Boxall's 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die discussion
Popular Topics
>
Which LIST book did you just finish?
message 1151:
by
Maureen
(new)
Sep 09, 2014 04:57PM

reply
|
flag
Finished The Parable Of The Blind. There were some parts I liked but all in all it was dragging on even though it was very short.


Cos it's big enough to bludeon someone to death with? It's a great read but books that are that chunky can be off putting to start off with. I often think - meh, something shorter this time.

Haha...I know! Plus the edition I had was a small paperback with that teeny, tiny type....not appealing at all.

Ha ha! Too funny. Sounds right up my alley, though. For some reason I tend to gravitate towards the big books. :)

Cos it's big enough to bludeon someone to death with?"
This book is only 609 pages at GRs most popular edition. That's a relatively tiny book compared to many on the list (and many of those not on the list).

Yes I know Elizabeth but MY paperback is a good solid size for belting someone over the head with.

Today I read The Nose by Nikolai Gogol. I got to the end and felt like I missed something. I got it from the library in a book with others of his short stories. On the grounds that I didn't like The Nose and none of the rest in the book are on the 1001 books list I'm not going to read them.

Finished *The Scarlet Letter* by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Poor Reverend Dimmesdale! Great sense of place in a wonderful book.
Jim


Today I read The Nose by Nik..."
I didn't like "The Nose" as much as the "Overcoat" Russian authors are difficult to read but often quite humorous.

Read a few months back and agree with you totally.

Maybe this will help to understand Jim's remark
http://www.shmoop.com/scarlet-letter/...


Finished *The Scarlet Letter* by Nathaniel Hawthorne. Poor Reverend Dimmesdale! Great sense of place in a wonderful book.
Jim"
I love Nathaniel Hawthorne! My favorite are his short stories. I have The Celestial Railroad and Other Stories. I would rank that book in my top ten all time favorites. Have you read this or others?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0451530...
Just finished Watchmen. It wasn't really my kind of thing. It was a bit too long and I was absolutely not interested in the texts and the end of each chapter. They often seemed so pointless.


Maybe this will help to understand Jim's remark
http://www.shmoop.com/scarlet-letter/..."
I *never* felt sorry for him. But maybe that's because I'm a woman.

It did have its good points; I liked the very start, I found the moving between 3 narrators interesting right up until I disliked all three of them and the slice of Indian history was a little interesting as well.
But, I'm just glad it was short and can only rate it 1 star. Not my sort of book at all.


In the beginning I was confused about what I was reading. I started out thinking it would be fiction, but apparently it is more like an essay, maybe meant as a part two of Rousseau's Confessions.
I think it makes sense to read Les rêveries before the Confssions (specially if you just want to give Rousseau a try, Les rêveries is just 150 pages). But reading a bit at Wikiopeadia beforehand is a good idea. For example he talks about what happens after “the stoning in Môtiers”. What? Who was stoned? No explanation. According to wiki his house in Môtiers was stoned on the night of 6 September 1765, and he had to flee.
Long passages again and again deals with people wanting to harm him. It is really hard to judge if it is true from the text, but I did get the feeling that it wasn't, since there is nothing concrete in the book about what they do to him (except the stoning that seems to be many years back).
According to wiki: "[he] began to experience paranoid fantasies about plots against him"
Maybe that is the most interesting accept of the book: How his thoughts/dreams keep returning to being hunted by other people and how he tries to reassure himself that they do not matter to him, and how you as a reader really cannot know if it is true or he is paranoid.
In some ways he's thinking is coloured by the times. For example he believes that plants that tastes well cannot be poisonous. A romantic and human-centric world view.

Great analysis, J. Very well-written and thoughtful.

I also found his passionate scenes about as erotic as a cold flannel on a winters morning.
That being said that it was still a good book. I liked the details of the era, the day to day living, the quiet stoicism of the working class. When dealing with these topics D H Lawrence was at his best; when try to convey intricate human relationships through indecisiveness and arguments I just got horribly bored and thought 'Oh for pete's sake, not this again!'.


Per your post - I am now intrigued in the novel and have added it to my list of books to read. I loved Lord of the Flies and this seems to be somewhat similar.


Yeah, I mentioned in my post under "which 1001 book did you start" that one of the reviews of this book noted the similarity to Lord of the Flies. Coincidentally, I had just finished reading LotF. But The Cement Garden has other disturbing scenes quite different from LotF, and probably much more disturbing in my opinion.

This is one of my favorite essays ever! It's a spectacular read. For anyone reading it for the first time, the less you know about it the better. Just read it is all :)
Finished The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling by Henry Fielding. Another one of the bigger ones out of the way for me. This book was a very pleasant surprise. I thought it would be stuffy and dull, but I was wrong. It was a fun and enjoyable read.

Tom Jones is great - The BBC series was great as well I just bought it and watched the first two episodes last night. It's as funny as I remember it being.

Nicola wrote: "Diane wrote: "Finished The History of Tom Jones, a Foundling by Henry Fielding. Another one of the bigger ones out of the way for me. This book was a very pleasant sur..."
I will have to watch it! I bet it is great dramatized.
I will have to watch it! I bet it is great dramatized.
Finished The Tenant of Wildfell Hall by Anne Brontë. This seemed a bit more Austen-esque than her sisters' books. The plot was very bold for the times. It took some time to get into at first, but it was well worth it.


I've just finished "Blue of Noon" by Georges Bataille, and I got that impression really strongly.

Do your funny bone a big favour and get your hands on a copy :-) It's priceless.
If you liked the book you'll love the series. The BBC and the superb cast (Brian Blessed was born to play Squire Weston!) pulled no punches; it's raunchy, rowdy and bawdy and an absolute delight.

I'm looking forward to Tom Jones, but I doubt I'll ever give up reading time to watch TV/movies.



I loved these as a child but I found them rather silly now. The implied social values, the repetition of Holmes deductive method for every story, the dramatic and unnatural way of speaking, it mostly had me rolling my eyes. I tried to just appreciate them for what they were and the writing is good but I think I prefer detective stories which you are given the clues and can work it out for yourself if you are paying close attention. Like Agatha Christie :-)
Unfortunately I'm now out of books on my Electronic Reader; I got some physical books out of the library but I don't want to be lugging 1Q84 and similar around with me everywhere I go.
Books mentioned in this topic
Max Havelaar, or the Coffee Auctions of the Dutch Trading Company (other topics)Catch-22 (other topics)
Blue of Noon (other topics)
Nemesis (other topics)
Untouchable (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Multatuli (other topics)Joseph Heller (other topics)
Georges Bataille (other topics)
Philip Roth (other topics)
Mulk Raj Anand (other topics)
More...