Bre Faucheux's Blog, page 37
December 27, 2016
RIP Carrie Fisher
[image error]
The lovely and beautiful Carrie Fisher who inspired me through her portrayal of Princess Leia from a young age, has died.
She will be missed.
May the force be with her.
Late Night with Milo?
A piece from the Columbia Journalism Review says the successes of Breitbart Senior editor MILO and President-elect Donald Trump are a response to late-night comedians like Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, who are notorious for attacking opponents of progressive America.
Lee Siegel of the Columbia Journalism Review suggests that Breitbart Senior editor MILO is a response to the late-night comedians who have made careers out of attacking conservatives and libertarians. Siegel adds that MILO represents the “dark, twisted underside” of the persona that Colbert adopted for his late-night program. The Columbia Journalism Review is the first mainstream outlet to declare MILO as the right’s response to satirists like Stewart and Colbert.
Yes, in the darkest days of the Bush years, they were sources of therapy, catharsis, and occasional illumination. But they were mining the same vein of contempt for reality as their counterparts on the other side. Just as the far right learned some tactical lessons from the 1960s’ countercultural left, the crew at Breitbart et al. learned some lessons from the two erstwhile prophets of Comedy Central. Breitbart creation Milos Yiannopoulos’s “Dangerous Faggot” is the dark, twisted underside of Colbert’s creation of the type of bullying, autocratic persona that would be perfectly at home at Breitbart.
The column mentions an op-ed written by Trevor Noah, the current host of The Daily Show, which details Noah’s concerns that the show’s audience expected him to “attack, crush, demolish, and destroy” opponents of American progressivism.
Siegel argues that because Stewart and Colbert weren’t producing their shows for the “good of the republic,” but rather the to bring in revenue for Comedy Central, the product that they offered was tainted by a sense of commercialism and celebrity. He suggests that Donald Trump, as a former reality television star, benefitted politically from the same sense of celebrity enjoyed by the likes of Stewart and Colbert.
Siegel concludes, in a sentiment that mirrors Andrew Breitbart’s theme that “politics is downstream from culture,” by suggesting that culture is the door by which bad politics can enter the American landscape. Siegel argues that the media must sacrifice “readership and profit” for the sake of protecting the American political landscape.
I think a late night talk show with Milo would be the perfect dose of medicine that television needs at the moment. For years Colbert, Stewart, Maher, and other left wing dickbags have dominated the late night talk shows. The problem with this is that many people get their news from these late night talking heads who really don’t know what they’re talking about and have to maintain a certain level of stupidity in order to please advertisers.
Andrew Breitbart was right when he said politics is downstream from culture. Placing a firey conservative in the late night talk show realm would only help right wing movements. And potentially give conservatism a new direction that it so desperately needs at the moment. Conservatism needs to decide whether or not it’s going to wither away and die or have a revival. I personally would love to see a revival with alt-right leanings to replace the old cucks that love to virtue-signal to their liberal friends and do nothing to conserve what made the U.S. the most free country in the world to start with. After all, the alt-right was started as an “alternative” to mainstream conservatism. It’s time conservatives started listening to them.
December 26, 2016
Conservative revival or death?
When I hear Milo speak about what true conservatism stands for, I think to myself that conservatism sounds like a wonderful thing that I want to be a part of.
Then I read about how conservatives have given away so much to the left on gun control.
Then I read about how conservatives have given away so much to the left on immigration.
Then I read about how conservatives have given away so much to the left on transgender issues.
Then I read about how conservatives have given away so much to the left on higher taxes.
Then I read about how conservatives have given away so much to the left on banning hate speech.
I knew before I even took the label of conservative that others would want, if not enjoy, placing guilt on me for failures in our government. The failures that have given over to pleasing the left so they could avoid being called racists, bigots, Nazis, xenophobes, sexist, misogynist, etc.
But when I hear Milo’s definition, it sounds like something I want to aspire to.
