A Discovery of Witches
discussion
Who would you like to see play Matthew in the movie, if one were made?
message 701:
by
Angie
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 01, 2014 07:26PM

reply
|
flag

You must have seen him playing an American character because Tom Hiddleston is actually British... VERY much so... even more reason to cast him! :)

YES! Richard Armitage has that otherworldly, European aristocratic look. Perfect!

? Yeah, I know he's British. Don't know how I made that unclear to you. Am not aware of him playing any american characters etc. anyway. I meant that whoever plays Matthew should prob. be a British actor.

Ooh, good one. He plays Luke in the Mortal Instruments. When I saw him in that, I was like, Mitchell! I thought you were a vampire, not a werewolf! : ) he also makes a pretty hot dwarf in the Hobbit!

That's not a bad idea!! I can really see Benedict Cumberbatch as Matthew though.He can pull off the brooding intensity and his accent is seriously sexy.

In the book Matthew is described as being tall, having black hair and appears to be in his mid- to late thirties. So I think if he meets those requirements and can pull off an air of mystery and danger I don't really mind who the actor is as long the movie gets made.

That sounded (at least to me) like you didn't think he was British. He was F. Scott Fitzgerald in Midnight in Paris, which is one American role that I can think of. Both him and Michael Fassbender would be amazing!


http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1694302/?r...


http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0147147/"
Why can't Goodreads have a "Like" button?




I agree completely. He can be tender, he can be vicious, he has the European flair Matthew has from being around for centuries. He has a fine chiseled face. Richard Armitage is so Matthew. I hope that our input gets out on the wind to whomever directs the series, should it be optioned out. I have hopes, since Outlander is ready to be viewed on Showtime.



Interesting you see it as a TV series, I think of it as a movie, or a series of movies. I wonder what Warner Brothers see's it as?

No I don't agree. Movies today are shot very fast 2-3 years max for all three, as you'd want to shoot them together because the story line doesn't make sense without all three pieces. I don't think I could see Matthew Clairmont played as a kid in his 20's, I see him in his 30-40 at least. He's a college professor and so is she that's not a 20 year old person. A younger actor wouldn't have the emotional maturity to play this character.
As for movie audience, one has to remember there are more baby boomers then kids, perhaps if they developed more scripts like this and aimed it at them, their audience would quadruple... Plus this has lots of other vampires that surround Matthew that are younger like his children and nephew that would fit a 18-25 year old. I think the young viewers are more interested in action scripts (look at the Hobbit, it made billions and most of the actors in it are in their late 30's some even older) so I wouldn't tie an actor's age to this, but rather who could carry the role best, what the script offer the young in terms of action sequences (the book offers a lot of possibilities there), and the older viewer in terms of a believable Matthew/Diana love story that spans time.
As for Henry Cavill I think he's not dark enough to fit Matthew's description. Michael Fastbender could carry it off but he doesn't really have the same characteristics as the character in the book. I think Richard Armitage is a much better fit.

I'd be happy to see it in any format...a full length movie would be great, several installments like Hunger Games.

Richard Armitage has all the qualifications, dark and brooding, sexy, European, right age, athletic build...etc. etc. I guess you can tell, I really like Armitage for Matthew.

http://deborahharkness.com/about-debo...




Gaspard Ulliel, there's is not much to say except . . . yum! Though he might be a bit young he'd def..."
I agree totally!!

Sights wrote: "I think Jason mamoa would be a good matthew."
Nice but a bit too "raw" for Matthew I think.
Nice but a bit too "raw" for Matthew I think.

He's definitely good looking, but imho not sophisticated and European enough. Richard Armitage has it all!

He's definitely good looking, but imho not sophisticated and Europ..."
Too common after True Blood. IMHO, Moyer is not tall enough, or suave enough and Paquin is not "soft" enough in looks...needs the coloring to be a coppery redhead, as well as blonde...eyes changeable and not brown.

He's definitely good looking, but ..."
Just my opinion, as you have yours. I like Moyer and Paquin, just not who I envisioned while reading the trilogy.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
A Discovery of Witches (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Fifty Shades of Grey (other topics)A Discovery of Witches (other topics)