Stephen King Fans discussion

This topic is about
The Shining
2nd Round of King Books
>
The Shining - Book 3

[spoilers removed]"
Thats the problem Femmy, as we get older we see things differently. We loose our creative innocence. As kids when we see a stick we saw guns swords magical wands and the like as adults we only see the stick I wish I never grew up, Sai King and J.K Rowling help me stay an immature 58 year old kid.


So, one question. How did the hotel get so evil? Any theories? Any hints in the book that I missed?

I don't think King really tells us or even hints. Some place just are evil. It's such a scary concept, because with no rhyme or reason to it, there is also no predicting or preventing.

[spoilers removed]"
Good catch! I completely missed that one.


I’d actually go a bit further than that and say many of the bad things happened because the hotel itself is evil. (view spoiler)


Toward the end, (view spoiler) .
Also, I’ve only seen the movie once and years ago, but I totally misremembered the “all work and no play” pages as happening in the book rather than in the movie. I kept waiting for that to show up. So fickle, our memories.


I think there are at least a few places in King's work where the building itself is evil. As Summer says, the building has a level of sentience. Depending on your theory of evil, if the building is sentient that it can go over to the dark side. which the hotel has. I think the movie goes a little further in suggesting that Jack himself is part of that sentience, and has been around a very long time.


I don't really feel like that's true. I think alcoholism definitely is a way it can use to break someone to do its bidding, but (view spoiler)
Ultimately I have to say I am slightly disappointed in how it all ends. (view spoiler)


Didn’t the movie reference an Indian burial ground as the culprit? I think that was part of the explanation (which didn’t really hold a lot of water, but *handwave storytelling*.)

Great analysis Ben.

The thing is There was no alcohol when Jack was there It was his imagination that allowed them to get to him and work on him. Yes he is a recovering alcoholic but with nothing to drink, they couldn't get him in that way. But unlike the last caretaker Jack was an educated man with a vivid imagination and a serious anger problem.

That was my impression, too. Wendy could smell it in his breath.

I don't believe the alcohol is the deciding factor in how the hotel can operate. Yes, the former caretaker had the same problem, but I felt like that was more or less a connection for the two characters to link them. Not because of the hotel itself, but because of the roles they would play. I think something to remember here is we actually have no real idea why the former caretaker did what he did. Was it because of the hotel? Was he just a violent drunk? Or did the hotel take his nature and nudge it in the right direction?
Another factor for Jack I feel we must consider (view spoiler)
I always imagined there was real alcohol provided by the hotel too. Not just from Jack appearing drunk, but even the smell was present.
I don't however, think that Jack had a shine. This wasn't about Jack, it was all about Danny. If Jack had a shine stronger, the Hotel wouldn't need Danny at all once it had possession of Jack. The hotel even goes so far as to tell Jack it's Danny it wants. Remember, all three members of the family see things. This isn't because all three have a shine, it's because Danny's shine is so great it's allowing things that could never be done before. Usually only those with the shine could see its manifestations, but the Hotel was able to draw on Danny's shine to become more powerful and become more present, more real. Its why it wanted Danny, and tried everything it could to get him.


I read it in 1980 so this is my second time around. I started last night. I forgot all about the foreshadowing!


Wasn't part of Jack's anger towards the end because he realized it was Danny and not him the Hotel really wanted? A jealousy of sorts.

Remember, Jack saw the hedge-animals move as well as the woman in Room 217 just like his son. Only those with "The Shining" can see these things...."
I’m with Tim and Kandice; that’s not how I read it at all. There really wasn’t any indication in the text that Jack could shine. It seems more like the hotel harnessed the strength of Danny’s power to project hallucinations for Jack.
Kandice wrote: “Wasn’t part of Jack’s anger towards the end because he realized it was Danny and not him the Hotel really wanted? A jealousy of sorts.”
Yeah, that’s where the story kind of breaks down for me. It sounds like the hotel needs to hijack other people’s shine in order to keep existing, which makes me wonder where the evil and its sentience came from in the first place. In any large hotel there’s going to be sex and drugs and shady deals so I’m not sure what made the Overlook so special that this evil manifested. Though, to be fair, King isn’t always great with the internal logic of his stories so a handwave may be the best explanation here.

I think the Hotel is capable of a LOT on it's own, but having a physical being at it's beck and call would make it's evil more... I don't know. Less psychological and more physical/real. Something like that.

Yes you are right Ben it did use his weakness against him, and I know he had the shining but he also had a vivid imagination. With the shining and his imagination the hotel found him easy to work on. Yes Jacks was stronger then Danny's but then again Jack was an adult and he has reached his full potential Danny is really only just starting to work with his shining.

You found The Shining on Netflix??? I just checked earlier this week and again now when I saw your comment and I don't see it on there...


I see The Shining on my Netflix. I live in Indonesia and Michele is in Finland. Maybe it's a geographical restriction thing.

When I read that line (as if Jack Torrance had something – something that he was hiding.) I felt that Jack had some other psychic power not necessarily the shining, maybe something that was closer to pure evil. It's not like shining is all there is. On some unknown scale, it may be one of the lesser psychic powers.

Maybe, but I like to think that the shining is just one power on a broad continuum of psychic powers and King would explore many different ones of them in his works.



This theme is also continued in Dr Sleep as the ghosts from the Overlook and the former hotel owner Horace continue to pursue Danny and his ability. Then Rose the Hat and The True Knot capture kids who can shine so they can consume their power. Danny protects a little girl as he empathises with her plight.
Jack was a mere pawn.

