Randy Green's Blog - Posts Tagged "law"
Favorite Elementary School Teacher
Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor. For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus [Galatians 3:24-26].
Do you remember who your favorite grade school teacher was? If you’ve put on the years like me, that is a tall order to fill. But I remember mine! No, I cannot recall his name, but I remember him. He was my fourth grade English teacher. He had somewhat of a resemblance to my father, same general size and build. Maybe that contributed to my embracing him.
But what I really liked the most about him was what he did. During English class he would read aloud to us a chapter at a time from the Hardy Boys mystery books. I used to love those books! This teacher did this in order to interest us in reading books on our own. He led by example, and it worked! Not just me, but many other students took to reading books because of this teacher. He left a lasting legacy.
In Galatians 3 the Apostle Paul recalled his own favorite school marm. He said the Law was his favorite school marm. No, I’m not making that up! Honest. Paul said that. Just read the verses in Galatians we quoted at the start of this post. Still don’t see it, huh? Okay, then let me explain it to you.
The NASB translation I employed in the quote twice uses the word tutor to depict the function of the Law. In the Greek original the word tutor is transliterated into English as our word pedagogue. If you go to an English dictionary and look up the word pedagogue, you will discover one of its meanings is “a teacher or school teacher”. See! Told you. The Law was Paul’s favorite school marm.
There is a reason I say the Law was a school marm or a grade school teacher, rather than a high school teacher or college professor. If you read Paul’s teaching in Galatians, he tells us that the Law was given to lead us to Christ. It served a purpose only until the fullness of the times had come, viz., until the Lord Jesus fulfilled the Law for us and then died on the cross to pay the penalty of our sins and rose again for our justification. Now that Jesus has accomplished that part of His ministry, we Christians are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, not through obedience to the Law as under the Old Covenant.
The pedagogue of Paul’s day was a knowledgeable and educated Greek slave, whom a wealthy Roman father put in charge of his infant son. The pedagogue had to educate the boy about the duties and responsibilities of being a Roman leader in society. This required education in a broad field of studies. Once the boy reached the age when his father felt he was ready to step out into the world and serve as a citizen, then the boy became a man and the father’s heir. At that time the boy become a man was no longer under a pedagogue.
So it is, you see, that the pedagogue was a school marm who taught boys and not men. The importance of this for us Christians can be expressed by these questions:
• Are we maturing spiritually to the point that we don’t need to be governed by do’s and don’ts?
• Are we beyond the pedagogue stage?
• Do we instead learn by sitting alone at the feet of Jesus and allowing Him to teach us directly?
If not then we are still living as if under the Law, and that is not a good thing.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Do you remember who your favorite grade school teacher was? If you’ve put on the years like me, that is a tall order to fill. But I remember mine! No, I cannot recall his name, but I remember him. He was my fourth grade English teacher. He had somewhat of a resemblance to my father, same general size and build. Maybe that contributed to my embracing him.
But what I really liked the most about him was what he did. During English class he would read aloud to us a chapter at a time from the Hardy Boys mystery books. I used to love those books! This teacher did this in order to interest us in reading books on our own. He led by example, and it worked! Not just me, but many other students took to reading books because of this teacher. He left a lasting legacy.
In Galatians 3 the Apostle Paul recalled his own favorite school marm. He said the Law was his favorite school marm. No, I’m not making that up! Honest. Paul said that. Just read the verses in Galatians we quoted at the start of this post. Still don’t see it, huh? Okay, then let me explain it to you.
The NASB translation I employed in the quote twice uses the word tutor to depict the function of the Law. In the Greek original the word tutor is transliterated into English as our word pedagogue. If you go to an English dictionary and look up the word pedagogue, you will discover one of its meanings is “a teacher or school teacher”. See! Told you. The Law was Paul’s favorite school marm.
There is a reason I say the Law was a school marm or a grade school teacher, rather than a high school teacher or college professor. If you read Paul’s teaching in Galatians, he tells us that the Law was given to lead us to Christ. It served a purpose only until the fullness of the times had come, viz., until the Lord Jesus fulfilled the Law for us and then died on the cross to pay the penalty of our sins and rose again for our justification. Now that Jesus has accomplished that part of His ministry, we Christians are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus, not through obedience to the Law as under the Old Covenant.
The pedagogue of Paul’s day was a knowledgeable and educated Greek slave, whom a wealthy Roman father put in charge of his infant son. The pedagogue had to educate the boy about the duties and responsibilities of being a Roman leader in society. This required education in a broad field of studies. Once the boy reached the age when his father felt he was ready to step out into the world and serve as a citizen, then the boy became a man and the father’s heir. At that time the boy become a man was no longer under a pedagogue.
So it is, you see, that the pedagogue was a school marm who taught boys and not men. The importance of this for us Christians can be expressed by these questions:
• Are we maturing spiritually to the point that we don’t need to be governed by do’s and don’ts?
• Are we beyond the pedagogue stage?
• Do we instead learn by sitting alone at the feet of Jesus and allowing Him to teach us directly?
If not then we are still living as if under the Law, and that is not a good thing.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Parlor Tricks – Part 1
One of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, testing him, “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?” And he said to him, “ ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments depend the whole law and the prophets.” [Matthew 22:35-40]
There is a significant division within Christianity. It often wears the label Dispensationalism vs. Covenantalism. I personally don’t choose to employ the label in my own writing because it smacks of a systematic theology doctrine. I myself am not a proponent of systematic theology. I am a practitioner of Biblical theology.
It isn’t my aim today to descant upon those two systems of theological interpretation. My goal is to define the division within Christianity in practical terms, rather than as the doctrines of Dispensationalism and Covenantalism. So let’s take a stab at it, shall we?
The Old Testament (aka the Old Covenant) actually consists of more than one covenant. For our purposes today the only covenant in the Old Testament we will concern ourselves with is the Covenant of Law (aka the Law of Moses or Torah). In contrast to this is the New Testament (aka the New Covenant). This covenant can be labeled the Covenant of Grace. So the contrast is between Law and Grace.
In a nutshell proponents of Covenantalism view Israel’s time as the Lord’s chosen people on earth as a past tense thing. The Law promised blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience to the Word of God. Israel sinned by disobeying God’s Law, so the Lord cast her off and chose the Gentiles instead of Israel (i.e., the Jews). Now Israel has all the curses for disobedience, while the Gentiles (who make up the Church) have all the blessings for obeying God’s Law. In fine, Israel is no longer God’s chosen people, nor will the Jews ever again be so.
