Randy Green's Blog - Posts Tagged "veil"
Apples to Oranges – Part 1
We are not like Moses, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently at the end of what was fading away. But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ [2 Corinthians 3:13-14].
You’ve undoubtedly heard the aphorism, “Comparing apples to oranges”. The two are both fruit, but otherwise the dissimilarities are determinative. Each is a different species entirely, not having the same family “genes”.
The same is true of the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace. Much confusion abounds in theology today because intelligent Christians compare apples to oranges, er, I mean Law to Grace. They think they have a handle on the Bible, but they fail to recognize the context of the text. They lump it all together as “God’s Word” and figure that suffices.
Yes, the entire Bible is unqualifiedly the Word of God, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts. But the entire Bible does not address the same social, political, economic, and spiritual situations. Nor was the entire Bible written to the same people. Neither was the entire Bible written to the same people facing the same conditions in each case.
To get the right meaning from the Bible, we must rightly divide the Word of truth (cf., 2 Timothy 2:15). Lumping it all together is like combining the sheep and the goats, under the guise that we see no difference. We’ll soon feel the difference, however. The sheep will follow, but the goats will head butt!
In the Bible text which we quoted to kick off this study, Paul based his teaching on this very concept. He wanted us to be sure we put into context each Bible text, to realize the fundamental difference between the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace.
In v.6 of 2 Corinthians 13 Paul makes reference to a “new covenant”. That, dear friends, refers to the Covenant of Grace. If there is a “new” covenant, then there perforce must be an “old” covenant too. Of course there is. It is the Covenant of Law. Let’s list the distinctions Paul makes, listing the “old” followed by the “new”.
1. written on stone tablets vs. written on human hearts (v.3)
2. the letter vs. the Spirit (v.6)
3. the letter kills vs. the Spirit gives life (v.6)
4. ministry of death vs. ministry of the Spirit (vv.7-8)
5. ministry of condemnation vs. ministry of righteousness (v.9)
6. that which fades away vs. that which remains (v.11)
We find a true interpretation of our opening Bible text in the context of Law vs. Grace, as itemized by those six contrasting phrases. Now let’s assay those verses.
Before the tabernacle worship structure was constructed and set up at Mount Sinai, Moses set up another tent outside the camp. He would repair to this tent when he wanted to visit with the Lord for whatever reason. After communing with the Lord in said tent, Moses’ face shone with the glory of the Lord. When he exited the tent the Israelites were afraid, so Moses covered his face with a veil. You may wish to consult Volume 2: Exodus for more information.
This is what Paul referenced in 2 Corinthians 3. Paul pointed out that Moses covered his face with a veil because the glory of the Lord which radiated on his face didn’t last long. It was a temporary glory, not a lasting or eternal glory. Mose, of course, brought the Word of God to the Israelites, and it is known as the Law of Moses, i.e., the Covenant of Law.
We will continue in our next study with this topic. Take the time now to enjoy fellowship with the Lord. Give Him His due and reap the blessings of His presence.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
You’ve undoubtedly heard the aphorism, “Comparing apples to oranges”. The two are both fruit, but otherwise the dissimilarities are determinative. Each is a different species entirely, not having the same family “genes”.
The same is true of the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace. Much confusion abounds in theology today because intelligent Christians compare apples to oranges, er, I mean Law to Grace. They think they have a handle on the Bible, but they fail to recognize the context of the text. They lump it all together as “God’s Word” and figure that suffices.
Yes, the entire Bible is unqualifiedly the Word of God, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts. But the entire Bible does not address the same social, political, economic, and spiritual situations. Nor was the entire Bible written to the same people. Neither was the entire Bible written to the same people facing the same conditions in each case.
To get the right meaning from the Bible, we must rightly divide the Word of truth (cf., 2 Timothy 2:15). Lumping it all together is like combining the sheep and the goats, under the guise that we see no difference. We’ll soon feel the difference, however. The sheep will follow, but the goats will head butt!
In the Bible text which we quoted to kick off this study, Paul based his teaching on this very concept. He wanted us to be sure we put into context each Bible text, to realize the fundamental difference between the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace.
In v.6 of 2 Corinthians 13 Paul makes reference to a “new covenant”. That, dear friends, refers to the Covenant of Grace. If there is a “new” covenant, then there perforce must be an “old” covenant too. Of course there is. It is the Covenant of Law. Let’s list the distinctions Paul makes, listing the “old” followed by the “new”.
