Reads with Scotch ’s
Comments
(group member since Mar 14, 2008)
Reads with Scotch ’s
comments
from the Axis Mundi X group.
Showing 21-40 of 1,977



edit**
To discuss anything other then her complete insignificance?


I think there are other companies out there that can do a better job of innovating our energy infrastructure. GE is an orgy of bad moves and worse decisions. frankly I am surprised they were able to scrounge together enough money to put up that web page.
Then way down on the list they still do business with Iran.

Steve Irwin= dumb ass who through complacency lost his healthy respect for nature, and paid the price for it.
jello= jiggly fun snack!

I think the problem with our (two?) teachers unions here is; they seem to never have education quality as the priority. That and they have too much power, they are actually dictating what happens in the education system. Perfect example of bureaucrats running the things instead of elected officials.

Holy cheese and crackers! All of this because I asked what was thought about the suspension of shuttle operations until 2020...
Ok so we can't get rid of the students, but there are many teachers that don't need to be in a classroom, we can all agree there yes? We have all had or known a teacher that simply doesn't have the ability to make a connection with students...
So we all agree the system is broken. We probably agree on the problems of the system. We just don't agree on how to fix it. Great were Americans and arguing is what we do...
So about that Orion...


And I laugh out loud at anyone that says American kids aren't lazy.




On a long enough time line we die if we stay here. Plus there is a finite amount of resources planet side so we need to expand out. If we go muck about in the water do you know what will happen? The same thing that happens everywhere else, we will ruin it.
So if were going to ruin something lets ruin something far away that will take us aeon's to ruin; outer-space! :D (eh, never mind about the low orbit debris fields...)

I digress, When the SR (strategic reconfiguration) turbines were produced by Siemens we had specific environmental guidelines, and operating tolerances, expectations. The SR turbines were suppose to operate with a 60% and some change reduction in emissions; additionally they were suppose to be robust enough to handle the environment conditions in the arctic. They were suppose to be able to function without reduced efficiency down to -70., and up to +95. And lastly they need to be able to function without interruption for 6 months.
Well Siemens failed across the board we are over a billion into this project and have not met a single milestone (in reality on paper it appears that we are almost done.)
Failure(1) The turbines overheat if it is warmer then +15. We have spent MILLIONS on auxiliary cooling alone and to be honest it isn't really making an impact. On the other side once we hit the -35 mark it starts to freeze up, so we have to throw up an ass load of auxiliary portable gas heaters to raise the temp to optimal operating temps (around zero).
Failure(2) The engineered environmental equipment is a complete failure. The SR turbines simply do not function when they are in place and engaged. If we don't use the scrubbers the SR equipment runs dirtier then the legacy equipment. (this is where the insurance comes in) Siemens is responsible for all State and federal fines accrued during this "dirty" time, and the cost of materials to produce functioning emissions control equipment.
Failure(3) The SR equipment has not has a consecutive operation period of more then 3 weeks at any station that is "complete".
Wow I really digress ok to the point I miss sold my idea... Were 6 years into a project that was suppose to be a 3 year deal. Were at 8 times the cost and still the end is nowhere in sight. If it wasn't for these contracted "ownership of failure" provisions then the pipeline would be bankrupt. So I suppose calling it an insurance policy is not accurate.