Georgette Heyer Fans discussion
Group Reads
>
The Nonesuch Oct 2019 Group Read Spoiler Thread


that's a good point, Critterbee, she must have felt like he was too good to be true and sort of braced to be disappointed.


You didn't use enough ellipses to be doing a Cartland!

You didn't use enough ellipses to be doing a Cartland!"
!! haha! :D

It's the free market at its worst.
The thing is, though, that there is a lot of talk about 'social cleansing' when trying to argue that a lot of 'poorer' folk actually 'need' to be in London, but from a business point of view not many do. Yes, there are the 'key workers' and 'service industries' (which, basically are there, as the name says, to 'serve' those richer than them....eg, work in the supermarkets, be the nurses, etc etc!!!!!!), but other than that, to be brutal about it, if you are living on benefits (for whatever reason, eg, single mother)) there really isn't any point in living in London, and if I were a single mum its' the last place I'd want to bring up a child.
As I say, the real root cause is overpopulation, and until countries have a robust and sustainable 'population plan' it's not going to get sorted.


The sad thing is, though, that if you move the educated/professional/middle classes in, then the 'lower orders' move off somewhere else.
It's the old conundrum of whether slums make people or people make slums....difficult!
Abigail wrote: "I'll stand up for Waldo. He is thoughtful and observant of others' feelings. He tones down his style so as not to stand out like a London swell when he comes into a rural community. He's kind to ..."
Yes, me too. I really like this book because I just like Waldo. He's kind, and thoughtful in small ways - to Charlotte about her fear of horses and to Humphrey Colebatch about his studies as well as to old Calver's neglected servants. He's been a bit of a lad in his youth, but he's grown out of all that and it doesn't even look as though he has mistresses any more. And once he realises what Ancilla's problem is, he sorts it out immediately, rather than stringing her along for his own amusement the way certain other gentlemen (view spoiler) do.
I find the ending a bit ... I don't know, 'tatty'. Tiffany has got just what she wanted, and has behaved extremely badly to get, in spite of our being told earlier on that the Burfords wouldn't be in London in July anyway. And there has been no development at all in her character: I would have liked to have seen her set on the path towards being a better person.
I'm also unsure about what's happening between Waldo and Laurie - when Laurie shouts that Waldo is a 'great gun', is he just talking about how sternly he's spoken to Tiffany, or are we to suppose that Waldo's remark about "If you expect to succeed as a horse-coper ..." means that Waldo has withdrawn his refusal to lend him the money? I really couldn't make it out. If he has, why has he?
Yes, me too. I really like this book because I just like Waldo. He's kind, and thoughtful in small ways - to Charlotte about her fear of horses and to Humphrey Colebatch about his studies as well as to old Calver's neglected servants. He's been a bit of a lad in his youth, but he's grown out of all that and it doesn't even look as though he has mistresses any more. And once he realises what Ancilla's problem is, he sorts it out immediately, rather than stringing her along for his own amusement the way certain other gentlemen (view spoiler) do.
I find the ending a bit ... I don't know, 'tatty'. Tiffany has got just what she wanted, and has behaved extremely badly to get, in spite of our being told earlier on that the Burfords wouldn't be in London in July anyway. And there has been no development at all in her character: I would have liked to have seen her set on the path towards being a better person.
I'm also unsure about what's happening between Waldo and Laurie - when Laurie shouts that Waldo is a 'great gun', is he just talking about how sternly he's spoken to Tiffany, or are we to suppose that Waldo's remark about "If you expect to succeed as a horse-coper ..." means that Waldo has withdrawn his refusal to lend him the money? I really couldn't make it out. If he has, why has he?

Beth-In-UK wrote: "Grey eyes always seem to indicate a cool temperament......"
I guessed very early on that GH's own eyes were grey - and was tickled pink when I finally read the biography and found I was right! It's always the sensible, mature heroine that has the grey eyes.
I guessed very early on that GH's own eyes were grey - and was tickled pink when I finally read the biography and found I was right! It's always the sensible, mature heroine that has the grey eyes.



But in fact I doubt they will end up moving in the same circles in London, because the Burfords, though wealthy, are Cits.

Here in Ireland 'a bit of a lad' means a chancer or someone up for anything. Harmless stuff but not quite on the straight and narrow.


I have a soft spot for GH’s heroes who have a dry sense of humor. This exchange made me laugh:
“Sir Waldo, circumstance compelled me to accept a seat in your carriage. When I consented to go with you to Leeds, I trusted that chivalry—a sense of propriety—would prohibit you from entering again upon this subject.”
“Did you?” he said sympathetically. “Only to find your trust misplaced! Well, that is a good deal too bad, and one must naturally shrink from shattering illusions. At the same time—where did you pick up such a ridiculous notion?”
I do like Waldo.

Not a bounder, though - that's more caddish, as in, whereas 'a bit of a lad' is fundamentally harmless (if sometimes somewhat annoying!), a cad or bounder is a bit of a 'bad hat'.
By the way, I think a 'peep o day' boy has different connotations in Ireland! Isn't it a political thing there, as in something to do with Protestants and Catholics during the 19thC?? Not sure, but I have a suspicion? I must look it up!

It would be interesting to see if Tiffany, even if she does marry into the aristocracy, would manage to subdue her temper and her bad behaviour sufficiently, or she would soon be cut by the likes of the Lady Patronesses etc. I think while men would make allowances for her beauty, middle aged powerful society doyennes would most certainly NOT!

