Gennaro Cuofano's Blog, page 130
January 3, 2022
What Is A Brownfield Investment? Brownfield Investment In A Nutshell


A brownfield investment normally occurs when an organization wants to begin operating in a new country without incurring the expensive start-up costs associated with a greenfield investment. For the purposes of this article, a greenfield investment is one where a new production facility is constructed from scratch. A brownfield investment is the lease or purchase of a pre-existing production facility in a foreign country.
Understanding a brownfield investmentA brownfield investment is a form of foreign direct investment which makes use of existing infrastructure by either merging, acquiring, or leasing that infrastructure. That is, the foreign company or individual invests in a business already established in another country. For the business entering a foreign country, this approach reduces costs and shortens the time to production.
While a brownfield investment is a low-cost, developed asset, it may still require ongoing capital expenditure. Many brownfield investments are associated with considerable development or construction as part of expansionary, enhancement, or retro-fitting programs.
Brownfield investment examplesTo understand how a brownfield investment plays out in the real world, consider these examples:
VodafoneThe British telecommunications company acquired a majority stake in Hutchison Essar, India’s fourth-largest mobile operator. The multi-billion investment saw Vodafone gain a controlling interest in the company. In the process, Vodafone established itself in the Indian telecom market through an established player.
Tata MotorsIndian automotive manufacturer Tata Motors acquired fellow British manufacturer Jaguar in 2008. The all-cash deal, worth $2.8 billion, gave Tata the right to establish a manufacturing plant and two design centers in the United Kingdom.
DisneyIn 2006, The Walt Disney Company acquired computer animation studio Pixar in a deal worth $7.4 billion. In acquiring Pixar, Disney gained access to advanced animated movie technology. The company also inherited Pixar’s unique culture and creative team, which it admitted was responsible for “some of the most innovative and successful films in history.”
Advantages and disadvantages of brownfield investmentsAdvantagesQuick access to a new marketSince much of the infrastructure is already provided, the company can enter a foreign market in a relatively short space of time. What’s more, the existing firm may have an established network of vendors, suppliers, and distributors.
Regulatory approvalsSimilarly, an existing firm with environmental or bureaucratic approvals in place means the acquiring firm can begin operations sooner and save time and money. This advantage is likely to grow over time as environmental approvals become increasingly difficult to obtain.
Skilled employeesAs we saw in the Disney acquisition of Pixar, some brownfield investments allow the controlling company to benefit from a skilled and productive workforce. In fact, it may be the sole reason a company makes such an investment in the first place.
DisadvantagesOutdated infrastructureThere is always the risk that a brownfield investment requires a major infrastructure upgrade. In some cases, the cost of the upgrade may be comparable to the cost of a greenfield investment.
Repatriation lawsSome countries impose restrictions on how much profit can be taken back to the home country of the acquiring company.
Buyer’s remorseNo matter how good the investment appears on paper, it is unlikely the acquiring company will find a facility with the type of capital, labor, equipment, and technology that suits its needs completely. The discomfort arising from buyer’s remorse must be prepared for and accepted if the business is to succeed in a less than ideal foreign market.
Key takeaways:A brownfield investment is the lease or purchase of a pre-existing production facility in a foreign country. Many such investments are associated with expansionary, enhancement, or retro-fitting programs.An example of a brownfield investment is the Vodafone acquisition of Hutchison Essar to enter the Indian telecommunications market. Another example is Disney, which acquired Pixar to inherit its advanced computer animation studios and a team of creative designers.Brownfield investments may help an organization enter a new market more efficiently with regulatory approvals, infrastructure, and a skilled workforce in place. However, there is a risk the acquired infrastructure is costly to maintain or replace. Some countries also enforce restrictive profit laws.Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness CompetitionBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkConnected Financial ConceptsBusiness Incubator







The post What Is A Brownfield Investment? Brownfield Investment In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
January 2, 2022
What Is The Pac-Man Defense? The Pac-Man Defense In A Nutshell