Huh? That does not compute, dear friends! Since when has the Church obeyed God’s Law? Answer: NEVER! The Jews have nothing on us Gentiles when it comes to sinning. We are highly skilled at disobeying God’s Word. So that part is wretched theology.
And then there is the meat of the matter. The Church is NOT under the Law: we are under GRACE! The Law served as a pedagogue, a school marm, until the fulness of the times had come. That is the substance of the Book of Galatians. When the fulness of the times did finally arrive—viz., when the Messiah, Jesus, took upon humanity and died as a sin offering for all mankind—then the Law had fulfilled its function.
So what was the function of the Law? Its function was to reveal invisible spiritual truths by making use of visible physical realities. In many different ways the Law pointed out to the Israelites, and through them to the Gentiles also, that every last human being (Jesus Christ excepted) is born with a sin nature. Consequently all of us sin! The wages of sin is death, so all of us have to die.
The Messiah took our place and died as payment for the penalty of man’s sins. Now that He has done so, the Law no longer has its purpose. Messiah Jesus fulfilled the Law for us, went to the cross to pay the penalty for our sins, and rose out of death, demonstrating Father God’s acceptance of His payment on our behalf.
Anyone who will acknowledge Jesus’ Person and Ministry and accept His payment is born again. With this new life we don’t obey the Law in order to live—for that was indeed the function of the Law, viz., to set forth rules and regulations to be obeyed perfectly all the time with no exception. Otherwise it proved man was not perfect and could not live with God in eternity. No, but now that we have this new life, we live it rather than try to earn it.
Oh, dear. We are out of time today. Let’s pause and reflect on what we’ve studied thus far. Sit at the feet of Jesus and allow the Spirit to lead you into all truth. May His name be exalted in all our lives!
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 1 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
There is a significant division within Christianity. It often wears the label Dispensationalism vs. Covenantalism. I personally don’t choose to employ the label in my own writing because it smacks of a systematic theology doctrine. I myself am not a proponent of systematic theology. I am a practitioner of Biblical theology.
It isn’t my aim today to descant upon those two systems of theological interpretation. My goal is to define the division within Christianity in practical terms, rather than as the doctrines of Dispensationalism and Covenantalism. So let’s take a stab at it, shall we?
The Old Testament (aka the Old Covenant) actually consists of more than one covenant. For our purposes today the only covenant in the Old Testament we will concern ourselves with is the Covenant of Law (aka the Law of Moses or Torah). In contrast to this is the New Testament (aka the New Covenant). This covenant can be labeled the Covenant of Grace. So the contrast is between Law and Grace.
In a nutshell proponents of Covenantalism view Israel’s time as the Lord’s chosen people on earth as a past tense thing. The Law promised blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience to the Word of God. Israel sinned by disobeying God’s Law, so the Lord cast her off and chose the Gentiles instead of Israel (i.e., the Jews). Now Israel has all the curses for disobedience, while the Gentiles (who make up the Church) have all the blessings for obeying God’s Law. In fine, Israel is no longer God’s chosen people, nor will the Jews ever again be so.
Huh? That does not compute, dear friends! Since when has the Church obeyed God’s Law? Answer: NEVER! The Jews have nothing on us Gentiles when it comes to sinning. We are highly skilled at disobeying God’s Word. So that part is wretched theology.
And then there is the meat of the matter. The Church is NOT under the Law: we are under GRACE! The Law served as a pedagogue, a school marm, until the fulness of the times had come. That is the substance of the Book of Galatians. When the fulness of the times did finally arrive—viz., when the Messiah, Jesus, took upon humanity and died as a sin offering for all mankind—then the Law had fulfilled its function.
So what was the function of the Law? Its function was to reveal invisible spiritual truths by making use of visible physical realities. In many different ways the Law pointed out to the Israelites, and through them to the Gentiles also, that every last human being (Jesus Christ excepted) is born with a sin nature. Consequently all of us sin! The wages of sin is death, so all of us have to die.
The Messiah took our place and died as payment for the penalty of man’s sins. Now that He has done so, the Law no longer has its purpose. Messiah Jesus fulfilled the Law for us, went to the cross to pay the penalty for our sins, and rose out of death, demonstrating Father God’s acceptance of His payment on our behalf.
Anyone who will acknowledge Jesus’ Person and Ministry and accept His payment is born again. With this new life we don’t obey the Law in order to live—for that was indeed the function of the Law, viz., to set forth rules and regulations to be obeyed perfectly all the time with no exception. Otherwise it proved man was not perfect and could not live with God in eternity. No, but now that we have this new life, we live it rather than try to earn it.
Oh, dear. We are out of time today. Let’s pause and reflect on what we’ve studied thus far. Sit at the feet of Jesus and allow the Spirit to lead you into all truth. May His name be exalted in all our lives!
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 1 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Parlor Tricks – Part 2
One of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, testing him, “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?” And he said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ On these two commandments depend the whole law and the prophets.” [Matthew 22:35-40]
Under the Law the Jews tried in vain to live the perfect life in their own power. Trouble was, all men are sinners so they sinned. They disobeyed the Law. This brought them condemnation and separation from God. Thus the Law found it necessary to provide them with animals to serve as substitutionary sacrifices in man’s stead, but only until the once-for-all perfect sin offering of Jesus Christ was offered up to God.
Professors of dispensationalism have to get rid of some of the Law by hook or by crook because they don’t obey all of it. I mean, when was the last time any of them went to the Temple in Jerusalem and presented their offerings? Uh, that would be never! So they indulge in a little legerdemain by dividing the Law of Moses into constituent parts, such as the “ceremonial law”, the “legal code”, and the “moral law”. Then they beg the question by asserting that Christians are only under the “moral law”.
Sounds convincing, does it not? Uh, not so fast. After reading the Bible more than 100 times straight through over the past 33½ years, I’ve yet to find one instance in Scripture where the Law is divided into parts. On the contrary Scripture recognizes the Law as one indivisible unit. Either we keep the whole Law all the time perfectly without fail, or else we are lawbreakers (aka sinners).
The only “division” of the Law in Scripture is not even a contrast between the clean and the unclean, or between the holy and the sinful. We quoted Matthew at the start of this study. In those verses we see the only “division” of the Law put forth by God in Scripture. Part of the Law was directed toward God, while the other part was directed toward man.
The Law of Moses ruled the Israelites while they lived in Israel. They were a nationality with their own country and legal code. The Law of Moses was the legal code for the nation of Israel in the Old Testament and in the Gospels until Jesus died and rose again.
Now God’s hand reaches out to mankind with the Covenant of Grace. Those who take hold of God’s hand are born again into His Body, the Church. We don’t keep the Law in order to show we are perfect and can live in heaven in our own right. We already live because Jesus fulfilled the Law for us and we received Him as our Savior.
