Bre Faucheux's Blog, page 34

Keep The Fakers Out

President Trump signed an executive order late Friday which temporarily bars refugees from entering the United States.

Trump signed the order on refugees while at the Pentagon, minutes after General James Mattis was sworn in as Secretary of Defense by Vice President Mike Pence at a brief ceremony which the president attended.

The executive order, “Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals,” contained these key elements:

Suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for 120 days, prohibiting the arrival of refugees into the United States from any country during that period Ordered the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security to undertake a complete review of the refugee vetting process

Permanently banned Syrian refugees until President Trump determined otherwise, and

Lowered the ceiling of refugees allowed to enter the United States during FY 2017 to 50,000.

Few people realize that in recent decades, up to 90% of all refugee seekers coming into the U.S. have been proven fraudulent cases. As someone who knows one case that wasn’t fraudulent, there are some that genuinely need refugee status. But if you’ve been watching the current waves of Islamic migrants flooding into Sweden and the rape epidemic there directly correlating with the amount of new economic migrants coming in, you would have to be an idiot to think that the two aren’t related. The problem has gotten so bad that the forever libtard Swedish police are barring women from confessing the ethnicity of their attackers for fear of “upsetting the migrants” or appearing politically incorrect.

Red flag!

And yes, I will continue to call them economic migrants and not refugees. The majority are men of military age. Can you imagine if we allowed male “refugees” of military age from Germany into the U.S. during the height of World War II? Because that’s what the libtards are asking for right now. To not judge Muslims collectively while we are currently at war with Islam. But it’s okay to judge Americans collectively for having concerns about allowing people through our borders from countries with a high rate of Islamic terror. 

Double think much?

Or maybe I’m one of the strange and rare people who remembers that horrifying image of the little girl lying dead in the street of Nice, France after being struck by a truck while enjoying the Bastille Day fireworks with her family.

This is yet another classic case of how the mainstream media lies to the American public. They will say that barring refugees is a horrible crime against humanity and not what America is about. Whilst not revealing how many cases are proven or suspected to be fraudulent. We’re made to feel guilty for not taking in every single Tom, Dick, and Harry who claims to be a refugee so they can come in and take advantage of the welfare state, which sadly most of them do. We’re paying for people who aren’t in danger to be here. We’re not a hotel!

At what point is it okay for Americans to say to the world, “We’ve done enough. Your turn.”

 

Treason in Britain

Those who willingly oppose the will of the British people should be held accountable for their treasonous acts.

The government must consult Parliament in order to invoke Article 50 and take Britain out of the European Union, the Supreme Court has ruled.

That means Parliament must take a vote on whether to invoke Article 50, which triggers the process to take Britain out of the EU, before Prime Minister Theresa May, can do so.

May had originally set a timetable to invoke Article 50 in March, but it remains to be seen whether that deadline will now be moved.

However, the judges ruled that the devolved parliaments in Cardiff, Edinburgh, and Belfast do not need to be consulted in order for the prime minister to proceed.

The Supreme Court decision was taken by a majority of eight judges, while three sided with the government.

Delivering the verdict, Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, said: “In broad terms, Article 50 provides that a country wishing to leave the EU must give a notice in accordance with its own constitutional requirements and that the EU treaties shall cease to apply to that country within two years.”

Noting that the ruling had no bearing on the decision to leave the EU, nor the timetable for such an event, Lord Neuberger said that the issue was only whether the government could trigger Article 50 without first consulting Parliament.

In that respect, the judges had found that “the government cannot trigger Article 50 without Parliament authorising that course”.

This is because “UK domestic law will change as a result of the UK ceasing to be party to the EU treaties and the rights enjoyed by UK residents granted through EU law will be affected.

“The fact that withdrawal from the EU would remove some existing domestic rights of UK residents also renders it impermissible for the Government to withdraw from the EU Treaties without prior Parliamentary authority.”

The ineptitude or unwillingness to follow through with the promise made to the British people in a timely manner may very well end up in chaos. I’m not British. I can’t say what the British people should do in this scenario. I only hope that those who are trying to stop the results of the Brexit vote from pushing through are be held accountable. That includes morons like Tony Blair who came back to politics for the purpose of subverting the democratic will of the British people.
 