1. written on stone tablets vs. written on human hearts (v.3)
2. the letter vs. the Spirit (v.6)
3. the letter kills vs. the Spirit gives life (v.6)
4. ministry of death vs. ministry of the Spirit (vv.7-8)
5. ministry of condemnation vs. ministry of righteousness (v.9)
6. that which fades away vs. that which remains (v.11)
We find a true interpretation of our opening Bible text in the context of Law vs. Grace, as itemized by those six contrasting phrases. Now let’s assay those verses.
Before the tabernacle worship structure was constructed and set up at Mount Sinai, Moses set up another tent outside the camp. He would repair to this tent when he wanted to visit with the Lord for whatever reason. After communing with the Lord in said tent, Moses’ face shone with the glory of the Lord. When he exited the tent the Israelites were afraid, so Moses covered his face with a veil. You may wish to consult Volume 2: Exodus for more information.
This is what Paul referenced in 2 Corinthians 3. Paul pointed out that Moses covered his face with a veil because the glory of the Lord which radiated on his face didn’t last long. It was a temporary glory, not a lasting or eternal glory. Mose, of course, brought the Word of God to the Israelites, and it is known as the Law of Moses, i.e., the Covenant of Law.
We will continue in our next study with this topic. Take the time now to enjoy fellowship with the Lord. Give Him His due and reap the blessings of His presence.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Apples to Oranges – Part 2
We are not like Moses, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently at the end of what was fading away. But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ [2 Corinthians 3:13-14].
Moses would enter the tent outside the camp and visit with the Lord. When he exited the tent his face glowed with the glory of God. Moses covered his face with a veil because this glory came from the Covenant of Law, and the Law was a temporary expedient until the fullness of the times came and the Messiah brought with Him the Covenant of Grace.
That is Paul’s point. The Law of Moses was the Word of God. It served as the legal code for the nation of Israel while they inhabited the Promised Land. But it was only a pedagogue, a school marm to teach the Israelites—and through them the Gentiles—of man’s inability to approach the Lord.
Every man is a sinner and God cannot tolerate sin. Man needs a Savior to pay the penalty for his sins and then provide him with a new, sin-free nature. Once man is cleansed of his sins and clothed in this new righteousness, then he is able to approach the Lord in covenantal relationship with Him.
The first man, that old sinner, required the Law to incessantly expose his sins and show him his need for a Savior. This was a temporary expedient for the simple fact that sooner or later each person dies for his sins or else accepts the Savior’s payment for his sins and receives His new life.
This confirms that the Covenant of Law, though glorious because it is God’s Word, possesses a fading glory. It also establishes the Covenant of Grace as possessing an eternal glory because it never ends. Once a person is born again, the new life in him never terminates. It is eternal and its glory never fades away.
So long as the Hebrews clung to the Law and rejected God’s grace, they had only a fading glory. The only way out was to recognize the true purpose of the Law, accept the Lord Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law on their behalf, and embrace Grace instead of Law.
Referring once more to our numbered list of six distinctions between Law and Grace, the Law was on stone tablets. This meant it was hard and cold, not warm and accepting and forgiving. It could not be altered. It condemned sinners without recourse.
Grace, contrariwise, lives in human hearts, motivating the saint to live for the Lord because he wants to do so. The Law could effect no such “want to”. It was on the outside of man, unable to get inside.
This is why Paul identified the Law as the ministry of death. It could only expose man’s sins, not effect a qualitative change in man’s nature. Grace, however, was inside in the heart. It not only was a qualitative change, a new nature, but it then brought out of man the life of the Spirit in his daily living.
The Law could not help but condemn man because the Law condemns sinners. That was the purpose of the Law. Grace can not help but justify man because the Lord Jesus, though being without sin, died for the sins of all mankind and paid sins penalty.
To any sinner who approaches Him in repentance, Jesus freely provides carte blanche payment for the penalty of his sins, and then Jesus freely bestows His own righteous nature on this man. It is free on all counts, which is the definition of “grace”.
This brings each of us to the crossroads with a decision to make. Will we go left or will we go right? To the left is the Law and condemnation for our sins. To the right is the Covenant of Grace with payment for the penalty of our sins, and with God’s own righteous nature to live inside us and empower us to live the new life. What say ye? Will you go to the left or to the right?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Moses would enter the tent outside the camp and visit with the Lord. When he exited the tent his face glowed with the glory of God. Moses covered his face with a veil because this glory came from the Covenant of Law, and the Law was a temporary expedient until the fullness of the times came and the Messiah brought with Him the Covenant of Grace.