The Pac-Man defense is a tactic used by a company that is the subject of a hostile takeover. The Pac-Man defense is a response to a hostile takeover attempt with another hostile takeover attempt. In essence, the company that was the subject of the original takeover turns the tables on the acquiring company by trying to take it over in turn.
Understanding the Pac-Man defenseThe Pac-Man defense is named after the Pac-Man video game. In the game, the eponymous character is chased by four colored ghosts who are trying to eat him. If the Pac-Man eats a Power Pellet, however, he can turn around and eliminate the ghosts.
Target companies use the same approach in the hope that the acquiring company abandons its takeover attempt. The acquiring company may institute a large-scale purchase of the target company’s shares, but this may be countered by the target company buying back those shares and then purchasing shares in the acquiring company.
How is the Pac-Man defense funded?The success of the strategy depends on whether the target company has the financial clout to purchase enough shares in the acquiring company to be a credible threat.
This may be facilitated via:
The sale of assets and business units – to generate enough cash to buy large amounts of shares in the acquirer, the target company can sell off non-vital assets or non-core business units.Capital raises – the target can also borrow cash from a lender or undertake a capital raise funded by retail or institutional investors. If the latter is done via a share issuance, it has the advantage of increasing the number of outstanding shares an acquiring company would need to purchase to take a controlling interest.Accessing a war chest – which refers to a cash reserve many companies maintain for use in adverse events or to take advantage of unexpected opportunities. The war chest usually contains assets that can easily be liquidated such as treasury bills and bank deposits.Pac-Man defense examplesHere are some real-world examples of where the Pac-Man defense has been employed:
Porsche and VolkswagenAs early as 2005, Porsche made several failed attempts to purchase a controlling interest in Volkswagen. When the company share price decreased in the wake of the GFC, Volkswagen took the opportunity to purchase discounted Porsche shares. In 2012, Volkswagen acquired 100% of Porsche to end what had become a seven-year saga between the two companies.
Bendix Corporation and Martin MariettaIn 1982, Bendix Corporation attempted a hostile takeover of building materials firm Martin Marietta. The latter sold off multiple business units and borrowed over $1 billion to thwart the attempt, with Bendix Corporation owning 70% of Martin Marietta and Martin Marietta then becoming the owner of 50% of Bendix Corporation. The Pac-Man defense was used by both companies in the back-and-forth and was an expensive exercise for both parties. In the end, Allied Corporation acted as a white knight and acquired Bendix Corporation in 1983.
Wolverhampton & Dudley and MarstonBritish brewery Wolverhampton & Dudley launched a hostile takeover of competitor Marston in 1998 after a friendly takeover failed. Marston then used the Pac-Man defense to acquire 73.5% of Wolverhampton & Dudley and prevent the takeover. This was the first time the strategy had been used outside of the United States.
Key takeaways:The Pac-Man defense is a tactic used by a company that is the subject of a hostile takeover. In essence, the company turns the tables on the acquiring company by trying to take it over in turn.The Pac-Man defense depends on the target company having the financial means to purchase a controlling interest in the acquiring company. Money must be raised through the sale of assets and non-core business units. Capital raises and war chests can also be used to fund the defense.The Pac-Man defense is perhaps best exemplified by Porsche’s failed takeover attempt of Volkswagen. The latter used the Global Financial Crisis to purchase Porsche shares at a discount and ultimately acquire a 100% stake.Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness CompetitionBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkConnected Financial ConceptsBusiness Incubator






The post What Is The Pac-Man Defense? The Pac-Man Defense In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
What Is The Outcome Bias? The Outcome Bias In A Nutshell


