Bre Faucheux's Blog, page 33

February 5, 2017

Buzzfeed Under Fire

Let this serve as a potential warning to others in the hoaxing media.


BuzzFeed is facing a lawsuit from a technology firm following its publication of an unverified dossier claiming President Donald Trump has close ties to the Russian government.


According to a report by McClatchy DC, XBT Holdings — a technology firm named in the dosser with Russian interests — is filing a defamation lawsuit against BuzzFeed, its editor-in-chief Ben Smith, as well as former British intelligence spy Christopher Steele, for the publication of what it describes as “libelous, unverified and untrue allegations.”


“The dossier included libelous, unverified and untrue allegations regarding XBT, Webzilla and Gubarev. The lawsuits seek yet undetermined compensation for the damages suffered by XBT, Webzilla and Gubarev as the result of the publication of the dossier,” a statement from XBT read.


“We were shocked to see our good name wrongly included and published in this unsubstantiated report. We are confident that the courts will review the evidence of our non-involvement and provide fair and reasonable compensation from the perpetrators of this outrageous allegation,” it continued.


Some of the unverified claims included in the dossier were that Donald Trump had worked in collaboration with the Russian government in the hacking of DNC internal emails. as well as that Trump had participated in extremely graphic sexual fetishism in the Moscow Ritz-Carlton.


The dossier also implicated the Russian technology entrepreneur Aleksej Gubarev as being heavily involved in the collaboration, without providing any evidence to substantiate the claim. BuzzFeed has since retracted his name from the dossier and apologized for its publication, although the lawsuit contends that it has left his “personal and professional reputation in tatters,” and presented a threat to his family’s safety.


Milo Yiannopolous claimed months ago that Buzzfeed would likely go out of business within the next ten years. This libelous article that they printed is proof that his claim might be true.


Buzzfeed is the homebase for fake news. They consistently print false stories not only about the God-Emperor, but also about the public at large. They’ve made horrible videos condemning white males and actively seek to divide people by claiming any white male or women who doesn’t kill themselves must be a racist. Or at least that’s the conclusion one inevitably comes to when reading the trash that they print.


I studied journalism for a year before abandoning the major. I realized that the majority of mainstream media was bought out by advertisers and that I wouldn’t be able to print the truth. This was long before I was even red pilled. Unfortunately, many others in the industry didn’t come to this same conclusion while studying journalism while at university. 


I sincerely hope that the libel laws are given stricter guidelines making it harder for the hoaxing media to print outright lies such as this one in the future. Honest journalists (if such a thing exists) that print factual articles that can be backed up by real sources won’t have much to fear from stricter laws on journalism. But those who intentionally slander and dox those they disagree with will.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 05, 2017 07:26

February 3, 2017

February 2, 2017

#UCBerkleyRiot Against Milo

As I groggily woke up in bed this morning and did my usual internet junkie thing of allowing the light from my iPhone screen to bring me back to the land of the living, I was stunned, and yet not so stunned, to see that Milo’s speech at UC Berkley was canceled. The event was terrorized by rioters from the progressive far left, socialists, antifas, and others who caused so much chaos that the event wasn’t even permitted to take place. They shot off fireworks at the building, broke glass, smashed ATMs, set fires, and lord knows what else.


Milo had to be evacuated, the police (from what I’ve gathered), were so ineffective that it’s sparked conspiracy theories, and the SJW Chancellor of UC Berkley proclaimed Milo to be engaging in hate speech before he even arrived. I have no trouble believing this as I’ve heard of other cases where police refuse to protect right wingers at NPI and American Renaissance events, let alone a Milo speech.


The BBC reported on this outrageous action on the far left by doing what they do best. Blaming Milo. And claiming that Milo was an “alt-right” speaker. We on the alt-right know that Milo is NOT alt right. We refer to him as alt-light. Or a civil nationalist. Milo has done a great deal to distance himself from the alt right, and the alt right has done a great deal to distance him from their movement as well.


I do see overlaps on occasion as it was Milo and many others in the alt-light who brought me over to the alt-right, but Milo is NOT alt-right. He’s a gay, Jewish, conservative who works at Breitbart. He discusses feminism, obesity, Islam, cultural appropriation, leftist insanity, and many other triggering subjects that the left can’t stand being consistently beat on. And maybe that’s the real reason why this happened. The left can’t win arguments anymore. So they’ve stopped making them. Who needs words when you can shut down the opposition by being violent? Who needs words when you can make people think twice about going to a Milo event by threatening those who want to attend? Who needs words when the attendees know the police won’t protect them?


Milo uploaded a wonderful video after the event to explain his side of what happened. I’ll link it down below.