That is Paul’s point. The Law of Moses was the Word of God. It served as the legal code for the nation of Israel while they inhabited the Promised Land. But it was only a pedagogue, a school marm to teach the Israelites—and through them the Gentiles—of man’s inability to approach the Lord.
Every man is a sinner and God cannot tolerate sin. Man needs a Savior to pay the penalty for his sins and then provide him with a new, sin-free nature. Once man is cleansed of his sins and clothed in this new righteousness, then he is able to approach the Lord in covenantal relationship with Him.
The first man, that old sinner, required the Law to incessantly expose his sins and show him his need for a Savior. This was a temporary expedient for the simple fact that sooner or later each person dies for his sins or else accepts the Savior’s payment for his sins and receives His new life.
This confirms that the Covenant of Law, though glorious because it is God’s Word, possesses a fading glory. It also establishes the Covenant of Grace as possessing an eternal glory because it never ends. Once a person is born again, the new life in him never terminates. It is eternal and its glory never fades away.
So long as the Hebrews clung to the Law and rejected God’s grace, they had only a fading glory. The only way out was to recognize the true purpose of the Law, accept the Lord Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law on their behalf, and embrace Grace instead of Law.
Referring once more to our numbered list of six distinctions between Law and Grace, the Law was on stone tablets. This meant it was hard and cold, not warm and accepting and forgiving. It could not be altered. It condemned sinners without recourse.
Grace, contrariwise, lives in human hearts, motivating the saint to live for the Lord because he wants to do so. The Law could effect no such “want to”. It was on the outside of man, unable to get inside.
This is why Paul identified the Law as the ministry of death. It could only expose man’s sins, not effect a qualitative change in man’s nature. Grace, however, was inside in the heart. It not only was a qualitative change, a new nature, but it then brought out of man the life of the Spirit in his daily living.
The Law could not help but condemn man because the Law condemns sinners. That was the purpose of the Law. Grace can not help but justify man because the Lord Jesus, though being without sin, died for the sins of all mankind and paid sins penalty.
To any sinner who approaches Him in repentance, Jesus freely provides carte blanche payment for the penalty of his sins, and then Jesus freely bestows His own righteous nature on this man. It is free on all counts, which is the definition of “grace”.
This brings each of us to the crossroads with a decision to make. Will we go left or will we go right? To the left is the Law and condemnation for our sins. To the right is the Covenant of Grace with payment for the penalty of our sins, and with God’s own righteous nature to live inside us and empower us to live the new life. What say ye? Will you go to the left or to the right?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B005PJ761C
https://sites.google.com/site/heavenl...
Apples to Oranges – Part 1
We are not like Moses, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently at the end of what was fading away. But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ [2 Corinthians 3:13-14].
You’ve undoubtedly heard the aphorism, “Comparing apples to oranges”. The two are both fruit, but otherwise the dissimilarities are determinative. Each is a different species entirely, not having the same family “genes”.
The same is true of the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace. Much confusion abounds in theology today because intelligent Christians compare apples to oranges, er, I mean Law to Grace. They think they have a handle on the Bible, but they fail to recognize the context of the text. They lump it all together as “God’s Word” and figure that suffices.
Yes, the entire Bible is unqualifiedly the Word of God, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts. But the entire Bible does not address the same social, political, economic, and spiritual situations. Nor was the entire Bible written to the same people. Neither was the entire Bible written to the same people facing the same conditions in each case.
To get the right meaning from the Bible, we must rightly divide the Word of truth (cf., 2 Timothy 2:15). Lumping it all together is like combining the sheep and the goats, under the guise that we see no difference. We’ll soon feel the difference, however. The sheep will follow, but the goats will head butt!
In the Bible text which we quoted to kick off this study, Paul based his teaching on this very concept. He wanted us to be sure we put into context each Bible text, to realize the fundamental difference between the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace.
In v.6 of 2 Corinthians 13 Paul makes reference to a “new covenant”. That, dear friends, refers to the Covenant of Grace. If there is a “new” covenant, then there perforce must be an “old” covenant too. Of course there is. It is the Covenant of Law. Let’s list the distinctions Paul makes, listing the “old” followed by the “new”.