Since we have His life in us, we obey the Word of God by choice, not in order to earn our way into heaven. And when we slip and fall into sin, we confess our sins and receive God’s forgiveness. Then we continue to work out His new life which He put in us.
So which shall it be for you? Will you attempt to earn your own way into heaven by obeying the Law (or “parts” of it)? Or do you prefer to accept what Jesus already accomplished on your behalf? I am not impressed with the parlor tricks of dividing the Law into “parts”. I choose the Covenant of Grace.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Under the Law the Jews tried in vain to live the perfect life in their own power. Trouble was, all men are sinners so they sinned. They disobeyed the Law. This brought them condemnation and separation from God. Thus the Law found it necessary to provide them with animals to serve as substitutionary sacrifices in man’s stead, but only until the once-for-all perfect sin offering of Jesus Christ was offered up to God.
Professors of dispensationalism have to get rid of some of the Law by hook or by crook because they don’t obey all of it. I mean, when was the last time any of them went to the Temple in Jerusalem and presented their offerings? Uh, that would be never! So they indulge in a little legerdemain by dividing the Law of Moses into constituent parts, such as the “ceremonial law”, the “legal code”, and the “moral law”. Then they beg the question by asserting that Christians are only under the “moral law”.
Sounds convincing, does it not? Uh, not so fast. After reading the Bible more than 100 times straight through over the past 33½ years, I’ve yet to find one instance in Scripture where the Law is divided into parts. On the contrary Scripture recognizes the Law as one indivisible unit. Either we keep the whole Law all the time perfectly without fail, or else we are lawbreakers (aka sinners).
The only “division” of the Law in Scripture is not even a contrast between the clean and the unclean, or between the holy and the sinful. We quoted Matthew at the start of this study. In those verses we see the only “division” of the Law put forth by God in Scripture. Part of the Law was directed toward God, while the other part was directed toward man.
The Law of Moses ruled the Israelites while they lived in Israel. They were a nationality with their own country and legal code. The Law of Moses was the legal code for the nation of Israel in the Old Testament and in the Gospels until Jesus died and rose again.
Now God’s hand reaches out to mankind with the Covenant of Grace. Those who take hold of God’s hand are born again into His Body, the Church. We don’t keep the Law in order to show we are perfect and can live in heaven in our own right. We already live because Jesus fulfilled the Law for us and we received Him as our Savior.
Since we have His life in us, we obey the Word of God by choice, not in order to earn our way into heaven. And when we slip and fall into sin, we confess our sins and receive God’s forgiveness. Then we continue to work out His new life which He put in us.
So which shall it be for you? Will you attempt to earn your own way into heaven by obeying the Law (or “parts” of it)? Or do you prefer to accept what Jesus already accomplished on your behalf? I am not impressed with the parlor tricks of dividing the Law into “parts”. I choose the Covenant of Grace.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Apples to Oranges – Part 1
We are not like Moses, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently at the end of what was fading away. But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ [2 Corinthians 3:13-14].
You’ve undoubtedly heard the aphorism, “Comparing apples to oranges”. The two are both fruit, but otherwise the dissimilarities are determinative. Each is a different species entirely, not having the same family “genes”.
The same is true of the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace. Much confusion abounds in theology today because intelligent Christians compare apples to oranges, er, I mean Law to Grace. They think they have a handle on the Bible, but they fail to recognize the context of the text. They lump it all together as “God’s Word” and figure that suffices.
Yes, the entire Bible is unqualifiedly the Word of God, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts. But the entire Bible does not address the same social, political, economic, and spiritual situations. Nor was the entire Bible written to the same people. Neither was the entire Bible written to the same people facing the same conditions in each case.
To get the right meaning from the Bible, we must rightly divide the Word of truth (cf., 2 Timothy 2:15). Lumping it all together is like combining the sheep and the goats, under the guise that we see no difference. We’ll soon feel the difference, however. The sheep will follow, but the goats will head butt!
In the Bible text which we quoted to kick off this study, Paul based his teaching on this very concept. He wanted us to be sure we put into context each Bible text, to realize the fundamental difference between the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace.
In v.6 of 2 Corinthians 13 Paul makes reference to a “new covenant”. That, dear friends, refers to the Covenant of Grace. If there is a “new” covenant, then there perforce must be an “old” covenant too. Of course there is. It is the Covenant of Law. Let’s list the distinctions Paul makes, listing the “old” followed by the “new”.
1. written on stone tablets vs. written on human hearts (v.3)
2. the letter vs. the Spirit (v.6)
3. the letter kills vs. the Spirit gives life (v.6)
4. ministry of death vs. ministry of the Spirit (vv.7-8)
5. ministry of condemnation vs. ministry of righteousness (v.9)
6. that which fades away vs. that which remains (v.11)
We find a true interpretation of our opening Bible text in the context of Law vs. Grace, as itemized by those six contrasting phrases. Now let’s assay those verses.
Before the tabernacle worship structure was constructed and set up at Mount Sinai, Moses set up another tent outside the camp. He would repair to this tent when he wanted to visit with the Lord for whatever reason. After communing with the Lord in said tent, Moses’ face shone with the glory of the Lord. When he exited the tent the Israelites were afraid, so Moses covered his face with a veil. You may wish to consult Volume 2: Exodus for more information.
This is what Paul referenced in 2 Corinthians 3. Paul pointed out that Moses covered his face with a veil because the glory of the Lord which radiated on his face didn’t last long. It was a temporary glory, not a lasting or eternal glory. Mose, of course, brought the Word of God to the Israelites, and it is known as the Law of Moses, i.e., the Covenant of Law.
We will continue in our next study with this topic. Take the time now to enjoy fellowship with the Lord. Give Him His due and reap the blessings of His presence.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
You’ve undoubtedly heard the aphorism, “Comparing apples to oranges”. The two are both fruit, but otherwise the dissimilarities are determinative. Each is a different species entirely, not having the same family “genes”.
The same is true of the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace. Much confusion abounds in theology today because intelligent Christians compare apples to oranges, er, I mean Law to Grace. They think they have a handle on the Bible, but they fail to recognize the context of the text. They lump it all together as “God’s Word” and figure that suffices.
Yes, the entire Bible is unqualifiedly the Word of God, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts. But the entire Bible does not address the same social, political, economic, and spiritual situations. Nor was the entire Bible written to the same people. Neither was the entire Bible written to the same people facing the same conditions in each case.
