Guy Byars

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about Guy.

http://www.google.com/profiles/guybyars
https://www.goodreads.com/guybyars

The Devils
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Technofeudalism: ...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
All the Dust that...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
See all 11 books that Guy is reading…
Loading...
Terry Pratchett
“O: You’re quite a writer. You’ve a gift for language, you’re a deft hand at plotting, and your books seem to have an enormous amount of attention to detail put into them. You’re so good you could write anything. Why write fantasy?

Pratchett: I had a decent lunch, and I’m feeling quite amiable. That’s why you’re still alive. I think you’d have to explain to me why you’ve asked that question.

O: It’s a rather ghettoized genre.

P: This is true. I cannot speak for the US, where I merely sort of sell okay. But in the UK I think every book— I think I’ve done twenty in the series— since the fourth book, every one has been one the top ten national bestsellers, either as hardcover or paperback, and quite often as both. Twelve or thirteen have been number one. I’ve done six juveniles, all of those have nevertheless crossed over to the adult bestseller list. On one occasion I had the adult best seller, the paperback best-seller in a different title, and a third book on the juvenile bestseller list. Now tell me again that this is a ghettoized genre.

O: It’s certainly regarded as less than serious fiction.

P: (Sighs) Without a shadow of a doubt, the first fiction ever recounted was fantasy. Guys sitting around the campfire— Was it you who wrote the review? I thought I recognized it— Guys sitting around the campfire telling each other stories about the gods who made lightning, and stuff like that. They did not tell one another literary stories. They did not complain about difficulties of male menopause while being a junior lecturer on some midwestern college campus. Fantasy is without a shadow of a doubt the ur-literature, the spring from which all other literature has flown. Up to a few hundred years ago no one would have disagreed with this, because most stories were, in some sense, fantasy. Back in the middle ages, people wouldn’t have thought twice about bringing in Death as a character who would have a role to play in the story. Echoes of this can be seen in Pilgrim’s Progress, for example, which hark back to a much earlier type of storytelling. The epic of Gilgamesh is one of the earliest works of literature, and by the standard we would apply now— a big muscular guys with swords and certain godlike connections— That’s fantasy. The national literature of Finland, the Kalevala. Beowulf in England. I cannot pronounce Bahaghvad-Gita but the Indian one, you know what I mean. The national literature, the one that underpins everything else, is by the standards that we apply now, a work of fantasy.

Now I don’t know what you’d consider the national literature of America, but if the words Moby Dick are inching their way towards this conversation, whatever else it was, it was also a work of fantasy. Fantasy is kind of a plasma in which other things can be carried. I don’t think this is a ghetto. This is, fantasy is, almost a sea in which other genres swim. Now it may be that there has developed in the last couple of hundred years a subset of fantasy which merely uses a different icongraphy, and that is, if you like, the serious literature, the Booker Prize contender. Fantasy can be serious literature. Fantasy has often been serious literature. You have to fairly dense to think that Gulliver’s Travels is only a story about a guy having a real fun time among big people and little people and horses and stuff like that. What the book was about was something else. Fantasy can carry quite a serious burden, and so can humor. So what you’re saying is, strip away the trolls and the dwarves and things and put everyone into modern dress, get them to agonize a bit, mention Virginia Woolf a few times, and there! Hey! I’ve got a serious novel. But you don’t actually have to do that.

(Pauses) That was a bloody good answer, though I say it myself.”
Terry Pratchett

T.S. Eliot
“There is, it seems to us,
At best, only a limited value
In the knowledge derived from experience.
The knowledge imposes a pattern, and falsifies,
For the pattern is new in every moment.”
T.S. Eliot, East Coker

Dorothy Parker
“Beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes clean to the bone.”
Dorothy Parker

T.S. Eliot
“Human kind
Cannot bear very much reality.

- Burnt Norton
T.S. Eliot, Four Quartets

T.S. Eliot
“Time present and time past
Are both perhaps present in time future,
And time future contained in time past,
If all time is eternally present
All time is unredeemable.”
T.S. Eliot

57460 GoodGames — 61 members — last activity Aug 30, 2017 03:54AM
This is just a group for all the gamers out there. It is also possible to have general chat and other group based activities and discussions.
25x33 Book Club — 1360 members — last activity Nov 14, 2020 11:18PM
Book club
107259 /r/Fantasy Discussion Group — 6566 members — last activity Jan 01, 2026 06:19AM
A place for readers/contributors of Reddit's /r/Fantasy subreddit to discuss books from the genre and see others' book lists and recommendations. ...more
41717 Q&A with M.L. Hamilton — 287 members — last activity Jun 28, 2014 06:14PM
Come join the author of the World of Samar series in discussions about reading and writing.
73066 All things Philosophical. — 185 members — last activity Feb 20, 2019 10:50PM
This is intended to be a rather general and open group on Philosophy. It will begin as a general discussion group with generalised topics. It can then ...more
More of Guy’s groups…
year in books
J.N. Ch...
260 books | 1,876 friends

Kevin Xu
7,428 books | 4,634 friends

Tym
Tym
19,566 books | 833 friends

David
1,081 books | 841 friends

caitlyn...
449 books | 11 friends

Matt
1,080 books | 4,995 friends

Rachel ...
4,640 books | 55 friends

Patrí
1,679 books | 211 friends

More friends…



Polls voted on by Guy

Lists liked by Guy