The Brexit vote was over six months ago and has yet to be triggered. In a time when Muslims are trying to sneak into Britain by running through the tunnels of the Eurostar rail between France and Britain, drastic measures should be taken.

Law and order returns

Maybe this is a sign that justice will be restored. Maybe there’s a glimmer of hope after all.

Most of the estimated 230 protesters who were arrested on Inauguration Day will face felony rioting charges, according to federal prosecutors.

Most of those arrested will be released without having to post bail on the condition that they return to court in February, CBS News reports.

If charged, the protesters could face a sentence of up to 10 years in federal prison and a fine of up to $250,000, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Interim D.C. police chief Peter Newsham said Friday that 217 people were being charged with rioting.

The arrests took place in a four-block stretch around downtown Washington while President Trump was being sworn in.

Protesters burned waste canisters, threw the embers at police, and broke windows of businesses downtown.

Police used pepper spray and “sting balls” against the crowd.

Six police officers suffered minor injuries due to the protests, with three of the officers hit in the head with flying objects, WUSA reports.

The left needs to know that if they behave this way, our new president isn’t afraid to let the police do their job. Obama loved demonizing our police. He loved pitting the people against them. He allowed the hoaxing leftist media to portray the police as vicious racists who were seeking to gun down any black man they could find.

No more.

For over a year police have been afraid to do their job. They even hesitated to do their job on many occasions which might have caused who knows how many people to die because they were afraid of being accused of racism or police brutality.

Let this be a warning to rioting leftists that law and order will come back to the land and the police won’t be afraid of their false accusations. And better yet, they finally have a POTUS who’s behind them.

Madonna under investigation

The woman who thinks it’s hot for a sixty year old to offer blow jobs to men so they will vote for Killary is now speaking up about her fantasies of blowing up the White House.

The U.S. Secret Service will reportedly open an investigation into Madonna after the singer told demonstrators at the Women’s March on Washington Saturday that she has often thought of “blowing up the White House.”

During a profanity-laced speech at the protest rally in Washington, D.C. Saturday, the 58-year-old “Rebel Heart” singer said she had felt “angry” and “outraged” over Donald Trump becoming the country’s 45th president.

“I’m angry. Yes, I’m outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House,” Madonna said. “But I know that this won’t change anything. We cannot fall into despair.”

A spokesman for the Secret Service reportedly told The Gateway Pundit that the agency was “aware” of the singer’s comments and would open an investigation, though the final decision on whether to prosecute would be made by the U.S. Attorney’s office.

Madonna performed two songs during her appearance at the Women’s March, “Express Yourself” and “Human Nature.”

During “Human Nature,” the singer changed the song’s lyrics to include “Donald Trump, suck a d***.”

Madonna’s comments aired uncensored on several cable TV networks, leading to apologies from some on-air anchors.

Madonna was one of several celebrities who participated in Saturday’s march. Other stars on hand included Alicia Keys, Amy Schumer, Ashley Judd, Scarlet Johansson, Cher, Julia Roberts and Katy Perry.

Madonna was one of Trump’s biggest celebrity antagonists during the election. In October, the pop star offered to perform oral sex on anyone who voted for former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

I don’t know what’s funnier about this whole situation. That it might actually blow up in Madonna’s face or that she thinks she still has influence over people. Remember, this is the same idiot that flashed her tit at a concert in Turkey. A predominantly Muslim country. Yes, there are some Christians, but come on.

I’ve never been a fan. I’ve never even found her halfway likable or attractive. In fact, I think she’s a shining example of what women shouldn’t become. All the women listed above are what women should avoid. How many of them are divorced? How many of them don’t have kids? How many of them have been victims of feminism and the thought or idea that men are disposable?

When I hear them protesting over how women are abused in the Middle East and how we shouldn’t allow that regressive culture to come here to the U.S. (which is exactly what Killary wanted to do and she claimed she would let 500x more “migrants” into the country) then I’ll change my tune. But I highly doubt that honor killings, acid being thrown in women’s faces, child marriages, female genitalia mutilation, no rights to drive a car, and being forced to wear a burka qualify as issues they should protest. They would turn around and tell us right wingers that we’re ethnocentric and that we should learn to respect a regressive culture that actually has no respect for women at all and would make good on their pursuit of stripping women of their rights.