1. written on stone tablets vs. written on human hearts (v.3)
2. the letter vs. the Spirit (v.6)
3. the letter kills vs. the Spirit gives life (v.6)
4. ministry of death vs. ministry of the Spirit (vv.7-8)
5. ministry of condemnation vs. ministry of righteousness (v.9)
6. that which fades away vs. that which remains (v.11)
We find a true interpretation of our opening Bible text in the context of Law vs. Grace, as itemized by those six contrasting phrases. Now let’s assay those verses.
Before the tabernacle worship structure was constructed and set up at Mount Sinai, Moses set up another tent outside the camp. He would repair to this tent when he wanted to visit with the Lord for whatever reason. After communing with the Lord in said tent, Moses’ face shone with the glory of the Lord. When he exited the tent the Israelites were afraid, so Moses covered his face with a veil. You may wish to consult Exodus: Volume 2 for more information.
This is what Paul referenced in 2 Corinthians 3. Paul pointed out that Moses covered his face with a veil because the glory of the Lord which radiated on his face didn’t last long. It was a temporary glory, not a lasting or eternal glory. Moses, of course, brought the Word of God to the Israelites, and it is known as the Law of Moses, i.e., the Covenant of Law.
We will continue in our next study with this topic. Take the time now to enjoy fellowship with the Lord. Give Him His due and reap the blessings of His presence.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
You’ve undoubtedly heard the aphorism, “Comparing apples to oranges”. The two are both fruit, but otherwise the dissimilarities are determinative. Each is a different species entirely, not having the same family “genes”.
The same is true of the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace. Much confusion abounds in theology today because intelligent Christians compare apples to oranges, er, I mean Law to Grace. They think they have a handle on the Bible, but they fail to recognize the context of the text. They lump it all together as “God’s Word” and figure that suffices.
Yes, the entire Bible is unqualifiedly the Word of God, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts. But the entire Bible does not address the same social, political, economic, and spiritual situations. Nor was the entire Bible written to the same people. Neither was the entire Bible written to the same people facing the same conditions in each case.
To get the right meaning from the Bible, we must rightly divide the Word of truth (cf., 2 Timothy 2:15). Lumping it all together is like combining the sheep and the goats, under the guise that we see no difference. We’ll soon feel the difference, however. The sheep will follow, but the goats will head butt!
In the Bible text which we quoted to kick off this study, Paul based his teaching on this very concept. He wanted us to be sure we put into context each Bible text, to realize the fundamental difference between the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace.
In v.6 of 2 Corinthians 13 Paul makes reference to a “new covenant”. That, dear friends, refers to the Covenant of Grace. If there is a “new” covenant, then there perforce must be an “old” covenant too. Of course there is. It is the Covenant of Law. Let’s list the distinctions Paul makes, listing the “old” followed by the “new”.
1. written on stone tablets vs. written on human hearts (v.3)
2. the letter vs. the Spirit (v.6)
3. the letter kills vs. the Spirit gives life (v.6)
4. ministry of death vs. ministry of the Spirit (vv.7-8)
5. ministry of condemnation vs. ministry of righteousness (v.9)
6. that which fades away vs. that which remains (v.11)
We find a true interpretation of our opening Bible text in the context of Law vs. Grace, as itemized by those six contrasting phrases. Now let’s assay those verses.
Before the tabernacle worship structure was constructed and set up at Mount Sinai, Moses set up another tent outside the camp. He would repair to this tent when he wanted to visit with the Lord for whatever reason. After communing with the Lord in said tent, Moses’ face shone with the glory of the Lord. When he exited the tent the Israelites were afraid, so Moses covered his face with a veil. You may wish to consult Exodus: Volume 2 for more information.
This is what Paul referenced in 2 Corinthians 3. Paul pointed out that Moses covered his face with a veil because the glory of the Lord which radiated on his face didn’t last long. It was a temporary glory, not a lasting or eternal glory. Moses, of course, brought the Word of God to the Israelites, and it is known as the Law of Moses, i.e., the Covenant of Law.
We will continue in our next study with this topic. Take the time now to enjoy fellowship with the Lord. Give Him His due and reap the blessings of His presence.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Apples to Oranges – Part 2
We are not like Moses, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently at the end of what was fading away. But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ [2 Corinthians 3:13-14].