Outcome bias describes a tendency to evaluate a decision based on its outcome and not on the process by which the decision was reached. In other words, the quality of a decision is only determined once the outcome is known. Outcome bias occurs when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events without regard for how those events developed.
Understanding outcome biasOutcome bias is common in humans because we tend to be self-evaluative. We tend to look back at what we’ve done and use any lessons learned to measure our future performance. This can be a useful trait in some circumstances, but it can also be a problem when something bad happens.
When a decision results in a poor outcome, we tend to place more importance on the outcome of a decision. We may be overly self-critical or indeed critical of others when compared to instances where a decision resulted in a positive outcome. It does not matter if the decision-making process was well considered or if the likelihood of success was down to chance.
This is not to say that outcome bias does not occur when there is a favorable outcome. Consider an individual who decides to invest in real estate after learning that a friend made a significant capital gain. Outcome bias causes the individual to become preoccupied with how much money was made and in the process, ignore the mechanisms behind their friend’s success. Perhaps a government stimulus package for new home builders was a contributing factor, or maybe a combination of low-interest rates and a knack for identifying undervalued property was the cause.
The outcome bias in businessIn business, an overemphasis on performance is creating an outcome-centric culture in which someone must lose in order for someone else to win.
As a result, outcome bias is present in many performance-related situations including:
RecruitmentA hiring manager is only considered successful if the employee they recruit performs well. With less emphasis on the reasoned and fair recruitment process, employees are led to believe that they are either good at their job or bad at their job. When evaluations are based on a binary result and not on the quality of an employee’s decision-making, good luck is rewarded over competence or expertise.
Product developmentProducts are judged according to how well they were received in the market, rather than the product development-related processes and systems that made the product a reality in the first place.
LeadershipOnce an outcome is known, the outcome bias also hinders our ability to evaluate whether a leadership decision was good or bad. Fearful of negative repercussions, outcome bias can make some leaders risk-averse. Conversely, irresponsible leaders who make reckless decisions are rewarded if their decision results in a positive outcome. In this case, the subordinates who doubted the leader’s ability may be subject to harsh treatment from others.
Avoiding outcome biasCritical thinking is one way of avoiding outcome bias. Instead of focusing on outcomes, we need to focus on the process as a whole.
Like many cognitive biases, however, outcome bias can be difficult to address on our own. We may sabotage ourselves by quitting too early or ignoring certain information we don’t like. In this situation, it can be helpful to collaborate with a colleague or superior to understand the underlying causes of the bias.
In any case, consider these questions:
What led us to make the decision?Was there a better process we could have followed in making the decision?Could we have liaised with other people?What information did we have at our disposal? What information did we not have?Could we have obtained more data?Was it necessary to decide at the point the decision was made?Were there previously unknown external factors that may have skewed the decision?Key takeaways:Outcome bias occurs when a decision is based on the outcome of previous events without regard for how those events developed.Outcome bias in business tends to occur in the recruitment process, product development, and leadership. Most conspire to create an outcome-centric culture in organizations where one person has to lose for another to win.Outcome bias can be avoided with critical thinking and a commitment to focusing on processes. Discussing the bias with a trusted colleague or supervisor can be a good way to uncover its underlying causes.Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness CompetitionBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkRelated Business Concepts












The post What Is The Outcome Bias? The Outcome Bias In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
What Are Masstige Brands? Masstige Brands In A Nutshell


Masstige is a portmanteau of the words “mass” and “prestige”. The term was made popular by Michael Silverstein and Neil Fiske in their 2008 book Trading Up and in a Harvard Business Review article entitled Luxury for the Masses. Masstige brands are mass-produced goods that are marketed as prestigious or luxurious to an aspirational audience.
Understanding masstige brandsMasstige brands rose to prominence during the 1980s and 1990s as economic growth lead to increasing disposable incomes, lower unemployment rates, and a growing wealthy class in emerging countries. Once the domain of a small, elite group of wealthy consumers, the so-called “democratisation of luxury” has today made luxury products accessible to a larger population.
This new class of luxury goods is less expensive than traditional luxury goods while still retaining aspects of a brand’s original prestige and value. With that in mind, there are two key components of a masstige brand:
They must be considered luxury or premium products, andThey must have price points that fill the gap between mid-market and super-premium.The consumers for whom luxury has been made more accessible come from the middle and upper-middle classes who purchase luxury goods as a form of self-reward and indulgence. This contrasts with luxury purchases made by the rich, which are mostly driven by status.
This emerging class of luxury product evangelists is perhaps best described by James Twitchell in his 2002 book Living It Up: Our Love Affair with Luxury. Twitchell noted that “These new customers for luxury are younger than clients of the old luxe used to be, they are far more numerous, they make their money far sooner, and they are more flexible in financing and fickle in choice. They do not stay put. They now have money to burn.”
Masstige brand categoriesBefore we list some masstige brand categories, it is important to note that not every category is appropriate for the masstige approach. Masstige brands must complement existing product lines and enrich the brand experience without creating overlap or conflict.
With that said, most masstige brands encompass the following categories:
EyewearDesigner fashion brands such as Dolce & Gabbana and Prada also sell sunglasses and other eyewear to broaden their respective target audiences. Porsche is another premium brand that has entered this space.
AutomobilesDespite earning a reputation as a luxury sedan manufacturer, BMW now sells a watered-down version of the luxury sedan known as the 1 Series. Brand prestige is maintained to some extent since the vehicle still wears the BMW badge. Ferrari also sells branded merchandise including hats, clothing, and even computers without that merchandise competing with the brand’s core identity that is rooted in sports cars.
Beauty productsWomen love masstige beauty brands because they offer comparable quality and trendiness to luxury brands but for a fraction of the cost. Indeed, the affordable price point combined with the aura of luxuriousness allows women to feel like they’ve treated themselves without breaking the bank.
FashionCompanies such as Zara exemplify the idea of selling taste and style to the masses. The fashion retailer imitates the clothing and store design of luxury brands and also takes inspiration from their advertising strategies. Armani Haute Couture jeans sell for $900, but the company also sells a $100 pair to appeal to brand-conscious wearers.
HomewaresAmerican home furnishing chain Pottery Barn sells homewares that are considered premium. However, these products are widely available and are sold at price points more affordable than more exclusive brands.
Key takeaways:Masstige brands are mass-produced goods that are marketed as prestigious or luxurious to an aspirational audience.Masstige brands are purchased by middle and upper-middle-class consumers as a form of self-reward or indulgence. Traditional luxury brands, on the other hand, were once the domain of the rich who purchased them as a status symbol.Masstige brands must complement existing product lines and not dilute or conflict with brand identity. These brands are most prevalent in eyewear, automobiles, beauty products, fashion, and homewares.Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkConnected Business Concepts









