Fantasy Aficionados discussion
Achive
>
Do You Ever Skip to the End of a Book?




My cousin skips ahead all the time and when she's pissed at me, instead of calling me down, she'll text me a spoiler of a book she knows I'm reading. It's a very effective punishment.

The worst I do is if I'm tense about something I start trying to read faster, which means I sometimes skim and miss things, and have to force myself to go back and read slower... but I would never skip to the end to see how it comes out.
If it's a crap book that I just want to find out what happens but not necessarily read it, then I might just read a Wiki summary or something, though. But that's only for crap books.

The worst I do is if I'm tense about something I start trying to read faster, which means I sometimes skim and miss things, and have to force myself to go back and read slower... but I would never skip to the end to see how it comes out.
If it's a crap book that I just want to find out what happens but not necessarily read it, then I might just read a Wiki summary or something, though. But that's only for crap books.
^This. Exactly what she said. I don't skip with books I'm enjoying but I do get tense and skim by accident.
But, also like Colleen, if the book is crap I'll skip, skim and wiki it.

I have a friend that does that too, only with movies. When she knew I was looking forward to seeing The Village, she called and blurted out the surprise before I could stop her. To this day I am still pissed about it.


To answer the question, I used to do this alot when I was younger. Usually to find out if favorite characters died or ended up together. I grew out of it though. It's too satisfying to get to the end and be surprised.


Because sometimes the journey is still worth it... or not. Sometimes I don't mind the drive, and sometimes I'd rather just fly over the whole state.

LOL. I loved that movie and if someone had told me the big deal right before I watched it, I would have wanted to shoot them. This is why I do not go to a movie with anyone who has seen it before. Even if they don't tell me what's going to happen, I hate it when you are sitting with someone who has seen the movie and they turn to watch your face every time something big happens. I hate that!

The Sixth Sense did get spoiled for me. A friend at work was talking about the movies and I covered my ears so I wouldn't hear. She stopped talking and I thought I was safe, but then she added (view spoiler) and of course that was the main spoiler! Still, I enjoyed the movie, maybe even more so because instead of waiting for THE BIG TWIST I was just going along with the story and appreciating it. In truth, I'm not a big fan of books or movies that rely solely on THE BIG TWIST to make it work.


I'm with the others who posted that the joy of a good book is immersing myself in the story, I just like to let it unfold. Now, if I'm really into a story and eager to see how it turns out, I'm not averse to staying up reading until 4 or 5am to finish it...

If a book is dragging on I’ll sometimes peak ahead to see if it gets any better.
That reminds me...do some of you read a book after seeing the movie? I have no desire to read the Time Travelers Wife because I have already seen the movie and know what happens.

The only time I seriously looked up what happens is for A Game of Thrones. When (view spoiler) , that wasn't so bad, I could flip ahead and see that (view spoiler) . But from then on, I knew that no character was totally safe, and when (view spoiler) , I was just so stressed out reading - every line of every chapter! - so I went online and found out who died, right up to the book/wall collision moment in Storm of Swords (view spoiler) , and I was able to carry on. Great books, brilliant writing, but the stuff that happens!!! Spoilerising myself was the only way I could read it.


In answer to the general question though, I may have done it on occasion when I was younger but I can't remember what book it was that I did that for =P


I always peek ahead. I like to know how the book ends; it never spoils the fun for me but sometimes I stop reading if I don't like how it ends. I like to know what a movie is about too, always read descriptions. And on this particular website, I always read spoilers. I love them.

Take Practical Magic, for example. I find the book by Alice Hoffman to be a completely different kind of story with little resemblance to the film. Personally, I like the movie waaaaay better.
@Jelilah As for Time Traveler's Wife, it isn't the kind of book I'd myself read, but I have a friend who loves the book and hated the movie. His opinion is that they took everything out of the movie that made the book great and "took an awesome speculative fiction and turned it into a trite love story" /exact quote I've heard every time the movie comes up.