In a way I can understand why - I'm a firm believer in Mark Twain's 'Buy land, they're not making any more of it!' - but of course in a housing crisis it should be prevented. It would be easy to ban foreign ownership, or limit it, but the government is spineless (!!!!) and of course wants foreign money coming in to the UK (as, I daresay, the USA does as well).
The 'good' thing about foreigners owning 'stuff' abroad is that it can easily be repossessed if necessary! Yes, that might be upsetting to the owners, but who cares about a bunch of foreign oligarchs and their mostly ill-gotten gains???!!!!!

The same happens here in the UK as the tax rules have changed so that the interest charges on the mortgages that landowners may take out to fund their buy-to-let property purchases, can't be deducted against tax (ie, it can't count as a business expense, to reduce the taxable profit from the rental).
It's a way of trying to get landlords to sell up, and then, hopefully, it will increase the supply of property on the open market, which 'should' help to keep property prices lower. BUT, since private individuals can't afford to buy ANY property, even if a 'bit' lower in price, that doesn't really help the housing problem, which is caused by undersupply of housing (in areas that people want/need to live for their jobs).
Similarly, in the UK, it is now harder than ever for poor folk on housing benefit (ie, their incomes are so low they get help from tax revenues to pay for their accommodation), to get any where to rent (the supply of government owned rentals...ie, 'council houses' is now very low, as most have been sold to their owners in the last generation, and no more have been built) (great for those who bought them, but not for the current generation of 'poor folk')
This is because the government optimistically, but mistakenly, changed the payment system from the local government (council) paying landlords their rent directly, to handing the money to the 'poor folk' to pay their landlord. Of course, that is to ignore the reason 'poor folk' often ARE 'poor folk' because their backgrounds are such that things like handling money responsibly is woefully lacking. So there are endless sad tales of single mothers facing eviction for non-payment of rent to private landlords, as they have received their rental money (ie, housing benefit) from the council, but instead of paying their rent for it, have gone and splurged it on clothes or whatever......
It's all very sad and depressing.

It's a political minefield, and causes endless inflammation of tensions.

Critterbee, Tiffany might well say something spiteful about Ancilla but it will only make her look bad.
I didn't recall the Burfords were cits!? wonder how that will affect Tiffany's ambitions to marry well.


It’s fun to Google gray eyes and look at the different shades and types. According to the World Atlas, though, less than 1% of the world’s population has gray eyes. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/w...

Grey eyes-noble blood!! My daughter must be a cuckoo in the nest:)

And every single one of them is in a Heyer book!


It's genetically recessive, so if a grey/blue eyed person marries a brown eyed person (even another Caucasian), if the brown eyed person had brown eyed parents, there is no chance their subsequent children could have blue/grey eyes. But, their grandchildren (if the children marry either blue/grey eyed partners, or brown-eyed partner one of whose parents was blue/grey eyed), have, I think I have the stats right, a one in four chance of being blue/grey eyed.
Similarly, if two blue/grey eyed people marry, their children can only be blue/grey eyed.
I suspect that if global intermarriage continues apace, that within a few hundred years, at most, there won't be any blue/grey eyed folk at all. Or, at least, even rarer than now.
So, I guess, overall, blue/grey eyes are indeed 'precious because rare'!!!! (like blonde and red hair!)
I wonder what the genetics of green eyes are - (or hazel?) - I've no idea! It tends to be associated with red heads, and, again, I would assume, recessive genetically.

oh, interesting, I never noticed that!


Regarding Ancilla’s inconsistencies: Upon this reading I find it “interesting” to say the least, that Ancilla’s is fastidious enough to NOT marry for safety and security without love in favor of the precarious life as a governess, yet having as an “ideal” the handsome, dashing, wealthy Waldo, an “ideal” that is a man who has limitless possibilities for a wife or extra marital companionship. It’s like having as an ideal, the handsomest, most popular boy, who has an expensive sports car, in high-school, whom every girl wants.
What does this say about Ancilla in general and what does it say about a 26 yo, allegedly sophisticated woman in particular?


There is one Corinthian character whom I can name who is a creep and a blackguard (don’t read this spoiler if you haven’t read Cotillion)! (view spoiler)

Waldo is a very nice, kind, and gracious to the people of the community, attending their “rustic” entertainments with a smile. We learn that philanthropy was a tradition in his family and though he’s sought-after in tonnish circles, neither popularity nor wealth have spoiled his temperament.
However, there’s something I’ve noticed on this reading that he’s done (though necessary to the story, I’ll admit!): Waldo insisted on calling attention to Ancilla repeatedly at social events. Governesses were supposed to stay in the background and if Mrs Underhill had been top-lofty, things could have gone badly between Mrs Underhill and Ancilla jeopardizing her employment and favorable opinion of her employer. At one point, cattier people in the neighborhood are gossiping about Waldo’s attention to the governess!
Contrast Waldo’s behavior with Sylvester’s toward Phoebe in Sylvester. Up until Phoebe and Sylvester’s (view spoiler)


I get the feeling he is trying to 'equalise' things between Ancilla and the local society, and remind all the 'catty ladies' that actually Ancilla is 'better born' than most of them, and certainly than her employer.
Interestingly, it's a snobbery that Ancilla doesn't share - she doesn't seem to be in the least 'class conscious' in that respect. Good for her!

Books mentioned in this topic
The Foundling (other topics)The Plain Princess (other topics)
Gone with the Wind (other topics)
Vanity Fair (other topics)
We Need to Talk About Kevin (other topics)
More...
Very good point, Abigail- I agree, not being a green girl just out, plus her position of dependency, has got to make it seem more desperate.