Moses would enter the tent outside the camp and visit with the Lord. When he exited the tent his face glowed with the glory of God. Moses covered his face with a veil because this glory came from the Covenant of Law, and the Law was a temporary expedient until the fullness of the times came and the Messiah brought with Him the Covenant of Grace.
That is Paul’s point. The Law of Moses was the Word of God. It served as the legal code for the nation of Israel while they inhabited the Promised Land. But it was only a pedagogue, a school marm to teach the Israelites—and through them the Gentiles—of man’s inability to approach the Lord.
Every man is a sinner and God cannot tolerate sin. Man needs a Savior to pay the penalty for his sins and then provide him with a new, sin-free nature. Once man is cleansed of his sins and clothed in this new righteousness, then he is able to approach the Lord in covenantal relationship with Him.
The first man, that old sinner, required the Law to incessantly expose his sins and show him his need for a Savior. This was a temporary expedient for the simple fact that sooner or later each person dies for his sins or else accepts the Savior’s payment for his sins and receives His new life.
This confirms that the Covenant of Law, though glorious because it is God’s Word, possesses a fading glory. It also establishes the Covenant of Grace as possessing an eternal glory because it never ends. Once a person is born again, the new life in him never terminates. It is eternal and its glory never fades away.
So long as the Hebrews clung to the Law and rejected God’s grace, they had only a fading glory. The only way out was to recognize the true purpose of the Law, accept the Lord Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law on their behalf, and embrace Grace instead of Law.
Referring once more to our numbered list of six distinctions between Law and Grace, the Law was on stone tablets. This meant it was hard and cold, not warm and accepting and forgiving. It could not be altered. It condemned sinners without recourse.
Grace, contrariwise, lives in human hearts, motivating the saint to live for the Lord because he wants to do so. The Law could effect no such “want to”. It was on the outside of man, unable to get inside.
This is why Paul identified the Law as the ministry of death. It could only expose man’s sins, not effect a qualitative change in man’s nature. Grace, however, was inside in the heart. It not only was a qualitative change, a new nature, but it then brought out of man the life of the Spirit in his daily living.
The Law could not help but condemn man because the Law condemns sinners. That was the purpose of the Law. Grace cannot help but justify man because the Lord Jesus, though being without sin, died for the sins of all mankind and paid sins penalty.
To any sinner who approaches Him in repentance, Jesus freely provides carte blanche payment for the penalty of his sins, and then Jesus freely bestows His own righteous nature on this man. It is free on all counts, which is the definition of “grace”.
This brings each of us to the crossroads with a decision to make. Will we go left or will we go right? To the left is the Law and condemnation for our sins. To the right is the Covenant of Grace with payment for the penalty of our sins, and with God’s own righteous nature to live inside us and empower us to live the new life. What say ye? Will you go to the left or to the right?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Moses would enter the tent outside the camp and visit with the Lord. When he exited the tent his face glowed with the glory of God. Moses covered his face with a veil because this glory came from the Covenant of Law, and the Law was a temporary expedient until the fullness of the times came and the Messiah brought with Him the Covenant of Grace.
That is Paul’s point. The Law of Moses was the Word of God. It served as the legal code for the nation of Israel while they inhabited the Promised Land. But it was only a pedagogue, a school marm to teach the Israelites—and through them the Gentiles—of man’s inability to approach the Lord.
Every man is a sinner and God cannot tolerate sin. Man needs a Savior to pay the penalty for his sins and then provide him with a new, sin-free nature. Once man is cleansed of his sins and clothed in this new righteousness, then he is able to approach the Lord in covenantal relationship with Him.
The first man, that old sinner, required the Law to incessantly expose his sins and show him his need for a Savior. This was a temporary expedient for the simple fact that sooner or later each person dies for his sins or else accepts the Savior’s payment for his sins and receives His new life.
This confirms that the Covenant of Law, though glorious because it is God’s Word, possesses a fading glory. It also establishes the Covenant of Grace as possessing an eternal glory because it never ends. Once a person is born again, the new life in him never terminates. It is eternal and its glory never fades away.
So long as the Hebrews clung to the Law and rejected God’s grace, they had only a fading glory. The only way out was to recognize the true purpose of the Law, accept the Lord Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law on their behalf, and embrace Grace instead of Law.
