flood of immigration from third world countries and practically cut off all immigration from Europe. Why? Because people from these third world countries tend to vote left. Also because they provide cheaper labor. Great combination for the big government leftists and neocons.


When I brought this up to friends, they didn’t seem concerned about it. One even said she wouldn’t mind if the first language in the U.S. became Spanish. Having listened to these gentlemen on YouTube for quite some time, I found this rather unsettling. Because unlike my friend, I started to realize that if my country changed in this way, the foundations of it would be irrevocably changed as well. But saying this out loud would undoubtedly make me a racist. Because Marxism would have us believe that all cultures are equal regardless of their practices or beliefs. And wanting to preserve your country’s heritage is downright heretical.


I started to notice another trend. This word “diversity” was being pushed everywhere I looked, even in the BookTube community and publishing industry that I now despise. Given that I had this newfound knowledge of the Kennedy immigration bill and certain powers in our government deliberately trying to change the demographics of my country in order to obtain votes, I knew that something was wrong. People from third world countries don’t share our values. There’s no magic dirt that makes them adopt the U.S. constitutional ideals of individual freedom, traditionalism, or Capitalism the second they cross the border. Most of them come from countries that have never had a concept of small government and like the idea of the government taking care of them. Which is probably why the majority of them (particularly illegals) are on welfare. This word “diversity” meant only one thing. Fewer white people. And we were told by assholes like Joe Biden that it was good for us. If not enriching to our culture.


Wrong. So wrong.


It was a deliberate attempt to make white people a minority. And it’s only ever pushed on nations that have a majority white population.


I started listening to various news outlets about the migrant crisis. The rising rape epidemic in Sweden and Germany. The fact that whites in Germany and Sweden and now France are being displaced in favor of migrants in their own homeland. Then they were told that it was good for them. The rising crime from their government’s own statistics said that this multi-culturalism garbage was destroying their nation, but such things were made almost illegal to even discuss. These people couldn’t protect themselves and they couldn’t speak out against being invaded by foreigners that had no respect for their culture or even the desire to assimilate. Women in Sweden aren’t even permitted to name the ethnicity of their attacker because the Arab rape epidemic is so high.


Well, I chose to discuss it. I chose to make a video pertaining to the issue of “diversity” in books. The aim of the video was to say that pushing for diversity in places that were creative and of the art realm is completely wrong and that authors could do no right. If they included diverse characters but didn’t portray another race or ethnicity in a perfect way that matches other’s idea of what that race is, they’re racist. If they have a cast of all white characters, they’re even more racist. I noticed an author named Victoria Schwab experienced an attack of this nature. I felt bad for her. I wanted to make it right and let her know that she didn’t have to apologize to anyone for the fact that she was white and that identity politics shouldn’t play a role in the creative process unless an author wants it to. It should never be forced on them by means of intimidation. Not to mention that those who push for more “diversity” do so in ways that are in fact intimidation and downright vicious.


Well, apparently Victoria thought she had something to apologize for. She even said that as a white author, she had erred. I can’t even imagine that feeling. To not only be ashamed of being white, but also feeling as though you should have to apologize for it playing a role in the creative process. It was disgusting to see. And the fact that she continued to do so after I released the video and claimed that I was in the wrong only made me more aware. More of an identitarian. More of a white advocate. And more determined to wake up other whites to the danger of becoming a minority in their own country.


Japan has a mostly Japanese population. Israel has a mostly Jewish population. Nigeria has a mostly Nigerian population. China has a mostly Chinese population. Brazil has a mostly Brazilian population. Russia has a mostly Russian population. Thailand has a mostly Thai population. But countries of white European origin are always told that they need more diversity. That they’re lacking in some way. That the minorities in their country are being oppressed and whites are too selfish to share in any of their power. I have some tough news to break to the lefties out there. Whether they like it or not, the U.S. was created by Europeans for Europeans. We are not a nation of immigrants. This concept came about in a play in the 1910’s and wasn’t even written by an American. The first settlers in this country would look at you with amusement if you tried conveying the idea of an immigrant to them and that their colonies needed more “diversity.”