I hope the Secret Service pursues Madonna and she’s formally charged with something. I don’t even know what. But anything that will show the left that their threats will be taken seriously and rioting in the streets will be seen as what it is. A crime. Conservatives that haven’t shown a backbone in the past when it comes to the full extent of the law for these rioters need to step up.

They should be charged yesterday.

 

Not Partisan My Ass

Yesterday, I did the unthinkable. I went to one of these Women’s Marches. I will have more about that for you at a later time. But here are some thoughts on the Women’s Marches from a liberal who voted for Trump.

Former WSJ reporter Asra Nomani asks in the NYT’s “Women In the World” section what is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the Women’s March? Her answer: “as it turns out, it’s quite significant.

After hearing consistently that one of Black Lives Matter’s biggest donors and pushers is George Soros, this doesn’t particularly surprise me. It’s already been revealed through the Wikileaks that the left wing organizations were busing people in to riot in cities during BLM protests and James O’Keefe’s ‘Project Veritas’ videos provided evidence that the DNC deliberately sent in instigators to disrupt Trump rallies to portray his supporters as violent.

Here is what else she discovered.

Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on Washington.

Not shocking. What hasn’t this man done to push the fall of Western civilization and general unrest?

In the pre-dawn darkness of today’s presidential inauguration day, I faced a choice, as a lifelong liberal feminist who voted for Donald Trump for president: lace up my pink Nike sneakers to step forward and take the DC Metro into the nation’s capital for the inauguration of America’s new president, or wait and go tomorrow to the after-party, dubbed the “Women’s March on Washington”? The Guardian has touted the “Women’s March on Washington” as a “spontaneous” action for women’s rights. Another liberal media outlet, Vox, talks about the “huge, spontaneous groundswell” behind the march. On its website, organizers of the march are promoting their work as “a grassroots effort” with “independent” organizers. Even my local yoga studio, Beloved Yoga, is renting a bus and offering seats for $35. The march’s manifesto says magnificently, “The Rise of the Woman = The Rise of the Nation.”It’s an idea that I, a liberal feminist, would embrace.

Giving the appearance that these protests are a natural uprising to the general unrest surrounding Trump’s inauguration is critical to the MSM’s narrative that the people don’t approve of Trump. Sure, there are millions who don’t. But perception is key here. The more it appears as though these protests are a natural thing that the people organized rather than something George Soros threw money at, the more blue pillers will believe it.

But I know — and most of America knows — that the organizers of the march haven’t put into their manifesto: the march really isn’t a “women’s march.” It’s a march for women who are anti-Trump. As someone who voted for Trump, I don’t feel welcome, nor do many other women who reject the liberal identity-politics that is the core underpinnings of the march, so far, making white women feel unwelcome, nixing women who oppose abortion and hijacking the agenda. To understand the march better, I stayed up through the nights this week, studying the funding, politics and talking points of the some 403 groups that are “partners” of the march. Is this a non-partisan “Women’s March”? Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association, a march “partner,” told me his organization was “nonpartisan” but has “many concerns about the incoming Trump administration that include what we see as a misogynist approach to women.”

The march I went to yesterday was all anti-Trump. Every single one of them was showcasing ‘solidarity’ against Trump. There were signs saying “safe abortions” and “LGBTQ Rights.” I can’t imagine the hell fire that would have come down if it was revealed that I, a pro-lifer and an AltRighter, was among them. These kinds of protests only have room for the women who agree with them. Women on the left will spout “tolerance” and “love” and “acceptance” of other cultures and beliefs to the point where your ears will bleed. But that tolerance ends when you don’t agree with them. Half the population of women in the U.S. are pro-life, and less than 20% identify as a feminist. The more exposure third wave feminism gets as a regressive movement that has made women progressively less happy since women’s liberation, and the more social justice warriors shit on white men, the fewer women identify with feminism. Thank goodness.

