14 books
—
12 voters
Iq Books
Showing 1-50 of 338

by (shelved 12 times as iq)
avg rating 4.01 — 140 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 6 times as iq)
avg rating 3.60 — 3,457 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 5 times as iq)
avg rating 3.80 — 98 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 5 times as iq)
avg rating 4.05 — 8,309 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 4 times as iq)
avg rating 4.47 — 123 ratings — published

by (shelved 4 times as iq)
avg rating 4.17 — 572,687 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 4 times as iq)
avg rating 4.23 — 774,029 ratings — published 1966

by (shelved 4 times as iq)
avg rating 3.55 — 332 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 4.28 — 329,288 ratings — published 180

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 3.25 — 40 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 3.64 — 14 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 4.23 — 434 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 4.07 — 7,367 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 3.69 — 750 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 3.37 — 206 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 4.19 — 852,623 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 3 times as iq)
avg rating 4.19 — 4,387 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.97 — 222,104 ratings — published -400

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.75 — 115,520 ratings — published -1200

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 4.21 — 471,198 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 4.40 — 156,666 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.95 — 557,408 ratings — published -500

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.77 — 22 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.88 — 16 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.67 — 18 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.55 — 11 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 4.05 — 697 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.25 — 8 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.96 — 24 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 4.19 — 16 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 4.05 — 133,070 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 3.43 — 7 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 4.30 — 23 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 4.14 — 3,981 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as iq)
avg rating 4.05 — 9,255 ratings — published 1982

by (shelved 1 time as iq)
avg rating 4.22 — 173,043 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 1 time as iq)
avg rating 3.91 — 30,977 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as iq)
avg rating 4.17 — 9,433 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as iq)
avg rating 4.36 — 198,903 ratings — published 2018

“Page 366:
Can the United States really have been experiencing falling IQ? Would not we be able to see the consequences? Maybe we have. In 1938, Raymond Cattell, one of the most illustrious psychometricians of his age, wrote an article for the British Journal of Psychology, “Some Changes in Social life in a Community with a Falling Intelligence Quotient.” The article was eerily prescient.
In education, Cattell predicted that academic standards would fall and the curriculum would shift toward less abstract subjects. He foresaw an increase in “delinquency against society” – crime and willful dependency (for example, having a child without being able to care for it) would be in this category. He was not sure whether this would lead to a slackening of moral codes or attempts at tighter government control over individual behavior. The response could go either way, he wrote.
He predicted that a complex modern society with a falling IQ would have to compensate people at the low end of IQ by a “systematized relaxation of moral standards, permitting more direct instinctive satisfactions.” In particular, he saw an expanding role for what he called “fantasy compensations.” He saw the novel and the cinema as the contemporary means for satisfying it, but he added that “we have probably not seen the end of its development or begun to appreciate its damaging effects on ‘reality thinking’ habits concerned in other spheres of life” – a prediction hard to fault as one watches the use of TV in today’s world and imagines the use of virtual reality helmets in tomorrow’s.
Turning to political and social life, he expected to see “the development of a larger ‘social problem group’ or at least of a group supported, supervised and patronized by extensive state social welfare work.” This, he foresaw, would be “inimical to that human solidarity and potential equality of prestige which is essential to democracy.”
― The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life
Can the United States really have been experiencing falling IQ? Would not we be able to see the consequences? Maybe we have. In 1938, Raymond Cattell, one of the most illustrious psychometricians of his age, wrote an article for the British Journal of Psychology, “Some Changes in Social life in a Community with a Falling Intelligence Quotient.” The article was eerily prescient.
In education, Cattell predicted that academic standards would fall and the curriculum would shift toward less abstract subjects. He foresaw an increase in “delinquency against society” – crime and willful dependency (for example, having a child without being able to care for it) would be in this category. He was not sure whether this would lead to a slackening of moral codes or attempts at tighter government control over individual behavior. The response could go either way, he wrote.
He predicted that a complex modern society with a falling IQ would have to compensate people at the low end of IQ by a “systematized relaxation of moral standards, permitting more direct instinctive satisfactions.” In particular, he saw an expanding role for what he called “fantasy compensations.” He saw the novel and the cinema as the contemporary means for satisfying it, but he added that “we have probably not seen the end of its development or begun to appreciate its damaging effects on ‘reality thinking’ habits concerned in other spheres of life” – a prediction hard to fault as one watches the use of TV in today’s world and imagines the use of virtual reality helmets in tomorrow’s.
Turning to political and social life, he expected to see “the development of a larger ‘social problem group’ or at least of a group supported, supervised and patronized by extensive state social welfare work.” This, he foresaw, would be “inimical to that human solidarity and potential equality of prestige which is essential to democracy.”
― The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life

“Mind Quotient (Sonnet 1209)
Throw away all stupidity of IQ and EQ,
They are but stain upon mind's honor.
To quantify intelligence is stupid,
To quantify emotion is even stupider.
When the feeble psyche seeks reassurance,
It craves comfort in all sorts of nonsense.
Most times it resorts to the supernatural,
Exhausting that it resorts to pseudoscience.
It is no mark of mental progress to replace
supernatural bubble with pseudoscience bubble.
No matter how they try to sell you security,
Know that, human potential is unquantifiable.
IQ is no measure of intelligence,
EQ is no measure of emotion either.
But craving for IQ and EQ is symptom
of a shallow and feeble character.”
― Rowdy Scientist: Handbook of Humanitarian Science
Throw away all stupidity of IQ and EQ,
They are but stain upon mind's honor.
To quantify intelligence is stupid,
To quantify emotion is even stupider.
When the feeble psyche seeks reassurance,
It craves comfort in all sorts of nonsense.
Most times it resorts to the supernatural,
Exhausting that it resorts to pseudoscience.
It is no mark of mental progress to replace
supernatural bubble with pseudoscience bubble.
No matter how they try to sell you security,
Know that, human potential is unquantifiable.
IQ is no measure of intelligence,
EQ is no measure of emotion either.
But craving for IQ and EQ is symptom
of a shallow and feeble character.”
― Rowdy Scientist: Handbook of Humanitarian Science