That’s exactly how I read it as well. As if he has some evil deep inside him.
Danny could have inherited the shine from a grandparent as well not necessarily a parent. If Jack had the shine and it was strong, why didn’t he ever he know what people where thinking, why didn’t he have any kind of premonitions?
The hotel is evil. Evil resides in Jack. It’s easy for the hotel to manipulate Jack because of the evil that already lurks deep inside him

Yep.

Now, I’m not trying to convince you you’re wrong. If that interpretation works for you and makes the book more layered and nuanced, that’s great. People interpret things differently all the time. :)

It doesn't bother me that others have their own interpretation/opinion for anything that Stephen King writes, because it's all fiction anyway, not reality. But when you say that I am "reading something into the story", then the same "reading something into the story" can be said about your opinion as well (right back at you)....since both our beliefs are based on what we conclude without actual "proof". Neither of us can produce concrete evidence to match our opinions. Because your own conclusion was never there to begin with either.
I based my own personal "opinion" on an obvious link between anyone who "shines" and whatever is haunting the Overlook.
Everything Danny experiences, Jack experiences as well.
1.) Danny goes to room 217 and leaves terrified after being choked by a she-ghost. And when Jack goes to investigate the same room, Danny tells his mother - "Don't worry , mom, He'll be alright because he doesn't shine, so she can't hurt him."
But Jack, in fact, does eventually see the same she-ghost. And I interpreted this as Jack's "Shining".
2.) They both have almost the same experience with the Hedge-Animals, they both have the same visions of murder, and they both sleepwalk. Both share moments of daydreaming/narcolepsy type states. Danny repeatedly blacks out to rendezvous with "Tony", and Jack similarly blacks out and has visions of his abusive father
3.) Both shared the same experience with the odd clock in the Ballroom, and both encounters the frightening Dog-Man named Roger
4.) Hollorann mentioned that only people who "shine" can see what is unseen by those who don't possess "The Shining".
If Jack "shines", he may not be aware of it. Even Hollarann stated that some people who have the "shine" have lived their whole lives without ever knowing it. They just get lucky sometimes and win at the horse-track, or get the correct numbers on a lottery ticket; but they never associate it with anything other than happenstance. And I happen to believe Jack "Shined" the very same way.
It's all how read and interpret what you read. No one has to agree, because only Stephen King knows the answer.

As for Jack seeing things, the interpretation of that kind of hinges on how the Hotel itself works. Do those with the shine see it solely because that what you NEED to see, or does the Hotel feed off the energy from the shine to be able to manifest? If you need the shine to be able to see underneath what we can naturally perceive to the hotels evil, then of course Jack must have some kind of shine. But if it feeds off the energy of those that can shine? Well, all bets are off aren't they?
Personally, I view it as the later. The hotel wants Danny because it has never seen an individual with such a shine. Normally only those with the shine can see anything unnatural because those specific people bring such little energy that that's all the hotel can manage. But with Danny, it has an energy smorgasbord and can gather enough strength to project itself so well anyone can be affected. To me, that's why Halloran thinks its only 'pictures' which can't do harm, because normally there isn't enough shine energy for the hotel to actually do anything but project pictures to those with the ability. But it's also why Halloran isn't so sure, because who really knows what it can do with a shine such as Danny's inside?
Now for what Halloran was unable to see inside Jack's head, I agree with Summer's analyses. I believe that Jack was hiding numerous things from himself, such as moving the timer forward on poor George, and it created a space in his head so locked that it was hidden from everyone and everything, except for the Overlook.

Because Jack is Hiding his Shine, Like Ben I think he does have the Shine, the hotel has the same problem Halloran has in identifying it. Also Danny's is still pure it isn't evil or good it just is. I will amend what I said earlier, Jack also has a touch of telekinesis as the hotel was feeding of his powers it used a touch of it to make the rire hose to fall out of it's holder to terrify Danny.



So which is it?
Did the novel state that "those with the shine see things solely because that's what you NEED to see"? Or does the novel state that the Hotel "feeds off the energy from the shine to be able to manifest"?
I don't recall either interpretation being written, which is why I love different opinions. I think King maybe did this on purpose.
Danny never knew what he had was called "The Shining" until he was given a brief schooling by Halloran. Originally, Danny thought it was "Tony" who tipped him off on everything (like finding things that went missing around the house). So he didn't know anyhing was different about himself at an early age, because his parents called "Tony" an "imaginary friend". And they convinced him that having an imaginary friend was normal for kids his age who had no friends. He later learned (in Dr. Sleep) that Tony was actually something his mind created whenever his "shine" tried to tell him something...which is why Tony went away (and later adopted from his subconscious by Abra Stone).
There was no hint, clue or Chapter in this novel that made me think this hotel was drawing "shine" from Danny in order to make poltergeists manifest for Jack's eyes to behold. But I can see how this might be interpreted.
Great debate!!
Books mentioned in this topic
Burnt Offerings (other topics)Hidden Bodies (other topics)
You (other topics)
Now about King books towards which I am pretty cold, don't have much enthusiasm for fan favorites The Shining, The Stand and Christine. And The Gunslinger is the only King book I hated, it is objectively a bad book in my opinion. Anyway that's the beauty of a writer with a back catalogue as large as King's, there is a scope for lot of contrasting opinions even among those who agree that he is one of the best writers working today.
Just another stray observation about The Shining, I don't remember how well King depicted Jack's struggle with alcoholism but I am currently reading James Lee Burke's Dave Robicheaux series, and the raw poignancy with which the need for booze is depicted in that series is probably unmatched in genre fiction.