To get the right meaning from the Bible, we must rightly divide the Word of truth (cf., 2 Timothy 2:15). Lumping it all together is like combining the sheep and the goats, under the guise that we see no difference. We’ll soon feel the difference, however. The sheep will follow, but the goats will head butt!
In the Bible text which we quoted to kick off this study, Paul based his teaching on this very concept. He wanted us to be sure we put into context each Bible text, to realize the fundamental difference between the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace.
In v.6 of 2 Corinthians 13 Paul makes reference to a “new covenant”. That, dear friends, refers to the Covenant of Grace. If there is a “new” covenant, then there perforce must be an “old” covenant too. Of course there is. It is the Covenant of Law. Let’s list the distinctions Paul makes, listing the “old” followed by the “new”.
1. written on stone tablets vs. written on human hearts (v.3)
2. the letter vs. the Spirit (v.6)
3. the letter kills vs. the Spirit gives life (v.6)
4. ministry of death vs. ministry of the Spirit (vv.7-8)
5. ministry of condemnation vs. ministry of righteousness (v.9)
6. that which fades away vs. that which remains (v.11)
We find a true interpretation of our opening Bible text in the context of Law vs. Grace, as itemized by those six contrasting phrases. Now let’s assay those verses.
Before the tabernacle worship structure was constructed and set up at Mount Sinai, Moses set up another tent outside the camp. He would repair to this tent when he wanted to visit with the Lord for whatever reason. After communing with the Lord in said tent, Moses’ face shone with the glory of the Lord. When he exited the tent the Israelites were afraid, so Moses covered his face with a veil. You may wish to consult Volume 2: Exodus for more information.
This is what Paul referenced in 2 Corinthians 3. Paul pointed out that Moses covered his face with a veil because the glory of the Lord which radiated on his face didn’t last long. It was a temporary glory, not a lasting or eternal glory. Mose, of course, brought the Word of God to the Israelites, and it is known as the Law of Moses, i.e., the Covenant of Law.
We will continue in our next study with this topic. Take the time now to enjoy fellowship with the Lord. Give Him His due and reap the blessings of His presence.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Apples to Oranges – Part 2
We are not like Moses, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently at the end of what was fading away. But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ [2 Corinthians 3:13-14].
Moses would enter the tent outside the camp and visit with the Lord. When he exited the tent his face glowed with the glory of God. Moses covered his face with a veil because this glory came from the Covenant of Law, and the Law was a temporary expedient until the fullness of the times came and the Messiah brought with Him the Covenant of Grace.
That is Paul’s point. The Law of Moses was the Word of God. It served as the legal code for the nation of Israel while they inhabited the Promised Land. But it was only a pedagogue, a school marm to teach the Israelites—and through them the Gentiles—of man’s inability to approach the Lord.
Every man is a sinner and God cannot tolerate sin. Man needs a Savior to pay the penalty for his sins and then provide him with a new, sin-free nature. Once man is cleansed of his sins and clothed in this new righteousness, then he is able to approach the Lord in covenantal relationship with Him.
The first man, that old sinner, required the Law to incessantly expose his sins and show him his need for a Savior. This was a temporary expedient for the simple fact that sooner or later each person dies for his sins or else accepts the Savior’s payment for his sins and receives His new life.
This confirms that the Covenant of Law, though glorious because it is God’s Word, possesses a fading glory. It also establishes the Covenant of Grace as possessing an eternal glory because it never ends. Once a person is born again, the new life in him never terminates. It is eternal and its glory never fades away.
So long as the Hebrews clung to the Law and rejected God’s grace, they had only a fading glory. The only way out was to recognize the true purpose of the Law, accept the Lord Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law on their behalf, and embrace Grace instead of Law.
Referring once more to our numbered list of six distinctions between Law and Grace, the Law was on stone tablets. This meant it was hard and cold, not warm and accepting and forgiving. It could not be altered. It condemned sinners without recourse.
Grace, contrariwise, lives in human hearts, motivating the saint to live for the Lord because he wants to do so. The Law could effect no such “want to”. It was on the outside of man, unable to get inside.
This is why Paul identified the Law as the ministry of death. It could only expose man’s sins, not effect a qualitative change in man’s nature. Grace, however, was inside in the heart. It not only was a qualitative change, a new nature, but it then brought out of man the life of the Spirit in his daily living.
The Law could not help but condemn man because the Law condemns sinners. That was the purpose of the Law. Grace can not help but justify man because the Lord Jesus, though being without sin, died for the sins of all mankind and paid sins penalty.
To any sinner who approaches Him in repentance, Jesus freely provides carte blanche payment for the penalty of his sins, and then Jesus freely bestows His own righteous nature on this man. It is free on all counts, which is the definition of “grace”.
This brings each of us to the crossroads with a decision to make. Will we go left or will we go right? To the left is the Law and condemnation for our sins. To the right is the Covenant of Grace with payment for the penalty of our sins, and with God’s own righteous nature to live inside us and empower us to live the new life. What say ye? Will you go to the left or to the right?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Moses would enter the tent outside the camp and visit with the Lord. When he exited the tent his face glowed with the glory of God. Moses covered his face with a veil because this glory came from the Covenant of Law, and the Law was a temporary expedient until the fullness of the times came and the Messiah brought with Him the Covenant of Grace.
That is Paul’s point. The Law of Moses was the Word of God. It served as the legal code for the nation of Israel while they inhabited the Promised Land. But it was only a pedagogue, a school marm to teach the Israelites—and through them the Gentiles—of man’s inability to approach the Lord.
Every man is a sinner and God cannot tolerate sin. Man needs a Savior to pay the penalty for his sins and then provide him with a new, sin-free nature. Once man is cleansed of his sins and clothed in this new righteousness, then he is able to approach the Lord in covenantal relationship with Him.
The first man, that old sinner, required the Law to incessantly expose his sins and show him his need for a Savior. This was a temporary expedient for the simple fact that sooner or later each person dies for his sins or else accepts the Savior’s payment for his sins and receives His new life.
This confirms that the Covenant of Law, though glorious because it is God’s Word, possesses a fading glory. It also establishes the Covenant of Grace as possessing an eternal glory because it never ends. Once a person is born again, the new life in him never terminates. It is eternal and its glory never fades away.
So long as the Hebrews clung to the Law and rejected God’s grace, they had only a fading glory. The only way out was to recognize the true purpose of the Law, accept the Lord Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law on their behalf, and embrace Grace instead of Law.
Referring once more to our numbered list of six distinctions between Law and Grace, the Law was on stone tablets. This meant it was hard and cold, not warm and accepting and forgiving. It could not be altered. It condemned sinners without recourse.