He made several very good points. One of them being that the left has been trying for quite some time to equate words with violence. Which is ironic, because the left is the first to use violence in order to shut down free speech, or speech that they just don’t like. And lucky for them, the hoaxing mainstream media doesn’t cover it when they do engage with violence. The left never disavows their crazies but is constantly seeking to force right wingers to disavow the right’s extremists. Meanwhile, had this been right wingers freaking out and rioting, it would televised everywhere as a testament to the crazies that exist on the right. But the hoaxing media was eager to spin this in any way they could to thrust blame on Milo rather than on their own extremists on the left.


I’m left wondering what the repercussions of this event will be. How will colleges respond in the future? This was Milo’s last tour stop, but do future tours for conservatives or right wingers in general stop from this moment onward? Will other university officials claim that they don’t have proper security measures and ban all right wing speakers? I wouldn’t be surprised. They have a legitimate argument for saying so now. Especially when the police didn’t do anything to tamper the violence.


Richard Spencer has spoken about wanting to have his own college tour. If someone as harmless as Milo is met with riots such as this, I don’t see how a self-proclaimed Alt-Righter, let alone the man who founded the term “Alt-Right” can possibly survive on a college campus.


Will these universities actually step up to the plate and say that they’ve had enough? I wonder if some of them realize that they could be a voice of truth, reason, and logic, and future tuition payments if they advertised their campuses as free speech zones where these lefties wouldn’t rule with an iron fist. But sadly, I don’t see that happening in the future. As much as I would like it to.


As I write this, Kassey Dillon just tweeted that Antifas tweeted out Milo’s location and he had to be evacuated again.


They can only have one motive by tweeting out his location. They’re hoping someone will do unspeakable violence toward Milo. The thin line between the actions of ISIS and the violence of the left in the West is becoming increasingly blurred.



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 02, 2017 08:34

February 1, 2017

Charge CNN for Fraud

The God-Emperor knows…


During a listening session for Black History Month on Wednesday, President Donald Trump said, “I don’t watch CNN. … I don’t like watching fake news.”


Trump said, “You read all about Dr. Martin Luther King a week ago, when somebody said I took the statue out of my office, and it turned out that that was fake news. The statue is cherished. It’s one of the favorite things in the — and we have some good ones. We have Lincoln, and we have Jefferson and we have Dr. Martin Luther King, and we have –, but they said the statue, the bust of Dr. Martin Luther King was taken out of the office, and it was never even touched. So, I think it was a disgrace, but that’s the way the press is, very unfortunate.”


He added, “I don’t watch CNN. … I don’t like watching fake news…but Fox has treated me very nice, wherever fox is, thank you.”


The alternative media was able to do something I never even knew they were capable of pulling off. They turned the mainstream media’s joke of a comeback around by proclaiming the alternative media to be fake news… by labeling the mainstream media as fake news. Which they are. So much so that the God-Emperor sees this. 


CNN panicked last year at a Trump rally when the people chanted “CNN Sucks.” CNN claimed it was dangerous to make such claims about their network. But when an entire stadium is yelling at you in such a way and you make no effort of self-reflection to better understand why people are mad, maybe it’s you.


The time has come to hold these lying networks accountable, and to charge CNN with fraud or slander every time they print a knowingly false story. Anyone who still listens to them or gives them any credit is acutely unaware that CNN has the credibility of the National Enquirer. It’s time to make it common knowledge to the normies.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 01, 2017 09:30

January 31, 2017

A Traitor’s Fate


President Trump fired his acting attorney general on Monday night, removing her as the nation’s top law enforcement officer after she defiantly refused to defend his executive order closing the nation’s borders to refugees and people from predominantly Muslim countries.


In an escalating crisis for his 10-day-old administration, the president declared in a statement that Sally Q. Yates, who had served as deputy attorney general under President Barack Obama, had betrayed the administration by announcing that Justice Department lawyers would not defend Mr. Trump’s order against legal challenges.


The president replaced Ms. Yates with Dana J. Boente, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, saying that he would serve as attorney general until Congress acts to confirm Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama. In his first act in his new role, Mr. Boente announced that he was rescinding Ms. Yates’s order.



Such a fate should be bestowed to all who defy the rulings of the God Emperor over his kingdom. Particularly those of the Obama administration who openly stand against the God Emperor and virtue signal to everyone over rulings that Obama initiated while still in office.


Did anyone tell Yates that the executive order was originally set forth by Obama concerning refugees and immigration before leaving office? Does it matter? Did anyone tell her that 92% of refugee cases are eventually proven fraudulent? Probably not. Would she care? Doubtful. Is anyone outside of the loyal legion of followers of the God Emperor aware that these executive orders might very well save Western Civilization from the path of self-destruction concerning massive changes in demographics that resemble those that caused the fall of Rome? Actually, I’m might be the only history nerd in the room on that one.