The left always makes the argument that we stole this land from the Native Americans. But here’s the real kicker. The Native Americans were already killing one another before we got here. They were also living in the stone age. To say that we committed genocide against them completely shits on Indians. For a culture that hadn’t even invented the wheel, they were our best adversaries in human history. It took us centuries to defeat them. And when we did, 40% of them assimilated into white culture.


Europeans were never the first to conquer other nations. Ethnicities and races with better technology have always done this to one another. Was it awful? Yes. But it happened and I’m sure as hell not going to take blame or give into grievance culture because of what people did centuries or even sixty years ago. I’m not them. I’m not responsible by mere happenstance of being born white.


Then the left always moves onto the slaves. Whites weren’t owed this land because it was built on the backs of slaves. Here’s another kicker for you. Over 25% of free blacks owned slaves. 4% of whites owned slaves (most of them Jewish in origin and very single one a democrat), the Irish were enslaved right alongside the blacks for a cheaper price because they were considered more expendable, and whites were often treated just as bad through indentured servitude, which is a form of slavery. Oh, and the first slave owner in the U.S. was a black man. I know, facts suck, right?


Everyone took part in slavery. Whites didn’t start it. They ended it. We sacrificed over 600,000+ men to end it. We got a clean slate after 1865. Were there still racial tensions that needed to be addressed? Yes. Absolutely. But the left can thank their democratic party for that because it was them who denied blacks Civil Rights after the war when the Republicans tried to push it through the government the first time. Yes, there was an attempt to give blacks citizenship and the right to vote directly after the war. I’ll bet most don’t know that.


These two things are often called greatest stains on American history. The Native Americans and slavery. Were they both terrible, yes. Was everyone equally at fault, yes. Anyone who denies that is denying history as a whole and therefore has no place in the realm of ideas. To deny facts is to say you have no right to debate.


Why did I go into all that? Because these are the weapons the left uses to try convincing whites of European origin in the U.S. that we have no right to our own country and therefore no right to dictate how immigration reform should be directed. I’m going to go ahead and say screw that.


I’m a white advocate because I realize that my own race is under direct threat. Is it a physical threat like a genocide where people are thrown into ovens? Not exactly. It’s much slower and methodical than that. We’re being overrun by populations that have a higher birthrate than us. Not just people from Latin countries, but also from Arab ones. People from third world countries tend to have more children regardless of the economic cost. White people tend to have as many as they can afford. If you’re offended by that fact, well…to be honest I really don’t care.


It was white Europeans who founded this country and made it into the wonderful nation it is today. Did people from other countries contribute? Of course! No one I can think of denies that. But it was mostly whites of European origin. Sorry not sorry. If we begin to lose whites as a majority in this country (which government statistics show could happen as soon as 2042), it will become another country. A third world country. Because many immigrants from third world countries don’t assimilate. Our founding fathers knew this, which was why so many had a disdain for the Pennsylvania Dutch, who we now call the Amish. And guess what, they still haven’t really assimilated.


Our founding fathers knew that when you change the demographics of a country, you inevitably change the entire country. There’s no such thing as magic dirt. There’s no magic spell that will make immigrants or migrants want to adopt American values. And as I mentioned in a previous post, if you think that those from Latin countries hold equal status in cultural norms and values with the U.S., try Googling Mexico’s age of consent.


Whites are under attack in Europe as well as in the U.S. We’re being made a minority in our own nations and told that it’s good for us. Can you imagine someone telling the Russians or the Chinese that being a minority in their own country is good for them? Maybe that’s the reason why HRC doesn’t like Putin. He protects the identity of the white Russian people and doesn’t import third world migrants for the sake of “cultural enrichment.” He recognizes the danger.