The post What Are Masstige Brands? Masstige Brands In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
What Is Neuromarketing? Neuromarketing In A Nutshell


For consumers, decision-making used to be easy. Today, however, they are inundated with information and even the simplest products come attached with endless choices.
The humble bottle of mineral water is one such example, with hundreds of brands now selling the product in the United States alone. This begs the question: how does a consumer choose between brands when there can only be so much variance in a tasteless product? In other words, what makes a consumer choose Aquafina over Evian? There may be no clear-cut answer to these questions. Nevertheless, the purchasing decision may be influenced by the design of the bottle or a personal experience the consumer had with the brand itself.
The point here is that consumers make most of their purchasing decisions subconsciously. Despite this fact, many businesses persist with traditional market research methodologies such as focus groups and surveys. But if we accept that consumers cannot consciously express the subconscious reasons for a purchasing decision, we can then accept that traditional strategies are somewhat ineffective.
This is where neuromarketing is useful since it is the only way to gather information from the human subconscious. Using this information, marketing teams can better understand how to develop, price, and advertise products and services.
How is neuromarketing information collected?This vital information is collected in two ways:
The measurement of neurological brain activityWhich directly measures brain activity related to specific brain functions using EEG, fMRI, and steady-state topography (SST). For example, steady-state topography measures the speed of electrical activity on the surface of the brain and links variance in certain areas to specific metrics like memory coding and engagement.
The inference of neurological responses by proxyThis approach uses eye tracking, facial coding, and biometric data such as heart rate monitoring. It is not as robust as the first method because it is not underpinned by true neuroscience and the resultant data allows for broader interpretation.
Using these approaches, neuromarketing has been used primarily in product design testing, user experience (UX) design, cross-platform testing, audio branding testing, rebranding, and second-by-second optimization of television advertisements.
Neuromarketing examplesIt’s important to note that neuromarketing is an expensive undertaking for any organization.
For example, an entry-level functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) machine can cost as much as $300,000, with premium machines retailing for more than $500,000. What’s more, the price of a single electroencephalogram (EEG) study may run as high as $20,000.
This means neuromarketing is primarily used by large companies or those that are heavily subsidized. Examples include:
GoogleThe search giant partnered with MediaVest and biometrics researcher NeuroFocus to evaluate how users responded to the semi-transparent overlay ads in YouTube videos. Forty individuals took part in the study, with their responses measured against criteria such as emotional engagement and attention.
The Weather Channel (TWC)This company also partnered with NeuroFocus in preparation for the launch of a new series entitled When Weather Changed History. A combination of EEGs, eye-tracking technology, and galvanic skin response (GSR) was used to ensure the company’s commercials and documentary content had maximum impact on the viewer.
Frito-LayAmerican snack-food manufacturer Frito-Lay analyzed the female brain to determine why most women preferred fruit and vegetables over its line of salty snacks. The company discovered that the part of the brain responsible for processing memory and emotion was larger in females and they often looked for characters they could empathize and relate with. Decision-making areas of the brain were also larger, which meant female consumers were more prone to feelings of guilt. In response, Frito-Lay redesigned its snack packaging to prominently feature healthy ingredients. The company then released an advertising campaign making explicit connections between women, exercising, healthy eating, and of course Frito-Lay snacks.
Types Of Marketing Connected To Neuromarketing













Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness CompetitionBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkThe post What Is Neuromarketing? Neuromarketing In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
What Is Monopolistic Competition? Monopolistic Competition In A Nutshell