Grace, contrariwise, lives in human hearts, motivating the saint to live for the Lord because he wants to do so. The Law could effect no such “want to”. It was on the outside of man, unable to get inside.
This is why Paul identified the Law as the ministry of death. It could only expose man’s sins, not effect a qualitative change in man’s nature. Grace, however, was inside in the heart. It not only was a qualitative change, a new nature, but it then brought out of man the life of the Spirit in his daily living.
The Law could not help but condemn man because the Law condemns sinners. That was the purpose of the Law. Grace can not help but justify man because the Lord Jesus, though being without sin, died for the sins of all mankind and paid sins penalty.
To any sinner who approaches Him in repentance, Jesus freely provides carte blanche payment for the penalty of his sins, and then Jesus freely bestows His own righteous nature on this man. It is free on all counts, which is the definition of “grace”.
This brings each of us to the crossroads with a decision to make. Will we go left or will we go right? To the left is the Law and condemnation for our sins. To the right is the Covenant of Grace with payment for the penalty of our sins, and with God’s own righteous nature to live inside us and empower us to live the new life. What say ye? Will you go to the left or to the right?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Of Covenants and Dispensations – Part 1
These things happened to them as examples and were written down as warnings for us, on whom the culmination of the ages has come. So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall! [1 Corinthians 10:11-12]
I incessantly teach that Christians are not under the Law. We are under grace. We are not required to obey the Law of Moses. The Law of Moses was the legal code for the Israelites while they inhabited the Lord’s land, the Promised Land.
There have been occasions where folks have taken exception to this teaching. Some of them are covenantalists, as contrasted with dispensationalists. We won’t spend words on defining these two positions, dear friends. It is not the subject for today’s study.
Suffice it to say that covenantalism holds to the tenet that God is always the same throughtout time and eternity, and so He always operates the same. This means that the way God interacted with Adam and Eve was the same way He interacted with Noah, with Abraham, and with the Church.
Dispensationalism, contrariwise, embraces the tenet that, yes, God is always the same. He never changes. However, mankind does, and God varies His approach at different times in order to effectively interact with man. For example, in Genesis 2 before man sinned, God came down to the Garden of Eden to spend time fellowshiping with man.
In Genesis 3 man sinned and God booted him out of the garden. It is obvious that God no longer related to man in the same way thereafter. Man was no longer in the garden! This fact precluded God from coming down to the garden to visit with man! Genesis 2 was one dispensation, one way in which God decided to interact with man. Genesis 3 was another dispensation entirely.
Some of the folks who’ve objected to me not teaching obedience to the Law were covenantalists. They believe God rejected Israel permanently and replaced Israel with the Church. God’s method of interacting with Israel, you see, now became God’s method of interacting with Christians. Christians, rather than Israel, are now obligated to keep the Law.
Belief in covenantalism does not in and of itself equate to not being a Christian. The two are not exclusive, the belief is just a wrong understanding of the Scriptures.
Some of the folks who took exception to me teaching that Christians are not obligated to obey the Law—well, they did so for other reasons. Some cults still insist on obedience to the Law.
A cult is a religious group which professes belief in the Bible and Jesus, but denies the Father and the Son (cf., 1 John). Or the group denies that Jesus has come in the flesh (cf., 1 John). They don’t accept that Jesus is literally God the Son, eternally and fully God. They don’t believe Jesus is the only way to be brought back to the Father. In one or more ways they reject the true, Biblical Jesus.
They are therefore not really Christians but wolves in sheep’s clothing, regardless of good intentions or anything else (cf., 1 John). Christianity is not a religious system or a set of doctrines. It is the Person and ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ. The churches are full of folks who hold to a set of doctrines and practically never leave the church building. Alas, but they know not Jesus personally and, because of this, they are not Christians.
We must take our leave at this time. The day is far spent. The night falls fast. Let’s spend time with Jesus before we hit the pillow. He has much to teach us from our study.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
I incessantly teach that Christians are not under the Law. We are under grace. We are not required to obey the Law of Moses. The Law of Moses was the legal code for the Israelites while they inhabited the Lord’s land, the Promised Land.
There have been occasions where folks have taken exception to this teaching. Some of them are covenantalists, as contrasted with dispensationalists. We won’t spend words on defining these two positions, dear friends. It is not the subject for today’s study.
Suffice it to say that covenantalism holds to the tenet that God is always the same throughtout time and eternity, and so He always operates the same. This means that the way God interacted with Adam and Eve was the same way He interacted with Noah, with Abraham, and with the Church.
Dispensationalism, contrariwise, embraces the tenet that, yes, God is always the same. He never changes. However, mankind does, and God varies His approach at different times in order to effectively interact with man. For example, in Genesis 2 before man sinned, God came down to the Garden of Eden to spend time fellowshiping with man.
In Genesis 3 man sinned and God booted him out of the garden. It is obvious that God no longer related to man in the same way thereafter. Man was no longer in the garden! This fact precluded God from coming down to the garden to visit with man! Genesis 2 was one dispensation, one way in which God decided to interact with man. Genesis 3 was another dispensation entirely.
Some of the folks who’ve objected to me not teaching obedience to the Law were covenantalists. They believe God rejected Israel permanently and replaced Israel with the Church. God’s method of interacting with Israel, you see, now became God’s method of interacting with Christians. Christians, rather than Israel, are now obligated to keep the Law.
Belief in covenantalism does not in and of itself equate to not being a Christian. The two are not exclusive, the belief is just a wrong understanding of the Scriptures.
Some of the folks who took exception to me teaching that Christians are not obligated to obey the Law—well, they did so for other reasons. Some cults still insist on obedience to the Law.
A cult is a religious group which professes belief in the Bible and Jesus, but denies the Father and the Son (cf., 1 John). Or the group denies that Jesus has come in the flesh (cf., 1 John). They don’t accept that Jesus is literally God the Son, eternally and fully God. They don’t believe Jesus is the only way to be brought back to the Father. In one or more ways they reject the true, Biblical Jesus.
They are therefore not really Christians but wolves in sheep’s clothing, regardless of good intentions or anything else (cf., 1 John). Christianity is not a religious system or a set of doctrines. It is the Person and ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ. The churches are full of folks who hold to a set of doctrines and practically never leave the church building. Alas, but they know not Jesus personally and, because of this, they are not Christians.
