22 books
—
4 voters
Teo
https://www.goodreads.com/teo2050
to-read
(0)
currently-reading (0)
read (947)
did-not-finish (0)
partly-read (24)
relief-or-prevention (182)
pain-or-suffering (141)
values-motiv (129)
__evo (121)
__medi (120)
perception (99)
__tech (96)
currently-reading (0)
read (947)
did-not-finish (0)
partly-read (24)
relief-or-prevention (182)
pain-or-suffering (141)
values-motiv (129)
__evo (121)
__medi (120)
perception (99)
__tech (96)
__neuro
(93)
__phil (84)
psychotropics (74)
_coop (68)
__hist (64)
biography-memoir (59)
sustainability (57)
health (54)
rationality (52)
__bio (51)
focus-habits (47)
valence (44)
__phil (84)
psychotropics (74)
_coop (68)
__hist (64)
biography-memoir (59)
sustainability (57)
health (54)
rationality (52)
__bio (51)
focus-habits (47)
valence (44)
“To talk of the size of a thought is odd, perhaps, but to say that someone is thinking big thoughts is not without meaning. "I want you all to come to my birthday party" is a bigger thought than "I want only some of you to come." Bodhicitta is theoretically the biggest thought anyone can think because of the number of beings involved, what it wants them to have, and the length of time it must last before its motivating power dies out. Since the duration of a thought is a variable of the aim, in the sense that the actions motivated by a thought cease when the aim is attained, one can conceive of thoughts that last longer and longer. Bodhicitta necessarily lasts until the last living being reaches the state free of suffering, because it is only then that the aim is finally achieved. This explains the prayer of Samantabhadra at the end of the Gandavyūha section of the Avataṃsaka Sūtra, which the Dalai Lama often invokes: "For as long as space endures may I remain to work for the benefit of living beings.”
― Vast as the Heavens, Deep as the Sea: Verses in Praise of Bodhicitta
― Vast as the Heavens, Deep as the Sea: Verses in Praise of Bodhicitta
“There is voluminous evidence that exclusive reliance on heuristic processing tendencies of Type I sometimes results in suboptimal responding (Baron, 2008; Evans, 2007a; Gilovich, Griffin, & Kahneman, 2002; Johnson-Laird, 2006; Kahneman & Tversky, 1973, 1996, 2000; Koehler & Harvey, 2004; Nickerson, 2004, 2008; Nisbett & Ross, 1980; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974, 1983, 1986) and that such thinking errors are not limited to the laboratory (Ariely, 2008; Åstebro, Jeffrey, & Adomdza, 2007; Baron, 1998; Baron, Bazerman, & Shonk, 2006; Belsky & Gilovich, 1999; Berner & Graber, 2008; Camerer, 2000; Chapman & Elstein, 2000; Croskerry, 2009a, 2009b; Dawes, 2001; Hilton, 2003; Kahneman & Tversky, 2000; Lichtenstein & Slovic, 2006; Lilienfeld, Ammirati, & Landfield, 2009; Myers, 2002; Prentice, 2003; Reyna et al., 2009; Stewart, 2009; Sunstein, 2002, 2005; Taleb, 2001, 2007; Tavris & Aronson, 2007; Tetlock, 2005; Thaler & Sunstein, 2008; Ubel, 2000).”
― Rationality and the Reflective Mind
― Rationality and the Reflective Mind
“Everything you wanted to say required a context. If you gave the full context, people thought you a rambling old fool. If you didn’t give the context, people thought you a laconic old fool.”
― Staring at the Sun
― Staring at the Sun
“When after hearing or reading instructions on how to set the mind on an object of meditation, you initially draw the mind inside and try to put it there, it may be that you will not be able to keep your mind on the object and will be subject to a waterfall of thoughts, one after another. If so, you are on the first level. You may even have so many thoughts that it seems as if trying to meditate makes them increase, but you are just noticing the previously unidentified extent of your own ramblings. Your attempts at mindfulness are causing you to notice what is happening.”
― How to See Yourself As You Really Are
― How to See Yourself As You Really Are
“While we think of the boundary between what is legal and what is not as a clear dividing line, it is far from being so. Rather, the boundary becomes further and further indented and folded over time, yielding a jagged and complicated border, rather than a clear straight line. In the end, the law turns out to look like a fractal: no matter how much you zoom in on such a shape, there is always more unevenness, more detail to observe. Any general rule must end up dealing with exceptions, which in turn split into further exceptions and rules, yielding an increasingly complicated, branching structure.”
― Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of Comprehension
― Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of Comprehension
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 316978 members
— last activity 0 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
Nonviolent/Compassionate/Needs-Based communication
— 10 members
— last activity Mar 23, 2015 06:12AM
Inspired by the late Marshall Rosenberg, and his needs-based communication, in this group people from all walks of life meet to share about their expe ...more
Kobo Users
— 135 members
— last activity Mar 01, 2026 02:21AM
This is a group of people who use Kobo to get together and talk about all things Kobo and book related!
Sentientism
— 254 members
— last activity Mar 18, 2026 09:23AM
"Sentientism is an ethical philosophy that grants degrees of moral consideration to all sentient beings. Sentientism extends humanism by showing compa ...more
Teo’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Teo’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Teo
Lists liked by Teo



















