If we identify this as a problem, we’re called white supremacists, racists, bigots, toothless rednecks and Nazis. Every other culture or ethnicity I can think of takes pride in their origin, as they should. Whites are not allowed this luxury. They’re not even allowed to have their own country or ethnic-nation without criticism.


Well, fuck the left, and fuck their attack on what made the U.S. the most free country in the world. Europeans.


I love my race. I value my heritage. I have been given no choice but to take pride in my cultural history and ethnic identity, which is rich with legend, lore, the Renaissance, the Reformation, and so much more. The left plays the game of identity politics constantly as a means of demeaning whites into submission. And they’re good at it. Whites tend to pay up when you make them feel guilty, which is why the Catholic church has such a great monopoly on guilt.


However, I refuse to feel any guilt. I will never accept this bullshit concept of white privilege when minorities in the country were given rights back in the 1960’s along with countless acts for their grievances. The U.S. is a country where if you work hard enough, you can succeed. And I won’t let anyone convince me that they’re being oppressed in the U.S. while there’s real oppression going on in the world such as women being forced to wear burkas in the scorching heat of the Middle East. So don’t even bother trying.


Am I Alt-Right? I honestly don’t know. But this is one of the key issues that the Alt-Right has. They’re pro-white. Not because they want supremacy and to rule over all other races. or to kick other races out. But because they recognize that the white race is under attack. It’s not an obvious one, but once you see it, it’s difficult to unsee. And without the white race as a majority in the U.S., the country will become less and less free. Because when you replace the majority of the country with a growing minority that doesn’t share their same Christian values and a core appreciation of small government and individual freedom, you will replace them with less tolerant people. And if whites are so terrible and intolerant, why is everyone and their cousin trying to get through the U.S. border in hopes of something better?


I am a white advocate. No, I don’t care how anyone feels about it.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 16, 2016 15:45

December 15, 2016

Hollywood doubles down


We didn’t care what these thoughtless, cowed, leftist zombies for the state thought of we little American plebs before the election, and we certainly don’t care now.


I knew that Hollywood would double down after their candidate lost. I called them on it in my Celebrity Dickbag Awards video. But this is further proof that they will stop at nothing to subvert our Constitutional Republic. Notice how I didn’t say democracy?


The popular vote has never decided an election. Obama had less experience than Trump. The electoral college wasn’t created to determine who becomes president by merit. It was created to determine who becomes president by how each individual county and state votes, regardless of how the electors feel about the candidate personally. These idiot celebrities who are doing the bidding of globalist elites want the House to decide the president because it’s occupied by democrats.


No wonder they disabled the comments for the video. Their egos just couldn’t handle our indifference to their plight anymore.


Shut up celebrity dickbags. God-emperor will look after you.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 15, 2016 13:22

December 14, 2016

Conservative women under fire

I received a comment on a former video of mine that didn’t sit well with me. Not because it was from someone who disagreed with me, but because it made it even more apparent to me the level of misinformation that our youth is experiencing in our god-awful cultural Marxist U.S. education system.


The comment was long, but the one sentence that stuck out to me was “Women for Trump = Trees for deforestation.”


This implies that women who want Trump in office are women who don’t value themselves, their gender, or women’s rights. HRC is the female champion and women who do vote Trump are misogynistic, etc. Aka: the gender card. (I refer to these voters as pussy voters. They like the PUSSY).


The democrats have mysteriously had a monopoly on women’s rights for decades. Not because they’ve ever been champions for women’s rights. Quite the opposite. They saw what they could gain from exploiting them.