I agree about the classics. I read Pride and Prejudice and Tom Jones after seeing the BBC miniseries, and nothing was ruined for me, but I do try to wait until I've read the book for the stories I don't know, for example, The Prestige (the movie would have ruined that for me-so glad I read the book first), The Help (haven't read it yet, so haven't seen the movie), The Power of One (the movie turned out to be a very poor adaptation, but wanting to see the movie is what motivated me read the book, and then it turned out to be one of my favorites, so I guess I'm glad they made the movie).
Yikes, that was a really long sentence.


Absolutely agree with this. Remains of the Day is a good example for me; great book, great movie, but great in different ways. The book has the subtlety and depth, the movie has the amazing acting and the visuals.
And Lord of the Rings, of course. Awesome book, how could the movie possibly do it justice? But it did, even though it was very different. I loved (most of) the bits they changed (no Tom Bombadil! elves at Helm's Deep! yay and thrice yay!), but I also loved (most of) the bits they kept (what do you fear, my lady? a cage; and the ride of the Rohirrim... sorry, welling up now... [sniffle]).
But @Emily, yes, it's better to read the book first, always. Think of a whole generation growing up who will only ever visualise Boromir as Sean Bean. Or Ned Stark, come to that. Although, on second thoughts, that's not so much of a problem, is it? ;-)


You're going to go watch it now, aren't you?
Rats. :)
I'm cool with changes being made in adaptations if they stay true to the spirit of the book. I didn't think they did that with The Power of One.
PaulineMRoss said
"But @Emily, yes, it's better to read the book first, always. Think of a whole generation growing up who will only ever visualise Boromir as Sean Bean. Or Ned Stark, come to that. Although, on second thoughts, that's not so much of a problem, is it? ;-)"
LOL. Yes, he suits me just fine. ;)


And I'm pretty sure I didn't peek ahead with that one.

It's given me short patience and the desire to wiki everything. O_o


Yeah, that is basically what I did with about 40% of the book.



***
I also reread books. It helps that I tend to forget details of stories after awhile. And sometimes I just want to see what it's like the second time around. There are things I might've missed, or just an added level of depth I get on the second go around.
And, sometimes, it's just nice to snuggle up with a favorite to break out of a reading slump, as others have said.
That said, I do think that I've been a bit more impatient with books lately.
Part of it is that I think that while I've always been a critical kind of reader, unless a story really grabs me, that as I've started writing reviews I've tended to keep a part of my brain on those critical elements a bit more while reading.
Another part, though, is that I think I've just been reading so much more than I used to that repeating patterns and motifs just become more and more noticeable and, as an extension, more and more unbearable.
I also find myself more keenly aware of just how many books are out there to be read - which I think also adds to my impatience level.
As far as my finds versus recommendations... by and large the books I read because everyone tells me how great they are I find myself less than impressed with.
But I have come across a few gems I may not have found otherwise, so I guess it's all worth it. ;)

My ideal read is one that I would never even think to skip ahead on, because I'm glued to the pages and following what's happening next.


I'm not a witch, I'm your wife!

omg, was drinking tea when I read this and I almost spit all over the computer screen!
My favourite was always the next part,
"I'm not a witch I'm your wife! But after what you just said, I'm not sure I wanna be that anymore!"
"You never had it so good!"

On a side note with everyone talking about The Princess Bride and with as much as I love the movie it will most likely be my next read.


Books mentioned in this topic
The Others (other topics)The Thief (other topics)
Bitten (other topics)
The Adamantine Palace (other topics)
The Hunger Games (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Lindsay Buroker (other topics)Joss Whedon (other topics)
Joe Abercrombie (other topics)
Steven Erikson (other topics)
Glen Cook (other topics)
More...
I confess that I have done this a few times. At the end of the Dark Tower series by Stephen King, the last book, I peeked. I couldn't help it. It looked like there was going to be a horrible ending and he was going to kill one of my fav characters, so I checked before continuing to read.
As a writer, though, I hate it when people tell me they've done this with one of my books. I put a lot of thought into how and when I want shocking surprises to come out. This is a bit hypocritical of me, I know, but I can't help it. I want my readers to be surprised... but when I read a book, sometimes I want to be let off the hook before finishing.
So, do you ever skip to the end?