Monopolistic competition describes a scenario where many firms compete by selling products that are differentiated from one other and hence are not perfect substitutes. Product differentiation may be due to the brand, product quality, location, or marketing strategy. Monopolistic competition describes an industry where many firms offer products or services that are similar (but not perfect) substitutes.
Understanding monopolistic competitionMonopolistic competition combines elements of a monopoly and perfect competition – a theoretical market state in which companies sell identical products and have equal market share. The term was first used by economists Edward Chamberlain and Joan Robinson in the 1930s to explain the competition that existed between firms with similar (but not identical) products.
Firms that are in monopolistic competition have a comparable and relatively low degree of market power. They are said to be price makers, or companies that can dictate the price they charge for goods because there are no perfect substitutes in the market. Importantly, prices can be lowered without inciting a price war which is a common problem in oligopolies.
As more firms enter a monopolistic market, the elasticity of the demand curve increases. This means consumers become more sensitive to price, with a small price increase causing demand for a product to vanish. Profit in the short term is positive, but over the long term, it approaches zero as marginal revenue equals marginal cost.
As a result, monopolistic competition is characterized by increased spending on advertising and marketing as firms seek to attain a competitive advantage.
Characteristics of monopolistic competitionTo summarise and expand upon the information presented above, consider the following characteristics of monopolistic competition:
The presence of many firms and many consumers, with no firm having total control over the marketplace.Few barriers to entry or exit. This means the market is dynamic as companies can easily enter or exit the market at their discretion.Differentiated but similar products and services. Consumers perceive there to be differences between products that are not based on price.Firms operate independently. That is, they operate with the knowledge that their actions will not affect the actions of other firms. Potential supernormal profits in the short term. One firm can profit from identifying a gap in the market until competing firms move in and offer similar products.Normal profits in the long run. Due to low barriers of entry, a new firm may see an existing firm make supernormal profits and enter the market to take their share. As competitors flock to an untapped market segment, profits are reduced to zero over time.Imperfect information – with many firms offering slightly different products, a consumer may find it more difficult to make a purchasing decision. In the insurance industry, for example, several comparison sites now exist to help consumers understand the sometimes vague but important distinctions between products.Examples of monopolistic competitionMonopolistic competition is present in many familiar industries. Examples include:
Clothing and apparelClothing items are inherently similar because each is designed for the same purpose. Brand and style differentiation is common in this industry.
RestaurantsWhich compete on food quality and customer service. Among Indian restaurants, for example, product differentiation is key since each offers more or less the same regional dishes. What’s more, there are also relatively few barriers to opening a new restaurant.
AccommodationThe accommodation industry is also characterized by many firms offering the same service. Each provider differentiates itself with minor variations in quality level or access to perks.
HairdressingAnother industry where the barriers to entry are low. The ability for a hairdresser to offer quality customer service and earn repeat business is the point of differentiation here.
Coffee shopsLike most retail or food and beverage outlets, there are countless coffee shops around the world selling the same product. Product differentiation occurs via the quality of the coffee beans and the level of customer service. These establishments may also offer Wi-Fi or be located within bookstores to stand out.
Key takeaways:Monopolistic competition describes an industry where many firms offer products or services that are similar (but not perfect) substitutes. The term was first used by economists Edward Chamberlain and Joan Robinson in the 1930s.Monopolistic competition has many characteristics, including the presence of many firms and consumers, low entry and exit barriers, short-term supernormal profits, long-term normal profits, and imperfect information.Monopolistic competition is present in many familiar industries, including clothing and apparel, restaurants, accommodation, hairdressing, and coffee shops.Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkConnected Business Concepts









The post What Is Monopolistic Competition? Monopolistic Competition In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
What Is An Oligopsony? Oligopsony In A Nutshell