Few realize that the Republicans were the true champions of the 19th amendment. They supported women’s right to vote since 1854. President Ulysses S. Grant gained women’s right to vote in Wyoming in 1869. A similar act was attempted in California, but the democrats defeated it. By 1918, several states passed laws allowing women to vote. In the end, the Republicans won women’s suffrage with a vote of 304-89. 91% of Republicans voted for it and the other Democrats who did probably had angry wives at home who wouldn’t give them any action if they didn’t. I’m guessing…


Democrats always use the argument of conservatives attacking Planned Parenthood and a woman’s right to abortion. Any conservative with a knowledge of history knows the truth behind Planned Parenthood. Margaret Sanger, its founder, created Planned Parenthood as a means of using eugenics to get rid of the black race and other unwanted minorities. Abortion has never been about women’s rights and never will be. It’s solely for the purpose of keeping minority birth rates in check by giving them easy access to abortions. Therefore blacks could never become a powerful force in America. This is why the majority of Planned Parenthood centers are in the poorest zip codes in the U.S.


Then moving onto feminism. Feminism was funded by the C.I.A. not because women’s rights was something they believed in. It was because they knew if women joined the work force, they could get income tax from an additional half of the population. That was more money flowing into the system. A system of bigger government leaning toward socialism. It would help rip apart the nuclear family. Women wouldn’t stay at home with the kids anymore because they would be “liberated” and their children could get into school faster leading to more indoctrination into cultural Marxist theories. Studies have overwhelmingly shown that women have been made increasingly unhappier each decade since women’s liberation. Believe it or not, most women in their mid-thirties don’t find being a corporate slave very satisfying. Meanwhile, women at home with their children find life very satisfying. And which party pushes women into the work force? Democrats.


Just for fun I’ll add in the fact that one of the very first things Hitler did in the Third Reich was get women into the work force so they could bring more tax revenue for their socialist system. Democrats love to bring up Hitler, so there’s that.


Granted just these few tidbits of history, I don’t really understand why liberals seem to believe that a vote for Trump equates to voting against women’s rights. The democrats are bringing in people from third world countries that have absolutely no respect for women or their rights, and they’re beginning to replace those who do in large numbers.


Immigration from third world countries is the biggest threat to American woman at this point in time. And that’s the one thing I want Trump to fix. Anyone who wants to tell me that Latin cultures respect women, I dare you to Google Mexico’s age of consent. Prepare to be shocked.


I didn’t reply to this comment on the video because quite frankly, comment battles bore me to death. They don’t achieve anything. I’m not going to convince this person of my opinion. She won’t convince me of hers. But her comment being there I’m sure makes her feel like she righted a wrong or got her opinion out there. It’s welcome to stay. Because I want others to know that liberals think this way. That they believe any woman who votes Republican doesn’t have women’s best interests at heart. Meanwhile, HRC wanted to bring in thousands of migrants from Arab countries that not only don’t respect women’s rights, but participate in honor killings, rape epidemics, throwing acid in women’s faces, zero marriage rights for women, and the practice of wearing 100% black polyester burkas in the scorching heat as a form of submission.


By the way, Hitler LOVED Islam. Once again for the liberals who always like to reference Hitler.


Trump is a god send for American women. Or at least he will be if he fixes immigration. I’m going to hold him to that standard. If he doesn’t succeed, I will consider him a failure and I will criticize him. But until that time, I remain hopeful.


 


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 14, 2016 11:20

December 13, 2016

Why stay at home moms are rock stars

Earlier this week, I was doing some Googling on stay-at-home moms. I was curious to know certain things because if and when I have children, I would like to stay home with them and potentially home school them. My friend Stacy did it with her children and sang the praises of being able to educate her children more efficiently by herself. I thought this was not only bold, but incredible. Especially given that after taking the red pill, I learned just how indoctrinated and poorly educated I was in the multitude of school districts I went through as a kid. I don’t want my children going through that.


I found one guy on Reddit that said something I found rather unsettling. When a woman was asking if guys liked women who wanted to be stay-at-home moms, the guy responded quite coldly with, “I want a partner. Not a dependent.”


I could only wonder why someone would say something like this. Reasoning would tell me that this guy didn’t have children. He didn’t have a wife. He didn’t have any traditional values. And he had obviously been indoctrinated like I once was.


