246 books
—
474 voters
2011 Books
Showing 1-50 of 100,000

by (shelved 2620 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.35 — 9,713,768 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2305 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.35 — 4,070,776 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2268 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.12 — 3,646,133 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1719 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.47 — 2,984,321 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1308 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.96 — 1,047,228 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1259 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.08 — 829,101 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1116 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.11 — 1,688,700 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1035 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.45 — 2,697,210 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 983 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.17 — 3,406,808 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 944 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.13 — 4,322,975 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 833 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.26 — 977,748 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 807 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.47 — 11,194,028 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 787 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.62 — 811,893 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 786 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.82 — 132,772 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 784 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.87 — 404,385 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 780 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.24 — 770,307 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 710 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.62 — 4,048,896 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 701 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.92 — 1,345,253 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 696 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.42 — 1,008,659 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 691 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.43 — 4,403,312 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 688 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.70 — 246,550 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 676 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.58 — 4,739,842 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 671 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.13 — 794,334 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 660 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.00 — 1,080,481 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 653 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.07 — 635,531 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 643 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.95 — 477,724 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 626 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.57 — 4,117,177 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 619 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.39 — 2,831,263 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 592 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.50 — 3,731,876 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 580 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.58 — 3,600,233 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 551 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.02 — 548,374 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 517 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.34 — 730,668 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 507 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.16 — 2,284,250 ratings — published 1846

by (shelved 493 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.96 — 463,705 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 489 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.55 — 836,868 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 483 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.89 — 128,172 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 474 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.85 — 830,641 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 469 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.18 — 492,219 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 465 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.93 — 350,667 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 461 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.07 — 2,144,163 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 455 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.39 — 995,523 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 436 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.17 — 782,949 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 434 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.97 — 304,216 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 420 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.99 — 88,933 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 414 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.77 — 119,244 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 413 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.29 — 4,701,592 ratings — published 1813

by (shelved 407 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.93 — 5,800,893 ratings — published 1925

by (shelved 395 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.90 — 365,027 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 394 times as 2011)
avg rating 3.79 — 174,219 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 392 times as 2011)
avg rating 4.33 — 421,498 ratings — published 2009

“A jacketless Murdoch resumes his quiz, brushing off the assault as 'an overexcited autograph-hunter wanting to have his shaving foam signed.”
―
―

“The great cause of the new Republican intake is the reduction of the deficit but to anyone seeking evidence of sincere attempts at deficit-reduction the evidence is baffling.
The Republicans showed before Christmas that they would seek to reduce the deficit but not when it came to a matter of the tax breaks that had aggravated the deficit in the first place.
Now there's a date set for the abolition of Barack Obama's healthcare plan, parts of which only came into operation at the start of this month. The Republicans are out to destroy the plan. Or, more precisely, to pretend to destroy the plan in the name of making good on election pledges. The measure won't get past the Senate.
But suppose it did get past the Senate, what effect would this have on the deficit? The answer is it would aggravate the deficit. Somehow, somewhere, there's an override mechanism that makes destroying Obamacare more important than destroying the deficit. If only one could figure out how it works.”
―
The Republicans showed before Christmas that they would seek to reduce the deficit but not when it came to a matter of the tax breaks that had aggravated the deficit in the first place.
Now there's a date set for the abolition of Barack Obama's healthcare plan, parts of which only came into operation at the start of this month. The Republicans are out to destroy the plan. Or, more precisely, to pretend to destroy the plan in the name of making good on election pledges. The measure won't get past the Senate.
But suppose it did get past the Senate, what effect would this have on the deficit? The answer is it would aggravate the deficit. Somehow, somewhere, there's an override mechanism that makes destroying Obamacare more important than destroying the deficit. If only one could figure out how it works.”
―