Catching up on Classics (and lots more!) discussion
Archived Chit Chat & All That
>
What Are You Reading Now?
message 2251:
by
Luís
(new)
Sep 07, 2024 07:08AM

reply
|
flag

Nice! I've been reading more classic Science-Fiction over the last couple years, and Smith is an author who captured my attention. I picked up the massive The Rediscovery of Man: The Complete Short Science Fiction of Cordwainer Smith and I hope to get started on it in the next few months. I'm glad to hear that you are enjoying his works too.


Howl's Moving Castle by Diana Wynne Jones
Rating: 3 stars
Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
and I started reading the dark suspense novel

A Dark-Adapted Eye by Ruth Rendell writing as Barbara Vine


RJ - Slayer of Trolls wrote: "Lynn wrote: "For those who like Science Fiction I have been reading The Best of Cordwainer Smith this year. It is a short story/novella collection. You can read one selection then pick..."
They are the same volume, just different names and yours will have a few more stories. I hope you like it too.
They are the same volume, just different names and yours will have a few more stories. I hope you like it too.

Its

Seems to be something of a Ruritanian romance type.
Also accidentally reading something superficially similar,



Roughing It by Mark Twain
Rating: 3 stars
Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
and I started reading the fourth Kingbridge novel (a prequel to The Pillars of the Earth)

The Evening and the Morning by Ken Follett
I recently finished Whose Body? by Dorothy L. Sayers. It took me six weeks to read this book. I almost abandoned it. In the end the book took a turn and the characters were fleshed out, but there was a dry spell in the middle. I gave it 4 stars but it required considerable effort for me to read.
I mention Whose Body? so that I can contrast it with my reading experience of Slaughterhouse-Five. I first read this book in the mid 1980s. I listed it as Jan 1985 - close enough. I can't exactly remember the first date. I reread the book this morning. It was a five hour, one sitting, reading experience. The last time I did that with a book was Flowers for Algernon which I read in April of 2019.
I gave Vonnegut's book 5*. It was creative, insightful, ingenious, full of Literary devices, and powerful in its understated way of making huge statements about the human condition.
I mention Whose Body? so that I can contrast it with my reading experience of Slaughterhouse-Five. I first read this book in the mid 1980s. I listed it as Jan 1985 - close enough. I can't exactly remember the first date. I reread the book this morning. It was a five hour, one sitting, reading experience. The last time I did that with a book was Flowers for Algernon which I read in April of 2019.
I gave Vonnegut's book 5*. It was creative, insightful, ingenious, full of Literary devices, and powerful in its understated way of making huge statements about the human condition.

On the 31st of August, 1946, a whole edition of The New Yorker was dedicated to John Hersey's reportage about 6 survivors of the Hiroshima bombing. It's been the only (as far) case in history when a magazine/newspaper's edition contained one topic by one journalist. The material became a sensation and quickly disappeared from shelves. It was published as a book with 4 chapters that fall. 40 years later John Hersey wrote 'Hiroshima: Consequences,' tracing the fate of the 6 survivors afterward. In later editions, it was included as the 5th chapter of the book.



Delirium's Mistress by Tanith Lee
Rating: 3 stars
Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
and I started reading the fourth installment in the Earthsea fantasy series

Tehanu by Ursula K. Le Guin



The Lottery and Other Stories by Shirley Jackson
Rating: 3 stars
Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

The King in Yellow by Robert W. Chambers
Rating: 3 stars (that is: 4 stars for the King in Yellow stories, and 2-3 stars for the rest)
Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
and I started reading Clive Barker's second full-length novel

Weaveworld by Clive Barker


3 star
Short book. Creature feature. Adventure. Lost world inspiration.
Inspired by German legends of wyrm, a German dragon legend.
1-2 hour read.
My review - https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

It got me in the mood for more South Pacific adventure so I’m starting [book:Kon-Tiki: Across the Pacific ..."
Kon Tiki and South Pacific were two of my Dad's favorite books; I should reread them, it's been ages. And my daughter loved Mysterious Island. So you've brought back some happy memories for me! I hope you enjoy all your reading.


4 stars
Classic science fiction, thriller, aliens,
My review here - https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Barnstormers (Comixology Originals) #2

4 stars
Bonny meets Clyde style adventure
My review here - https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

I gave Vonnegut's book 5*. It was creative, insightful, ingenious, full of Literary devices, and powerful in its understated way of making huge statements about the human condition.
Your description is on point.



⭐⭐⭐
Published September 17, 2024
Read as a #ReviewCopy. #Booksirens
#femaleauthor #femaleprotagonist
#sisters
My review - https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


Published April 30, 2024
3.5 stars
Read as a review copy.
Nazis, Hitler, American Presidents, the Oval office, conspiracy theories and more.
My review here - https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

I'm reading The Warlock is Missing right now, and having fun with it. A nice trip down memory lane.