I knew that stay-at-home moms had taken a knocking as of late. Thank you, feminism. But I was surprised to see that some of the anti-mother concepts had reached inside the minds of men as well.


Recent studies have revealed that children who spend a lot of time in day care facilities because moms are at work suffer from all kinds of emotional problems when they grow up. Paul Joseph Watson even claimed in a video that it’s the daycare generation that’s given us the oh-so lovable SJW network of spinster childless harpies.


While I was growing up, my father went to work and my mom stayed at home with me. She occasionally took a part-time job after my brother and I went to school. But she was there. She made dinner. She cleaned. She had projects. And she handled a lot that I never even knew about because I was busy “learning” in the local indoctrination factory known a U.S. public schooling. When I asked my dad about it he said to me, “your mom had the hard job. Mine was easy compared to hers.”


That’s the honest truth in a nutshell. Mothers who stay at home and care for their children are demonized by modern femi-nazi culture as women who have taken the easy road. Women who gave up on their true potential. Women who are dependent on a man. Women who take advantage of a guy’s paycheck. I’m calling bullshit on that one. Stay-at-home moms have the hardest and most noble of jobs in the entire world.


Apparently, sitting at a desk hacking away at a keyboard in a corporate environment is the new highlight of a woman’s life. I have many happily married friends. I have friends with children. I have friends who have children and work. I have friends who are stay-at-home moms. And guess what? It’s easy for me to see who’s happiest of them all. The women who are committed and have children are among the most fulfilled in the whole country. Women who end up leading a life of pleasing their corporate masters end up bitter. I’ve seen it. And I can easily tell which women will end up going down that path and claim that their dogs or cats are their children. They always end up unhappy but unwilling to admit it.


I understand better than most that living off one income is difficult. Especially for millennials. This will be the first generation to be far worse off financially than their parents. It’s one of the reasons why the white birth-rate is dramatically on the decline. Because who can afford to have children when it takes two incomes to afford a house payment or an apartment in an overcrowded expensive city that abuses 20-something year-olds out of their youth by telling them that city living is the height of sophistication.


I see millennials as a lost generation. By trying to break glass ceilings, they allowed the floor to rot beneath them. This is largely not their own fault. But it’s no wonder why socialism appeals to so many millennials. They’ve never experienced a good economy where there’s more jobs than there are people to fill them. When I went looking for work after graduating high school, it was almost impossible. The first question I was asked was “do you speak Spanish?” My mom wanted me to learn French in high school because my grandfather’s family was French. The answer being “no, I don’t” meant that many jobs were closed off to me. Jobs that I would have wanted. I would have had no problem cleaning hotel rooms or working in the back of a Chipotle. But even now I couldn’t get a job there. And I know that this isn’t an issue singular to living in the deep south and close to the border. But remember, to any leftists, bringing up third world immigration realities is deemed racist. Just trying bringing it up and watch the mental gymnastics take place right before your eyes.


The struggle won’t be healed any time soon. The nuclear family has been under attack since the 1950s or 60s. And I don’t see an end to it any time soon. But to the gents or ladies out there who think stay-at-home moms are somehow lesser, take some advice from my own father and know this. Your job is easy compared to hers.


Unless you’re in the military. But that’s a completely different story.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 13, 2016 14:08

December 12, 2016

In mourning for writing

Women and African-American sf writers created trumpist dystopias because they were beta testing trumpism.


Kameron “Geek Feminist Revolution” Hurley notes that writers like Octavia Butler crafted stories that feel eerily prescient of our present moments with books like Parable of the Sower and Parable of the Talents — but not because they were fortune tellers, but because trumpism — corrupt confiscation of wealth, overbroad policing powers, discriminatory hiring practices, impunity for violent abusers — has been a daily fact of life for brown people, women and queer people.


William Gibson has described science fiction as “predicting the present” — taking parts of the future that are here but “just not evenly distributed,” and writing about them as though they would become the salient facts of life for everyone in the years to come. For the cyberpunks, that meant imagining that poor people might have the mobile computing devices and access to computer networks that only the most privileged business elites and technologists were using in the mid-1980s.