Nick Fish, national program director of the American Atheists, another march partner, told me, “This is not a ‘partisan’ event.” Dennis Wiley, pastor of Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, another march “partner,” returned my call and said, “This is not a partisan march.”

Really? UnitedWomen.org, another partner, features videos with the hashtags #ImWithHer, #DemsInPhily and #ThanksObama. Following the money, I poured through documents of billionaire George Soros and his Open Society philanthropy, because I wondered: What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the “Women’s March”? I found out: plenty.

As someone who went to a march with thousands of people yesterday, I can confirm, it was extremely partisan. Not a single person was wearing a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat. They would have been attacked.

By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment.  

Not shocking. Not even in the least. These are all organizations that are committed to keeping their doors open. They will fund any unrest they possibly can to intimidate others into silence. And have done so in the past.

When there’s societal unrest in the form of protests and riots pertaining to the left, you can count on any of these organizations to have their greasy hands on it. And somewhere in the pile of dirty hands are those of George Soros.

Trump Inauguration Protests

Can we all take a moment to breath a big heavy sigh of relief?

Phew! It’s over!

So far, God Emperor managed to ascend to the cherry blossom throne without any massive hiccups. And unlike the nutzo from the other night, no one to my knowledge has set themselves on fire. The commitment shown by monks during the Vietnam War protests doesn’t seem to be the preferred method of choice for demonstration from the anti-Trump snowflake lefties.

There have been reports from Cassandra Fairbanks on Twitter of some damage done to a Bank of America and Starbucks, as well as some car windows. Because destroying places of employment is very capitalist for the Antifas attending the protests.

But my favorite moment had to be from snowflake SJW celeb Jessica Chastain.

Jessica Chastain Verified account ‏@jes_chastain
Ladies, remember to set your clocks back 100 yrs tonight.

Chastain seems to have forgotten that half the women in the country are indeed Pro-Life, and the number of women who identify as a feminist is less than 20%. And getting smaller the more people discover that the feminist movement has nothing to do with equality and everything to do with superiority. There’s no gender pay gap. The CIA funded feminism to get more income tax from the population and to get women away from their children so they could get into those public school indoctrination factories quicker. The more women I can wake up to this fact, the better. And for the lefties who love to reference Hitler… one of the first things Hitler did was get women into the work force. All for the exact same reason. Even Lenin said “give me the schools.” He knew what feminists don’t. One generation of indoctrination and you can take the country by storm.

Not to mention that Hillary wanted to import 500x more Islamic economic migrants into the U.S. I refuse to call them refugees, because they’re predominantly males of fighting age and the hoaxing media does nothing but lie to the American people by saying they’re children. As though we can’t tell the difference.

What part about importing a culture that is worse than ours, respects women less, rapes young boys, throws acid in women’s faces, participates in honor killings, wants male and female segregation, and puts women in burkas sounds progressive to Chastain? I guess living in that big NY pad has guarded her from the realities smaller town folk would have to face if they were forced to deal with the beauties of multi-culturalism that Germany and Sweden enjoy today. Along with those rape epidemic statistics that are exactly in line with the number of migrants that pour into the countries. So much so, that Sweden has made it illegal for the rape victims to identify the ethnicity of their attacker. That’s what happens when you import a culture that has a custom called ‘the rape game.’

But keep thinking that Trump is gonna set back women’s right on issues most women already disagree with, Chastain. You and so many other celebs are only going to help God Emperor win again in 2020.

My appearance on Red Ice TV

I was honored to be interviewed by the beautiful Lana Lokteff of Red Ice TV this week. We discussed the recent controversy concerning my ‘The Problem with Diversity in Books | Rant’ video, feminism, MGTOW, traditionalism, and much more. I hope you enjoy it.

Do as the Swiss Do

I have a newfound respect for the Swiss.

A Dutch vegan who applied for a Swiss passport has had her application rejected because the locals found her too annoying.

Nancy Holten, 42, moved to Switzerland from the Netherlands when she was eight years old and now has children who are Swiss nationals.