Referring once more to our numbered list of six distinctions between Law and Grace, the Law was on stone tablets. This meant it was hard and cold, not warm and accepting and forgiving. It could not be altered. It condemned sinners without recourse.
Grace, contrariwise, lives in human hearts, motivating the saint to live for the Lord because he wants to do so. The Law could effect no such “want to”. It was on the outside of man, unable to get inside.
This is why Paul identified the Law as the ministry of death. It could only expose man’s sins, not effect a qualitative change in man’s nature. Grace, however, was inside in the heart. It not only was a qualitative change, a new nature, but it then brought out of man the life of the Spirit in his daily living.
The Law could not help but condemn man because the Law condemns sinners. That was the purpose of the Law. Grace cannot help but justify man because the Lord Jesus, though being without sin, died for the sins of all mankind and paid sins penalty.
To any sinner who approaches Him in repentance, Jesus freely provides carte blanche payment for the penalty of his sins, and then Jesus freely bestows His own righteous nature on this man. It is free on all counts, which is the definition of “grace”.
This brings each of us to the crossroads with a decision to make. Will we go left or will we go right? To the left is the Law and condemnation for our sins. To the right is the Covenant of Grace with payment for the penalty of our sins, and with God’s own righteous nature to live inside us and empower us to live the new life. What say ye? Will you go to the left or to the right?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Faded Genes – Part 1
We are not like Moses, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently at the end of what was fading away. But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ [2 Corinthians 3:13-14].
You’ve undoubtedly heard the aphorism, “Comparing apples to oranges”. The two are both fruit, but otherwise the dissimilarities are determinative. Each is a different species entirely, not having the same family “genes”.
The same is true of the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace. Much confusion abounds in theology today because intelligent Christians compare apples to oranges, er, I mean Law to Grace. They think they have a handle on the Bible, but they fail to recognize the context of the text. They lump it all together as “God’s Word” and figure that suffices.
Yes, the entire Bible is unqualifiedly the Word of God, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts. But the entire Bible does not address the same social, political, economic, and spiritual situations. Nor was the entire Bible written to the same people. Neither was the entire Bible written to the same people facing the same conditions in each case.
To get the right meaning from the Bible, we must rightly divide the Word of truth (cf., 2 Timothy 2:15). Lumping it all together is like combining the sheep and the goats, under the guise that we see no difference. We’ll soon feel the difference, however. The sheep will follow, but the goats will head butt!
In the Bible text which we quoted to kick off this study, Paul based his teaching on this very concept. He wanted us to be sure we put into context each Bible text, to realize the fundamental difference between the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace.
In verse 6 of 2 Corinthians 13 Paul makes reference to a “new covenant”. That, dear friends, refers to the Covenant of Grace. If there is a “new” covenant, then there perforce must be an “old” covenant too. Of course there is. It is the Covenant of Law. Let’s list the distinctions Paul makes, listing the “old” followed by the “new”.
1. written on stone tablets vs. written on human hearts (verse 3)
2. the letter vs. the Spirit (verse 6)
3. the letter kills vs. the Spirit gives life (verse 6)
4. ministry of death vs. ministry of the Spirit (verses 7-8)
5. ministry of condemnation vs. ministry of righteousness (verse 9)
6. that which fades away vs. that which remains (verse 11)
We find a true interpretation of our opening Bible text in the context of Law vs. Grace, as itemized by those six contrasting phrases. Now let’s assay those verses.
Before the tabernacle worship structure was constructed and set up at Mount Sinai, Moses set up another tent outside the camp. He would repair to this tent when he wanted to visit with the Lord for whatever reason. After communing with the Lord in said tent, Moses’ face shone with the glory of the Lord. When he exited the tent the Israelites were afraid, so Moses covered his face with a veil. You may wish to consult Exodus: Volume 2 for more information.
This is what Paul referenced in 2 Corinthians 3. Paul pointed out that Moses covered his face with a veil because the glory of the Lord which radiated on his face didn’t last long. It was a temporary glory, not a lasting or eternal glory. Moses, of course, brought the Word of God to the Israelites, and it is known as the Law of Moses, i.e., the Covenant of Law.
We will continue in our next study with this topic. Take the time now to enjoy fellowship with the Lord. Give Him His due and reap the blessings of His presence.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
You’ve undoubtedly heard the aphorism, “Comparing apples to oranges”. The two are both fruit, but otherwise the dissimilarities are determinative. Each is a different species entirely, not having the same family “genes”.