While some science fiction was giving us futures in which the tools of the elites pushed out into the wider world, writers like Butler were presenting futures in which the daily grind of racialized people, women and poor people became the daily lives of the white middle class. Butler’s best writing on the subject comes from the Clinton years, when Bill Clinton weaponized Reagan’s attacks on poor people with his crime bill and welfare “reforms,” just as neoliberal trade deals and automation were accelerating the deindustrialization of America. The precarity of Butler’s characters, going from bare middle class stability and respectibility to homelessness and a nomadic, criminalized existence was just a fictionally amplified version of the lives of millions of Americans a quarter century again, and now that their trauma is being visited on larger slices of the nation, Butler’s work takes on the aura of fortune-telling.


For the last four or five months, I’ve been in mourning for what I thought I knew about the publishing industry, about my love of writing, about those who consume the YA/Fantasy/Sci-fi genres, and about the audience I slowly realized could never be satiated in their wicked pursuit of social justice.


Taking the ‘red pill’ and coming to terms with the fact that modern day liberalism is nothing short of yesterday’s communism and fascism came with a lot of suffering. That suffering stemmed from the realization that the art form and industry I loved most had been hijacked by soft-core communists. It made me realize that I never wanted to be traditionally published. That crowd (particularly in the YA/Fantasty/Sci-fi realm) is incestuously liberal/communist. It’s hurting consumers. It’s hurting readers. It’s hurting the young adults who continue to believe that anything populist or nationalist is evil.


The worst part about this revelation was the knowledge that those in the publishing industry and those whose writing I had been admiring for years, didn’t know any of this. They still don’t. They probably never will. And worse yet, they’re actively participating in it. Trump’s victory in this U.S. election wasn’t just a victory for Republicans. It was a victory against communism. A victory against a false ‘social justice’ narrative that was intentionally designed by the Frankfurt school philosophers to start a socialist revolution dating all the way back to the 1950s. It’s now in our culture via the universities. As George Carlin once said, “this is the best we can do folks. Garbage in, garbage out.” And he was right. The universities are largely to blame.


The humanities programs in universities have completely indoctrinated the youth of America to believe that everything about Western Civilization (aka: the patriarchy) is poison. A poison that can only be treated by tearing down the foundations that the U.S. was built on. White people are a plague that can do no right and capitalism is evil because it takes opportunities away from others. People who have lived in the U.S. and benefited from it’s splendor buy into this theory and start to view everyone as being oppressed by the wickedness of white people and capitalism. In the end, everyone is made equal by means of making everyone equally poor and starving to death. The Russians know this. The Vietnamese know this. The Cambodians know this. The Cubans know this. The Chinese knows this. And now Venezuela is getting a hard lesson on the evils of “social justice” and what it really means.


But we don’t learn about communist Russia in the American humanities departments in university, do we? We don’t learn about Lenin, Mao, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, or Kim Jong-Un. We don’t teach our young that Hilter’s Nazi party stood for National Socialist German Worker’s Party. Keyword being socialist. Instead our youth thinks that anything right wing is fascism, even though there’s countless evidence that proves Hitler was a socialist. This misinformation was no accident. They don’t want our youth realizing that socialism is evil. Or everything they’re fighting for has caused the deaths of hundreds of millions of people worldwide in the 20th century alone. Worse yet, these students in university believe that their education has given them the tools to spot the “racist” or spot the “bigot” or spot the “fascist” because only educated people can do so.


These authors who write dystopia novels while believing that they’re revealing something about the world through the evils of trumpism have been force fed the lies of social justice. I have no doubt that they will double down. We will see countless novels in the next couple of years about the evils of what happens in totalitarian or authoritarian societies from authors who don’t realize they’re apart of a movement that desires nothing less of  what they most fear.


