76 books
—
1 voter
John Dee Books
Showing 1-50 of 78

by (shelved 4 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.67 — 18 ratings — published 1909

by (shelved 4 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.36 — 1,406 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 4 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.83 — 817 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 4 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.68 — 1,969 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 3 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.06 — 763 ratings — published 1927

by (shelved 3 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.12 — 87,025 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.19 — 75 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.47 — 921 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.25 — 57 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.43 — 219 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.04 — 153 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.18 — 61,335 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.13 — 69,925 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.86 — 166,269 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.10 — 100,624 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.14 — 529 ratings — published 1979

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.86 — 59 ratings — published 1972

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.84 — 69 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 3.96 — 23 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 2 times as john-dee)
avg rating 4.20 — 15 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.60 — 5 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.31 — 16 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.71 — 17 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.80 — 227 ratings — published 2023

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.89 — 366 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.27 — 2,770 ratings — published 2023

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.67 — 3 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.55 — 352 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.76 — 8,566 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.93 — 1,742 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.00 — 2 ratings — published 1968

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.75 — 4 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.57 — 54 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 5.00 — 4 ratings — published 1631

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.55 — 231 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.53 — 107 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.31 — 332 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.13 — 31 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.25 — 4 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.11 — 70 ratings — published 1956

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.64 — 2,311 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.96 — 316 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.33 — 3 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.50 — 2 ratings — published 1908

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.50 — 4 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.37 — 329 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.96 — 98 ratings — published 1968

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 3.12 — 8 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 1 time as john-dee)
avg rating 4.00 — 230 ratings — published 1564

“To return to the general analysis of the Rosicrucian outlook. Magic was a dominating factor, working as a mathematics-mechanics in the lower world, as celestial mathematics in the celestial world, and as angelic conjuration in the supercelestial world. One cannot leave out the angels in this world view, however much it may have been advancing towards the scientific revolution. The religious outlook is bound up with the idea that penetration has been made into higher angelic spheres in which all religions were seen as one; and it is the angels who are believed to illuminate man's intellectual activities.
In the earlier Renaissance, the magi had been careful to use only the forms of magic operating in the elemental or celestial spheres, using talismans and various rituals to draw down favourable influences from the stars. The magic of a bold operator like Dee, aims beyond the stars, aims at doing the supercelestial mathematical magic, the angel-conjuring magic. Dee firmly believed that he had gained contact with good angels from whom he learned advancement in knowledge. This sense of close contact with angels or spiritual beings is the hallmark of the Rosicrucian. It is this which infuses his technology, however practical and successful and entirely rational in its new understanding of mathematical techniques, with an unearthly air, and makes him suspect as possibly in contact, not with angels, but with devils.”
― The Rosicrucian Enlightenment
In the earlier Renaissance, the magi had been careful to use only the forms of magic operating in the elemental or celestial spheres, using talismans and various rituals to draw down favourable influences from the stars. The magic of a bold operator like Dee, aims beyond the stars, aims at doing the supercelestial mathematical magic, the angel-conjuring magic. Dee firmly believed that he had gained contact with good angels from whom he learned advancement in knowledge. This sense of close contact with angels or spiritual beings is the hallmark of the Rosicrucian. It is this which infuses his technology, however practical and successful and entirely rational in its new understanding of mathematical techniques, with an unearthly air, and makes him suspect as possibly in contact, not with angels, but with devils.”
― The Rosicrucian Enlightenment

“Weirdly, D&D didn't encourage my leanings towards trying magic of my own at all. In fact, it frustrated them. Even the most pompous and ambitious historical magicians, from the Zaroastrian Magi through John Dee, Francis Barrett and Aleister Crowley, never claimed to be able to throw fireballs or lightning bolts like D&D wizards can. So D&D was never going to feed the fantasies of practising magic in the real world. That is all about gaining secret knowledge, a higher level of perception or inflicting misfortune or a boon on someone rather than causing a poisonous cloud of vapor to pour from your fingers (Cloudkill, deadly to creatures with less than 5 hit dice, for those who are interested). The game, as we played it, just doesn't support the occult idea of magic.
In fact, it might even be argued that, by giving such a powerful prop to my imagination, D&D stopped me from going deeper into the occult in real life. I certainly had all the qualifications—bullied power-hungry twerp with no discernable skill in conventional fields and no immediate hope of a girlfriend who wasn't mentally ill. It's amazing I'm not out sacrificing goats to this day.”
― The Elfish Gene: Dungeons, Dragons And Growing Up Strange
In fact, it might even be argued that, by giving such a powerful prop to my imagination, D&D stopped me from going deeper into the occult in real life. I certainly had all the qualifications—bullied power-hungry twerp with no discernable skill in conventional fields and no immediate hope of a girlfriend who wasn't mentally ill. It's amazing I'm not out sacrificing goats to this day.”
― The Elfish Gene: Dungeons, Dragons And Growing Up Strange