Ancient & Medieval Historical Fiction discussion
General Discussions
>
Random Thoughts

So..
Napoleon had his own private librarian.
Pretty cool. Maybe if he wasn't messing around with his books, Richard Sharpe wouldn't have captured his Eagle so easily in Sharpe's Eagle...
http://militaryhistorynow.com/2015/04...

And that's why our Fearless Leader is great."
Haha! Thanks, mate. :-D

So..
Napoleon had his own private librarian.
Pretty cool. Maybe if he wasn't messing around with his books, Richard Sharpe wouldn't have captured his Eagle so easily in [..."
Lol.

It is catastrophic.


And Las Vegas..:(
America sure has been put through the ringer lately.

That is an interesting topic in this day and age.

That is an interesting topic in this day and age."
At an online site called furturelearn.com where a few on here (me included) have done some history courses before - over the 6 weeks its been incredible to learn about a subject I wasn't overly familiar with bar man's intrusion (that covered week 5) into the Amazon & Far East destroying habitats..... a real eye opener & something I would hope the next generation is studying as the science & results are out there.



We are hoping to get to the Galapagos Andy, I'll have to post some pics for you!
I enrolled for the King Richard course but didn't end up doing it 😐
https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/e...

That would be grand! Been watching some film of the islands this afternoon, the discussion is about tourism & how the islands have become threatened by population & feral animals like cats/dogs. Its been quite a challenging course of ideals.
Never did the King Richard one myself, jus did one on Bonnie Prince Charlie but that descended into a Protestant vs Catholic war at times, some ideals are so entrenched..... :(
Doing another on "The European discovery of China" which is great as its taking us through all the dynasties from the Zhou to the Ming which is a completely alien history for me - all we ever learnt was about Marco Polo & the Opium Wars!
They really are (mostly) good courses.

That was the first time the Richard course had been run and I don't know if they've changed it much.

Kind of puzzled as to why they included medieval writing. If it was Richard II I could understand it. Three of England's greatest medieval writers were alive during his reign: Chaucer, Gower, and Langland.


That was the first time the Richard c..."
I waited so long for the first one but when they finally scheduled it in I wasn't online enough to enroll. Then I enrolled a couple of months back, but had visitors on board and we were site seeing etc and I ended up not even doing week 1.
I'm terrible at "study" in any case, so I probably would have procrastinated each week getting any assignments done!


Kind of puzzled as to why they included medieval writing. If it was Richard II I could understand it. Three of England's greatest medieval writers were alive during his reign: C..."
They really went into medieval aspects that I struggled to see the point of. The medieval writing wasn't really the authors, it was the actual writing. How to read manuscripts. How they were printed, where books were being made.
All very interesting if you were doing a course on it...the course really wasn't on RIII. His name is in the course title, but it was really on random medieval England stuff.

I have no doubt what so ever that no agent will want it, but it will be nice just to finish it and get that yoke off my neck.
The reason I bring it up, is that once I finished the first draft the other week and I was wondering whether it was complete sh#t or not, it suddenly sunk in that women authors seem to only write hist fic about true personalities from history.
Has anybody else ever noticed this? This has to be because the readers want that from female authors.
Male authors don't seem to have this same expectation on them.
So many of the male hist fic we read in this group is not about real people. Purely fictional ones.
I mean, sure there are men who do write about real people ie Conn Iggulden, but there are as many who don't.
It is weird that I have never noticed this until now.
My manuscript is purely fictional characters. Another reason maybe an agent won't want it. haha.
I don't care though. I just want it finished, sent away, so I can move on.

Aren't you supposed to be harsh on me? Be tough on me so I'm used to the real world out there where it is dog eat dog.

Ellis Peters - detecting aside, her Cadfael books gave excellent insight into the working of a medieval monastery.
Lindsey Davis - ditto for life for the common people of Imperial Rome.
Victoria Holt/Philippa Carr - mostly gothic under the VH name, but did a wide sweeping family saga as Philippa Carr.
Cecelia Holland - also sweeping family saga.

Aren't you supposed to be harsh on me. Get tough on me to get me used to the real world out there where it is dog eat dog."
Then find some test readers, I am sure there’s a few in the group who will give you a honest review.

I could think of a time where it leaned the other way. Female authors were writing fiction. I prefer it myself.
Prefer it in my male authored books too. I love a good fabricated yarn set in real historical context.
I love Uhtred. :)


Margaret is my guinea pig currently. :)
But I'll be writing under a pseudonym and nobody will ever know its me! lol.
(Except Lady Margaret)

Interesting though that you mention Manda, Jane. When you think about it, she wrote under her real name, as a female author and wrote a series about a real person of history. Boudica.
Yet when she wrote under a unisex pseudonym so male readers wouldn't know she was a woman unless they looked into M.C Scott, she wrote about a fictional character, Pantera. (think I got that name right?)
Kind of a perfect example there of what I have noticed about male and female authors.

Margaret is my guinea pig currently. :)
But I'll be writing under a pseudonym..."
Well do it all by pm. 😎😎


Rome series
https://www.goodreads.com/series/5520...
I highly recommend this one.

Send a couple of chapters when you are ready.📖

yes, she did. If I'm too ambiguous: she did use M.C. for that series.

yes, she did."
Yes she did only use M.C or yes she did use Manda as well.
I looked at all editions of the first book and they were all M.C.
Was it the later two in the series that she also published them under Manda? I didn't check them.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Berry Pickers (other topics)Fortune's Child (other topics)
Hild (other topics)
Sharpe's Command (other topics)
Edenglassie (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Amanda Peters (other topics)Nicola Griffith (other topics)
Bernard Cornwell (other topics)
Bernard Cornwell (other topics)
Allan Hands (other topics)
More...
It’s unnatural!!!