I’ll leave you with the wise words of a man taken from us too soon. Andrew Breitbart.


screenshot-308


 


 


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 12, 2016 09:16

December 11, 2016

How fake news reports

CAIRO, Dec 11 (Reuters) – An explosion inside Cairo’s Coptic cathedral killed at least 25 people, most of them women, and injured 49, Egypt’s state television said.


Never say the word “bomb” when referring to an Islamic attack. Always say “explosion.” As if something spontaneously combusted.


Security sources told Reuters that at least six children were among the dead. There was no immediate claim of responsibility, however, some supporters of the Islamic State militant group celebrated the attack on social media.


When referring to a clear threat of Islam, such as ISIS or Al-Qaeda, always call them an “Islamic State militant group.” Because we don’t know the motives behind someone yelling aloha snack bar. Sorry, I mean Allah Akbar.


“God is great, God is great, God is great,” one wrote on Telegram messenger. “God bless the person who did this blessed act,” wrote another, also on Telegram.


Remember, not all Muslims! It’s just some internet trolls.


A device containing about 12 kg (26 pounds) of the explosive TNT had detonated on the women’s side of the cathedral, the security sources said. “As soon as the priest called us to prepare for prayer, the explosion happened,” Emad Shoukry, who was inside the cathedral when the blast took place, told Reuters.


Even better than an explosion, just call it a “device.” Calling it a bomb or a potential suicide bombing is just too darn obvious.


Orthodox Copts, who make up about 10 percent of Egypt’s 90 million people, are the Middle East’s biggest Christian community. They have long complained of discrimination under successive Egyptian leaders.


I can’t imagine why.


Islamists are waging an insurgency led by Islamic State’s branch in North Sinai, where hundreds of soldiers and police have been killed. The insurgents have also launched deadly attacks Cairo and other cities.


-Huffington Compost


Always make it clear that these extremists hate their own as well as Christians. We can’t judge their hatred as being single minded. That would be ethnocentric.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 11, 2016 05:41

December 9, 2016

Trump VS Liberal Logic

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 09, 2016 07:11

December 5, 2016

D-Day vs the Feminazi

img_4802Call it feminism. Call it diversity. Call it gender equality.


I’m gonna call it what it is. Fucking sick.


Women should have been on the battlefield of D-day? Does Hernandez have a problem with Steven Spielberg’s direction of ‘Saving Private Ryan’ and his casting choices? Maybe I have a problem with the potential of film directors to blatantly ignore historical fact and put women in a combat scene where there were none. This dishonors the men that were there and who died in battle.


There have been countless studies done on women in the military. While there are some who serve our country in ways that are remarkable and I commend them, I find the claim that women should have been on the battlefield of Normandy completely disgusting. What kind of culture asks its women to take to the battlefield? In the words of Milo Yiannopolous, it’s ‘societal suicide.’ The studies have overwhelmingly shown that women under perform on the front lines and in training. It destroys morale, they end up having to be protected, it distracts the men, the PTSD hits women harder, and the generals who are pushing it forward have generally never seen combat. The Marine Corp. put sensors on a whole unit of women and men in a 90 day exercise. Women drastically under performed.


If it’s between a military that operates or a military that panders to femi-nazi SJW idiots, I’ll take those the SJWs call misogynists. Is the U.S. ready for women to come back with legs blown off? Or with half their face melted from a grenade?


Soldiers need to be focused. Soldiers need to kill without remorse. Soldiers need to come back from battle and be able to acclimate to living normal lives again.


The one place where the SJW narrative should be shunned is the military. Gamergate +1. Military 0.


If you needed more proof that feminism is cancer, you just got it.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 05, 2016 14:31

Winning AIDS is contagious!

Sharing… because we need to bring awareness to the cause of Winning AIDS!




 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on December 05, 2016 11:47

December 4, 2016

Bre Faucheux's Blog

Bre Faucheux
Bre Faucheux isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Bre Faucheux's blog with rss.