Young Adult Book Reading Challenges discussion
Member's Chat
>
Worst YA books

Try more Women of the Otherworld. Please?Bittenwas her very first book. You read it in the right order chronologically, but you gave up when she was just learning how to write. The next book in the series is also about Elena & Clay. She gets better, really! What you read first by her is some of her most recent stuff.
If you're looking for other authors who write adult urban fantasy that's very different try Charles de Lint, Emma Bull, andTerry Windling.

Seeker wrote: "I would have to say Twilight was pretty horrible. I mean I probably would have actually thought it was okay if there wasn't so much hype about it. I mean that period when everyone was so ridiculous..."
i agree! :)
i agree! :)



Um, what else was bad? Oh yes, Hush, Hush

Another book I wanted to toss in the trash was Fairest

Okay, well, thats all my ranting for now!
Chloe :)
PS I just thought of another one - Extras




I personally loved Extras! I saw the connection to Uglies, Prettiest and Specials as showing us the way Tally's choices affected the world overall and just how much things had changed. Although that's just how I saw it and I do admit it just isn't the same as the other books in the trilogy.
The most recent really bad YA books that I've read and can think of right now are:
Hush, Hush it was just a sham, a complete copycat of Twilight. Also Chosen the House of night's book 3 and onwards were just BAD, it became a complete an utter mess of what could have been such a good series. Lastly, Blue Moon and Shadowland sucked, the lead character suddenly turned into a complete dumbass.
Hush, Hush it was just a sham, a complete copycat of Twilight. Also Chosen the House of night's book 3 and onwards were just BAD, it became a complete an utter mess of what could have been such a good series. Lastly, Blue Moon and Shadowland sucked, the lead character suddenly turned into a complete dumbass.




That cannot be true, and yet I can't think of any books off the top of my head. I think the paranormal and vampire books have been targeted at this age since the beginning. We have Earthsea and Lord of the Rings in the Teen room at my library. Then, there are the series that came from television like BVS and Charmed. Granted, I haven't read those, but I just cannot believe that the bound trash that is Twilight started the ball rolling for really wonderful YA Lit. Somebody back me up, please?


Ha ha, as for this battle of the Twilight lovers and haters, I don't think it's a bad book. You have to understand it's for teenage girls and it just so happened to spread to the hearts of soccer moms and grannys. (For older women who might've just read that, DON'T get your panties in a wad and take that personally. It's just my opinion). Teenagers don't really read all that much now-a-days, this excluding the lovely people on here, so the fact that all these teens like Twilight is probably because it is such an easy read. But of course, to people like us who read often, we know how complex a good book is or how well written books can lure you in.
As for this: Amy wrote: Twilight was the one that started the entire paranormal craze in the first place.
I think it's safe to say Anne Rice was one of the many great authors who made vampires a sexy and captivating character to read about way before Ms. Meyer! WHOOP WHOOP! <3 ;)


Books, like everything else in mainstream culture, has trends that fade and then come back later in a circle pattern. Over time, you can trace the trends of fantasy/supernatural through the years just like every other genre.
Many times, it is how we (the readers) are preceiving our culture around us at the time that determines the trend we seem to favor. When things get really bad (ie...economy stinks, fears of war, uncertain future, ect.) we tend to want to read and see movies that are more escapism than our own reality. That is partly why you see the trend with vampires and supernatural forces right now being so hot. We want to escape from our own problems and enter a world that is so far-reached from our own but yet still recognizable with the assurance that it could never truly happen to us. Yes, word of mouth and good writing also are important but the overlying aspect of our culture is WHY we seem to relate to the book (or series) to begin with.
I predict that soon this trend of supernatural will too start to fade and another one will slowly start to take it's place....maybe this year, maybe in the next. (In my opinion, I feel that we will start to see more books written with a spy or average human crime solver along the lines of Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. You know the type....girl works for good but has a dark side....) But for all you fans of supernatural and fantasy, don't worry.....it will soon be all the rage once again in the future.
Many times, it is how we (the readers) are preceiving our culture around us at the time that determines the trend we seem to favor. When things get really bad (ie...economy stinks, fears of war, uncertain future, ect.) we tend to want to read and see movies that are more escapism than our own reality. That is partly why you see the trend with vampires and supernatural forces right now being so hot. We want to escape from our own problems and enter a world that is so far-reached from our own but yet still recognizable with the assurance that it could never truly happen to us. Yes, word of mouth and good writing also are important but the overlying aspect of our culture is WHY we seem to relate to the book (or series) to begin with.
I predict that soon this trend of supernatural will too start to fade and another one will slowly start to take it's place....maybe this year, maybe in the next. (In my opinion, I feel that we will start to see more books written with a spy or average human crime solver along the lines of Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. You know the type....girl works for good but has a dark side....) But for all you fans of supernatural and fantasy, don't worry.....it will soon be all the rage once again in the future.

In my opinion, Twilight could make a lot of people stop reading. The problem is not that it's a book about vampires and werewolves but that it's so poorly written.
I know enough to realize that there are thousands of well-written books worth reading. On the other hand, if I didn't read regularly and I thought Twilight was the best that was available because of all the hype around it, I doubt I would bother with many other books after reading it.

The worst stand alone. Huh. I'll have to think about that one.

"
I very very very much agree!!! My major problem with "Evermore" was all the product placement. I think she "paid" her way into having this book published. Im ok with some product placement when they make sense to the story. But all the products mentioned in this book had no real relevance to the story. It was aweful. And then second one I will admit was better but not much. So I stopped there.