Hail the God Emperor! Down with traitors!


For your entertainment and red pilled education:



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 31, 2017 05:57

January 30, 2017

Diversity at play in Canada

And… it’s Islam. 


Six people died and eight were injured after gunmen opened fire at a Quebec City mosque, a shooting that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned Monday as a “terrorist attack.”


Police spokeswoman Christine Coulombe told journalists that two suspects were arrested following the attack, that police were also treating as an act of terrorism.


Trudeau said in a statement that “we condemn this terrorist attack on Muslims in a center of worship and refuge.”


“Muslim-Canadians are an important part of our national fabric, and these senseless acts have no place in our communities, city and country.”


According to witnesses interviewed on local television, two masked gunmen entered the cultural center around 7:15 pm (0015 GMT) on Sunday.


The motive of the attack was not immediately clear. Police quickly set up in the mosque’s vicinity.


Coulombe said those killed were between ages 35 and 70.


Police did not rule out the possibility of a third suspect who had fled the scene.


“It is heart-wrenching to see such senseless violence,” Trudeau said. “Diversity is our strength, and religious tolerance is a value that we, as Canadians, hold dear.”


I called it less than 48 hours ago.


[image error]


From Paul Joseph Watson’s Twitter this morning:



Paul Joseph Watson@PrisonPlanet 3h3 hours ago

Strange how the left’s outrage over the mosque attack suddenly disappeared after it emerged one of the terrorists was called Mohamed.



Paul Joseph Watson@PrisonPlanet 3h3 hours ago
Suspects in mosque attack named as Mohamed Khadir and Alexandre Bissonnette.


The hoaxing leftist mainstream media has been saying all morning that this was an unprovoked attack and that the motive can’t be known. Worse than that, they took their usual stance of slanting the story to make it sound as though it was a hate crime against Muslims. Only one problem. The terrorist attack was committed by… other Muslims against Muslims. Which isn’t uncommon overseas but is unheard of in the West. It’s not something people in the West are used to hearing about so they immediately assume that it must have been a hate crime. Few realize that Muslim extremists hate their own people, and will kill them without compassion or remorse.


Canada, diversity is not your strength. It will be your downfall. You’re dealing with an ideology that looks at your “tolerance” as an opportunity for conquest. If Trudeau continues his lines of pure idiocy, which he will, we will see more attacks committed in Canada. And more leftists trying to blame their own people for causing the attack through their “Islamophobia” while absolving the terrorists of any morality, self reflection, or guilt. 





Update: The hoaxing media is now reporting that the act of terror was committed by two or maybe even three white supremacists. I smell something fishy. The timing is too convenient.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 30, 2017 09:58

January 29, 2017

Coping with Being Red Pilled

I’ve been told that the audio still leaves a little to be desired. Only the left speaker tends to work. I’m working on fixing the problem. Alas, I’m not the best with technology but I’m learning.




 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 29, 2017 10:30

January 28, 2017

Identity > Culture > Politics

Um….duh!


Breitbart Senior editor MILO appeared at the University of New Mexico today to deliver his immigration policy speech entitled, “Americans Deserve Borders”, where the Dangerous Faggot ripped into illegal immigrants, the hijab and the threat of Islam.


Discussing the recent trend of fake hate crimes following Trump’s election and the identity crisis that Latino people face in America, MILO said, “Why would all of these fake attacks be devised in such a way to illustrate our differences? I will tell you the answer — these social activists with their horribly regressive social attitudes about women and gays and intolerance for non-Muslims have no interest in assimilation.”


MILO continued, “Latinos face different challenges in assimilation. For one thing, their identity is confused. You might think of them as geographic trannies.”


“A 2011 Pew Research Center survey of Latinos in America showed just 20% of them think of themselves as American. Only 24% of them think of themselves as Latino. A whopping 51% think of themselves according to their national origin, whether it is Mexico or Brazil. According to this survey, saying Latino is a bit like saying LGBT, plus whatever other letters they’ve added on this week.”


“Gays and lesbians don’t really think alike at all, but always get lumped together. To say nothing of the offensive association with mentally ill crossdressers. It’s the same with Latinos. According to that survey 7 out of 10 Latinos don’t believe there is a common Latino culture. That’s because the whole thing is a liberal confection.


“The other challenge with Latinos is language. The book “We Wanted Workers” by George Borjas makes the argument that recent immigrants are learning English more slowly than previous immigrants thanks to the rise of ethnic enclaves. Now before you start thinking that is coming from a right wing think tank or evil right wing blog, Borjas is a Professor at Harvard — not exactly a hotbed of conservatism. And he is a Cuban immigrant as well.”