An oligopsony is a market form characterized by the presence of only a small number of buyers. These buyers have market power and can lower the price of a good or service because of a lack of competition. In other words, the seller loses its bargaining power because it is unable to find a buyer outside of the oligopsony that is willing to pay a better price.
Understanding an oligopsonyAn oligopsony is a market for a product or service dominated by a few large buyers. The concentration of demand means each buyer has power over the seller to keep prices low.
An oligopsony is the opposite of an oligopoly, where the market is dominated by a few sellers that inflate prices in the absence of competition from other supply sources.
In addition to the presence of relatively few buyers, there are a few more traits that define an oligopsony:
It develops in a market of imperfect competition since buyers are the entities exercising market power. Imperfect competition is also associated with significant barriers to entry and prohibitive start-up costs.Each buyer is connected. Thus, the policies of one buyer will have repercussions for the other buyers.The presence of homogeneous products, or any product that cannot be distinguished from competing products from different suppliers. Most commodities including vegetables, fruits, oil, grains, and metals are homogeneous goods.Buyers also ensure market costs provide them with a certain amount of profit that does provide an incentive for competition to enter the market.Oligopsony examplesHere are a few examples of an oligopsony in a real-world scenario:
Fast-foodPerhaps the most cited example of an oligopsony is the fast-food industry. Restaurant chains such as McDonald’s, Burger King, and Wendy’s purchase most of the beef produced by cattle farmers. Such is their power that these buyers also influence animal welfare conditions and labor standards. In the United States alone, McDonald’s sells more than 1 billion pounds of beef each year.
Retail groceryThe retail grocery industry is now dominated by giant supermarket chains such as Walmart, Costco, Albertsons, and Kroger. Their influence extends back to dairy and produce farmers at the start of the supply chain, lowering farm-gate prices over time and making it more difficult for farmers to turn a profit.
CocoaA less obvious example of oligopsony is also present in the cocoa industry. Cocoa beans are grown all over the world, but there are only three primary buyers: Cargill, Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), and Barry Callebaut. Most cocoa is sourced from poor farmers in third-world nations with already low bargaining power.
Aircraft componentsFor companies that manufacture aircraft components, their choice of buyers is also limited. Boeing, Airbus, and Embraer dominate commercial aircraft assembly, while Boeing and Airbus together with Lockheed and GE dominate aerospace and defense aircraft assembly.
CinemaThere are also few buyers of the specialized screen and projector technology found in modern cinemas. In North America, the cinema industry is dominated by five chains: AMC Entertainment, Regal Cinemas, Cineplex Entertainment, Marcus Theatres Corp., and Cinemark. Collectively, these chains operate 22,390 cinema screens across the United States and Canada and enjoy market dominance.
Key takeaways:An oligopsony is a market for a product or service dominated by a few large buyers. The concentration of demand means each buyer has the power to put downward pressure on prices.An oligopsony develops in markets characterized by imperfect competition, connected buyers, homogeneous products, and profit margins that do not attract new entrants.The fast-food industry is one notable example of an oligopsony. However, the effect is also present in retail grocery, cocoa farming, aircraft component manufacturing, and cinema technology.Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkConnected Business Concepts









The post What Is An Oligopsony? Oligopsony In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
What is an L-shaped recovery? The L-Shaped Recovery In A Nutshell


The L-shaped recovery refers to an economy that declines steeply and then flatlines with weak or no growth. On a graph plotting GDP against time, this precipitous fall combined with a long period of stagnation looks like the letter “L”. The L-shaped recovery is sometimes called an L-shaped recession because the economy does not return to trend line growth. The L-shaped recovery, therefore, is a recession shape used by economists to describe different types of recessions and their subsequent recoveries. In an L-shaped recovery, the economy is characterized by a severe recession with high unemployment and near-zero economic growth.
Understanding an L-shaped recoveryThe most important characteristic of an L-shaped recovery is a failure for the economy to revert to full employment after a recession. Controlling forces such as the government do not allocate enough resources to mobilize workers and increase business output, which means more workers are unemployed for longer and some may choose to leave the workforce entirely. By extension, factories, equipment, and other capital assets may sit idle or at the very least underutilized.
The L-shaped recovery is considered to be the most severe form of recovery and is sometimes called a depression. The affected economy may take years or even decades to recover.
Examples of L-shaped recoveriesHere are some real-world examples of L-shaped recoveries:
The Japanese asset price bubbleJapan’s economy grew at unprecedented levels between the end of the Second World War and the late 1980s. After the asset-price bubble burst in 1992, deflation followed and the country experienced a long period of slow growth now known as The Lost Decades. The Japanese economy has not yet returned to the growth rates it enjoyed before the crash.
The Great DepressionUnemployment was as high as 25% after the stock market crash of 1929 in the United States. GDP contracted significantly and high unemployment persisted for over a decade, despite attempts by President Hoover to increase taxes and introduce federal funding for unemployment benefits.
The Great RecessionWhen the United States housing market collapsed in 2008, credit markets dried up and bankruptcies soon followed as unemployment rates surged to 10% the following year. The Bush and Obama administrations instituted a wave of expansionary monetary policy underpinned by new lending facilities and multiple rounds of quantitative easing, but unemployment remained above 5% until 2016. GDP growth was just 2.3% over the same period with the economy experiencing the slowest recovery since the Great Depression decades earlier.
What causes an L-shaped recovery?To some extent, the causes of an L-shaped recovery are particular to the shock or crash that preceded it. The recovery seen after the Great Recession, for example, was caused by:
The inability of the housing sector to rebound after so many loan foreclosures.The lack of financial support from the government, particularly in the immediate aftermath of the market collapse, andThe dire lack of available credit for consumers and businesses as banks diverted capital to repaying the large amount of debt they had amassed.Having said that, the key determinant in whether an L-shaped recovery occurs is the shock’s ability to damage the supply side of an economy – otherwise known as capital formation.
When the lending ability of a bank is diminished and the value of public and private assets does not grow, recovery is hindered and employee skills are lost as individuals exit the workforce. Productivity then decreases and the shock becomes structural.
Key takeaways:The L-shaped recovery is a recession shape used by economists to describe different types of recessions and their subsequent recoveries. In an L-shaped recovery, the economy is characterized by a severe recession with high unemployment and near-zero economic growth.Real-world examples of an L-shaped recovery include the Japanese asset price bubble, the Great Depression, and the Great Recession.To some extent, the factors responsible for an L-shaped recovery are unique to the shock or crash that preceded it. However, whether such a recovery occurs depends on the shock’s ability to damage the supply side of an economy and its structure.Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkConnected Business Concepts









