This is not The Haters Club You're Looking For discussion
That it took me this long to realize this:
date
newest »
newest »
message 51:
by
Donitello
(new)
Jun 11, 2009 09:49AM
So you didn't answer my question yet. Have you seen the FOX Channel?
reply
|
flag
yeah, It was the only channel to show Married with children... I think they air it on TV land now though.
Wasn't talking to you, dang it! What do I have to do to get an answer from Kasia?You like Married with Children? Jesus. Maybe you're French. They like our crappiest comedy, too.
Guess it would be a bad time to mention that my mom's family is French, eh? Ha.Kasia, what was your question? I'm not quite sure what it was...
There are ways to redeem yourself, Matt; in fact I think you already did when you decided not to breed. However as you say, you have a weakness in your ancestry so you will have to be watched to make sure you don't get weak in the knees and breed.
AAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! This thread is a messMatt wrote: "Kasia, what was your question?"
I did not ask one. I think Doni directed a question at me...
Doni wrote: "So you didn't answer my question yet. Have you seen the FOX Channel?"
I've seen bits an pieces, I know what you're referring to. Maybe even I have it on my cable, donno, I've never checked...
Matt wrote: "Guess it would be a bad time to mention that my mom's family is French, eh? Ha."
It all suddenly makes sense.
Oh Doni, I cannot give you an honest, objective opinion of FOX news. I've watched way too much of Jon Stewart for that, sorry. To me it's all tabloid stuff and it's strongly pro Bush. Overall: poor journalism that focuses on gossip.
FOX news had it's own 5min of fame in Poland a few months back. I was looking for a youTube clip... no luck so far. Anyways, from what I recall FOX presenters laughed at our Prime Minister saying he's got no bank account and lives with his mother. Haha.
Tabloid stuff, poor journalism that focuses on gossip.... What's not honest and objective about that?
ok so maybe it's honest, but objective? That's just one side right? I could say that apparently there's a need for such a station, that seeking sensation might not be all that bad because it draws some people to politics, people who otherwise would stay ignorant. And any bit of knowledge counts. I could say that - it would be more objective, but I don't want to do that.
Kasia wrote: "FOX news had it's own 5min of fame in Poland a few months back. I was looking for a youTube clip... no luck so far. Anyways, from what I recall FOX presenters laughed at our Prime Minister saying ..."Lucky thing you didn't hear them during the commercial break, saying how funny he sounds when he talks Polish.
Kasia wrote: "ok so maybe it's honest, but objective? That's just one side right? I could say that apparently there's a need for such a station, that seeking sensation might not be all that bad because it draws ..."But you never said there WASN'T a need for poor journalism that focuses on gossip. So your statement was objective.
Well done ladies. I'm thoroughly convinced.Alfonso, I thought of one. You could become a fan of this guy:
The Green Book
Books mentioned in this topic
100 Days Drive: The Great North American Road Trip (other topics)Ohio Oddities: A Guide to the Curious Attractions of the Buckeye State (other topics)
Killing Maine (other topics)
What You Don't Know (other topics)
Shadow Man (other topics)
More...