I also hear members of the alt-right talking about how conservatives are completely ill-equipped, if not incapable of addressing the problems that the U.S. will face in the coming decades ahead. This is without a doubt, extremely true. Conservatives, if they want to survive, must adopt some of the theories that the alt-right has developed. Things such as race realism, human biodiversity, closed borders (until demographics can heal a bit). And they must do so without the fear of being called racist or anti-immigrant. I personally think that anyone against these things is anti-American. Because they have no understanding of what made America a strong country to begin with. And here’s a clue. It was never diversity.
The alt-right says constantly that conservatism is dead. Maybe it is. Or maybe it’s evolving into something else. Something that the palecons and neocons can’t fathom or even come close to understanding. Which might be why they are still scratching their heads at the ascendancy of God-Emperor to the cherry blossom throne.
But Milo is certainly right about one thing in this conversation. Conservatism is a bit lost at the moment. The philosophy in general is lost. But while being lost and not concretely defined, maybe something new can rise from the ashes. That might be the alt-right. If so, I want on board.
December 24, 2016
December 23, 2016
Gun free zones are kill zones
The family of late pop singer Christina Grimmie has filed a lawsuit against the “gun-free” concert venue in which she was shot and killed on June 10, 2016.
A former contestant on reality singing competition The Voice, Grimmie was killed by Kevin James Loibl in the Plaza Live Theater as she signed autographs after performing. Loibl took his own life thereafter and two Glock 9mm handguns were found on his person.
According to ABC News, the Grimmie family’s suit alleges the theater had “negligent security.”
“The owners of the facility in which she performed and the outside security company hired to provide security for the concert … failed to take adequate security measures to ensure the safety of the performers and the attendees at the concert venue,” the suit alleges.
On June 11, the Crime Prevention Research Center reported that the theater was a designated “gun-free” zone. Breitbart News previously reported that Loibl passed a background check for his firearms. Police investigating the attack said Loibl not only passed a background check for his guns but did not pick them up until after completing a waiting period required by Florida law.
“We are hopeful that our lawsuit will bring widespread attention to the issue of concert security and safety and more effective safeguards will be implemented to protect performers and attendees at concerts around the U.S. in the future,” the family wrote in the suit.
I’m just glad to hear that they’re not blaming the gun company or gun laws. Any venue that’s proudly anti-gun or a gun free zone should be sued if those inside the venue can’t protect themselves or be protected.
Gun free zones are nothing more than death traps. A bunch of sheep grazing where wolves are expected to stay clear but are openly invited… as long as they promise to play nice.
Is identity for whites inevitable?
The University of Wisconsin, Madison is offering a course in the spring semester entitled “The Problem of Whiteness,” which aims to ask “what an ethical white identity entails, what it means to be #woke, and consider the journal Race Traitor’s motto, ‘treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.’”
The syllabus for the course, which will be offered by the University of Wisconsin’s African Cultural Studies department during the upcoming spring semester, claims that students will be asked to consider “what it really means to be white.”
In an interview with the online conservative campus watchdog site The College Fix, the course’s instructor explained that the course was designed to force white students to consider what it means to be white. “Whites rarely or never questioned what it is to be white,” Assistant Professor Damon Sajnani said. “So you go through life taking it for granted without ever questioning or critically interrogating it.”
Sajnani went on to claim that he wants his students to understand that race isn’t a biological or cultural construct, but rather a political and social construct. He claims that because of racial oppression, African-Americans are constantly forced to consider what it means to be black and whites typically don’t think what it means to be white.
Sajnani told The College Fix that he is a far-left instructor who views both the Republican and Democratic parties as instruments of the American right-wing.
And people wonder why there’s currently growing strength in the white nationalist movement…
This is why Trump won the election. The real swing vote in the U.S. isn’t any particular state. It’s white people. The same people who voted for Obama, some of them twice, are now being told that their whiteness is what’s wrong with society today.
Whites… who went to war and lost 620,000 young men to end slavery in the U.S. Civil War. Whites… who went to war and lost 100,000 young men in World War I in Europe. Whites… who went to war and lost 400,000 young men to stop Fascism. Whites… who ousted the British twice to make sure the American colonies remained free. Whites… who were enslaved alongside the blacks. But that’s not on the uni curriculum. Whites… who have given minorities beyond their fair share of generosity to atone for their ancestors sins. In other words, whites today are giving reparations to other ethnic groups that they’ve never harmed and fought and died for minorities who now hate them.