The post What is an L-shaped recovery? The L-Shaped Recovery In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
December 31, 2021
What Is The Leasing Business Model? The Leasing Business Model In A Nutshell


Under the leasing business model, a company purchases a product and then leases it to a customer for a periodic fee. The seller passes the property of the item to the lessor, which is a financier, that enables a buyer (the lessee) to use the item for a given period of time. In the end, the buyer can exercise the option to buy the item at the current market rate. This agreement makes it possible for the seller to dispose of the item, for the financier to make a profit on it, and for the buyer to use it while avoiding total costs of ownership.
Understanding the leasing business modelCompanies that utilize the leasing business model sell continuous access to a product or service over an agreed period.
The model normally involves three parties:
The seller – the owner of the product or service that sells ownership of the item to a lessor in exchange for payment. Note that the seller may or may not retake possession of the item once the contractual agreement has ended.The buyer (lessee) – the entity that negotiates access to the product or service in exchange for a periodic payment to the lessor. Once the lease is up, the buyer sometimes has the option of purchasing the item at the current market rate.The financier (lessor) – a third-party that enters into an agreement with the lessee and provides it with the item for temporary possession. In essence, the lessor serves as an intermediary or facilitator.Where does the leasing business model occur?The leasing business model is most often seen in transactions involving the exchange of expensive physical goods, including:
Commercial and industrial fleet vehicles – including passenger vans, buses, box trucks, tractors, trailers, and delivery vans.Manufacturing and industrial plant equipment – in industries notorious for expensive item costs, leasing arrangements may be in place for stamping and forming machinery, welders, conveyor systems, and factory infrastructure or floor space.Restaurant and hospitality equipment – these include exhaust hoods, tables, seating, point-of-sale (POS) systems, and stoves. Medical and laboratory equipment – such as lasers, X-ray machines, CT scanners, and even surgical tables.Municipal equipment – many local councils and authorities also lease equipment to reduce costs. Items include police cars, garbage trucks, and street sweepers.Advantages of the leasing business modelLet’s now take a look at some of the advantages of the leasing business model for both the seller, lessee, and lessor.
SellerEarly revenue – leasing can help the seller meet a need for early revenue, even if some revenue must be shared with the lessee.Relationship building – since many leasing agreements extend over long periods, the seller has time to build a sustainable and loyal relationship with a buyer.LesseeAffordability – the most obvious benefit for a buyer is affordability. Many buyers are not willing to expose themselves to the risk of owning an asset outright while others simply cannot meet the high upfront cost. The leasing business model enables the buyer to pay in smaller monthly installments which can be budgeted for in advance.Continuous upgrades – businesses that rely on the latest model equipment can easily upgrade when the current lease expires. This means they are never stuck with an obsolete model.LessorIncreased sales – lease financing through a third party can help product manufacturers increase their sales. In these circumstances, the lessor is in a stronger position to negotiate a commission from the manufacturer.Tax benefits – as the owner of the asset, the lessor can claim various tax benefits including depreciation and investment allowance to reduce their liabilities.Key takeaways:Under the leasing business model, a company purchases a product and then leases it to a customer for a periodic fee.Leasing transactions normally involve three parties: the seller, the buyer (lessee), and the financier (lessor). The lessor purchases the product from the buyer and then sells access to the product to the lessee over a set period.For the seller, the leasing business model gives them access to early revenue and the chance to build a loyal customer base. For the lessee, leasing allows them to avoid the risk and cost of purchasing an item outright. For the lessor, they may be able to negotiate a higher rate of commission with the product manufacturer and reduce their tax liabilities.Main Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkConnected Business Models to The Leasing Business ModelFranchising Business Models