We must take our leave at this time. The day is far spent. The night falls fast. Let’s spend time with Jesus before we hit the pillow. He has much to teach us from our study.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Of Covenants and Dispensations – Part 2
These things happened to them as examples and were written down as warnings for us, on whom the culmination of the ages has come. So, if you think you are standing firm, be careful that you don’t fall! [1 Corinthians 10:11-12]
Let’s continue with our study from yesterday. A dear woman and her husband in one of my churches fell under the spell of the Seventh Day Adventists, a cult. This group is entangled in obeying the Law in order to be a Christian. They go so far as to insist that Saturday is the only true day to hold church services and reject Sunday, the Lord’s Day. Hence their name.
Before leaving one of the churches I was pastored, this elderly lady commenced to quarreling with me during Bible study about Christians no longer being under the Law. She wanted to win converts to her brand of legalism, you see, and take them with her to the Adventist Church. She challenged, “Well, if we are no longer under the Law, why do we still bother to study it? Why not remove it from our Bibles and just study the New Testament?”
She felt pretty good about herself, and it showed all over her face. To her she was the man and I was confronted with irrefutable argumentation. In actuality her argument was mere sophistry. It had the appearance of logic and validity, but it was specious reasoning par excellence.
If she knew her Bible as well as she thought she did, she would have known that the Apostle Paul fought ferociously against the Judaizers. The Judaizers were Pharisees, Jewish legalists, who supposedly converted to Christ. However, they insisted on attaching the Law to belief in Jesus. It was necessary to believe in Jesus, yes, but it was also necessary to continue to obey the Law.
Paul rebuked them scathingly, declaring, “We are no longer under Law but under grace!” This same Paul, notwithstanding, still taught the Old Testament to his converts to Jesus. The tenth chapter of 1 Corinthians is one such example. The Bible text we quoted to commence this study is Paul’s conclusion to his Old Testament teaching.
In the first ten verses of 1 Corinthians 10, Paul reiterated multiple situations which occurred with the Israelites in the wilderness under Moses’ leadership. Then Paul penned the words quoted at the start of this lesson. Those words tell us why we still study the Old Testament, even though we are no longer under the Law.
God preserved His Word, including all of the Old Testament, to furnish us with examples. These examples serve as a good source of instruction. We are to learn from the past history of God’s people how NOT to serve the Lord, as well as HOW to serve the Lord. If we learn from Israel’s mistakes, we will be better able to avoid them ourselves.
Think about it, dear friends. I am not obligated to obey the legal code of the Roman Empire, but I still studied Roman history and in the process gleaned a good deal of learning which has relevance today.
We don’t study the Old Testament because we are under the Law. We study it because the Lord used visible physical realities to teach us invisible spiritual truths. I want to know all of these truths. I don’t want to miss any of them. That’s why I study the Old Testament.
Another reason is that I love the Lord and love to learn how He has related to man through the centuries and millennia. The Bible is the only source for learning this. And the Bible is the only book which contains no errors or lies.
So let’s not attempt to obey the Law in order to be saved or to stay saved. But let’s study the Law to know the Lord all the better. This is an excellent time for us to grab our Bibles and go be with Jesus. He loves to teach us His Word, if only we want to learn it and obey it.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Let’s continue with our study from yesterday. A dear woman and her husband in one of my churches fell under the spell of the Seventh Day Adventists, a cult. This group is entangled in obeying the Law in order to be a Christian. They go so far as to insist that Saturday is the only true day to hold church services and reject Sunday, the Lord’s Day. Hence their name.
Before leaving one of the churches I was pastored, this elderly lady commenced to quarreling with me during Bible study about Christians no longer being under the Law. She wanted to win converts to her brand of legalism, you see, and take them with her to the Adventist Church. She challenged, “Well, if we are no longer under the Law, why do we still bother to study it? Why not remove it from our Bibles and just study the New Testament?”
She felt pretty good about herself, and it showed all over her face. To her she was the man and I was confronted with irrefutable argumentation. In actuality her argument was mere sophistry. It had the appearance of logic and validity, but it was specious reasoning par excellence.
If she knew her Bible as well as she thought she did, she would have known that the Apostle Paul fought ferociously against the Judaizers. The Judaizers were Pharisees, Jewish legalists, who supposedly converted to Christ. However, they insisted on attaching the Law to belief in Jesus. It was necessary to believe in Jesus, yes, but it was also necessary to continue to obey the Law.
Paul rebuked them scathingly, declaring, “We are no longer under Law but under grace!” This same Paul, notwithstanding, still taught the Old Testament to his converts to Jesus. The tenth chapter of 1 Corinthians is one such example. The Bible text we quoted to commence this study is Paul’s conclusion to his Old Testament teaching.
In the first ten verses of 1 Corinthians 10, Paul reiterated multiple situations which occurred with the Israelites in the wilderness under Moses’ leadership. Then Paul penned the words quoted at the start of this lesson. Those words tell us why we still study the Old Testament, even though we are no longer under the Law.
God preserved His Word, including all of the Old Testament, to furnish us with examples. These examples serve as a good source of instruction. We are to learn from the past history of God’s people how NOT to serve the Lord, as well as HOW to serve the Lord. If we learn from Israel’s mistakes, we will be better able to avoid them ourselves.
Think about it, dear friends. I am not obligated to obey the legal code of the Roman Empire, but I still studied Roman history and in the process gleaned a good deal of learning which has relevance today.
We don’t study the Old Testament because we are under the Law. We study it because the Lord used visible physical realities to teach us invisible spiritual truths. I want to know all of these truths. I don’t want to miss any of them. That’s why I study the Old Testament.
Another reason is that I love the Lord and love to learn how He has related to man through the centuries and millennia. The Bible is the only source for learning this. And the Bible is the only book which contains no errors or lies.
So let’s not attempt to obey the Law in order to be saved or to stay saved. But let’s study the Law to know the Lord all the better. This is an excellent time for us to grab our Bibles and go be with Jesus. He loves to teach us His Word, if only we want to learn it and obey it.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Bargain Basement Talk – Part 1
The Lord said to me, “I have heard…the words of this people... They have done well in all that they have spoken. Oh that they had such a heart in them, that they would fear Me and keep all My commandments always.” [Deuteronomy 5:28-29]
I can recollect days of old (or not so very old), when my kids were in middle school and high school. Every year just before school started up again, I would take them on an excursion through the mall, where they would pick out some clothes to wear that school year.
Here’s the thing. Back in the day I was going through some tough times financially. We were living from hand to mouth. But it didn’t faze the kids. They would always pick out the most expensive clothes anyway! After all, the kids they hung with all wore suchlike duds, so my kids figured they had the right to wear them too.
They were never much impressed when I explained the facts of life to them. It went like this. When you have a hundred dollars, you can spend a hundred dollars. When you have ten dollars, you cannot spend a hundred dollars!
