Historical Fictionistas discussion
Group Information Folder
>
Group Related Comments, Questions or Suggestions?
message 51:
by
April
(new)
Aug 05, 2009 09:09PM

reply
|
flag
Yes! I know. And, as if I needed one, it's another reason to go book shopping! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
I also opened a challenge thread for ideas, if anyone is interested. I'd like to keep it small, but it should be fun if we do one, and it would maybe allow people to read something they might not have tried before.


Does this make me a historical dunce?
I think for me... I'm willing to allow anything in which the story in the book takes place at least 30 years (roughly) before the book was written.
For instance, I'd consider The Kite Runner and A Thousand Splendid Suns to be HF, because they chronicle Afghanistan's history, starting in the late 60's, early 70's...
Also, I Know This Much Is True, which has historical parts in a mostly-recent-to-contemporary book.
Does that help? I wanna be as flexible as possible. As long as it's not strictly contemporary, I think I'll take it. :)
For instance, I'd consider The Kite Runner and A Thousand Splendid Suns to be HF, because they chronicle Afghanistan's history, starting in the late 60's, early 70's...
Also, I Know This Much Is True, which has historical parts in a mostly-recent-to-contemporary book.
Does that help? I wanna be as flexible as possible. As long as it's not strictly contemporary, I think I'll take it. :)

No im a dunce too on that front lol i think mistress Becky has ruled that a classic written in a period that is historical to us now, i.e regency/victorian, is not the same as historical fiction of a contemperorary person writing about that period,
Jon wrote: "Misty wrote: "I don't know if this has been asked, and I don't read historical often enough to know how strict people are about it all, but in this group, are we distinguishing between historical =..."
That would be correct. I think a 20-30 year historical time gap is enough, but if it was contemporary when written - or even set in the future, as in 1984, which of course is now in the past - then it's not allowed.
Everything else goes! :)
That would be correct. I think a 20-30 year historical time gap is enough, but if it was contemporary when written - or even set in the future, as in 1984, which of course is now in the past - then it's not allowed.
Everything else goes! :)

Thanks!

I'll leave it for the Big Cheese though.
Ehh, I'm the Big Cheese now huh? *eye roll*
Misty, I don't have a problem with that. We know you're not spamming. Go ahead and post it in the Swap folder. I'll rename it Swap-A-Book/Giveaways.
Misty, I don't have a problem with that. We know you're not spamming. Go ahead and post it in the Swap folder. I'll rename it Swap-A-Book/Giveaways.




It's because there are pictures in the thread. I'll have Al or Heather remove them (I'm at work, so it will freeze my computer too!).
Sorry about that J!
Sorry about that J!

Sorry about that J!"
No problem Becky. Thanks :)

It has something to do with the fact that the pictures are linked outside of the GR server, and certain browsers, and certain connections and security. I dunno... But maybe Al could post something and make an authorized "Pictures Accepted" thread... Then if people want to post a picture, they can post it in the pic thread, and then just post the comment number in the normal thread so people know to look...

Wow... I can't believe it's already been a month!!! *hair blows back in the wind caused by the speedy passage of time*


By using this "button" it is quicker for readers to link to the books and the authors. A reader of the comment will no longer need to copy and paste or retype the title or author's name in the search box. In addition the book or author is listed in the links near the top right side of each thread. Another advantage is that on a particular book's page a link is given to the group's thread where the book/author is mentioned. This makes the group become more well known! New members means additional tips for all of us!
I love this group and that is why I thought I would come with this suggestion.
Another idea I have had is that the ratings of the group members who have all read a monthly read could be displayed. I do not know how to do this, but I think I saw it somewhere here at GR! This must be of interest b/c we are the people who adore HF, so it is important to know what we think of it. How could you add the ratings of people who have read a given book prior to it becoming a monthly read? Maybe that is more difficult. Maybe a member of the group could go to a particular place and add it themselves when they see the group has chosen to read a book one has previously read. Just an idea......
These are just some of my ideas. Forget them if they are silly!
Books mentioned in this topic
The Tokaido Road: A Novel of Feudal Japan (other topics)The Women (other topics)
Homegoing (other topics)
The Violinist of Venice (other topics)
Dark Fire (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Elizabeth Freemantle (other topics)Katherine Longshore (other topics)
Jean Plaidy (other topics)
Kate Emmerson (other topics)
Alison Weir (other topics)
More...