However, when she tried to get a Swiss passport for herself, residents of Gipf-Oberfrick in the canton of Aargau rejected her application.

Ms Holten, a vegan and animal rights activist, has campaigned against the use of cowbells in the village and her actions have annoyed the locals.

The resident’s committee argued that if she does not accept Swiss traditions and the Swiss way of life, she should not be able to become an official national.

Ms Holten told local media: “The bells, which the cows have to wear when they walk to and from the pasture, are especially heavy.

“The animals carry around five kilograms around their neck. It causes friction and burns to their skin.”

She added: “The sound that cow bells make is a hundred decibel. It is comparable with a pneumatic drill. We also would not want such a thing hanging close to our ears?”

Tanja Suter, the president of the local Swiss People’s Party, claimed Ms Holten has a “big mouth” and that residents did not want to grant her citizenship “if she annoys us and doesn’t respect our traditions”.

Responding to the rejection, Ms Holten said: “I think I spoke my mind too often, and I say it out too loud.”

Ms Holten, who describes herself as a freelance journalist, model and drama student, has also campaigned against a number of other Swiss traditions like hunting, pig races and the noisy church bells in town.

She was previously rejected for citizenship in 2015 after residents voted to block her initial application.

The Swiss have also rejected a few Islamic girls who refused to participate in a swim class with young boys. Let Switzerland be an example to the rest of Europe. If people do not adhere to your culture and refuse to assimilate, don’t let them stay. Don’t give them passports. And don’t give them citizenship. When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Entering a foreign country, especially from the generosity that’s gotten Europe into so much trouble through migrant crisis, then demanding that the host country cater to your own culture or beliefs and not their’s is about as arrogant as it gets. Even if it’s as small bugging the crap out of everyone else with your intolerance for their way of life when it comes to neck tied cow bells.

Critics of ‘Patriots Day’ lose their shit

Some critics are taking shots at “Patriots Day” – the thriller starring Mark Wahlberg about the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings and the manhunt for the terrorists in the aftermath of the attack – for its unapologetic portrayal of America as a force for good in the battle against radical Islamic terrorism.

Uh oh… did a production company actually produce a movie where the majority white guys are good and terrorists who bombed the Boston marathon are the bad guys? Someone should tell them that whities are always at fault for everything and we should submit to Islam yesterday.

Writing at BuzzFeed, Anne Helen Petersen says the film omits crucial context about the motives of the terrorists, brothers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who killed 4 and injured 264 in the blasts at the marathon’s finish line and killed an MIT police officer several days later while fleeing.

Because the motives of the terrorists couldn’t have been…I dunno… Islam. And killing innocents isn’t a cowardly act that radical Islamists participate in almost a daily basis now. But it’s Buzzfeed, so we really can’t expect logic or reason.

The real world is not as black and white as “Patriots Day” makes it out to be, she says.

Stunning observation. But I will be siding with the police who did their job after the Boston Marathon throughout this blog post. Just so my bias is out there.

“You can argue that evil needs no explanation, no contextualization,” Ms. Petersen writes in her review published on Friday. “But that’s the problem with a post-9/11 film like Patriots Day: There’s a reason, and a history, for the radicalization of Islam — a history in which the United States has played an active part.”

Because there’s absolutely no such thing as absolute truth and the folks at Buzzfeed are fervently committed to their moral relativism… unless the West is defending itself. How dare those awful western police accuse these terrorists of… um… terrorism. Ms. Peterson is actually making the claim that the terrorists should be cleansed of all responsibility because it was evil westerners who caused them to commit this atrocious crime. Is she aware that one of the victims killed was a foreign exchange student? I believe she was Asian. Does she get an equal role in collective white guilt as well?

She says “Patriots Day” captures the spirit of “Trump’s America,” which includes “a return to the delineation of global politics into camps of right and wrong, patriot and terrorist, winners and losers, and an impulse to flatten and otherwise ignore reality in the name of feeling good and guiltless.”

Wahlberg made a feel good movie that has old fashion patriotic values? Are the tickets available online yet?

Oh wait. I forgot. A Hollywood movie can only be considered good by the leftist critics if it shits on white people and slams them with collective white guilt. Because that’s not racist at all.