3.5 Stars
The infallible, Queen of Crime. Miss Marple. Re-read.
My review here - https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...



Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
Rating: 5 stars
Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
and I started reading

Notes from Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky
(which I have actually already finished reading but I haven't yet posted a review)

A Cidade de Deus, Vol. II: Livros IX a XV
Confissões de Uma Liberal
A Funda: 4º volume

I just finished The Feminine Middlebrow Novel, 1920s to 1950s: Class, Domesticity, and Bohemianism by Nicola Humble. It's a study of social change in England during the wars and how novels of the time reflected or resisted that change. It was interesting, and I got a long list of authors and books to try.
And I'm slowly moving through The Spiritual Poems of Rumi by Jalal ad-Din Muhammad ar-Rumi. I've not read much of his poetry before, so I'm enjoying diving into more.

One’s chances of seeing even Shaw’s most famous plays in adequate stage productions these days is slight. Heartbreak House, for example, requires 10 top-notch actors: Not cheap or easy to assemble.
So reading is the way to go, but even among confirmed readers of the classics, plays (outside of Shakespeare) don’t seem to get the attention they merit. It is too bad. Shaw is hardly just dialogue - his stage directions are exquisite and enable one to readily visualize a production.
The same thought occurs to me as I read each of these Shaw plays, and indeed when I read almost ANY classic play: Where would the audience for this be found today? Because the demands on the audience are pretty intense: A rapt level of attention, an intense sensitivity to verbal nuance, a high level of cultural literacy and sophistication, the willingness to work for the art instead of just letting it wash over you.

* I recently read a chapter of John Cowper Powys’ A Glastonbury Romance that is all mystically revelatory sex - the earth moved, the mystery of life was revealed, etc - and as with the similar passages in D.H. Lawrence, I felt way outside the text. From my POV, orgasm is nice and all, and that’s about it. I have never thought to freight it with such significance.

I like WCW’s work very much, and he is an especially meaningful figure for me because he lived right across the Passaic River from my boyhood home. My mom the nurse worked under Dr. Williams at Passaic General Hospital in the Fifties, and my pediatrician, Dr. Albert Hagofsky, was a colleague of his; their offices were only a few blocks apart. Hence I am well-disposed towards Williams, and always thought of him as a nice guy.
But the biography, perhaps unsurprisingly, undercuts that. I was frankly horrified by an incident in Williams’ late 30s when, frustrated by his lack of recognition at that point, he wrote and published a big old hatchet piece in which he attacked basically every other poet and critic in America, including many close friends, as lacking in talent and principles. Many colleagues took a long time to forgive him, and some never did. He was not a kid; he was a medical doctor, for goodness sake (“Do no harm”); he was bitter and angling for attention. The incident puts him in a terrible light.
On the more amusing side, it is fun to read of Williams’ uneasy rapprochement with Wallace Stevens, whom he reasonably enough considered as his chief rival; and his unwillingness for a long time to engage with the alarmingly talented upstart Hart Crane. Aficionados of choice literary gossip will find a lot here.


Anyway, I perfectly well know that Claude’s hundreds of pages of dissatisfaction and frustration are a set-up for his eventually finding meaning when he packs off to World War I. But imagining war was simply not in Cather’s wheelhouse. She undertook to do it because she was wrestling with the death in battle of her cousin Grosvenor Cather, who “could never escape from the misery of being himself, except in action”, and who was the model for Claude Wheeler. I accept that this was material she felt impelled to work on, but I don’t think she pulled off what she was trying for. Writing a long novel about a consistently miserable character is maybe not the best way to engage the reader, and capping it off with an account of wartime that seems distant and unreal and completely outside the author’s experience (because it was) makes matters worse. Hemingway HATED those chapters, and I can’t say he was wrong to do so.
So while I am glad I read the book, as a completist and a Catherite, it was rather a let-down. And guess what? This is the novel she won the Pulitzer for. Go figure.

Howells contrasts Durgin with a fastidious older artist, Westover (often taken to be a Howells self-portrait). I can’t say as I’d be friends with either man – Durgin is too shallow and brutish, Westover a passive priss. But their relationship fuels the novel effectively. The settings in rural New Hampshire (where the Durgin family inn is located, hence the book’s title) and urban Boston (especially Harvard, which Jeff uneasily attends) are also tellingly contrasted. A sharp and compelling novel overall. I am a big Howells fan.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Hobbit, or There and Back Again (other topics)The Hobbit, or There and Back Again (other topics)
The Mysterious Affair at Styles (other topics)
The Hobbit, or There and Back Again (other topics)
The Man Who Was Thursday: A Nightmare (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Eça de Queirós (other topics)Eça de Queirós (other topics)
M.P. Shiel (other topics)
Anthony Trollope (other topics)
Frank Herbert (other topics)
More...