“Immigrant Latinos are assimilating slower than they used to, because they don’t have to. Is there a government form anywhere in the US that isn’t available in Spanish?”


This is the key point that everyone knows but refuses to say. Or if they think otherwise they might be too blue pilled to even handle the truth.


The vast majority of immigrants, particularly those from third world Latin cultures don’t think of themselves as Americans. But they’re more than willing to come into the U.S., demand special privileges or welfare benefits and claim racism when their idea of “equality” isn’t received. Affirmative action, special grants, loans, scholarships, and diversity quotas are just the start if this pattern is permitted to continue. These are laws that were passed which deliberately set back whites in a country that was 85-90% white prior to 1965. Then whites are told that they have white privilege even though the poorest cities in the U.S. have the densest population of white people. Whites have been more than generous to those who barely consider themselves Americans.


I take the up front approach. The one that people despise and the one that I was raised with my whole life.


You are owed nothing. Not a penny. Not a dime. Nothing. A big fat nothing. I’m not owed. You’re not owed. No one is owed. Just because you are breathing doesn’t mean this world owes you. And if those from Latin cultures in the U.S. are so oppressed, point me to one country in the world where they are treated better and have superior opportunities than in the U.S.


The concept of identity isn’t difficult to figure out. When you ask most minorities in the U.S. what they are, they’ll tell you Mexican American. Cuban American. African America. Indian American. Japanese American. Those who simply refer to themselves as “American” are so small that they’re insignificant.  Which is the main reason why I’ve started to identify as European American. Because if you don’t have a tribe, you don’t have anything. In the future, your skin will be your uniform because fewer and fewer people will identify as being simply “American.” Tribal strife is inevitable. 


Why should foreigners have to assimilate and actually adapt to American culture when the government caters to them by requiring government agencies to speak Spanish? Immigrants in Japan have to know Japanese to become a citizen. But not in America. The thought or idea of asking them to assimilate to us is considered racist. So why not just call California, Florida and Texas the newest version of Mexico?


Those who flee Latin countries usually do so for a better life. I can’t imagine they want their new home to start reflecting the one they fled. Or so I would like to believe about the smart ones. And if they do want their new country to reflect the one they fled, they shouldn’t be here. 


Harsh? Yes. But immigration in massive hoards like we see today resembles former historical cases of conquest. And I don’t want my country conquered in favor of regressive principles. As I’ve said before, if you actually believe that these Latin cultures share the same values and ideals that the U.S. does and that we don’t need these immigrants to assimilate, or that we should conform to their needs rather than them conforming to ours, Google Mexico’s age of consent. Then come back and tell me that crossing the magic dirt of the U.S. border will cause immigrants to magically adopt American values. 


It doesn’t work that way. And it never will.


People on the right tend to hate identity politics and disregard it as a vicious tool of the left. But here’s the simple truth. You might not care about identity, but identity cares about you. Race cares about you. These are the ruling concepts of the U.S. I don’t see that changing any time soon.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 28, 2017 07:56

MSM = Opposition Party

Come on… it’s true.


President Donald Trump joined his chief strategist Friday in characterizing the media as “the opposition party,” expressing an unusually high level of antagonism toward the press just a week into his administration.


Trump, echoing comments made by strategist Steve Bannon earlier this week, told CBN News that a “big portion of the media” is guilty of “dishonesty, total deceit and deception. It makes them certainly partially the opposition party.”


Trump continued that the media is “much more capable than the opposition party. The opposition party is losing badly. Now the media is on the opposition party’s side.”


The comments are hardly the first time a president has expressed open hostility toward the media. Richard Nixon referred to the media as an enemy and his vice president, Spiro Agnew, called reporters “nattering nabobs of negativism.” Lyndon Baines Johnson once complained that if he could walk across the Potomac River, the headline the next day would be “President Can’t Swim.”


If Trump gave every American a puppy, the hoaxing media would say that puppies were stolen from their pup mother. If Trump gave the Lincoln bedroom to a homeless man, the hoaxing media would say the homeless man was kidnapped against his will. If Trump became a pastor for the purpose of marrying gay couples, the hoaxing media would say that he was only doing it because he’s secretly gay.


As someone who thinks of the hoaxing media as a terrorist organization, I can only say that the more Trump calls them out on their lies, the better. Maybe a few more reasonable people out there will self-reflect and ask themselves, what are they lying about? Why is Trump saying this? Which is only the first layer of the rabbit hole and the first of many red pills.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 28, 2017 07:19

Bre Faucheux's Blog

Bre Faucheux
Bre Faucheux isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Bre Faucheux's blog with rss.