Not to worry. In our house we followed the golden rule: he who has the gold makes the rule! I had the gold, so we spent ten dollars and left the hundred dollars to those parents who had it. This led us to the bargain basement section of the stores—you know, the place where sales items and clothes without the interior design label and stitching were kept.
Not that my kids ever went to school looking like tramps, mind you. They blended in quite well and are well adjusted to this day. It was just that outrageously priced clothing didn’t grace their closets. What they wore was neat and clean and stylish, just not extravagant and gaudy.
At Mount Sinai the Lord spoke the Ten Commandments to the Israelites. As He spoke the ground shook violently like a canoe on white water rapids, the mountain smoked and burned like a humongous furnace, and lightning flashed in all directions like some syfy movie where electrical flashes open up a time warp.
When it was all over, the Israelites made a mad dash to Moses and vented their outrage at him. They said, “Listen up, Moshe! Everything the Lord said we will do. No problemento, señor. Only one itsy bitsy favor we request of you. Don’t let the Lord speak to us again or we’ll die! From now on you go hear what He has to say, and then you can tell us and we’ll do everything…everything, we tell you!”
It was at that point of the conversation that the Lord spoke to Moses the words quoted to commence this study. Look at the words once more. Read them to yourself very slowly. Stop and ponder them a bit. Allow them to roll over your tongue, as you sample the taste of each word. Okay, what did you learn?
Did you catch how the Lord contrasted their words with their hearts? Hmm. What does that mean? Well, He liked their words just fine. Every last one was all pretty and cuddly and quaint. No one would have any objection to marrying them and taking them home. They were pleasant to the ear and likeable to the sight.
Oh, but we are out of time today. We’ll take up the issue again tomorrow. In the interim be sure to enjoy your time alone with Jesus. He misses you.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
I can recollect days of old (or not so very old), when my kids were in middle school and high school. Every year just before school started up again, I would take them on an excursion through the mall, where they would pick out some clothes to wear that school year.
Here’s the thing. Back in the day I was going through some tough times financially. We were living from hand to mouth. But it didn’t faze the kids. They would always pick out the most expensive clothes anyway! After all, the kids they hung with all wore suchlike duds, so my kids figured they had the right to wear them too.
They were never much impressed when I explained the facts of life to them. It went like this. When you have a hundred dollars, you can spend a hundred dollars. When you have ten dollars, you cannot spend a hundred dollars!
Not to worry. In our house we followed the golden rule: he who has the gold makes the rule! I had the gold, so we spent ten dollars and left the hundred dollars to those parents who had it. This led us to the bargain basement section of the stores—you know, the place where sales items and clothes without the interior design label and stitching were kept.
Not that my kids ever went to school looking like tramps, mind you. They blended in quite well and are well adjusted to this day. It was just that outrageously priced clothing didn’t grace their closets. What they wore was neat and clean and stylish, just not extravagant and gaudy.
At Mount Sinai the Lord spoke the Ten Commandments to the Israelites. As He spoke the ground shook violently like a canoe on white water rapids, the mountain smoked and burned like a humongous furnace, and lightning flashed in all directions like some syfy movie where electrical flashes open up a time warp.
When it was all over, the Israelites made a mad dash to Moses and vented their outrage at him. They said, “Listen up, Moshe! Everything the Lord said we will do. No problemento, señor. Only one itsy bitsy favor we request of you. Don’t let the Lord speak to us again or we’ll die! From now on you go hear what He has to say, and then you can tell us and we’ll do everything…everything, we tell you!”
It was at that point of the conversation that the Lord spoke to Moses the words quoted to commence this study. Look at the words once more. Read them to yourself very slowly. Stop and ponder them a bit. Allow them to roll over your tongue, as you sample the taste of each word. Okay, what did you learn?
Did you catch how the Lord contrasted their words with their hearts? Hmm. What does that mean? Well, He liked their words just fine. Every last one was all pretty and cuddly and quaint. No one would have any objection to marrying them and taking them home. They were pleasant to the ear and likeable to the sight.
Oh, but we are out of time today. We’ll take up the issue again tomorrow. In the interim be sure to enjoy your time alone with Jesus. He misses you.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Bargain Basement Talk – Part 2
The Lord said to me, “I have heard…the words of this people... They have done well in all that they have spoken. Oh that they had such a heart in them, that they would fear Me and keep all My commandments always” [Deuteronomy 5:28-29].
Yesterday we left off with the Israelites speaking smooth words to Moses about obeying the Word of God. Let’s take a gander at the other side of the coin now. It’s what else the Lord addressed that should have us concerned, dear friends. He put His finger on the real issue by saying, “Would that their hearts were just as sold out to Me!” Yikes! That is not our first choice for what we would prefer to hear from the Lord!
Essentially the Lord said that the Israelites’ words came from the bargain basement section of the store. Their words were cheap, not valuable. This didn’t mean the Israelites were insincere and phony, or that their intentions were underhanded and manipulative. No! They were most sincere and had the best of intentions.
Trouble is, they were sincerely wrong. And they were ignorant of spiritual reality, so their intentions never rose to the occasion. They failed to realize that sinful man CANNOT do everything the Lord says, not even some of the time, much less most of the time, and certainly not always.
Yet the Law—and the Law is exactly what they had committed to do perfectly at all times—but the Law doesn’t allow for violations of any kind ever. For example, if the speed limit is 30 and I’m going 50 and get a ticket, when I go to court the judge cannot declare, “It doesn’t matter. Just go home and have a good life!”
Nix, nix, dear friends. The Law doesn’t work that way. Either the judge decides the evidence doesn’t convict me, in which case he issues a ruling of not guilty, or else he finds me guilty and sentences me. He may be lenient with the sentencing or he may lay down the hammer! But what he cannot do is overlook the law and sweep the crime under the rug.
The Law condemns the guilty. All mankind is guilty of sin. Ergo all mankind is condemned to death. The only way of escape is to flee outside the law, to flee to grace for deliverance. The Law was given through Moses. We must flee from its wrath.
On the other hand, grace and truth wer given through Jesus Christ. Jesus died on the cross to pay the penalty of our sins. If we go to Him in faith, go to Him as God’s Word states it, and ask Him to forgive us of our sins, He already paid the penalty and can therefore righteously remove our sins. He is both just and at the same time the justifier of all those who have faith in Christ Jesus. He can be both because he doesn’t overlook our sins: He paid their penalty for us.
