129 books
—
71 voters
1880s Books
Showing 1-50 of 1,658

by (shelved 73 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.83 — 1,326,543 ratings — published 1884

by (shelved 61 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.13 — 487,363 ratings — published 1887

by (shelved 59 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.83 — 650,864 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 54 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.85 — 533,663 ratings — published 1882

by (shelved 36 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.14 — 212,368 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 33 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.39 — 376,940 ratings — published 1880

by (shelved 30 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.80 — 84,546 ratings — published 1881

by (shelved 27 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.78 — 107,295 ratings — published 1889

by (shelved 24 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.80 — 14,995 ratings — published 1884

by (shelved 22 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.79 — 52,261 ratings — published 1885

by (shelved 22 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.84 — 87,817 ratings — published 1883

by (shelved 21 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.70 — 25,415 ratings — published 1880

by (shelved 20 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.81 — 76,442 ratings — published 1884

by (shelved 19 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.07 — 172,412 ratings — published 1883

by (shelved 18 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.86 — 48,017 ratings — published 1885

by (shelved 18 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.86 — 65,512 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 17 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.88 — 69,426 ratings — published 1887

by (shelved 17 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.83 — 79,140 ratings — published 1889

by (shelved 16 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.79 — 67,520 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 16 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.04 — 209,925 ratings — published 1880

by (shelved 15 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.03 — 111,346 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 15 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.58 — 7,926 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 14 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.87 — 124,632 ratings — published 1881

by (shelved 14 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.26 — 37,222 ratings — published 1881

by (shelved 13 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.29 — 6,783 ratings — published 1888

by (shelved 13 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.07 — 66,568 ratings — published 1883

by (shelved 12 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.86 — 34,703 ratings — published 1889

by (shelved 12 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.20 — 42,250 ratings — published 1885

by (shelved 11 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.88 — 23,119 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 11 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.83 — 39,183 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 10 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.17 — 33,885 ratings — published 1888

by (shelved 10 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.98 — 20,126 ratings — published 1883

by (shelved 10 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.03 — 37,529 ratings — published 1880

by (shelved 10 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.19 — 37,144 ratings — published 1888

by (shelved 9 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.12 — 16,822 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 9 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.96 — 57,619 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 9 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.87 — 15,443 ratings — published 1883

by (shelved 9 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.91 — 24,610 ratings — published 1885

by (shelved 9 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.70 — 6,748 ratings — published 1888

by (shelved 8 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.86 — 23,446 ratings — published 1887

by (shelved 8 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.91 — 141,150 ratings — published 1886

by (shelved 8 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.00 — 1,080,805 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 8 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.87 — 14,993 ratings — published 1882

by (shelved 8 times as 1880s)
avg rating 4.08 — 9,944 ratings — published 1888

by (shelved 8 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.43 — 4,302 ratings — published 1885

by (shelved 7 times as 1880s)
avg rating 3.87 — 40,037 ratings — published 2016

“A study of fifty women conducted in 1887 revealed that the corset forcibly contracted their waists by anywhere between two and a half and six bodies. The pressure it applied to women's bodies averaged twenty-one pounds but could reach as high as eighty-eight pounds. Tight-lacing was thus akin to crushing oneself slowly from all sides. As a harsh critic of the corset noted, 'It is evident, physiologically, that air is the pabulum of life, and that the effects of a tight cord round the neck and of tight-lacing only differ in degree.... for the strangulations are both fatal. To wear tight stays is in many cases to wither, to waste and to die.”
― Flapper: A Madcap Story of Sex, Style, Celebrity, and the Women Who Made America Modern
― Flapper: A Madcap Story of Sex, Style, Celebrity, and the Women Who Made America Modern

“One of the most ambitious men to exploit the timber trade was Hugh F. McDanield, a railroad builder and tie contractor who had come to Fayetteville along with the Frisco. He bought thousands of acres of land within hauling distance of the railroad and sent out teams of men to cut the timber. By the mid-1880s, after a frenzy of cutting in south Washington County, he turned his gaze to the untapped fortune of timber on the steep hillsides of southeast Washington County and southern Madison County, territory most readily accessed along a wide valley long since leveled by the east fork of White River. Mr. McDanield gathered a group of backers and the state granted a charter September 4, 1886, giving authority to issue capital stock valued at $1.5 million, which was the estimated cost to build a rail line through St. Paul and on to Lewisburg, which was a riverboat town on the Arkansas River near Morrilton. McDanield began surveys while local businessman J. F. Mayes worked with property owners to secure rights of way. “On December 4, 1886, a switch was installed in the Frisco main line about a mile south of Fayetteville, and the spot was named Fayette Junction.” Within six months, 25 miles of track had been laid east by southeast through Baldwin, Harris, Elkins, Durham, Thompson, Crosses, Delaney, Patrick, Combs, and finally St. Paul.
Soon after, in 1887, the Frisco bought the so-called “Fayetteville and Little Rock” line from McDanield. It was estimated that in the first year McDanield and partners shipped out more than $2,000,000 worth of hand-hacked white oak railroad ties at an approximate value of twenty-five cents each. Mills ran day and night as people arrived “by train, wagon, on horseback, even afoot” to get a piece of the action along the new track, commonly referred to as the “St. Paul line.” Saloons, hotels, banks, stores, and services from smithing to tailoring sprang up in rail stop communities.”
―
Soon after, in 1887, the Frisco bought the so-called “Fayetteville and Little Rock” line from McDanield. It was estimated that in the first year McDanield and partners shipped out more than $2,000,000 worth of hand-hacked white oak railroad ties at an approximate value of twenty-five cents each. Mills ran day and night as people arrived “by train, wagon, on horseback, even afoot” to get a piece of the action along the new track, commonly referred to as the “St. Paul line.” Saloons, hotels, banks, stores, and services from smithing to tailoring sprang up in rail stop communities.”
―