Their gratitude is overwhelming.
My question is… with the white birthrate dramatically on the decline, do the whites taking this course actually believe that once whites are a minority that this treatment will stop? That they’ll earn respect of other ethnic groups because they’re no longer a majority? That the growing hatred for whites will suddenly be healed? If you’re white, others won’t care if you feel for the plight of minorities. Your whiteness will make you complicit with the crimes of ancestors you have nothing to do with. If I recall correctly, the Nazis that the left love to refer to didn’t care if someone was only half Jewish.
Too little too late
A member of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) has said illegal migrants such as Christmas market attack suspect Anis Amri play the German asylum system and should not have been in the country in the first place.
MP for Berlin and CDU member Dr. Philipp Lengsfeld told BBC Radio 4’s Today audience that men like Amri “fits a profile” that sceptics of Merkel’s Willkommenskulture (‘welcome culture’) have been discussing for some time.
“They are young guys who have all sorts of plans but who are not from civil war areas. This guy has come to Lampedusa, burnt down a camp, has been sentenced to four years, escaped Italian authorities, is wanted around Europe, around Germany, playing our system and our officials,” said Dr. Lengsfeld.
He then stated that following revelations of the suspect’s background that it was right to review Germany’s asylum policies – a suggestion backed by Merkel’s coalition partner and Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU) leader Horst Seehofer.
Affirming that Amri should not have been in the country in the first place, Dr. Lengsfeld said: “These types of people are deliberately hiding their identity, their country of origin, their age, their status, and are in no need of shelter as asylum seekers in Germany.
“They should not be in the country, they should not be allowed into the country and we should be discussing these border transition zones for quite some time and they have been blocked by the left side of the aisle.”
“It is not acceptable that we call everybody refugees,” the Berlin politician added.
Dr. Lengsfeld is a member of the ‘Berlin Circle’ – a traditionalist group within Merkel’s CDU which wants to return the party to its conservative roots and roll back Merkel’s migrant policy.
When asked by presenter John Humphrys whether it was reasonable to expect that those under the pressure of fleeing persecution would be able to collect their identification papers, the CDU politician replied: “Look at this individual and others who roam our parks. His past time was dealing drugs in Berlin and North-Rhine Westphalia. This is not a guy – a family – being bombed out of Aleppo.
“It is so obvious I don’t need a police agency to come to that determination.”
92% of all asylum/refugee cases in the U.S. during recent decades have been discovered to be frauds. And yet we throw the word refugee around to anyone who wants to flee their own country for reasons that can’t be proven as if the western world is a hotel.
Germany has accepted thousands of Muslim military age young men from countries that aren’t at war. Then the German politicians expected them to assimilate. Or worse, they expected the people of Europe to adhere to the needs of the migrants. And when people objected, the leftist politicians (particularly in the Green party) told them that their replacement in their own country was good for them.
Was this an act by globalists to give one final push to their agenda because they realized that national populism was on the rise? Or was this merely the guilt of white European politicians who wanted to virtue signal to the world how tolerant they are by allowing unvetted economic migrants to flood their countries like a wave of locusts ready to feed on anything they saw?
Regardless of the reason, over 55% of the German population still supports Angela Merkel. The country might be beyond saving. But they can certainly serve as a warning to the rest of the world. Attacks like we saw this week at a Christmas market in Berlin show what open borders, globalism, and a psychotic immigration policy does to a population. A nation without pride, borders, or an identity isn’t a nation. It’s a hotel where anyone can stay and trash the rooms without punishment.
December 22, 2016
December 19, 2016
Germany has fallen
[image error]
After a Nice-style truck attack in Berlin killed nine and at this moment has injured several others, Germans remain calm. This is exactly why Germany will fall. This is exactly why so many German women are being raped and molested. This is exactly why Islam is marking their territory everywhere they go. This is exactly why the migrants don’t fear repercussions for their actions. This is exactly why the feminization of men should be resisted. This is exactly why the birthrate of Muslims in Germany will soon exceed those of the Germans. This… is how a nation falls.
Bre Faucheux's Blog
- Bre Faucheux's profile
- 79 followers