This is a fine time to look in the mirror and do a little introspection, a little soul-searching, a little diagnosing of the heart. Does our religion, our faith, consist of bargain basement words? I hope not! Let’s stay on our knees before Jesus until we know for certain. Sincerity and good intentions pave the road to hell. Let’s not be on it.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Yesterday we left off with the Israelites speaking smooth words to Moses about obeying the Word of God. Let’s take a gander at the other side of the coin now. It’s what else the Lord addressed that should have us concerned, dear friends. He put His finger on the real issue by saying, “Would that their hearts were just as sold out to Me!” Yikes! That is not our first choice for what we would prefer to hear from the Lord!
Essentially the Lord said that the Israelites’ words came from the bargain basement section of the store. Their words were cheap, not valuable. This didn’t mean the Israelites were insincere and phony, or that their intentions were underhanded and manipulative. No! They were most sincere and had the best of intentions.
Trouble is, they were sincerely wrong. And they were ignorant of spiritual reality, so their intentions never rose to the occasion. They failed to realize that sinful man CANNOT do everything the Lord says, not even some of the time, much less most of the time, and certainly not always.
Yet the Law—and the Law is exactly what they had committed to do perfectly at all times—but the Law doesn’t allow for violations of any kind ever. For example, if the speed limit is 30 and I’m going 50 and get a ticket, when I go to court the judge cannot declare, “It doesn’t matter. Just go home and have a good life!”
Nix, nix, dear friends. The Law doesn’t work that way. Either the judge decides the evidence doesn’t convict me, in which case he issues a ruling of not guilty, or else he finds me guilty and sentences me. He may be lenient with the sentencing or he may lay down the hammer! But what he cannot do is overlook the law and sweep the crime under the rug.
The Law condemns the guilty. All mankind is guilty of sin. Ergo all mankind is condemned to death. The only way of escape is to flee outside the law, to flee to grace for deliverance. The Law was given through Moses. We must flee from its wrath.
On the other hand, grace and truth wer given through Jesus Christ. Jesus died on the cross to pay the penalty of our sins. If we go to Him in faith, go to Him as God’s Word states it, and ask Him to forgive us of our sins, He already paid the penalty and can therefore righteously remove our sins. He is both just and at the same time the justifier of all those who have faith in Christ Jesus. He can be both because he doesn’t overlook our sins: He paid their penalty for us.
This is a fine time to look in the mirror and do a little introspection, a little soul-searching, a little diagnosing of the heart. Does our religion, our faith, consist of bargain basement words? I hope not! Let’s stay on our knees before Jesus until we know for certain. Sincerity and good intentions pave the road to hell. Let’s not be on it.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Janus the Baptist? – Part 1
For all the prophets and the Law prophesied until John [Matthew 11:13].
It’s Final Four week, that time of the year when the four best men’s college basketball teams go at it to determine a national champion. Consider how men’s college basketball games are structured. There are two halves, with each consisting of twenty minutes, for a total of forty minutes per game.
Once a college player graduates, if he is fortunate enough to move on to the NBA, he discovers he must make some changes in his perception of the game. For one thing there are no more “halves”, and for another the game no longer lasts forty minutes. The NBA game is divided into quarters, with each consisting of twelve minutes, for a total of forty-eight minutes per game.
And then there is the matter of how many games are played in a season. For the college ranks the number hovers around thirty, but for the NBA it soars to eighty-two. Hmm. “30” versus “82”. That’s a lot of difference! So no longer are there around 30 games per year, each consisting of only forty minutes. Suddenly the one-time college player must play 82 games of forty-eight minutes each. Think those guys are worn down by the end of the regular season?
I thought about this when I read the quoted text which began our study today. College rules apply for a time, then suddenly new and entirely different rules apply for the NBA. So it was with the Covenant of Law versus the Covenant of Grace.
Jesus noted how long the Covenant of Law lasted when he declared, “all the prophets and the Law prophesied until John”. That would be the John of John Baptist fame. UNTIL JOHN, i.e., up until the time of John the Baptist, the Law and the prophets were in effect. The Old Covenant was God’s rule of Law for Israel.
Then suddenly the forty minute games became forty-eight minutes long, and the two halves transformed into four quarters. What once consisted of about 30 games suddenly metamorphosed into 82 games. Things were drastically different, you see, once John the Baptist came on the scene.
This calls to mind the Roman god Janus. Janus had two faces, with one facing behind and the other facing forward. The name “Janus” is where our month “January” derives its name. Janus looked to the past and to the future at the same time. Just as January 1 begins a new year by looking backward and then going forward, so to did the Roman god Janus. Janus signified the end of one thing and the start of another.
Oh, dear. We’ve come to the end of the line already. Let’s call it a day and begin afresh tomorrow. Some time alone with Jesus sounds about right just now. Won’t you join in?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
It’s Final Four week, that time of the year when the four best men’s college basketball teams go at it to determine a national champion. Consider how men’s college basketball games are structured. There are two halves, with each consisting of twenty minutes, for a total of forty minutes per game.
Once a college player graduates, if he is fortunate enough to move on to the NBA, he discovers he must make some changes in his perception of the game. For one thing there are no more “halves”, and for another the game no longer lasts forty minutes. The NBA game is divided into quarters, with each consisting of twelve minutes, for a total of forty-eight minutes per game.
And then there is the matter of how many games are played in a season. For the college ranks the number hovers around thirty, but for the NBA it soars to eighty-two. Hmm. “30” versus “82”. That’s a lot of difference! So no longer are there around 30 games per year, each consisting of only forty minutes. Suddenly the one-time college player must play 82 games of forty-eight minutes each. Think those guys are worn down by the end of the regular season?
I thought about this when I read the quoted text which began our study today. College rules apply for a time, then suddenly new and entirely different rules apply for the NBA. So it was with the Covenant of Law versus the Covenant of Grace.
Jesus noted how long the Covenant of Law lasted when he declared, “all the prophets and the Law prophesied until John”. That would be the John of John Baptist fame. UNTIL JOHN, i.e., up until the time of John the Baptist, the Law and the prophets were in effect. The Old Covenant was God’s rule of Law for Israel.
Then suddenly the forty minute games became forty-eight minutes long, and the two halves transformed into four quarters. What once consisted of about 30 games suddenly metamorphosed into 82 games. Things were drastically different, you see, once John the Baptist came on the scene.
This calls to mind the Roman god Janus. Janus had two faces, with one facing behind and the other facing forward. The name “Janus” is where our month “January” derives its name. Janus looked to the past and to the future at the same time. Just as January 1 begins a new year by looking backward and then going forward, so to did the Roman god Janus. Janus signified the end of one thing and the start of another.
Oh, dear. We’ve come to the end of the line already. Let’s call it a day and begin afresh tomorrow. Some time alone with Jesus sounds about right just now. Won’t you join in?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Deuteronomy: Volume 5 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