The same is true of the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace. Much confusion abounds in theology today because intelligent Christians compare apples to oranges, er, I mean Law to Grace. They think they have a handle on the Bible, but they fail to recognize the context of the text. They lump it all together as “God’s Word” and figure that suffices.
Yes, the entire Bible is unqualifiedly the Word of God, inerrant and infallible in the original manuscripts. But the entire Bible does not address the same social, political, economic, and spiritual situations. Nor was the entire Bible written to the same people. Neither was the entire Bible written to the same people facing the same conditions in each case.
To get the right meaning from the Bible, we must rightly divide the Word of truth (cf., 2 Timothy 2:15). Lumping it all together is like combining the sheep and the goats, under the guise that we see no difference. We’ll soon feel the difference, however. The sheep will follow, but the goats will head butt!
In the Bible text which we quoted to kick off this study, Paul based his teaching on this very concept. He wanted us to be sure we put into context each Bible text, to realize the fundamental difference between the Covenant of Law and the Covenant of Grace.
In verse 6 of 2 Corinthians 13 Paul makes reference to a “new covenant”. That, dear friends, refers to the Covenant of Grace. If there is a “new” covenant, then there perforce must be an “old” covenant too. Of course there is. It is the Covenant of Law. Let’s list the distinctions Paul makes, listing the “old” followed by the “new”.
1. written on stone tablets vs. written on human hearts (verse 3)
2. the letter vs. the Spirit (verse 6)
3. the letter kills vs. the Spirit gives life (verse 6)
4. ministry of death vs. ministry of the Spirit (verses 7-8)
5. ministry of condemnation vs. ministry of righteousness (verse 9)
6. that which fades away vs. that which remains (verse 11)
We find a true interpretation of our opening Bible text in the context of Law vs. Grace, as itemized by those six contrasting phrases. Now let’s assay those verses.
Before the tabernacle worship structure was constructed and set up at Mount Sinai, Moses set up another tent outside the camp. He would repair to this tent when he wanted to visit with the Lord for whatever reason. After communing with the Lord in said tent, Moses’ face shone with the glory of the Lord. When he exited the tent the Israelites were afraid, so Moses covered his face with a veil. You may wish to consult Exodus: Volume 2 for more information.
This is what Paul referenced in 2 Corinthians 3. Paul pointed out that Moses covered his face with a veil because the glory of the Lord which radiated on his face didn’t last long. It was a temporary glory, not a lasting or eternal glory. Moses, of course, brought the Word of God to the Israelites, and it is known as the Law of Moses, i.e., the Covenant of Law.
We will continue in our next study with this topic. Take the time now to enjoy fellowship with the Lord. Give Him His due and reap the blessings of His presence.
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Faded Genes – Part 2
We are not like Moses, who used to put a veil over his face so that the sons of Israel would not look intently at the end of what was fading away. But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ [2 Corinthians 3:13-14].
Moses would enter the tent outside the camp and visit with the Lord. When he exited the tent his face glowed with the glory of God. Moses covered his face with a veil because this glory came from the Covenant of Law, and the Law was a temporary expedient until the fullness of the times came and the Messiah brought with Him the Covenant of Grace.
That is Paul’s point. The Law of Moses was the Word of God. It served as the legal code for the nation of Israel while they inhabited the Promised Land. But it was only a pedagogue, a school marm to teach the Israelites—and through them the Gentiles—of man’s inability to approach the Lord.
Every man is a sinner and God cannot tolerate sin. Man needs a Savior to pay the penalty for his sins and then provide him with a new, sin-free nature. Once man is cleansed of his sins and clothed in this new righteousness, then he is able to approach the Lord in covenantal relationship with Him.
The first man, that old sinner, required the Law to incessantly expose his sins and show him his need for a Savior. This was a temporary expedient for the simple fact that sooner or later each person dies for his sins or else accepts the Savior’s payment for his sins and receives His new life.
This confirms that the Covenant of Law, though glorious because it is God’s Word, possesses a fading glory. It also establishes the Covenant of Grace as possessing an eternal glory because it never ends. Once a person is born again, the new life in him never terminates. It is eternal and its glory never fades away.
So long as the Hebrews clung to the Law and rejected God’s grace, they had only a fading glory. The only way out was to recognize the true purpose of the Law, accept the Lord Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law on their behalf, and embrace Grace instead of Law.