As far as the Twilight series there were pieces I enjoyed, but my favorite thing about this series is how many of my reluctant readers picked it up and read it. It opened their eyes to a world outside of theirs, and I saw many of them start to look for other series they can enjoy. :)


I just finished this book last week, and I have to say that I loved it. I smiled the entire time i was reading!




The Maximum Ride books weren't for me, either.
Here's two I hated I am Scout and Mockingbird: A Portrait of Harper Lee both are by Charles J. Shields. Harper Lee hasn't given an interview since 1964. So what does this slimeball masquerading as a biographer do? Write to every school mate, at every level, many of whom are not and never were friends and repeat their gossip. Repeat the worst and most hateful things her "friends" ever said about her.
Oh! He also publishes her address!
Jerk!
(Yeah, I feel a little strongly on the subject...)
I would have to say the worst YA book for me is. Vampire diaries. The plots are stupid and predictable, and the meeting of the human and vampire is cheese. Well everything about the book is cheese.



Also, I don't even know if it qualifies as YA, but I HATED H.I.V.E.: Higher Institute of Villainous Education. When I first picked it up, I thought "hey, a sort of Hogwarts for villains, that might be cool." Except that I found the first book abstolutely random. The ending was cringe-worty IMO, but I decided to read the second installment. Huge mistake. The story only gets weirder, with things happening out of the blue. So I decided to Google the other books and the whole "he is a computer" thing ruined it for me. Probably the worst book I've ever read.

So here's my question: what's a book that focuses on a serious subject for teens but really drops the ball?

Sticky Fingers is another one I would suggest. The story takes forever to get to the serious subject (date rape drugs) and then the whole issue is kind of glossed over in the last few chapters.


And you could also use Cut by Patricia McCormick

- House of Night
For reasons that shouldn't need explaining. Zoey, I do not like your ways. Authors: putting LOL, BFF, and all those replacement swearwords and writing vampires 'vampyres' does not make you look cool. Nor does it help you with people who appreciate the English language.
- Blue Bloods
Ugh. Way to much description on the clothing and who was who and what was in and out. It would have been much better if the author had focused on the vampire parts of the novel rather than the fashion.
- Evermore
I read the first book and liked it very much. But after the horrible reviews that I've read I can't even bring myself to pick up the sequel, Blue Moon.
- Fallen
I could only read up to chapter nine (page 140 something) I think. I simply got bored and found all the characters really boring.
- Beautiful Creatures
I properly read the first hundred pages of this book. After that I simply skimmed the descriptions and read only the speech.
For now, that's all I can think of.

I've read the first two and they were very Mehh for me. And according to an article a few years back (?) it was revealed that James Patterson doesn't even write his own books. Yet he earned 70 million (highest paied author last finanical year) for his books.

That's not even cool! An author is suppose to write his/her own books not profit from someone elses writings!

You'd be surprised by how many authors have ghost writers, whether writing under a penname after they've passed away (in the case of V.C. Andrews) or others who choose to carry a specific franchise. But I see your point entirely.
I've read the same article that Ellen mentioned, and it explained to me why I thought a lot of his books seemed so inconsistent. Some were really good, and then others were really, really bad. (My sister finished reading "Sunday's at Tiffany's" a while back and didn't like it very much. Usually if she doesn't like it, it's a sign that I might hate it, but I'm still going to see how it is for myself.)
I haven't read the Maximum Ride series yet, but I thought I'd give it a try at some point. There's been a huge divide as to people who liked it or hated it. I figure I'd try it for myself and see where it went.
All of the Nancy Drew and Hardy Boy books were written by a team of writers working for a book company so this practice of having ghost writers is a very long one.

Agreed. Not cool, Patterson, not cool.

You'd be surprised by how many authors have gh..."
Yea I know. I just find it sad that books have come to that. I want to read the books that are written by real authors not by "Ghost Writers."

-Looking for Alaska by John Green. This disappointed me since I loved An Abundance of Katherines. I just couldn't relate to any of the characters, and I wanted to punch the main girl character.
-Forever. Judy Blume really dropped the ball on this one.
-Nineteen Minutes. This is a book about school shooting, but the author tries to incorporate every possible teen drama into it so it seemed unfocused.
-LoveSick. Creepy and a bad message. Basically, it's OK to let someone to have an eating disorder as long as you love them.
Nick & Norah's Infinite Playlist Random and annoying.
There are several more that I can think of, like The Tribes of Palos Verdes: A Novel, Slam,Aftershock,It's Kind of a Funny Story, Before I Die, Prep, and Dramarama.


I though Forever was actually handeled quite well. Although it was very "informative", Judy Blume seems to take the subject and make it much easier to read. Although I would never put it in a SCHOOl library, I do believe it has its place in a public library.
As for Th1rteen R3asons Why, well I honestly LOVED this book. He was not encouraging suicied in any way, but he protrayed a clear picture of the world around us and just how much we really don't know about people.
Everyone is entitled to there own opinions, but I just thought I'd say my part.
Oh, and I also just wanted to say that Night Runner is also one of my least favourite books :P
Books mentioned in this topic
Incarceron (other topics)Sapphique (other topics)
Reached (other topics)
Matched (other topics)
Crossed (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Emma Bull (other topics)Terri Windling (other topics)
Charles de Lint (other topics)
Beth Fantaskey (other topics)
I don't remember it (although it is listed in imdb) - I just remember loving the book and his writing. I wouldn't hesitate to read any of his books.