659 books
—
1,523 voters
read
(214)
currently-reading (3)
to-read (486)
2021-wishlist (43)
classic (42)
non-fiction (39)
historical (34)
favorites (33)
2018-wishlist (30)
read-some-parts-again (26)
philosophy (25)
2020-wishlist (22)
currently-reading (3)
to-read (486)
2021-wishlist (43)
classic (42)
non-fiction (39)
historical (34)
favorites (33)
2018-wishlist (30)
read-some-parts-again (26)
philosophy (25)
2020-wishlist (22)
disturbing
(22)
life-altering (21)
psycho-thriller (21)
economics (18)
psychology (18)
2022-wishlist (15)
humour (12)
2019-wishlist (10)
political-science (10)
dystopia (9)
india (9)
sci-fi (8)
life-altering (21)
psycho-thriller (21)
economics (18)
psychology (18)
2022-wishlist (15)
humour (12)
2019-wishlist (10)
political-science (10)
dystopia (9)
india (9)
sci-fi (8)
progress:
(page 0 of 216)
"Postman recommends this book as one of the three essential dystopias written in the 20th century. (The other two were Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World.)" — May 13, 2023 11:54PM
"Postman recommends this book as one of the three essential dystopias written in the 20th century. (The other two were Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World.)" — May 13, 2023 11:54PM


“I am not an angel,' I asserted; 'and I will not be one till I die: I will be myself. Mr. Rochester, you must neither expect nor exact anything celestial of me - for you will not get it, any more than I shall get it of you: which I do not at all anticipate.”
― Jane Eyre
― Jane Eyre

“I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.”
―
―

“The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies

“Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta. She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita. Did she have a precursor? She did, indeed she did. In point of fact, there might have been no Lolita at all had I not loved, one summer, an initial girl-child. In a princedom by the sea. Oh when? About as many years before Lolita was born as my age was that summer. You can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, exhibit number one is what the seraphs, the misinformed, simple, noble-winged seraphs, envied. Look at this tangle of thorns.”
― Lolita
― Lolita
Siddharth’s 2022 Year in Books
Take a look at Siddharth’s Year in Books. The good, the bad, the long, the short—it’s all here.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Siddharth
Lists liked by Siddharth