The post What Is The Leasing Business Model? The Leasing Business Model In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.
December 30, 2021
What Are External Economies of Scale? External Economies of Scale In A Nutshell


External economies of scale describe factors beyond the control of a company that are present in the same industry and that lead to cost benefits. These factors may be positive or negative industry or economic trends. External economies of scale, therefore, are business-enhancing factors occurring outside a company but within the same industry.
Understanding external economies of scaleWhen a government imposes higher import tariffs on passenger vehicles, for example, this reduces competition for domestic manufacturers. In response, the average cost of production decreases as the production output increases to take advantage of fewer imported vehicles.
In general, a company has external economies of scale if its size results in preferential treatment. Governments often reduce state taxes to attract companies large enough to provide the most jobs. Large companies in turn take advantage of partnerships with universities to reduce their research and development expenditure.
Smaller companies do not have the leverage to enjoy similar benefits, but they can sometimes band together by pooling their resources or locating themselves in the same geographic area.
What causes external economies of scale?External economies of scale occur for the following reasons:
Cluster effectCompanies located in close proximity make it more efficient for suppliers to do business with a larger customer base. For example, artists, galleries, and restaurants may benefit from being located in the same city art district.
Price transparencyThe cluster effect also reduces prices for each business. Since each is purchasing from the same supplier, the supplier cannot charge different prices to different businesses. Transparent pricing ensures no firm pays a higher amount for inputs, which reduces the average cost.
Transport linksWhen an iron ore company establishes a new venture in a region known for mining, it can take advantage of existing transport infrastructure and obtain lower average costs.
Supportive legislationAs noted in the previous section, governments can introduce subsidies or reduce tariffs for local industries that are politically or economically important. These incentives lead to a lower cost of doing business.
Skilled laborAmerican universities such as MIT and Harvard have better access to a stronger, smarter workforce. The same can also be said for Silicon Valley, where tech firms spend relatively less recruiting skilled labor.
Advantages and disadvantages of external economies of scaleExternal economies of scale are sometimes referred to as positive externalities because they result in a positive gain on both the private and societal levels.
Research and development conducted by one company increases the profit potential of similar companies while also benefitting society. For example, the initial investment in smartphone technology by Apple paved the way for subsequent profitable companies and has improved society through more accessible information.
Businesses that emphasize investment in education also create a smarter and more intelligent workforce. These workforces increases external economies of scale because it costs the business less money to train and develop them.
So what are the disadvantages?
For one, the factors responsible for external economies of scale are beyond the control of participating businesses. This means no business receives a competitive advantage and any obtained benefit may disappear at a moment’s notice. The domestic vehicle manufacturer may lose the benefits derived from increased import tariffs when a new government takes office and decides to abolish them.
Secondly, businesses within the same industry that cluster in the same region may find it difficult to move to a new location away from the cluster. That is, the benefits realized from clustering may be canceled out by the costs associated with expanding into new markets.
Key takeaways:External economies of scale are business-enhancing factors occurring outside a company but within the same industry.External economies of scale occur for several reasons, including the cluster effect, price transparency, transport links, supportive legislation, and a skilled workforce. External economies of scale can result in positive gains for both the business and society as a whole. Having said that, realized benefits are beyond the control of the receiving entity and may be withdrawn at any time. Businesses who enjoy the benefits of the cluster effect may also find those benefits negated by an ability to expand. Diseconomies Of ScaleNetwork EffectsNegative Network EffectsPlatform Business ModelAmazon Business ModelMain Free Guides:
Business ModelsBusiness StrategyBusiness DevelopmentDigital Business ModelsDistribution ChannelsMarketing StrategyPlatform Business ModelsRevenue ModelsTech Business ModelsBlockchain Business Models FrameworkConnected Business Concepts to External Economies of Scale









The post What Are External Economies of Scale? External Economies of Scale In A Nutshell appeared first on FourWeekMBA.