Additionally, the film’s depiction of police officers is unrealistic because “there are no negative interactions with citizens, no race-based tensions, no depictions of Islamophobia in the wake of the bombings.”

Because a depiction of police can’t possibly be accurate without police officers engaging in racist activity. We all know police are horribly racist mongrels with no redeemable qualities and they don’t protect citizens on a daily basis. And Americans can only ever be portrayed as Islamophobic monsters after experiencing an unprovoked direct threat against their lives while watching a running marathon. Genuine fear after a terror attack can only be seen as Islamophobic. Maybe if we tried to better understand the terrorists, they wouldn’t have attacked. Or something…

Does Buzzfeed realize that we’re going to be pissing on their grave?

“You can argue that evil needs no explanation, no contextualization,” Ms. Petersen writes in her review published on Friday. “But that’s the problem with a post-9/11 film like Patriots Day: There’s a reason, and a history, for the radicalization of Islam — a history in which the United States has played an active part.”

Are you aware that there’s a reason and explanation for why people voted for Trump? THIS IS IT! Such as immigration officials not learning their damn lesson after 9/11 and not placing sanctions against countries with a high rate of Islamic terror? Or is Ms. Peterson going to shit on the victims of 9/11 as well and say it’s their own fault that so many of our firefighters died when the Twin Towers collapsed as they heroically entered the building knowing it was going to come down on top of them?

Kaitlyn Tiffany echoes several of these sentiments at The Verge. Movies like “Patriots Day,” Ms. Tiffany writes in her review published on Sunday, provide a “prism through which viewers can project their own pre-conceived (and carefully catered to) notions of American heroism.”

Is Ms. Tiffany claiming that police officers capturing murdering terrorists was a bad thing? We can always buy her a one way ticket to the Middle East if her standards of living here aren’t up to her expectation of adequacy.

She expresses contempt for the “clapping and scattered whooping” of her fellow audience members during decisive moments and punch lines throughout the movie – the sort of chauvinism President Obama sought in vain to extinguish during his time in office, she says.

How dare they cheer when the bad guys lose! Or when the police save the day! What monsters!

And Buzzfeed still doesn’t realize why Trump won. Keep being assholes and as anti-white and anti-American as possible. It will take an entire generation for your party to recover. Or so I’m hoping.

“This movie caters to a jingoism that the political right has spent the last eight years defending from the withering gaze of an incredibly enlightened president, but even New Yorkers found it in themselves to cheer for what is now the winning team,” Ms. Tiffany writes.

You mean New Yorkers liked it when the terrorists went down?  I can’t imagine why.

And writing at Slate, Amy Nicholson groups “Patriots Day” with other real-life stories purporting to depict American valor on the big screen, such as “Lone Survivor,” “American Sniper” and “13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi.”

These movies, Ms. Nicholson writes in her review published Jan. 2, “took recent-ish headlines and simplified them, and their idealized saviors, into a satisfying adventure where the good guys win—or, at least, make it clear who’s to blame.”

Because American soldiers and patriots are never the good guys. Ever. Soldiers do nothing but cause destruction as they’re overseas protecting your freedom and your right to a high standard of living, you arrogant, selfish, unappreciative piece of unworthy shit.

They are “strangely soothing bedtime stories that whisper yes, the word is cruel and dangerous, but everything’s going to be OK if a competent white man is in charge,” she continues. “They’ll be martyred for the world’s sins.”

I want an AltRight man or woman on my six while at war with these assholes. I’ll take a competent white man willing to run into the charge with guns blazing over this sorry excuse for a beating heart any day of the week. If you don’t like it here, Ms. Nicholson… LEAVE. No one will miss you.

“Patriots Day,” directed by Peter Berg, opened to $12 million over the first days of the holiday weekend and has a 79 percent favorable rating at Rotten Tomatoes.

You betcha I’m seeing this movie. And given the critical hatred it’s receiving, I will be thrilled to review it on my channel soon.

MLK… Freedom Fighter or Socialist?

Careful. After watching this you might never celebrate Dr. Martin Luther King ever again.