Referring once more to our numbered list of six distinctions between Law and Grace, the Law was on stone tablets. This meant it was hard and cold, not warm and accepting and forgiving. It could not be altered. It condemned sinners without recourse.
Grace, contrariwise, lives in human hearts, motivating the saint to live for the Lord because he wants to do so. The Law could effect no such “want to”. It was on the outside of man, unable to get inside.
This is why Paul identified the Law as the ministry of death. It could only expose man’s sins, not effect a qualitative change in man’s nature. Grace, however, was inside in the heart. It not only was a qualitative change, a new nature, but it then brought out of man the life of the Spirit in his daily living.
The Law could not help but condemn man because the Law condemns sinners. That was the purpose of the Law. Grace cannot help but justify man because the Lord Jesus, though being without sin, died for the sins of all mankind and paid sins penalty.
To any sinner who approaches Him in repentance, Jesus freely provides carte blanche payment for the penalty of his sins, and then Jesus freely bestows His own righteous nature on this man. It is free on all counts, which is the definition of “grace”.
This brings each of us to the crossroads with a decision to make. Will we go left or will we go right? To the left is the Law and condemnation for our sins. To the right is the Covenant of Grace with payment for the penalty of our sins, and with God’s own righteous nature to live inside us and empower us to live the new life. What say ye? Will you go to the left or to the right?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
Moses would enter the tent outside the camp and visit with the Lord. When he exited the tent his face glowed with the glory of God. Moses covered his face with a veil because this glory came from the Covenant of Law, and the Law was a temporary expedient until the fullness of the times came and the Messiah brought with Him the Covenant of Grace.
That is Paul’s point. The Law of Moses was the Word of God. It served as the legal code for the nation of Israel while they inhabited the Promised Land. But it was only a pedagogue, a school marm to teach the Israelites—and through them the Gentiles—of man’s inability to approach the Lord.
Every man is a sinner and God cannot tolerate sin. Man needs a Savior to pay the penalty for his sins and then provide him with a new, sin-free nature. Once man is cleansed of his sins and clothed in this new righteousness, then he is able to approach the Lord in covenantal relationship with Him.
The first man, that old sinner, required the Law to incessantly expose his sins and show him his need for a Savior. This was a temporary expedient for the simple fact that sooner or later each person dies for his sins or else accepts the Savior’s payment for his sins and receives His new life.
This confirms that the Covenant of Law, though glorious because it is God’s Word, possesses a fading glory. It also establishes the Covenant of Grace as possessing an eternal glory because it never ends. Once a person is born again, the new life in him never terminates. It is eternal and its glory never fades away.
So long as the Hebrews clung to the Law and rejected God’s grace, they had only a fading glory. The only way out was to recognize the true purpose of the Law, accept the Lord Jesus’ fulfillment of the Law on their behalf, and embrace Grace instead of Law.
Referring once more to our numbered list of six distinctions between Law and Grace, the Law was on stone tablets. This meant it was hard and cold, not warm and accepting and forgiving. It could not be altered. It condemned sinners without recourse.
Grace, contrariwise, lives in human hearts, motivating the saint to live for the Lord because he wants to do so. The Law could effect no such “want to”. It was on the outside of man, unable to get inside.
This is why Paul identified the Law as the ministry of death. It could only expose man’s sins, not effect a qualitative change in man’s nature. Grace, however, was inside in the heart. It not only was a qualitative change, a new nature, but it then brought out of man the life of the Spirit in his daily living.
The Law could not help but condemn man because the Law condemns sinners. That was the purpose of the Law. Grace cannot help but justify man because the Lord Jesus, though being without sin, died for the sins of all mankind and paid sins penalty.
To any sinner who approaches Him in repentance, Jesus freely provides carte blanche payment for the penalty of his sins, and then Jesus freely bestows His own righteous nature on this man. It is free on all counts, which is the definition of “grace”.
This brings each of us to the crossroads with a decision to make. Will we go left or will we go right? To the left is the Law and condemnation for our sins. To the right is the Covenant of Grace with payment for the penalty of our sins, and with God’s own righteous nature to live inside us and empower us to live the new life. What say ye? Will you go to the left or to the right?
To further research this issue, I direct you to my book Exodus: Volume 2 of Heavenly Citizens in Earthly Shoes. To purchase my books please go to:
http://www.amazon.com/Randy-Green/e/B...
